The Declaration of Independence, signed by members of the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, is the founding document of the American experiment in free government. What is too often forgotten is that what the Founding Fathers argued against in the Declaration was the heavy and intrusive hand of big government.
Most Americans easily recall those eloquent words with which the Founding Fathers expressed the basis of their claim for independence from Great Britain in 1776:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
But what is usually not recalled is the long list of enumerated grievances that make up most of the text of the Declaration of Independence. The Founding Fathers explained how intolerable an absolutist and highly centralized government in faraway London had become. This distant government violated the personal and civil liberties of the people living in the 13 colonies on the eastern seaboard of North America.
In addition, the king's ministers imposed rigid and oppressive economic regulations and controls on the colonists that was part of the 18th-century system of government central planning known as mercantilism.
"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States," the signers declared.
At every turn, the British Crown had concentrated political power and decision-making in its own hands, leaving the American colonists with little ability to manage their own affairs through local and state governments. Laws and rules were imposed without the consent of the governed; local laws and procedures meant to limit abusive or arbitrary government were abrogated or ignored.
The king also had attempted to manipulate the legal system by arbitrarily appointing judges that shared his power-lusting purposes or were open to being influenced to serve the monarch's policy goals. The king's officials unjustly placed colonists under arrest in violation of writ of habeas corpus, and sentenced them to prison without trial by jury. Colonists often were violently conscripted to serve in the king's armed forces and made to fight in foreign wars.
A financially burdensome standing army was imposed on the colonists without the consent of the local legislatures. Soldiers often were quartered among the homes of the colonists without their approval or permission.
In addition, the authors of the Declaration stated, the king fostered civil unrest by creating tensions and conflicts among the different ethnic groups in his colonial domain. (The English settlers and the Native American Indian tribes.)
But what was at the heart of many of their complaints and grievances against King George III were the economic controls that limited their freedom and the taxes imposed that confiscated their wealth and honestly earned income.
The fundamental premise behind the mercantilist planning system was the idea that it was the duty and responsibility of the government to manage and direct the economic affairs of society. The British Crown shackled the commercial activities of the colonists with a spider's web of regulations and restrictions. The British government told them what they could produce, and dictated the resources and the technologies that could be employed. The government prevented the free market from setting prices and wages, and manipulated what goods would be available to the colonial consumers. It dictated what goods might be imported or exported between the 13 colonies and the rest of the world, thus preventing the colonists from benefiting from the gains that could have been theirs under free trade.
Everywhere, the king appointed various "czars" who were to control and command much of the people's daily affairs of earning a living. Layer after layer of new bureaucracies were imposed over every facet of life. "He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance," the Founding Fathers explain.
In addition, the king and his government imposed taxes upon the colonists without their consent. Their income was taxed to finance expensive and growing projects that the king wanted and that he thought was good for the people, whether the people themselves wanted them or not.
The 1760s and early 1770s saw a series of royal taxes that burdened the American colonists and aroused their ire: the Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townsend Acts of 1767, the Tea Act of 1773 (which resulted in the Boston Tea Party), and a wide variety of other fiscal impositions.
The American colonists often were extremely creative at avoiding and evading the Crown's regulations and taxes through smuggling and bribery (Paul Revere smuggled Boston pewter into the West Indies in exchange for contraband molasses.)
The British government's response to the American colonists' "civil disobedience" against their regulations and taxes was harsh. The king's army and navy killed civilians and wantonly ruined people's private property. "He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people," the Declaration laments.
After enumerating these and other complaints, the Founding Fathers said in the Declaration:
"In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people."
Thus, the momentous step was taken to declare their independence from the British Crown. The signers of the Declaration then did "mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor," in their common cause of establishing a free government and the individual liberty of the, then, three million occupants of those original 13 colonies.
Never before in history had a people declared and then established a government based on the principles of the individual's right to his life, liberty, and property. Never before was a society founded on the ideal of economic freedom, under which free men may peacefully produce and exchange with each other on the terms they find mutually beneficial without the stranglehold of regulating and planning government.
Never before had a people made clear that self-government meant not only the right of electing those who would hold political office and pass the laws of the land, but also meant that each human being had the right to be self-governing over his own life. Indeed, in those inspiring words in the Declaration, the Founding Fathers were insisting that each man should be considered as owning himself, and not be viewed as the property of the state to be manipulated by either king or Parliament.
It is worth remembering, therefore, that what we are celebrating every July 4 is the idea and the ideal of each human being's right to his life and liberty, and his freedom to pursue happiness in his own way, without paternalistic and plundering government getting in his way.
Post Feedback
We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.
View Feedback
Posted by Philip Mccormack on 7/4/2010 1:17:27 AM
It is worth remembering, therefore, that what we are celebrating every July 4 is the idea and the ideal of each human being's right to his life and liberty, and his freedom to pursue happiness in his own way, without paternalistic and plundering government getting in his way.
I don't have any figures to prove it but with the knowledge I have it can be guaranteed that in the Western World more than 50 % of earnings go to the plundering state in the many forms taxes are coerced. It seems people in general are unaware of this and figures that outline this problem would help to educate them. In The Anarchists Manifesto by Kurt Zube in Germany are given 1976, they were staggering even then. Has DB any figures for the US or Canada?
The total burden of all federal, State, and local government taxes (without the public debts which the State also charges to all citizens!) runs to no less than 4,100 DM per head, i.e. 16,400 DM for a family of four. They are higher than what remains for the family to live on.page 124.
Another example of ignorance was the debate (today) Intelligence Squared on BBC world on the state in the Ukraine. Not one mention of their monetary system. Have a happy day
Reply from the Daily Bell:
"Has DB any figures for the US or Canada?"
We will look into it. Others are welcome to respond ...
Posted by Philip Mccormack on 7/4/2010 1:19:24 AM
It was page 64 and it's online ...
Posted by Slingshot on 7/4/2010 1:21:55 AM
Yes, it is worth remembering but what exactly does, today's countrymen remember? If you were to stop a person on the street could they tell you why we rebelled against the crown?
Could they tell you, who are the founding fathers? How many states comprised the original colonies? Do they know that they pledged all. Von Stueben, Nathan Hale, Nathanial Green, John Paul Jones, and Layfette. For if they do not not know who they are,
The Declaration of Independence and our Constitution are just pieces of paper. Oh it is the day of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Paid for in Blood and sacrifice by those who valued those words, more than their lives. Our rememberance rings hollow.
Posted by John Edwards on 7/4/2010 6:04:40 AM
Yes Slingshot, it's much the same in Australia. Possibly even worse. We are taught to have short and selective memories by our schools, government, and media.
All these 'official' anniversaries of founding events and world turning points that have been reproduced and reinforced for decades, if not hundreds of years or more, have my BS detectors driving into the red.
The aspect of the Declaration of Independence that comes immediately to mind is the omission of any attempt to specifically deny the promoters of Central Banks and Fractional Reserve Banking a foothold to do business in the USA.
I can't believe they didn't know the threat that mercantile banking posed to the newly formed USA.
To my mind that implies that they knew and could do nothing to stop it so didn't bother to try. In which case the document is seriously flawed. Or, the Founding Fathers were in fact in on the scam of the Central Bankers and the DecofIn is a sham document designed to fool the citizenry of the newly formed USA into believing that they actually won something from all the blood split, death wrought, and MONEY SPENT fighting what was supposed to be an ally.
P.S. The Daily Bells writers are to be highly commended for the way they select and compose their subject matter. I find the subjects discussed have a high degree of clarity and are extremely helpful in my ongoing de-programming from the 'received knowledge' that the High Priests of the MSM and it's many affiliates have foisted on myself and many others over the years. Bravo!
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Thank you for the kind words and passionate post. You might rather want to direct that passion at the US Constitution, which was the charter document of the new nation and certainly contained many lacunae from a free-market point of view.
Posted by John Edwards on 7/4/2010 6:50:14 AM
True enough, and maybe properly and completely applied, the Declaration of Independence would ensure life, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. But from where I'm sitting in Perth, Western Australia it sure doesn't look like they have anything like a free and prosperous nation.
It looks like a train wreck that could explode and take us all down with it.
Unfortunately America is now seen as a military dictatorship to most observers not paid to argue the opposite (which, as we all know, are becoming more numerous by the day) in Australia. But we don't really care because we are not at war with the USA. Lucky that, I reckon.
Anyway, I don't want to offend, out of hand, anyone by my opinions. It's just the way I interpret the world: against the backdrop of powerful ancient families, possibly dating back to before recorded history, deliberately collapsing entire civilisations rather than give up their wealth and power.
More mundanely, my opinions of all Australia's government actions and history in the world I mostly consider to be despicable but characterised as the opposite in our media and society.
I consider Australia to be a much more secret place than America.
Posted by W E E B L E on 7/4/2010 9:03:46 AM
@ Philip Mccormack
I did a calculation on the state of the UK's parasitic infection on zerohedge.com* recently, based on quantities of people that work for the "private" sector, compared to the number of people that can work; the rate of infection was 42.1 percent. But it is actually higher, because the value of government workers productivity and the "handicapped / welfare" sector that produces nothing, makes the rate a little harder to ascertain. I would take a stab at well over 50 percent.
The scales of justice are tipping ever more aggressively towards a catapult into our hands.
Not long now.
* zerohedge has many people feedbacking. Lots of people that are way too into sex, so it is an indicator they have not crossed over, so the speak. I now only go there for the headlines and articles only.
Posted by Liberty666 on 7/4/2010 9:31:23 AM
Most people are farmiliar with the big 3 unalienable rights (Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But upon careful reading of the Declaration Jefferson suggests we have more unalienable rights that he doesn't specifically mention. Does anyone know what other unalienable rights Jefferson was refering to?
Reply from the Daily Bell:
And the answer is? ...
Posted by Victor Barney on 7/4/2010 11:02:07 AM
Great article and responses. However, just yesterday I heard someone from Australia claim on the Fox Business channel, I think, that Australia was having a booming economy, unlike us? It did not seem that is true here!
Reply from the Daily Bell:
It is likely the mining economy that is doing it.
Posted by Terry on 7/4/2010 1:18:51 PM
Our founder's document is just as relevant today as it was 230 years ago. The right perspective, and with the insertion of the correct parties involved, we should re-declarate. .. For this Re-Declaration, it is posted here.
Thank you for accepting, and I am sure, reading my post, even though you chose not to publish it. It will be up to you to keep such things from the public. I think the Re-Declaration has merit.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
It is up.
Posted by Jimi BigBear on 7/4/2010 3:15:43 PM
Earlier post went too soon when I tried to format some text :P
Dr. Benjamin Franklin, along with John Adams and of course Jefferson, comprised the committee to draft the Declaration of Independence. As one who was there, we should heed HIS words for the causes of the Rebellion.
[Most of the following is from a wordpress blog, "How Benjamin Franklin Made New England Prosperous" " link is below.]
Pre-rebellion:
Before the American War for Independence in 1776, the colonized part of what is today the United States of America was a possession of England. It was called New England, and was made up of 13 colonies, which became the first 13 states of the great Republic. Around 1750, this New England was very prosperous. Benjamin Franklin was able to write:
"There was abundance in the Colonies, and peace was reigning on every border. It was difficult, and even impossible, to find a happier and more prosperous nation on all the surface of the globe. Comfort was prevailing in every home. The people, in general, kept the highest moral standards, and education was widely spread."
Franklin Pre-Rebellion:
Before the American War for Independence in 1776, the colonized part of what is today the United States of America was a possession of England. It was called New England, and was made up of 13 colonies, which became the first 13 states of the great Republic. Around 1750, this New England was very prosperous. Benjamin Franklin was able to write:
"There was abundance in the Colonies, and peace was reigning on every border. It was difficult, and even impossible, to find a happier and more prosperous nation on all the surface of the globe. Comfort was prevailing in every home. The people, in general, kept the highest moral standards, and education was widely spread."
Franklin visits England and is appalled by the economic desperation " poor houses and debtor prisons:
Franklin's friends then asked him how the American Colonies managed to collect enough money to support their poor houses, and how they could overcome this plague of pauperism. Franklin replied:
"We have no poor houses in the Colonies; and if we had some, there would be nobody to put in them, since there is, in the Colonies, not a single unemployed person, neither beggars nor tramps."
Then Franklin "spilled the beans":
At that time, England was throwing into jail those who could not pay their debts. They therefore asked Franklin how he could explain the remarkable prosperity of the New England Colonies. Franklin replied:
"That is simple. In the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. It is called 'Colonial Scrip.' We issue it in proper proportion to make the goods and pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power and we have no interest to pay to no one."
This of course was not happy news to the owners of the PRIVATE Bank of England " who quickly activated some of their minions in Parliament (The Lords of Trade and Plantations) to outlaw Colonial Scrip.
Quoting again from the article (which is linked below):
The first law was passed in 1751, and then completed by a more restrictive law in 1763. Franklin reported that one year after the implementation of this prohibition on Colonial money, the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployment and beggars, just like in England, because there was not enough money to pay for the goods and work. The circulating medium of exchange had been reduced by half.
Franklin added that this was the original cause of the American Revolution ' and not the tax on tea nor the Stamp Act, as it has been taught again and again in history books. The financiers always manage to have removed from school books all that can throw light on their own schemes, and damage the glow that protects their power.
Franklin, who was one of the chief architects of the American independence, wrote it clearly:
"The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament, which has caused in the Colonies hatred of England and the Revolutionary War."
Happily, as we celebrate INDEPENDENCE DAY in America, there is a Movement, led by Ellen Brown " the Mother of Public Banking " Bill Still (The Secret of Oz) and scholar Stephen Zarlenga (The Lost Science of Money)that will culminate in We the People reclaiming our Sovereign Right of The MONEY POWER from the PRIVATE banking cartel now exposed as the FED, bringing us
Liberty, Peace, Prosperity and Love
Jimi
PS " Before someone responds that Anthony's Blog goes on to deflate Congressman Binderup's quotes of Franklin, the scholars that he consulted DID agree that Franklin COULD have said and written similar things, though not with some of the more modern terms. And Franklin did, without question, write "A Modest Enquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency" in 1729.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Didn't Franklin admit toward the end of his life that these approaches were inherently inflationary?
Posted by Bill Adkins on 7/4/2010 3:52:56 PM
I find it amazing that I could take this well written, informative article, and by changing just a few words describe today's present Federal Government. It is hard to believe that so many of our citizens have gone to sleep and allowed the central government to take so many of our liberties. I hope the revolution has started and will continue into November 2010 and beyond.
Posted by Terry on 7/4/2010 4:24:40 PM
Thank you . .. .impatience is not a virtue. I am guilty as charged.
Posted by John Ewards on 7/4/2010 8:34:40 PM
The Australian economy is just as dysfunctional as the rest of the Western world's economies. We were lucky in that when the GFC hit we had been experiencing a commodities prices boom which fuelled massive investment in the mining and energy sectors of the Australian economy.
This investment was keenly felt in Western Australia, making housing some of the most expensive in the world and thus helping to destroy the Aussie dream of owning your own home.
Investment in mining and energy in this country has made a few rich at the expense of the rest of the population. We spend most of our Royalties and tax revenues from our mineral wealth building infrastructure such as deep water ports in the middle of nowhere specifically for the mining industry.
Meanwhile our Health system, Hospitals and public services generally are mismanaged and under-funded by politicians who are only there now for these large corporations who fund their elections and lifestyles.
Australia is a great place to live if your rich, for sure, and it is those rich people and their supporters who are the ones that get to talk on shows like Fox. It is in these peoples interests to give the impression from outside the country that our internal economy is booming as well.
As with most things the reality is somewhat more complicated.
The non-mining/energy sector is struggling to achieve any uplift from our export oriented economy.
It is only limping along with the massive government stimulus that will soon run out leaving us fiscally vulnerable to more austerity and privatisation of government assets and services.
Australia, like so many parts of the world, has effectively a two tiered economy. One drives inflationary distortions in our local markets while the other employs most of the people at relatively low wages compared to the mining/energy sector, which has driven price inflation to unprecedented levels.
On and on it goes, smug buggers just look down their noses and smirk, knowing the system always serves the interests of the Elite.
Australia could have a fantastic economy that spreads wealth throughout the larger community and the world, but we also have the disease of Central Banks who control everything by the creation of debt.
Posted by Weeble.. on 7/4/2010 10:15:54 PM
I read an article recently that ING Bank was going to offer mortgages with a "pick your payment" scheme (i.e. compounding interest with an unhappy ending). This is a sign of a bubblicious real estate market. It will pop soon. Did you know it is almost impossible to buy gum without aspartame* in it now? How do you spell live mummification?
* Aspertame turns into formaldehyde inside the human body.
Posted by Weebl.e.. on 7/4/2010 10:17:03 PM
That's ING in Ozzyland.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Ozzyland being Australia.
Posted by Sally Preston on 7/5/2010 5:22:52 AM
Dearest Weeble...you are staggering all over the pages, oddly changing your moniker. How do you identify yourself on zerohedge? I hope you are well.
Is liberty an illusion? Perhaps it is an idol. Perhaps we will never know. I am going to my garden now; I'm pragmatic when puzzled.
Posted by Knldgskr on 7/5/2010 6:42:53 AM
July 4 is Sunday and this year before Mass the Priest read the Declaration of Independence. When he finished the congregation applauded. Listening to those words it was evident that we must declare our independence again, not from England and its King, but from the Federal and State Bureaucracy. I wish someone would read the Declaration of Independence on TV once a week.
Posted by Bud Wood on 7/5/2010 12:27:30 PM
Rather than celebrating July 4th as a day of independence from intrusive government, it is increasingly apparent that if there is any celebration at all, we find ourselves celebrating central government. The mythology of "in the rockets' red glare,that our flag was still there . . " is just that: twisted mythology that celebrates the USA union.
It's obvious that we collectively are easily lead by those who benefit from our curious brand of collectivism. So, whoopee! Set-off another firecracker if you can afford,it.
Posted by Sally Preston on 7/5/2010 4:57:37 PM
@ Knldgskr
Do you know how easy it is to create a podcast or a youtube channel and read the Declaration of Independence on once a week? By looking toward the "networks" (a centralized power) to do this simple task for us, we perpetuate their power. If techology is not your "gig", then find some local, low powered radio station and volunteer to do it! Or maybe you could do it by short-wave radio. Just a thought. It is a beautiful document. I am trying not to be too cynical...more pragmatic.
Posted by Charles Pasley on 7/6/2010 10:26:01 AM
Once in a two-year college English class that I was teaching, I had the students read the Declaration of Independence from their anthology as an example of an argumentative essay. One of my students, a returned Viet Nam War veteran, remarked in the discussion that our own federal government was doing the same things to us that the Declaration had listed in its enumeration of grievances.
Post Feedback
We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.