The Daily Bell Newswire – It's Free!

News & Analysis

EU Creates Money Out of Thin Air to Float Greece

Wednesday, May 05, 2010 – by Staff Report

Trichet May Rewrite ECB Rule Book to Tame Greek Risk ... European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet, who capitulated on a January pledge not to relax lending rules for the sake of one country, may have to sacrifice more principles to prevent Greece from bringing down the euro. Trichet yesterday diluted rules for the second time in a month to guarantee the ECB will keep taking Greek government bonds as collateral for loans. The central bank may have to extend that to other nations, renew a program of lending unlimited cash to banks for a year, and even start buying government debt if the 110 billion-euro ($146 billion) bailout plan for Greece fails to stem the euro's slide, economists said. "Rather you break the rule book than the euro area," said Jacques Cailloux, chief European economist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc in London. "We're far from being out of the woods. There is now a real opportunity for the ECB to take the lead." – Bloomberg

Dominant Social Theme: Emergency measures are absolutely necessary.

Free-Market Analysis: It is often a bit hard to figure out what is going on in the domain of high finance because the reporting is nearly impermeable. But if people understood clearly, they would probably be enraged. This article from Bloomberg is a case in point. What it really is reporting is that the ECB will print as much money as necessary to fund the Greek government so long as the larger market is unwilling to lend to Greece. While it may work for a while, funding government deficits by printing money out of thin air simply increases inflation and eventually promises significant price inflation. And this will create other problems that the article hints at. Here's some more from the article, also excerpted above:

"Despite fundamental differences, it remains impossible to rule out a self-fulfilling crisis," UBS AG Chief European Economist Stephane Deo wrote in a research note to clients. "To the extent that markets become illiquid the ECB would have to respond." The next response to a broadening loss of confidence in euro-area finances would be for the ECB to channel cash through banks, either by lending them more for longer in its regular auctions or by weakening collateral rules further, Deo said. Another option would be to accept bank loans to governments as security, he said.

The bank's policy makers may move as soon as their May 6 meeting in Lisbon to reintroduce unlimited three-month loans, Citigroup Inc. economists led by Juergen Michels said today. The ECB may have to go even further and buy government bonds if it is to stabilize financial markets and avoid a return to recession as governments slash spending to appease investors, said David Owen, chief European economist at Jeffries Group Inc. in London. "There is a good chance the ECB will ultimately have to resort to quantitative easing," he said.

Harvinder Sian, a senior fixed-income strategist at Royal Bank of Scotland, wrote in a report today that "markets should be alert to the risk of ECB bond buying, as early as today." While the ECB is prohibited from buying assets directly from authorities, it can buy them on the secondary market. Trichet said on May 2 that "at this stage, we have absolutely no decision on the purchase of government bonds."

Such a strategy remains unlikely because it would be a "red line which the German government would not allow to be crossed," said Marco Annunziata, chief economist at UniCredit Group in London. "Purchases of government bonds would be a straight monetary financing of excessive fiscal deficits, which is anathema to the Bundesbank and German government." Still, the ECB said yesterday that it would accept all Greek government debt as security when lending to banks, reneging on Trichet's pledge in January that it would not loosen lending requirements "for the sake of any particular country."

The last paragraph is the really important one. It is telling us that if the ECB starts to print money to buy Greek bonds that no one else will buy, the Germans, collectively (having had too much experience with the terrors of price inflation in the past 100 years), will take some sort of definitive action (maybe seek to pull out of the EU?). Of course, it won't be socialist German leaders who will initiate the action. The electorate will drag them into it.

The kinds of draconian measures that the ECB is contemplating reminds us that the crisis is far from over. It all sounds so official, so complex and so ... necessary. But what is the reality? The reality is that what is being contemplated is printing money out of thin air to pay for Greek government profligacy. The Greeks have promised themselves many wonderful things that they now cannot pay for. And the EU is going to step in and buy Greek bonds with electronic money that has no intrinsic value.

A small group of men got together about 50 years ago to set up the European Common Market to ensure that nothing like World War II would ever happened again. Despite other hypotheses, we believe the group was driven by an Anglo-American axis that wanted to see Europe consolidated under a single currency and political system. In any event, the EU has been built up in the modern era using numerous lies that have disguised the true intentions of its leaders. At every critical juncture, Europeans were assured that ambition was to create a functional economic union. In fact, such a union would not work without political integration. And those at the top knew it. 

The EU elites created a common currency that could not outlast a serious economic downturn. They basically patched together a bunch of dysfunctional and debt ridden national currencies, all in the hope of creating a false illusion of strength. The ultimate idea was that a financial crisis would force the EU to become a political as well as an economic force. While that is taking place today, the Internet and the technology of advanced communications has made it very difficult for the elite to promote the necessary dominant social themes that would justify the kind of political action that is necessary. The patchwork currency-quilt is starting to unravel and the warm fuzzy feelings associated with being in bed with the EU along with it.

The EU, in our opinion, encouraged the socialist profligacy that has led to current account deficits. The leaders of the EU knew that the stability of the currency would inevitably create a temptation to leverage additional government spending, especially for Southern EU countries. This was supposed to create a crisis to lead to a more political union. But now the crisis has seemingly backfired. To combat it, the EU is willing to print as much money as it needs to float the Deficits of the Profligate.

What we see from this is that the crisis itself was manmade – intended to further consolidate wealth and control in the hands of those who stand in the shadows and run Europe nonetheless. Further, we see the powers-that-be are willing to print money out of nothing to ensure that the EU does not truly go bust. This is what the Bloomberg article is telling us in its impenetrable manner.

Conclusion: The media and the academic institutions that provide the justification for this sort of financial system are as much as fault as the EU itself. The entire program – along with the culture of the European professional upper classes – seems positively Swiftian. It piles absurdity upon absurdity and then through various devices and creative communication attempts to create complexities in the hopes that people won't see through to what is really going on. But such strategies seem to be working less well these days.




Latest Daily Bell Articles

Feedback

Effective April 25, 2012, the Daily Bell will discontinue allowing feedback comments. We have left in place the large body of responses posted in the past, as we appreciate the valuable contributions made by some of our readers.
Showing 1 - 20 of 28 - Newest on top - Reorder Feedback
  Posted by Sue on 05/07/10 03:07 AM

Hi, I don't really understand something. What would be the worst thing for Greece if the European Union didn't bail it out? Would it lose its standing as a sovereign nation? Would the creditors take away the Acropolis? What would happen if they just go bankrupt? In Monopoly. the creditors take all the properties from the debtors...is that what would happen here? Would all people of Greece be stripped of their belongings? Would the government people be put into "debtor's prison"? Can anyone tell...what's the worst that would happen to Greece? Could it be any worse than what's going on there now?

Reply from The Daily Bell

Not in our opinion.

  Posted by Dougiefreshhh on 05/06/10 12:29 PM

If the EU were to think of bringing gold/silver back as a form of currency, it would be the equivalent of financial WWIII. The last thing at this stage of the game the elites want is to give up the ability to create money at the touch of a button.

To feed the continual fractional-reserve lending machine, we need to continue to consolodate globally...pull purchasing/consumption power together at an increasing pace.

Greece is being allowed to crumble. How the elite use this to their advantage will be interesting, but I'm guessing the long term goal is to pull together the EU, US, Canada and Mexico.

  Posted by F. Beard on 05/06/10 02:43 AM

"It isn't Greece that is being "bailed out", instead it's the banks." Mark

Thanks for that reminder. It can't be repeated too often. Money-for-debt is unstable and predatory but when it blows up the perpetrators, not the victims, are bailed out.

Reply from The Daily Bell

We disagree with this somewhat. It is fashionable to repeat at the moment that the powers-that-be are "bailing out the banks." But this presupposes that the elite has no care for the dominant social theme that is the EU itself - and which has been 50 years in the making. The whole scheme of regional - and then global- currencies is beginning to topple. The stakes are bigger in our estimation than a bank bailout no matter of what size.

  Posted by Mark on 05/06/10 02:26 AM

It isn't Greece that is being "bailed out", instead it's the banks.

The powers that be don't want the wealthy bond holders to take a haircut. As such they'll commit public funds from their respective countries to subsidize the banks losses.

  Posted by Haiduk on 05/06/10 01:20 AM

Yesterday's events in Athens, where three bank employees were burned alive by violent protesters, marked the point where it became obvious, that Greece is simply not part of the western world. The only reason for pulling Greece into the European Union and Maastricht Treaty, was the desire to have some facility that allows money transfers from wealthy European countries - here particularly Germany - to the borders of the confrontation between the socialist east and the liberal west as to stabilize it politically. The same was true for West-Berlin, a city that was at the frontline of that confrontation and thus had to be stabilized over decades with money transfers. The same is true for Turkey - a country which never saw itself as part of the west.

Reply from The Daily Bell

We wonder where these masked individual "anarchists" came from.

  Posted by Paul Weber on 05/05/10 11:30 PM

I think the European Union could work if it had a common coin impervious to inflation. It's called "gold" (and silver for smaller transactions). With such coins in circulation, the need for a central authority pulling all the strings would vanish. No one is going to turn down a one-ounce silver coin for a transaction, even if the coin has the image of someone else's king on it.

I agree that a free market in money should exist. It's hard to see how pot-metal government-issued coins could compete with gold and silver coins, however. In fact, governments would be powerless to inflate, absent legal tender laws.

Excellent analysis!

  Posted by Adrian W. on 05/05/10 10:26 PM

Greece news of interest.
Click to view link

  Posted by Sean on 05/05/10 07:50 PM

Debt is the slavery of the free. There can be no free markets under slavery. To free our fellow people we need to engange with them -on their level. Marketing 101. The majority do not follow intelectual pursuits, therefore keep it simple. Complexity, confusion and obfuscation are our enemies weapons. Keep it simple.Get the people to engage the grey matter.Point out some of the ancient control strategies, its modern equivalent and absurdities.

On the GFC: Do you honestly believe that the witch doctors from the tribe over the hill caused our crops to fail?

Slavery and the working classes: From wage slave to mortgage slave. You had a small ball and chain on your left foot. It was taken off. You thought you were free (rising house prices). Then a huge ball and chain was placed on your right foot (mortgage). So if you went from being a wage slave to being a mortgage slave how can you be free?

Virgin sacrifices: The debt gods are angry! We need virgin sacrifices! How sire? Find some neophyte aspirational homeowners and seduce them with a first home owners grant.Then when interest rates rise their throats will be slit on the mortgage alter. And the best part is that because they were volunteers, we won't be blamed.

Carbon indulgences equals the middle ages pleniary indulgences to relieve you of your guilt trip. Cui bono-who benefits?

The only free cheese is in the mouse trap! Who owns the trap?
The people are already Click to view linkghten their burden sometimes with a little education through humour.

  Posted by Bill on 05/05/10 06:22 PM

So long as all the currencies INFLATE in harmony, the status quo is maintained and the elite remain the elite. Much like the USA did for England in the 1920s to help England maintain its number one power position a little longer.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Good for you about the 1920s. You are now officially a contrarian monetary historian, if you were not before.

  Posted by F. Beard on 05/05/10 05:06 PM

"Greenspan recanted long ago in his famous paper about gold, written when he was a disciple of Ayn Rand's. He just didn't live up to his principles." The Daily Bell

Greenspan said that the Fed had learned to make paper behave like gold. That certainly sounds feasible. What if he tried but failed? Doesn't that suggest that the problem is not gold vs paper or Mr. Greenspan's lack of adherence to principle but something else?

I know The Daily Bell agrees that liberty is the solution. Perhaps Mr. Greenspan will come to that conclusion too. Logically, he must either condemn the free market as a failure or admit that money creation cannot be left out of it. What else?

Reply from The Daily Bell

He is an old man.

  Posted by Dauden on 05/05/10 04:31 PM

Dittos on complimenting Clayton's commentary. As someone new to studying economic philosophy, this view was helpful.

  Posted by F. Beard on 05/05/10 04:20 PM

"The creation of money exclusively as debt is the critical, destabilizing flaw in the American Economy."
-Theodore R. Thoren

All right. I ordered the "The Truth in Money Book" by Mr. Thoren. It is out of print and expensive but the above quote won me over. We'll see.

It would be nice if someone of standing like Mr. Greenspan or Bernanke would see the light and recant. Why can't they at least recommend that alternatives to our current government enforced monopoly money supply be allowed?

Which raises another question: What does it do to the sanity of someone who is responsible for a great Depression? For, if we are not allowed any alternatives, then all responsibility lies with the monopolists.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Greenspan recanted long ago in his famous paper about gold, written when he was a disciple of Ayn Rand's. He just didn't live up to his principles.

  Posted by Ryan on 05/05/10 01:15 PM

Subprime mortgages that were a poor credit risk taken individually were bundled up into securities where, to borrow a phrase used to describe the NASDAQ bubble, they would "lose money on every sale, but make it up in volume" -- somehow rendering the security as a whole investment-grade.

It seems that the same has been done with the Eurozone members. They were poor credit risks taken individually, but when their individual sovereign credit risks were aggregated and redistributed as they joined the Euro, that was supposedly a sign of strength for the Euro. But does the metaphor of 'strength in numbers' work when it comes to a gaggle of debtors?

  Posted by F. Beard on 05/05/10 12:23 PM

"Every aspect of Western culture needs a new code of ethics - a rational ethics - as a precondition of rebirth."
- Ayn Rand via The Daily Bell

I think this is the third time I have seen this quote here and I can no longer refrain:

Our financial problems stem from several things forbidden by a old system of ethics:

1) centralization; this was warned against in 1st Samuel 8: 5-22.
2) theft via inflation (Isaiah 1:22)
3) loaning at interest to one's countrymen (Deuteronomy 23:19)

Reply from The Daily Bell

The old religious texts are founts of accumulated wisdom.

  Posted by Lance E. Schultz on 05/05/10 11:09 AM

This was just an brilliant commentary by Clayton and the Bell's well pruned critical thinking skills and analysis are richly displayed day-after-day and something which I look to with great anticipation.

My only observation to add is that what now appears on the surface as a whimsical expression of perceived indecisiveness is actually quite methodically and exponentially decisive.

The present state of world-wide financial, economic and political "interconnectedness" did not suddenly appear on the world stage by "accident."

Remind yourself, there are no accidents. The flight plan for our present course was filed many ages ago and is only capable of landing in one singular predetermined destination.

The location of which is not pleasant. But now thanks to the internet many are persons are realizing that perhaps a better destination is desired and that it is, at least not yet, too late to change the course.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Yes, the Internet provides a kind of metaphysical/metaphorical proof that all is NOT predetermined. But history shows this as well. The idea that the power elite is an irresistable force seems to us as much a dominant social theme - a kind of promotion - as any other.

  Posted by F. Beard on 05/05/10 10:46 AM

"So we now reach the end of the illusion that a hard paper money is possible. " Clayton

I disagree! Common stock is a hard form of paper money, for instance, except capital gains tax on it precludes its use as money.

What has been discredited is

1) debt-for-money (fractional reserve lending) which is a form of theft by inflation) and
2) large scale loaning for interest.

Please don't fall into the precious metals trap. Though precious metals are a perfectly acceptable form of money we should always insist that other forms be allowed too.

Reply from The Daily Bell

A free-market banking system would include every option and exclude none. Let the market decide.

  Posted by Kees Bruin on 05/05/10 09:30 AM

As I said in my feedback to an earlier article: "Once Germany gives in to the pressure from other countries to bail out Greece, the fences are down."

Well this seems to be the case right now. Even more astonishingly, now the ECB has thrown the rulebook out of the window and wants to print money out of thin air!

It seems they are in a complete panic. I don't agree with some who may say that this was premeditated, that the ones that rule knew that some sort of crisis would arise, out of which they could gain new powers, because these would be "necessary" to manage the situation.

I think the whole European thing has gone completely out of hand and the EU leadership has no clue anymore how to handle this crisis.

What will happen? God only knows. In my opinion it would have been best some time ago, to kick Greece out of the EMU, make an example of them. This would also have been better for Greece itself, giving them an opportunity to default and devalue their currency. Now Greece is already submerged in social unrest, and it won't be long before the other European countries, notably the ones that will have to pay for the mess, will also see civil unrest.

The EMU was a very bad idea from the outset, and those who have warned against it, with good reason, are proven right today.

Reply from The Daily Bell

"Now Greece is already submerged in social unrest, and it won't be long before the other European countries, notably the ones that will have to pay for the mess, will also see civil unrest."

This is an interesting point. Many have been predicting unrest in PIG countries. But if the North is pushed to bail out the South, the unrest could certainly spread beyond the PIGS.

  Posted by Mike on 05/05/10 09:27 AM

I was wondering when all the governments of the world will get together and print up pictures of food for everyone to eat.They could also tell us to feed the pictures to earth so we can grow a nice rich planet that only gets bigger.

In the real world where everything is contracting showing you what you really have and don't have,this will show them to look like a broken down carnival looking for a last stand.Buy things of real lasting value and hold on to them until the time is right.

Downsize yourself into reality and make the most of your talents.

Make-believe expansion games are over.

  Posted by R M'Geddon on 05/05/10 08:56 AM

My feeling is that it is all a case of the EU & eurozone managing this crisis by the seat of their pants. And making a real mess of it as a result.

If they hadn't been so arrogant & so centralist from the word 'go', & instead had been prepared to listen to contrarian opinions, then they would have had a solution agreed in advance for any country that got into a Greek-style mess:

(i) being helped to temporarily leave the euro,

(ii) devalue in their repacement currency,

(iii) re-structure their debts,

(iv) work their way back to genuine solvency & a reformed economy, &

(v) - if they still wished to - to return to the euro.

But this commonsense & non-hubristical process was never countenanced - & was treated as so taboo by EU leaders & officials that no one dared to mention it for fear of being branded as being of unsound mind - & a euro-sceptic to boot!

Now if I, as a self-confessed hard-line euro-sceptic can see this, then all the over-paid & over-mighty enthusiasts for the euro should certainly have done so too. But they didn't. And now they basically don't know what to do!

  Posted by John C. Calhoun on 05/05/10 08:39 AM

Excellent commentary by Clayton.

Reply from The Daily Bell

He is very good. in fact, we are blessed with many feedbackers who share free-market insights and analysis most generously.

1 2 Next