Exclusive Interview
Hugo Salinas Price on the Nature of Money and Why Silver Should Be Legal Mexican Currency
The Daily Bell is pleased to present an exclusive interview with Hugo Salinas-Price.
Introduction: Hugo Salinas Price, 75, is a successful, retired businessman who lives in Mexico. He has been a follower of the Austrian School of Economics since his youth. He has written three books in Spanish on how and why silver should be instituted as money in Mexico, in parallel with paper money, and numerous related articles in English and Spanish, posted at his website. His organization, the Mexican Civic Association Pro Silver, is actively lobbying the Mexican Congress to approve legislation, which will institute the pure silver "Libertad" ounce as money.
Daily Bell: What is your campaign in Mexico for sound financial policy?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I actually avoid discussing "sound financial policy" because one can argue about that till the cows come home. During the last fifteen years I have devoted my efforts to one single aim, and that is to achieve the monetization of a silver ounce coin currently minted by our Central Bank. This coin has no engraved monetary value and is called the "Libertad" coin; it can very easily be turned into a monetary coin, that is to say, a coin with a monetary value. As such, anyone owning such a coin could, if he or she wished, be able to pay any bill or debt denominated in Mexican pesos.
The monetary value of this coin would be slightly higher than its bullion value; the monetary value would not fluctuate according to the price of the silver ounce, but its monetary value would be raised if the bullion price of silver rose and closed in on the monetary value. The Central Bank would give the coin its monetary value, according to a formula in the proposed legislation.
If the price of silver fell to $1 dollars an ounce, the monetary value of the coin would remain where it was last pegged. (But it would still be better money than any paper or digital money in the world!)
On the other hand, if silver should go to $50 dollars an ounce, this coin would remain in circulation, useable as money, because then its monetary value would be about $57 dollars, and stay there until a further rise in the value of bullion silver.
The monetized silver ounce would be an excellent refuge for savings and would attract them irresistibly. You don't need a bank account, you don't even have to know how to sign your name, to invest your savings in this simple and inflation-proof way.
This coin would be better money than the US dollar and I expect many Americans would be wanting to own these "Libertad" ounces once monetization is realized.
Daily Bell: Has Mexico always suffered from an unsound economy? Does Mexico now have a stable political structure?
Hugo Salinas-Price: The first question is like asking me "When did you stop beating your wife?"
Seriously, I think the Mexican economy is sounder than the US economy – which isn't saying too much. The Mexican economy is much less complex than the American economy. Think of the Mexican economy as a low, wide pyramid or mound. The American economy is by comparison a skyscraper. Personally, I don't like to occupy hotel rooms above the 12th story, thinking of the possibility of a fire. Think also of all the things that can go wrong for a skyscraper: a power outage, and you and your family are on the 30th floor. No elevators, no water, no refrigerator...you get the idea. The American economy is vulnerable in ways that the Mexican economy is not.
Mexicans have mostly fully-paid housing – the house may be very modest, such that most Americans would not care to live that way, but – it is paid for! Mortgages are not widespread; during recent years there was an increasing use of mortgages but on the whole, the Mexican population lives in housing that is paid for.
Mexican indebtedness is not as great as in the US; because until recently, 70% of the population did not have bank accounts – which given the behavior of banks in general, is a very good thing.
Mexicans, unlike Americans, are used to bearing with hard times. They can "cope" with situations which would drive an American to despair. We do not have a government that prints the World's money, so we haven't been as coddled by all levels of government, as the American people.
About political stability: I don't think American political stability is stronger than ours. We don't have Tea Parties and we don't think about taking up guns and holing up in our houses. Matter of fact, I think I see a Revolution brewing right in the old U.S. of A. But of course, we can always be the object of "Regime Change" by the Powers That Be in Washington, D.C. It's happened before, though most Mexicans are not aware of the fact that our Glorious Revolution of 1910, was a "Regime Change" Operation, carried out covertly by the U.S., because Mexico was getting too prosperous and inviting European Capital into the country, in preference to American Capital. So, it can happen again – any excuse will do. How about: "The Drug War in Mexico threatens American security"? That ought to do the trick.
Daily Bell: Give us some background on yourself. Where did you grow up? Where did you go to school and how did you get interested in business?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I grew up in Mexico City, the eldest of six kids. My father was a Mexican from Monterrey, Mexico. My mother was an American from Bryn Athyn, PA. Our family all spoke both English and Spanish from childhood. We still slip from one language to another when we talk. Most of my friends as a boy were sons of Americans living in Mexico. I went to High School in my mother's home town, which is a religious community, and enjoyed it greatly. I tried three different Universities looking for a career, and dropped out of all three. I was particularly unhappy at the famous Wharton School of Business and Finance, at the U. of Pa.
After three strikes I was out and decided, at the ripe old age of 20, that I better get to work and stop wasting money. So, I got a job from my father. Two years earlier, he had set up a small company manufacturing radios and I got the job of manager. So I started at the top and did what I could to stay there! Well, fortunately we had a bright man as engineer, he was a Mexican who had been interested in electronics since he was boy. One day, this man asked me "Mr. Salinas (no employee of mine has ever called me by my first name) why don't we manufacture TV sets?" I said, "Are you out of your mind? That's a terribly complicated technology, we can hardly make good radios..." But he insisted, "No, we can do it; it's not such a big problem." So I said, "Well, build a sample; if you can build a TV set, I'll give you a new car..."
So we got into TV business, and that saved that tiny company. If we had not done that, in not more than two years we would have gone broke. I didn't realize this until many years later. In 1954 I married; my wife and I fell in love at first sight, she was 15 and I was 18. The very best decision I ever made in my life!
Elektra couldn't sell our sets by selling to retailers – there were a dozen manufacturers offering retailers their goods, with well-known brands; our brand was unknown. So, we went to direct sales.
Once we were in direct sales, we added other household goods to the stuff our salesmen could offer the public. Our salesmen were heroic, they knocked on doors from morning till night, and got us our orders.
In 1959, I began to set up our stores, where salesmen could take their customers to view the merchandise. So that's how we got into retailing. We sold on terms – credit up to 24 months. How to sell on credit – and collect! – was something learned from my father, who learned it from his father. That's what we are still doing today, with about 1,000 stores.
Daily Bell: How big did Elektra get – and was it your biggest achievement in business?
Hugo Salinas-Price: Elektra has gotten rather large – stores in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Salvador, Panama, Peru, Brazil and Argentina. (Argentina is the pits, let me tell you.) Elektra owns a bank, which has a very large deposit base among the same people who are its customers. Very solid bank, I am pleased to say. Our Systems department is vast – one of the largest in Latin America. I started up our Systems in 1968, on a ten-year plan to get the company wholly computerized. This finally happened in 1983. We are totally up-to-date in this technology.
Well, my biggest achievement in business happened in 1987, when I was 55. I didn't know it was that, at the time. What happened was that – I got myself out of the way. Elektra had 59 stores, no debt, was running just fine; my eldest son, who was 32, had been working at Elektra for the past seven years, and he knew everything there was to know about it and was much more active and energetic than I; so one fine day, I just up and resigned, to everyone's great surprise. Cancelled all Powers of Attorney, Bank signatures, the works. Son Richard took over that day and – that was the best business decision I ever made!
Daily Bell: Is it easy to build a business in Mexico? Why did you decide to retire from it?
Hugo Salinas-Price: Maybe it's hard, maybe it's easy. For those who have the knack, it may be easy. I don't have that knack. Let me tell you I see a family that sells tasty food out of a pick-up truck at around 11 a.m. weekdays; they set up business outside of the building where I have my office. That family pays zero taxes and is raking in money every day, customers galore. A lot of Mexico lives this way, under the taxman's radar, Praise God!
Now why did I decide to retire? I am not really a businessman. I got a job and worked at it "in my fashion" – never got a degree. I enjoyed my work very much, designing radios and TV sets and "Combos", and opening stores. Actually I am more of a thinker than a man of business. I have very few friends. Don't play golf. I have a large library, I like to collect books. I saw that Richard had much more push than I did, that he knew exactly what was going on in the business and more enthusiasm than I about running the business. So, I just handed over the reins. I have never missed not being No. 1. And I never will. It appears that very, very few men are willing to give up being No. 1.
Daily Bell: Does Mexico have a large middle class? If not, why not?
Hugo Salinas-Price: No, I guess I would have to say we do not have a large middle class. I am worried that our middle class may begin to contract in numbers, given the world situation of excessive debt everywhere.
Why is our middle class in danger of contracting? First of all, I have to express my opinion that the US middle class that prospered so much after WW II was to a large extent based on an expansion of credit which took place in the US after WW II and up to 2007. So, as that expansion appears to be over, you may see an unpleasant phenomenon take place – people who thought they were in the middle class, reduced to poverty. Present US policies are headed toward that outcome.
The problem for Mexico has been that, as in all countries everywhere, its governments have attempted to stay in power by spending money they don't have in order to get the votes. So this spending hits the value of our money and cancels the savings of those who would make up the middle class. This policy hits us harder than Americans, because our money is not welcome outside of our borders, unlike Americans whose Fed can print up money and allow Americans to export it to buy a lot of nice things all over the world.
Daily Bell: Is Mexico a bifurcated state between upper class and the poor? [If so] why is it?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I think that a "bifurcation" – in other words, a division into two – is one of the objectives of Communist agitation: to promote "class consciousness" through envy, mainly. This way of advancing in politics has been going on for centuries. Julius Caesar used it and it worked for him – and he was no Communist.
I can truly say that I do not feel we are in a "bifurcated state" – to promote this feeling is the policy of Chavez in Venezuela, as it has been the policy of Castro in Cuba. My opinion is that there are always and everywhere, rich and poor, but this only becomes a problem when a politician or a political party wants to create the problem for their own advancement. Perhaps we shall face that problem further on – as you well may, yourselves.
Daily Bell: How bad is the drug war in Mexico? Do you think drugs should be made legal?
Hugo Salinas-Price: The drug war is mainly between those who are in the drug dealing business and are fighting over territory. But this war also breeds criminals who take up other ways of getting money, by assaulting peaceable citizens. A US President once told a Mexican President: "Mexico is the spring-board for drugs into the US." To which our President at once replied: "If we are the spring-board, you are the swimming pool."
Legalization of drugs would greatly diminish the problem of outlaw drug lords in Mexico – but I mean, legalization in the US. We have a drug war, because drugs are illegal in the US and thus fetch a very high price. Legalize the business in the US and the price of drugs will come down to the price of corn. Mexicans will go back to raising vegetables. Remember, it was Prohibition that made Al Capone rich.
Daily Bell: Is the drug war Mexico's fault, America's fault or both? Is Mexico a failed state?
Hugo Salinas-Price: We had marihuana in Mexico when I was a boy. Only a few people indulged in it. Nobody cared if they did. Cocaine was in use in the US in the 30's – Cole Porter wrote it into one of his songs: "I Get a Kick Out of You".
Personally, I blame the artificiality of life in our times – caused by funny money, which distorts all aspects of human life – for the hunger that people feel for drugs, to forget their insecurity.
Mexico a failed state? Not yet, by any means! The US may be a failed state long before Mexico falls into such a condition. If we can monetize a silver coin – and believe me, it is quite possible we shall be able to do this – can a State which has silver money be called a "failed State"? Note well: our politicians are far, far less corrupt than yours! Ron Paul, a noble exception among US politicians.
Daily Bell: Would a more stable currency help Mexico?
Hugo Salinas-Price: Undoubtedly. But all currencies in the world are essentially unstable since they are all fiat currencies. There can be true stability only under a gold standard.
Daily Bell: What is your plan for the silver Mexican dollar? What is it called?
Hugo Salinas-Price: My plan is to have the Mexican silver ounce monetized, i.e., turned into ready money. It is called the "Libertad". This coin would come into circulation in parallel with paper and digital bank money.
People would then have the option of obtaining this coin for their savings – on which no interest would be paid; unlike deposits in banks on which the banks pay interest, people would save these coins even though they pay no interest. This is as it should be: there is no reason for people to expect interest on their savings, if what they are saving is worth saving.
Policy all over the world today, is to promote consumption. This is total nonsense! Savings must come before, long before consuming.
Families who have savings are happy, satisfied people. They are secure in the knowledge that they have solid savings for emergencies and for their retirement. This makes for a happy nation. And that should be the object of politics.
Daily Bell: Will your plan come to fruition in the near future? Does it have much support?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I think there is a good chance it will come to fruition in the near future. We were almost there, late last year. The terrible condition of the world, in monetary terms, is a plus for the silver coin. I have a book out just recently, where I mention all the warnings I made before the present chaos, announcing the coming disaster. The Mexican Congress made a poll of public opinion, last year, and found that 81% of the people want silver money.
We have wide support in the Congress, both Houses. Just yesterday I had a very heartening meeting with one of the leaders, he is all for the measure. He is President of the Mexican College of Economists and influential. I have met with energetic women in the Congress who are all for silver. (Silver is a tradition in Mexico, not yet forgotten.) Yes, there is lots of support. The main opponents are those arrogant individuals who have Post Graduate degrees in Universities such as Stanford, Princeton, Yale, Harvard, etc. who think that what they learned in the US is Gospel Truth. Their minds are closed. Not so the majority of our Congressmen and women, who still enjoy common sense.
Daily Bell: Why did you decide to devote your life to this cause?
Hugo Salinas-Price: When I was a boy, I had an excellent man as teacher. He was an Englishman born in the Victorian era. He made us memorize poetry every week. Do you remember this:
"Tell me not in mournful numbers
Life is but an empty dream.
For the soul is dead that slumbers
And things are not what they seem.
"Life is real, life is earnest
And the grave is not its goal.
Dust thou art, to dust returnest
Was not spoken of the Soul" ...
"Let us then be up and doing,
With a heart for any Fate.
Still achieving, still pursuing,
Learn to labor and to wait."
Daily Bell: A Psalm of Life by the great poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. You are obviously a literary person, as your many articles illustrate. Are you a critic of Mexico as it is?
Hugo Salinas-Price: No, I don't think I am a critic of Mexico as it is. Why write about our defects when we are all conscious of them? What I attempt to do is to inspire our people to rise to what they can and should do, and specifically, to inspire them to the greatest possible thing they can do: monetize a silver coin.
Daily Bell: What does Mexico have to do to become a successful state in your opinion? Is America the problem?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I wouldn't say that Mexico is an "Unsuccessful State" at all. It has problems which are common to the whole world and which mainly arise from the world's having abandoned real money by stages, beginning in 1909, or 1873 if you want to go back that far, when the US government decreed that the Treasury would no longer continue to accept all the silver offered to it and return it minted into dollars.
I must admit that the US has forfeited its leadership in the world, over which it had such mighty power after WW II, by unwise behavior in the sphere of banking and money. You have an oligarchy in power, actually running the US Government behind the scenes, and they want to retain their power at all costs, even sacrificing the American People to their ends. Together with their brothers in the UK, they are the prime obstacle to a reform and renewal of Finance and Money, to put the world on a path to sustainable prosperity. I believe they have put a rope around their own necks due to their obstination and avarice. The rope is closing in on them – note the rising gold price.
A strong state is a generous state. As the US has become weaker and troubled, it has become easier for people to take out their frustrations on minorities. Thus the illegal immigrants are in for it. The politicians approve of this – it distracts people from thinking about the true causes of their troubles. Not that I blame Arizona for the legislation it is putting into place regarding illegal immigrants. This measure has provoked wrath in Mexico, but the fact is, Arizona is clearly within its rights.
Daily Bell: Is America becoming a failed state?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I don't think so, not yet. But popular discontent may cause a lot of grief in the US. Americans are not used to hardship.
Daily Bell: Are you an Austrian free-market economist?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I am an economist without a degree. If I had a degree in economics, I would probably not be an economist. Yes, I consider myself an Austrian economist – but a Neo-Austrian economist. You see, Professor Antal E. Fekete of Budapest, has improved some points of the Austrian theory as left to us by the eminent Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard. He is the founder of a Neo-Austrian School of Economics. Those who have accorded Mises and Rothbard iconic status, don't think there can be any improvement upon their theories. I disagree and I think that Mises, a fine gentleman of my acquaintance when I was young, was great enough to accept well-founded observations which improved upon his basic ideas, without discrediting their underlying value.
Daily Bell: Are free-market economics having an impact in Mexico?
Hugo Salinas-Price: Yes, but the impact has not been favorable. Because "free market economics" was thought up when gold was the only money that existed. Economists of that time could not imagine a world without true money such as we have today!
It turned out that a free-market without the gold standard caused the de-industrialization of the US, Britain and Europe – and Mexico, too.
Deindustrialization causes unemployment, of course. Since the deindustrialization occurred while we were trying out "free market economics", the deindustrialization has been blamed on "Free Market Economics", when the real cause was going off the Gold Standard. Very, very few anywhere, see the relationship. I have written briefly about this, in my article, "Gold the Protector and Creator of Jobs."
You see, if we had the gold standard, Americans and Mexicans could simply not buy from countries that did not buy from the US and Mexico in return; that being the case, if the gold standard were reinstated jobs would sprout like mushrooms in a matter of months. Protectionism is only a Band-Aid.
Daily Bell: Where does Mexico go from here?
Hugo Salinas-Price: There is going to be terrible turmoil in the world. No one can know what is in store.
Daily Bell: Where do you go from here?
Hugo Salinas-Price: This is my last decade! From here, the grave.
Daily Bell: Are you optimistic about Mexico's economy?
Hugo Salinas-Price: Not too optimistic – unless we monetize the silver coin. I think it will be a seed from which a multitude of good things will grow, beginning with an awakening of a spirit of confidence and pride in our country.
Daily Bell: Are you optimistic about the West's economy?
Hugo Salinas-Price: Without the gold standard, we are at a dead end. A very dangerous place to be.
Daily Bell: Is America headed for a depression or hyperinflation? How about the EU?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I think the US is already in a Depression, but the Media are keeping the news from the people. If Bernanke's creation of massive amounts of money ever gains traction by the money filtering down to the people, then inflation will take hold, and Bernanke will not be able to stop it, try as he may. The genie will be out of the bottle!
Europe is in for a bunch of trouble. I do have a suspicion that the EU was deliberately attacked by US Finance. Certainly, Europe dug its own grave with their version of funny money, although they kept up appearances pretty well until given a strong push by the rating agencies. Perhaps the European Monetary Union will fall apart and the euro may disappear as things unravel.
Daily Bell: Will the EU and the euro survive?
Hugo Salinas-Price: The euro is a fiat money construct and is destined to fail eventually. The EU was a good idea, but based upon sand. I remember that von Mises wrote that the Austrian Empire, which was a collection of nations with different languages, religions and customs, was held together by the gold coin of the Empire. When that went, the Empire was doomed. I suspect that unless the EU wakes up and initiates a move to a European gold standard, they too are doomed. The buying of gold in Europe is a signal that instead of being fought or ignored, it should form a part of planning for the future of Europe.
Daily Bell: What's the biggest problem in the world economically today?
Hugo Salinas Price: Without a doubt, the enormous "structural problems" which the economists talk about – imbalances of trade, where some countries export lots of stuff and other countries buy quantities of that stuff but have nothing, or little, to sell to the exporting countries – this problem has caused China for instance, to accumulate enormous "reserves" of dollars and euros, while the US and the West in general have lost their industries. This is the main problem in the world today and it cannot be remedied without the gold standard.
Only through the gold standard can the world achieve peace and harmony in economic relationships. Only the gold standard can prevent a huge country like China, from devastating the industries of the "developed world".
Daily Bell: Is that the biggest problem in South America and Central America too?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I certainly do think it is the biggest problem today. However, I wouldn't go so far as to say it's the only problem. People have different sets of values, you know. Not everyone everywhere wants to live in a suburban home with two cars, grass in the front yard, two kids that are going to go to college, etc. etc. Strange as it may seem, some people in this world – and they are not a few – prefer to live simple lives, working only when they have to and perhaps as little as possible. "Work" is not such a great thing everywhere. Some people like to be what we call, lazy. They like to take a nap in a hammock after lunch.
So the idea of a world-wide middle class with a similar standard of living must be an illusion founded on misconceptions about people. There is great deal of harm done by "Improvers", who are always thinking of ways to improve upon what people actually want if they are let alone.
Give them sound money, and let each work out his destiny, I say. A couple of years ago, a poll was taken to find out who are the happiest people in the world. Guess what? Mexico was Numero Uno!
Daily Bell: Any English books or articles you have written that you recommend?
Hugo Salinas-Price: I have not written any book in English – the readers I write for are Mexicans and I really have no business talking about the rest of the world, including the US. If I translate some of my articles into English, it is because I feel a few people may be interested in what is, after all, a unique project with no similarity to anything being proposed in the rest of the world.
You can find my articles in English at my website, www.plata.com.mx. Thank you so much, for taking an interest in my opinions!


Hugo Salinas-Price comes across as thoughtful and gracious soul – someone who truly has the good of his country in mind in many ways. His is certainly a life well-lived. He has built a national Mexican company from the bottom up, provided for his family and then spent his mature years engaged in a great struggle to introduce sound money into the economy of his native land. In fact, given the sensibleness of his endeavor (which grows closer to success in our opinion every year) you would think that his campaign to create a legal and circulating silver dollar in Mexico would already have borne fruit.
Given the shape of the Mexican economy and of paper money in general, Hugo Salinas-Price's monetary solution makes sense. Silver is the money of the people, just as gold has traditionally been the money of bankers and the wealthy. Silver has traded in a ratio with gold for millennia, and thus bi-metallism has been the monetary standard of choice for many cultures and countries. Historically, this is provable and seems reasonable to us here at the Bell, but such is the decrepitude of modern understanding of money that the Internet is assaulted a thousand times a day with elaborate monetary plans featuring all kinds of money stuff and strategies.
Essentially, money over the millennia has proven to have four characteristics:
(1) durability (value),
(2) divisibility (malleability),
(3) transportability, and
(4) noncounterfeitability (serviceability)
As free-market economist Murray Rothbard has famously pointed out, money evolved from a competition featuring different kinds of money stuff. Gold and silver (and to a lesser extent copper), precious metals often found together, were not appointed by a committee or king. The market itself determined the choice of money historically – and in fact money has manifested itself in other forms as well – beads, salt, sugar even large, carved rocks. But ultimately and over and over, the market itself has chosen gold and silver as the money of choice.
We have often observed in these modest pages that a gold (or silver) backed currency would prove most attractive if some country were to step forward and issue it. In fact, were Iceland or Greece or some other nation currently struggling with the ruinous ramifications of mercantilist fiat money to simply back the national currency with gold, many difficulties would be reduced or eliminated. (Of course, a country would need to find the gold to begin with, but that is a separate question.)
In the best of all worlds, of course, a country and a ruling class will not mandate the composition of money nor control its circulation. The market itself would decide on the composition of money, the kinds of banking that was demanded and even the level of fractionality with which money would circulate, if any. In fact, money really is a pretty simple issue once the market itself is re-involved. In a laissez-faire money economy, interest rates would fluctuate regionally, no doubt, the supply of money would vary from region to region and even inflation or deflation rates would be variable.
What we have today, of course, is much different. The powers-that-be have taken the various paraphernalia of money – its banks, bills and issuance – and gradually hollowed them out, offering instead an imitation that provides a historical representation but none of the control or value. Even government mints, which used to stamp gold and silver, today work overtime stamping what in the past would have been considered slugs – any kind of non-precious metals.
From our point of view it is only a matter of time until some nation, some group or even some region re-introduces currency backed by precious metals – or even, as Hugo Salinas-Price hopes, circulates the metal itself as a national money. If he has his way, Mexico will be the first major modern country to do this. We wish him well in this important quest. When Mexico does begin to circulate its Libertad, others countries will soon follow. The benefits will be clear and fairly immediate.
------------------------------
Received May 25, 2010
Dear Editors of The Daily Bell
My heartfelt thanks to all who had kind words to say about myself and this plan to monetize a 1 oz. silver coin in Mexico. Thank you so much, Daily Bell, for having spread the news about silver in Mexico to so many people.
Your support and the support of so many of your readers, is powerful motivation to continue in this effort – while so many Mexicans approve of and hope for the realization of the silver project. For those who have questions, I have answers which they will find at my site, www.plata.com.mx. And for those who express doubts – more verse -
"If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, yet make allowance for their doubting, too...." IF, by Kipling.
My gratitude to all, for your very kind expressions of support.
Hugo
------------------------------
We thank Hugo Salinas-Price on behalf of all those who have read or responded to his interview. We feel most fortunate to have conducted it and urge all who wish to find out more about the Libertad or his thoughts on the subject to visit his website, plata.com.mx
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||


Posted by ristump on 12/18/12 02:31 PM
I would like to talk with Senor price about a very important invention. Could the Daily Bell help me out with communicating???? Doc Stump!
Posted by JCC on 07/06/11 09:41 PM
This is a great, great article. Thank you Daily Bell.
Posted by Acudoc on 01/13/11 03:06 PM
Amazing, that such men walk the earth.
Posted by Breck on 11/19/10 11:20 PM
First time I have ever seen this explanation and it makes alot of sense. All this time I thought that Government was the cause solely, but the people played their part too. But heck, what did we know?!
"I have to express my opinion that the US middle class that prospered so much after WW II was to a large extent based on an expansion of credit which took place in the US after WW II and up to 2007. So, as that expansion appears to be over, you may see an unpleasant phenomenon take place ‒ people who thought they were in the middle class, reduced to poverty. Present US policies are headed toward that outcome".
Posted by Jon Lawrence on 10/27/10 10:11 PM
Mr.Salinas-Price I throw a bouquet of kudos to you.
Such an easy graciousness, combined with a very sharp modern mind is a rarity in today's world, esp when it comes to common sense with money/finance/culture.
I am 81 with grave doubts re the future, if the U.S. continues on its present path. My children in their 50s are absolutely uneducated in these matters (poor school system without a doubt.
Thankfully, my father, a very successful chemist took it upon himself to acquire an education in money. This was passed on to his 2 children who are prosperous in that they have invested their financial futures in precious metals. We are doing well, however, hard working citizens are being defrauded by present/past monetary policies dating back to the evil concept of a Federal Reserve... corrupting themselves/politicians/elites/& finally, the average Joe-6pack.
Once, Mexico or Indonesia or whoever institutes a precious metal money standard the rest of the world will notice the great increase in prosperity & will follow so as not to fall behind. Again, thanks for your insights devotion to a most worthy cause.
Posted by Vidal on 05/29/10 02:38 AM
Personally I agree 100% with Price regarding the monetazation of silver/gold.... He obviously thinks in line with Ron Paul or Ron Paul thinks in line with him, no matter, the concept is what would allow for accountatability since no one ( central banks/federal reserves) can print up trillons of dollars/Libertads (Argentum) anytime they need to convince the masses that all is A - OK...
Long live real money GOLD AND SILVER ( Que Viva dinero verdadero Oro Y Plata)! Aside from my agreeing with the real money concept, I'm amazed by those in power down south beyond the border where my grandparents and other familiy members were born and brought upcome, none of them look like this guy named Price....
How is it that the VAST majority of Mexico's population look like me and my family yet I have not seen anyone that remotely resembles us or someone similar to us - ie Pancho Villa, Emiliano Zapata or Vicente Guerrero?
During colonial Mexico after the Indigenous people could no longer work the silver and gold mines, the conquerors brought African slaves into Veracruz and for each spaniard there were 30 African slaves (ie Guerrero was the second president of Mexico who was technically the first black president of N. America). Price looks like George Washington and would easily fit pass through the state of Arizona without ever being asked for ID?
One of the other readers worded this well; Maybe once Mexico returns to Ag. and the wealth grows, Arizona will not have to worry about asking people with dark skin for ID and maybe roles will reverse with politicians of Arizona will be sent back from Mexico as they attempt to seek employment there...Maybe once Mexico has real money in place they will also have real Mexicans. Oh well, go figure......
Posted by Duane Gainsburg on 05/27/10 10:58 PM
Re Gned the Gnome's points - no argument here, but again, why try to relate the physical weight of gold, whether in ounces or grams, to so many pieces of fiat paper? I'm selling a good suit normally priced at 1 ounce of gold. One "O." This week only, and only for my good friends, the price will be 0.95 oz, or 9.5 "T's." Extra buttons and a belt will cost only another 10 "H's". Etc. No need to translate into dollars, greenbacks, Washington's. If you prefer to think in grams, no problem.
My computer will check to see that you have enough in the gold bank, and its ownership will simply be transferred to my account. Simple.
Posted by Glenn Ellis on 05/27/10 08:09 PM
Thanks for posting this informative interview. I look forward to learning more about his thinking.
Posted by Tooppy on 05/27/10 05:06 PM
M.Salinas is a refreshing voice in this world. He expresses ideas I long adopted.
If only he could be listened to !
I am afraid minds destruction has progressed so deeply everywhere, it will take ages to recover a minimum level of sanity.
The coming destruction is certainly going to help, but at a terrible cost !
Humans have to drink the wine to the dregs to learn their lessons, to quickly forget about it and repete it again and again.
Posted by Honestann on 05/27/10 02:38 PM
Very enjoyable to hear the words of an honest, benevolent man who largely thinks for himself. One important mistake, however. The practice of assigning totally fiat/fictitious units to a medium of exchange leaves that medium very easy to manipulate by the self-appointed elitist predator class.
Thus, the unit of "money" must be "GRAM of gold" or "GRAM of silver". Why? Because that IS what it is. By assigning some totally arbitrary, authoritarian-based fictional unit like "dollar" or "peso" or "lira", you essentially BEG for gangsters and banksters and politicians to fiddle the purity or exchange-rate or create fictional paper-receipts and substitutes to cheat EVERYONE out of their life.
Posted by Howard McGill on 05/27/10 01:45 PM
A really great article about a man that I have only recently become aware of. Elektra, of course, I have known of, having lived here in Mexico for more 35 years. But , I did not realize that Sr. Salinas-Price was the founder. I certainly wish him well in his endeavor to get silver backing of the peso.
Howard McGill
Posted by Joseph Curry on 05/27/10 10:53 AM
***** for Hugo - since I don't work for him,I can call him that he he -- he is right on. I live in Mexico, have efffectively since 1955 and am married to a lovely Mexican woman.
I have a son and two grand children that are dual citzens. I have helped raise 6 other Children of single mothers.
I am involved in mining, so of course am a bit predjudiced. One can say "I know Mexico and Mexicans", He is correct, common sense will tell one that.
![]() |
Posted by Chris Coles on 05/26/10 12:48 PM
Now I understand why Mr. Salinas-Price, when he realised I am but a poor, unfunded British inventor, closed our conversation. In his position, he must be inundated by the likes of myself.
But, if I may, I would like to make one small suggestion regarding his attempt to get the Mexico administration to take up his wish that they introduce the Silver coin.
Surely he has everything to hand to bring that about from his own resources by simply selling his own minted silver coin himself, through his bank to the ordinary citizens of his nation. He would be selling the coin at the value of the Silver, and thus would not have to endure any loss. They in turn, would be buying at the market value of the Silver at the time of their purchase.
By combining that strategy with his own marketing campaign for the coin; he could introduce the entire nation to the idea of such a coin without making any attempt to controvert the wishes of his government. Call the coin a "Hugo" and sell it as a souvenir.
So, why not?
Reply from The Daily Bell
He is a modest man, and cautious?
Posted by Mark Herpel on 05/26/10 12:03 PM
Excellent interview. He echos much of what the Liberty Dollar(NORFED) tried to start and what the American Open Currency Standard (Click to view link) is doing now. Silver is the people's money.
Mark
editor@Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
Interesting magazine.
Posted by Gned The Gnome on 05/26/10 12:48 AM
A bi-metallic standard is a bad idea as the gold/silver ratio fluctuates a lot, used to be 16 or 20, now 50-70 these days. This was one of the problems in early American history.
Anyway I wanted to get back to my main point, Sr. Salinas-Price's method is a workable compromise between the strictly by the ounce or gram method and the face value method.
Fewer people seem able to understand and deal with silver/gold by weight, as it's like a foreign currency to them, and Americans are not used to ever having to convert currencies (Canadians and Mexicans living near the US, and Europeans and others, are used to multiple currencies), so there's a mental block in accepting the idea.
So the face value method was conceived to simplify it for public understanding and acceptance. The Liberty Dollar, and later, the American Open Currency Standard at Click to view link , realized they'd have to put a high enough face value on the "coins" (or "rounds" as we say because the US gov't doesn't like us calling them "coins") to stay in circulation despite fluctuation in the silver/gold price in $. A higher difference is needed to offset the cost, time, and hassle of re-minting them with a higher face value when needed.
Thus, the face value tends to be 1.5 to 3 times the intrinsic value, which many people think makes them a ripoff or at least questionable. Even those who understand that the intrinsic value is not the point (the point being that fixed, established ratios and amounts are set up so that there can only be so many of such rounds issued, it's not inflatable like fiat money) find it hard to convert back to $ when needed to pay taxes or other bills, and this discourages acceptance.
Sr. Salinas-Price's method seems to me to be a good workable compromise between the 2 extremes. With the official peso or dollar value being dynamic and announced as needed, rather than being hard-imprinted into the round itself, the expense and hassle of re-minting is avoided so the official price can be closer to the intrinsic value, thus no one is uncomfortable with the difference. Thus under this method, with silver around $17/oz., the MSRP could still be $20 while AOCS and even the LD already had to go to a $50 face value.
To avoid undue fluctuation or chasing a spike and regretting it later, some sort of moving average would be used, or even a combination, among the 10, 20, 30, or 60 day moving averages as reported at the end of the daily issue from Scotia-Mocatta.
Thus the silver price might exceed the official value during a short spike but would then retreat back to, say, 80-90% of the official value within a few days, and in that case the official value should not be changed. Increasing it gradually in response to averaged out increases in the silver price would enable it to keep up adequately, and knowing this, the people would not panic over a short spike, knowing that if the silver price stayed higher long enough, the official value would then be increased to stay ahead of it again most of the time.
If the silver price drops a lot, some people might sell the coins, but knowing that the gov't or a large organization would back them up by standing ready to buy them back, fewer people would then feel like they really needed to sell them. Of course it might be reasonable for the backing gov't or organization to have, say, a 25% restocking fee, and the free market might cause some voluntary organization (like coin shops or whatever) to spring up willing to charge only a 10% fee or whatever.
The problem is that a gov't or large organization needs to back it up. As pointed out earlier, national gov't's would be against it because they don't want the threat to the fiat currency monopoly. However, state, provincial, and local gov't's are caught in the middle, unable to issue their own fiat currency and they're adversely affected by inflation like the rest of us, so they should be amenable to this approach. As I and a few others are working on promoting this idea here in the US, perhaps Sr. Salinas-Price might consider this approach if he hasn't already - of course this depends on whether Mexican law or its constitution would allow for it; I think that the US constitution clearly implies that it would be allowed but I don't know about other countries.
Anyway, good article, and best of luck.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks for this insightful analysis.
Posted by Jeremy Price on 05/25/10 10:42 PM
Although no direct relation, Mr. Price's opinions resonate here in Canada where our central bank has seen fit to sell almost all of its gold at the bottom of the market, similar to what Gordon Brown
did in the UK.
I hope people from around the world return to the embrace of a bi-metallic monetary standard in the new global financial order as it is breathtakingly dishonest to print vast amounts of money with nothing to back it up!
Hyperinflation is the sin of the central bankers and I expect we will all pay quite dearly for this wholly misguided and stupid approach to monetary policy, particularly in the West.
Posted by Hugo Salinas Price on 05/25/10 03:29 PM
Dear Editors of The Daily Bell
My heartfelt thanks to all who had kind words to say about myself and this plan to monetize a 1 oz. silver coin in Mexico. Thank you so much, Daily Bell, for having spread the news about silver in Mexico to so many people.
Your support and the support of so many of your readers, is powerful motivation to continue in this effort " while so many Mexicans approve of and hope for the realization of the silver project. For those who have questions, I have answers which they will find at my site, Click to view link.mx. And for those who express doubts " more verse -
"If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, yet make allowance for their doubting, too...." IF, by Kipling.
My gratitude to all, for your very kind expressions of support.
Hugo
Reply from The Daily Bell
We thank Hugo Salinas-Price on behalf of all those who have read or responded to his interview. We feel most fortunate to have conducted it and urge all who wish to find out more about the Libertad or his thoughts on the subject to visit his website, Click to view link.mx
Posted by DesertBill on 05/25/10 12:31 PM
Great general information, but before buying just any form of silver investors need to learn about the various ways to investor. A good start is this website: Click to view link. Many dealers, esp. those advertising on TV, hawk overpriced, high premiums products. Bullion products are the best way to go for investors seeking the physical products.
Posted by Duane Gainsburg on 05/25/10 09:59 AM
Thank you for this excellent idea interchange.
1. The "Free Market" idea probably resonates especially with the Banksters/Slicksters and their government appointees, who are able to set the rules and deal among themselves, to their profit. A "free market" seems at one end of the spectrum whose other end is tight government regulation. In either case, any system whose core is fake money invites the age-old financial-government cooperation (I didn't say conspiracy).
2. Why value gold or silver or copper or carved rocks in anything else? The price of a good man's suit, in gold, is about where it was 2000 years ago or so I read, so a good Nordstrom suit should cost about one oz of gold. An electronic cipher would prove I have it, stored somewhere, and a click or two could transfer ownership to the merchant, who would transfer 9/10ths to his employees or suppliers and keep 1/10th and buy his wife a new dress. Lucky her. Why complicate things by assigning a fiat currency value? Electronic transactions don't require monopoly money.
Posted by Curious Mind on 05/25/10 07:18 AM
Sorry - I still don't get this.
The idea is to create a new currency that will be cumbersome and unusable in daily life that is based upon the exchange rate given to it by fiat currencies through the international bullion value thus making it, in essence, a silver based pseudo-fiat currency.
I understand the idea, Daily Bell, however I ask again.
What's the point of creating a currency for the sake of creating a currency in a market that can manipulate it so easily as demonstrated in my examples?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Here is our best answer - and we do not speak for Hugo Salinas-Price ... We like the idea because it is a step in the right direction - money backed by an asset it is infinitely preferable to pure fiat issued in torrents by mercantilist central banks. And we would hope as well that the parameters of the Libertad would be adjusted for workability if it proved cumbersome or easy to manipulate.
|
|



l 












