Exclusive Interview
Nelson Hultberg on Libertarian-Conservatism and His New Conservative American Political Party
The Daily Bell is pleased to present an exclusive interview with Nelson Hultberg.
Introduction: Mr. Hultberg is a freelance writer in Dallas, Texas and the Executive Director of Americans for a Free Republic. His articles have appeared in such publications as The Dallas Morning News, the San Antonio Express-News, The American Conservative, Insight, The Freeman, and Liberty, as well as numerous Internet sites. He is the author of Why We Must Abolish The Income Tax And The IRS (1997) and has just written a new book titled, The Conservative Revolution: Why We Must Form a Third Political Party to Win It. In addition, he has a major work on political philosophy, The Golden Mean: The Case for Libertarian Politics and Conservative Values, that is to be released in this coming year.
Daily Bell: There's a lot we want to discuss, so thanks for another interview. Your insights are always welcome. We spoke about an Anglo-America power elite last time. What's your sense of how this elite is positioned in the early 21st century? Are they disturbed by the amount of analysis and attention their activities are receiving?
Nelson Hultberg: I think they are very disturbed by the amount of attention their activities are getting from the freedom movement. But it is a disturbance spawned by scorn for those they conceive to be conservative rubes woefully ignorant of the "great beneficence" that they the elites wish to impose upon us.
They should be having recurring nightmares over the potential cataclysm that is descending upon the world because of their criminal policies. But they're not because, as incredible as it sounds, they don't really grasp the full implications of what they and their predecessors have wrought. Powerful and intellectual humans are quite capable of blinding themselves to the big truths of existence. In fact, I would say that such blinding is the norm throughout history, rather than the exception. This is why man's history is such a tumultuous travesty of tyranny and evil, with but interludes of sanity and freedom.
The Greek and Roman republics, the flowering of the late Middle Ages, the Elizabethan Age, Jefferson's Republic of States were but brief interludes. Tyrannical collectivism has dominated the societies of the world throughout history via the Pharaohs, the Caesars, the Byzantine Empire, the Inquisition, Rousseau and the Jacobins of the Enlightenment, Comte and Marx of the 19th century, the communists and fascists of the 20th century, up to the velvet glove totalitarians of the Nanny State today working so relentlessly to spread coercive egalitarianism to all mankind.
Thus we have to ask ourselves, are these corporate, bureaucratic, and intellectual elites throughout the West just greedy power lusters fully aware of the value of freedom, but too evil and Machiavellian to work for it? Or are they the ugly norm of "old world collectivism" manifesting once again through the evolution of a warped zeitgeist? Do they understand that freedom and prosperity require the absence of intrusive government? That Mises and Hayek were right? That the Great Depression was caused by excessive government inflation of the money supply after the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913?
Daily Bell: And the answer is?
Nelson Hultberg: Hardly. They think that free enterprise is the culprit, that it is immoral and dangerous, racked with contradictions and basically unworkable as Adam Smith portrayed it. They think this way because of the modern zeitgeist laid down in their brains by the ideologies of Rousseau, Comte, Marx and Keynes that have resurrected the "old world collectivism" that has plagued mankind since ancient times. The elites believe devoutly that they must intervene aggressively and perpetually so as to guide the economy (and its hapless individuals) through the "treacherous storms of reality," when, of course, it is they and their Marxist-Keynesian fallacies that have created the treacherous storms. But they can't see this monumental truth because they are blinded by hubris and false ideology.
Daily Bell: So are these elites just ideologically misguided moguls, bureaucrats and intellectuals striving to collectivize the West?
Nelson Hultberg: Certainly not. They are greed driven, amoral power seekers that have been poisoned by the ideologies of Marx and Keynes in their formative years. It is this ideological poisoning combined with their power lust that drives them to establish a One World Government. Marxism / Keynesianism allows them to think they are fashioning an ideal political-economic system for the nations of the world. It gives them their moral zealotry. And naturally they envision themselves as the ones who are to run this "ideal" One World Government. Thus it is greed, power lust and ideology that form the roots of our problem here.
Daily Bell: We deal extensively with the promotional themes of the elite. Are fear-based promotions having a more difficult time of it? Global warming for instance seems to be leaking credibility.
Nelson Hultberg: I would say that the fear-based promotions are definitely beginning to leak credibility. But we have to be careful here not to become overconfident and let our guard down. Collectivism has incredible resiliency. After all, it has been the norm for thousands of years because it is ingrained in the natures of the weaker and less ambitious of humans who far outnumber those who are strong and industrious.
Global warming is a very sophisticated fraud that has been successful because the masses wish to believe it. They welcome the statist / liberal view of things because it allows them to justify the government's takeover and control of entrepreneurial capitalism, which they think will reward them with an easier life through more and more transfer entitlements. This is basic human nature -- to take the path of least resistance toward sustaining one's life. The statists are very clever sophists who subconsciously understand this facet of human nature and are always ready to take advantage of it to stampede the masses into more and more subservience to the state.
In addition by 1970, most statists began to suspect that Marx's economic theories were false. Capitalism did not grind the workers down to starvation wages; in fact, it liberated them and gave them ever-increasing "real wages" wherever it was allowed to prevail in its laissez-faire form. Thus the statists had to find another "horrific evil" with which to attack capitalism in the eyes of the people. Environmental destruction became that horrific evil. The sophistry of global warming is but the latest manifestation of this fear tactic.
Daily Bell: We've noticed that the legislative mechanism continues to grind forward even when elite promotional propaganda ceases to be effective. Is this dangerous to the larger civil society?
Nelson Hultberg: Very dangerous. Legislative machinery is the result of a certain political paradigm accepted by society. To lessen or stop the machinery requires a new paradigm to be ushered in, which is not done easily. It is kind of like turning a giant aircraft carrier at sea. There is a big delay from the time the captain starts rotating the wheel and when the rear of the ship is able to swing around and complete the turn. Likewise with society. There's a big delay from the time radical intelligentsia begin selling a new paradigm, and when it kicks in as acceptable. We are not there yet ideologically in America.
This is why we so desperately need a third political party to make it into the National TV Presidential Debates. It is the only way to turn society back toward freedom. Our other avenues of informing the people have been closed to us because the collectivists took over the schools and media and other institutions of truth procurement throughout the 20th century. This was the goal of the "Cultural Marxists," which I discussed in my recent TDB review of James Jaeger's film on the subject.
The people are now denied a vision of freedom every election year because the Democrats and Republicans monopolize the ideas of the debates by excluding the "small government view." They do this with the mandate stipulating that one must get 15% in the polls in order to participate. Thus only candidates of the two major parties qualify, and they both espouse the "big government view." Until this monopoly is broken by a viable third-party getting the necessary 15%, America will continue to slide further into tyranny and decadence. An ignorant electorate -- cut off from the truth in the schools, through the media, and on the campaign trail -- cannot rise up to challenge its enslavers.
Daily Bell: Do you believe that mass civil protest is one way to begin to address the gap between what society as a whole seems to support and the contrary direction in which various laws are taking society in both America and Britain?
Nelson Hultberg: Absolutely. It is pretty much our last chance to turn the tide. If we fail to galvanize a sizeable grass roots movement for "genuine freedom" in the West, which means eliminating the two evils of 1913 (the progressive income tax and government banking), the coming cataclysm is going to sweep America and Britain into a Second New Deal, only far more regimented. This will act as the final nails in the coffin of liberty -- a liberty that sprang from the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence. No other nations in the world grasp the "individualism" necessary for freedom to work. Only Britain and America have long standing, rational traditions of "individual rights." So if we are to avert the threat of a new "high-tech" Dark Ages consuming us in the upcoming centuries, we must take our final stand in these two nations now.
Daily Bell: Is the Tea Party making progress in your estimation? Is it having an impact on the American political discussion?
Nelson Hultberg: In its beginning, the Tea Party movement was full of righteous wrath and radical desires. It had enormous potential if it could avert the tendency of revolutionary political movements to gravitate toward what will buy them immediate (but superficial) success as measured by the media and the establishment of their time. I had hopes that the Tea Party patriots would be able to avert this tendency. But now I have grown pessimistic.
Neo-cons like Newt Gingrich and pseudo-conservatives like Dick Armey have moved their organizations to co-opt the Tea Party revolutionaries into the Republican Party. This is the kiss of death. Gingrich, Armey and their cohorts are the epitome of what is wrong with the conservative movement in America. They pay only lip service to freedom's ideals. When it comes time to match the rhetoric with action and adherence to principle, they cave in like a homeless alcoholic in face of saloon music and the smell of whiskey. It's pitiful how Republican Party stalwarts delude themselves into believing they are fighting "a great fight for freedom" while throwing trillions to the banking oligarchs and steadfastly refusing to address the immigration invasion. The lures of "celebrity" and "social approval" have consumed their integrity of thought. They want too much to be revered by the ghouls of Wall Street, as if riding in black limousines with thieves is somehow honor. They want too much to be invited to palace dinners at the White House. Thus usurpation and shameful profligacy become tolerable tools of trade.
Daily Bell: You told us that what is desperately needed in America today is the restoration of the Jeffersonian/Burkean blend of libertarian-conservatism that built our nation during the first 125 years up through World War I. Give us an update on your efforts to implement this sort of movement.
Nelson Hultberg: Naturally neo-conservatives hate what the "libertarian-conservative" movement is all about. They go out of their way to smear conservatives who believe in individual rights, limited government, federalism, and a mind-our-own-business foreign policy. But this is to be expected; they are collectivists. They hate the whole idea of individualism, and the self-reliance that sustains it.
Numerous "conventional conservatives" are not comfortable with the libertarian-conservative blend -- politicians such as Sarah Palin, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Orin Hatch, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Sam Brownback, etc. Washington's powerful think tanks also squirm uneasily when the libertarian principles of the Founders are expressed vigorously and consistently. And most of the conservative talk show hosts steer clear of fully endorsing the libertarianism of the Founders.
But the battle to light "brushfires of freedom in the minds of men" that Samuel Adams spoke of has been launched. The Ron Paul Revolution ignited it, and hopefully there will be no stopping it. We are politically libertarian because freedom requires a strictly limited government, but we are culturally conservative because freedom requires the inculcation of objective moral values into the young. Freedom does not mean the anarchical fetish of "doing your own thing" as the pure libertarian seems to think. Freedom is meant for "doing the right thing" as Albert Jay Nock espoused. We believe, with Jefferson, in the rights of man, but we believe with Burke that "men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites."
If the Founders were alive today, they would term themselves libertarian-conservatives. They would be horrified with Bill Kristol's neo-cons, and they would be thoroughly disgusted with the "mealymouth conservatives" of Congress. But they would also be contemptuous of those libertarians who espouse open borders, unilateral free trade, atheism, egoism, and anarchism. The Founders were passionate patriots who understood that rights do not come from government and the Supreme Court, but from Nature's God, that principle transcends popularity, that freedom is not license, that it requires an objective morality being taught in the schools and churches, that fair weather friends of freedom can never sustain a great nation, and that the idea of the nation is a legitimate entity with its defense a higher priority than always acquiring the cheapest foreign trade goods.
Daily Bell: Generally update us on the progress of the Conservative American Party, which you've founded.
Nelson Hultberg: AFR is presently getting the party legally registered. This is a lengthy and expensive process, but we hope to consummate it over the next year. We have joined forces with James Jaeger's Matrixx Entertainment Corp. to produce a 90-minute documentary about why only a third-party can stop the runaway freight train of debt and delusion that our Demopublican elites are riding. It is titled Spoiler: How the Tea Party Revolution Could Succeed.
Our goal is to convince the Tea Party patriots that hanging their hat with the Republicans will never stop the dictatorial drift of America, as the past 40 years clearly demonstrate. Republicans have expanded government every bit as fast as the Democrats ever since the Eisenhower administration.
Patrick Buchanan and Edwin Vieira are committed to participation in the film. We are also seeking Ron Paul and Ross Perot, along with G. Edward Griffin, and several other scholars and pundits sympathetic to the freedom movement.
Daily Bell: Any plans to merge with the Constitution Party?
Nelson Hultberg: We would love to bring off a merger with the Constitution Party. We feel comfortable with them rather than the Libertarian Party. This is because the Constitution Party is culturally conservative as are the American people. This gets back to the Jeffersonian / Burkean blend that is necessary in order to build a valid political movement to restore what America is all about. The Libertarian Party doesn't quite get this crucial insight. Thus, in our opinion, they take destructive stands on issues like immigration, trade policy, and gay marriage.
But the Constitution Party doesn't share our strategy of incrementalism. They espouse across-the-board, radical positions that threaten the people with the dissolution of the welfare state. Consequently they get less than 1% of the vote every election year, which marginalizes them and renders them ineffective. The Conservative American Party prefers to take a radical stand on only a few key issues such as taxation and monetary policy and a conventional stand on all others. In this way, we don't threaten the voters with dissolution of the welfare state. We can then appeal to a much larger number of voters and become a REAL challenger to the Demopublican monopoly.
Thus prospects of merging with the Constitution Party are not good. We have not given up on the idea, but it is basically on the back burner for the time being.
Daily Bell: At AFR, you believe it is best to just concentrate on the "Two Pillars Strategy" of tax and monetary reform. What kind of approach are you adopting to make this a reality?
Nelson Hultberg: To make this a reality, we plan to launch a vast array of Meetup Groups that are geared toward explaining the vital necessity of this strategy. Only with implementation of the "Two Pillars" of radical tax and monetary reform (a 10% equal-rate tax for all citizens and a 4% auto-expansion plan for the money supply) can government growth be brought under control. And only if government growth is brought under control, can freedom be saved.
Thus these two pillars of reform transcend all other political issues. The government's growth is dependent on the massive confiscatory taxes and currency debasement in which it partakes. To stop such tyrannical growth, these root causes of the problem must be addressed rather than evaded. This, the Republicans don't understand, which is why they can never be our answer. The Conservative American Party does understand it, though, which is why we are America's only hope. Teaching this to the grass roots of America is thus a major goal of the CAP.
Daily Bell: You told us that you are focused on positioning the Conservative American Party so that it receives the necessary 15% in the polls to qualify for the crucial national TV election debates. How is this going?
Nelson Hultberg: This is our most unique and innovative tactic. However, it requires one to think outside the box in regards to political parties and political campaigns. The Conservative American Party is not a conventional third-party. We realize that we can't challenge the tyrannization of America without telling the truth to the voters. But we can't tell the truth to the voters if immediate election victory is our goal. It will take time to convince the voters; it can't be done overnight.
Thus in order to effectively tell the truth about what is happening to the country, we have to do two things:
One. We have to first make it into the National TV Presidential Debates, which requires that we garner 15% in the polls. This will give us a podium in front of 70 million voters, which the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party cannot achieve because their platforms are structured to get only 1% in the polls. In other words, entrance into the debates will make us an effective source for truth to the voters.
Two. Once in the debates, however, we have to possess a strategy that will stop the disastrous growth of government and be salable to Americans in large enough numbers to eventually get 35% in an election, which will win in a three man race. This, the Two Pillars Strategy does for us.
Thus getting 15% in the polls is of paramount importance. It is the first step to "telling the truth" to 70 million American voters, which is the only way to restore the American Republic. This, the Republicans cannot do because they are obsessed with winning office immediately and must evade the truth at all cost. Not everyone grasps this at first, but once they read my book, The Conservative Revolution, they can see it and appreciate the revolutionary power of the strategy.
Daily Bell: What's your position on Internet attacks and invisible back-end censoring such as is going on currently in Britain? Is it effective? We think a new technology like the Internet is very hard to control.
Nelson Hultberg: I'm not so sure. China controls its Internet, and a future American mega-state could also. It seems to me that all the government has to do is regulate the ISPs and license them as they presently do with radio broadcasters and TV stations, imposing stiff fines and prison sentences for those who don't toe the government line, which is what takes place in China. This gives the government sufficient control over all recalcitrant ISPs. A future American dictatorship would emulate such policy. When the time comes to exert an authoritarian takeover, all ISPs could then be nationalized and made into state operated entities.
Thus I don't think it is wise to get too confident in the fact that we have a free Internet that is "difficult to control." Collectivists are incredibly resilient, obsessed, and ruthless. They believe they are the "benevolent good guys," and that we are the "selfish bad guys" in a profound morality play unfolding historically. This gives them their zeal and makes them doggedly persistent in their goals. So I believe that they will move to control the Internet in the upcoming years, and the present policies in China indicate that it can be done -- maybe not done easily, but done sufficiently to stifle the free exchange of ideas that are mandatory to sustain a free society.
The ultimate dream of the statists is to eventually control all of us by eliminating the use of cash and establishing a total credit card based economy run through the central bank. In this way, they can deny the power to purchase food and basic necessities to all who rebel. And this would include ISPs who defy government mandates.
Of course, a black market would naturally evolve to circumvent such regimentation, but such a market would be bleak and primitive. As I see it, a new Dark Ages of global corporatism in the manner of the 1970s movie, Rollerball, would evolve combined with desolate outback sectors of the world like we saw in Mad Max. Scattered but vicious gangs of renegades would populate the outback, while vast throngs of herd mentalities would accumulate in the controlled sectors of the world based upon regional governments like we saw in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Cashless economies, government provided bread and circuses, a subservient media, academy, and film industry would prevail. Access to basic goods and services, along with status and security, would be the magnets that gather billions into the controlled sectors. Privation and perpetual violence and turmoil, would be the repellents that keep inhabitants of the uncontrolled sectors at minimal levels.
Daily Bell: Do you have a position on "Net neutrality." We think the Internet ought to be subject to market forces, of course, though we have doubts whether a company like Google constitutes a "market" force, given its extensive linkages to government.
Nelson Hultberg: I haven't studied the issue of "Net neutrality." But I certainly agree that the Internet ought to be subject to market forces. The problem, as I see it, is that government will almost surely try to do to the Internet what it has done to the rest of the economy. We have "government managed money and business" today. Will we have a "government managed Internet" also? If so, I can't see it remaining a free arena of entrepreneurs in the marketplace. It will become a national asset, and if regional government develops to wipe out America's sovereignty, it will become a supra-national government asset.
Unless Americans and Europeans muster the will to oppose the authoritarian zeitgeist presently controlling our cultures and indoctrinating our children, the 21st century promises to be a dreadful descent into regional government that, in the words of Tocqueville, "compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people" until they are "reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."
The fact that there will be black markets and outback regions where rebels can go to be free will be of little consolation. It will be a hideous, primitive freedom ruled by gangs and anarchistic war lords. Unfortunately Murray Rothbard has bamboozled the libertarian movement into believing that such anarchy would be idyllic instead of Hobbsian.
Daily Bell: You made a good point during our last interview that America is probably the only place where there has been "extensive" free-market education that has taken place – all of it despite a system of governance and public schools that are increasingly hostile to such a perspective. Is this trend (a freedom focus) inexorable in your view? Some would argue that the logic of empire is inexorable. We have never thought so.
Nelson Hultberg: I try to think of nothing as "inexorable." Man is possessed of free will. He is also cursed with an alarming array of animalistic tendencies that drive him to blank out on the basic moral laws of civilization when he thinks it will benefit him. Witness our quislings in the Democratic and Republican parties, obsessed as they are with personal power, status and material wealth at the expense of America's founding principles. Thus it is not certain as to whether the freedom movement will continue to expand.
Human nature is the key here, and it is dual. Man has a marvelous capacity for heroism and high-minded achievement, but also an irremediable tendency to wallow in turpitude, deception, and ruin. No one knows how humans in general will react when the final stages of economic collapse are upon us. Will it be patriotically, or will it be slavishly? Will collectivism and the desire for personal entitlements shove aside the rights of man in the political arena? These are distinct possibilities because the past century's philosophical positivism in the schools has taught men and women a pernicious moral relativism, which has destroyed their belief in the fundamental morality that enshrined the values of self-reliance, charity, magnanimity, and equal rights. Do our citizens still possess the restraints and rectitude to function as high-minded humans who value freedom?
All these factors will be coalescing over the next 20 years as the world's economies continue to collapse. Will such a coalescence bring us the heroic side of man, or the ruinous side? The jury is obviously still out. Western civilization is not just breaking down monetarily and financially; it is undergoing a pervasive decay morally. This combine has the power to negate all the positives that we see around us today stemming from the Internet, the Ron Paul Revolution, the libertarian movement, etc.
I remain guardedly optimistic. I believe that there are, in every generation, heroic men and women who act as leaders. They are acutely intelligent and grasp the power of ideas in the unfolding of history. Consequently they act in ways that set an example for the masses to follow. Their natures drive them to fight for freedom, to place principle over popularity, and to strive for humility in face of the awesome perplexities of the human condition. It is to these men and women that I appeal, and for which the Conservative American Party has been formed. If America is to be saved, it will be because these natural patriots come to the barricades in large numbers to engage the enemy in Washington.
Daily Bell: America has been the focus of vast power-elite depredations in our view. The War Between the States was only the beginning of a concerted attack against what seems like every single important free-market verity. Yet today, the country is active as never before, seething with anti-government outrage, some of it rooted in the kind of literate free-market thinking that you espouse. Gun control has made little progress and monetary theories proposing alternative societal and economic viewpoints are more popular than ever. How is this possible?
Nelson Hultberg: It is possible because of several factors, one being the heroic independence of America's natural patriots. They have not succumbed to the brainwash of the public schools. Being contrarian by nature, they have sought answers outside the system, which they found in the works of Ludwig von Mises, Ayn Rand, Rose Wilder Lane, Henry Hazlitt, Richard Weaver, Paul Gottfried, G. Edward Griffin, John Hospers, Paul Johnson, Thomas Sowell, and others. The freedom of a civilization is dependent upon numerous factors, but most importantly upon the ideological stream that is produced through its ablest thinkers. And America and Europe produced a powerful array of thinkers starting back in the 1940s in rebellion to FDR's New Deal and its Keynesian monetary fraud. Will such a vibrant stream of ideas, however, lead to the passionate political activism necessary to bring down the elites in Washington and fashion a government based on rights rather than privileges? And will it do so in time? These questions are still in doubt.
Daily Bell: The collapse in confidence in the Obama administration is startling. Did they expect it?
Nelson Hultberg: Of course not. Remember these collectivist elites suffer the disease of immense hubris. They are so arrogant in the belief that they are indispensable to running the lives of working day Americans that they expected multitudes of voters to rise up in overwhelming gratitude for "blessing" the country with Obamacare. They genuinely think that we "hapless individuals" cannot take care of ourselves, that freedom is a primitive aberration sought only by troglodytes, and that without their sage and guiding hand, all of society would disintegrate into rapacious entrepreneurial criminality. This is a psycho-political pathology unrivaled in human history. It is a curse handed down to modernity by many warped thinkers over the past 200 years, but the four most important are Jean Jacques Rousseau, Auguste Comte, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes.
Daily Bell: Those involved in the conspiracy movement for lack of a better word anticipate some sort of military crackdown in America if the population begins seriously questioning the system. Do you agree with this? If not, why not? We think in part the widely publicized executive orders about emergency powers and "prison camps" built by Halliburton are a PR exercise. A way of trying to keep control via threat. We're not sure how realistic it all is. Do you believe a military takeover of the country is viable or realistic at this point?
Nelson Hultberg: I don't think any kind of military takeover is imminent, but I certainly do believe that it could come to that down the road if the unraveling of society proceeds in the manner that past nations with severe monetary crises have unraveled. Those media Pollyannas who believe Congress would heroically resist the Military-Bureaucracy-Banking complex in defense of Constitutional procedure are embarrassingly naïve regarding history and human nature. If the time comes when the elites believe their backs are sufficiently up against the wall, that we the people are not sufficiently obedient to maintain order, they will come down on us and our savings accounts like all brutal dictatorships of the past. They will attempt to squash us with currency controls, windfall profits taxes, devaluations, martial law, tanks in the streets, FEMA camps, whatever they, in their hubris, deem necessary to retain control of and shore up the banking / bureaucratic debt system.
To them, we are the enemy. We and our desire for profits, our disrespect for government, our desire to be left alone, our concern with our children over mankind, our individualism, our self-reliance are all thorns in the socks of social welfarism. It is we who must be bridled in order to save the system, not they and the theoretical insanities they have foisted upon our economy over the past 100 years.
Daily Bell: How is your latest book doing? Tell our readers about it once again and how they can find it.
Nelson Hultberg: It is doing quite nicely, thank you. We have a second printing coming up. And it has struck a real chord out in the heartland. For example, many buyers who buy one copy come back in two to three weeks to buy 5-10 copies so they can pass it out to their children, friends and neighbors. It's title is The Conservative Revolution: Why We Must Form a Third Political Party to Win It. Your readers can read a review and buy a copy of it if they CLICK HERE.
Daily Bell: Let's take a quick look at the larger political and economic scene. Your thoughts on the EU – is it unraveling?
Nelson Hultberg: I certainly hope so. It is the precursor to Orwell's regional governments, Oceania, Eurasia, and East Asia. If it turns out to be a success, then it's supporters here in the U.S. will be further emboldened to push its odious centralizing upon Canada, America, and Mexico.
The problem with the EU is that its demise will not come quickly. Again we are confronted with the resiliency of collectivism. Countries such as Greece and others in the Balkans may dropout over the next decade, but the primary coalition will probably limp along. This is the grotesque nature of bureaucracy. Once begun, it spreads over our lives like a psoriasis blanketing one's skin and becomes impossible to get rid of.
Because of this, the statists are working assiduously for such a union here in North America. The North American Union, the Independent Task Force on North America, and the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America all promote this scheme along with a new currency, the Amero, for our three countries. Conservative journalists such as David Frum smear those of us who are alarmed with such a sacrifice of American sovereignty as "conspiracy nuts," but that is because writers of his ilk have assumed the role of courtiers to the elites. They are the "pseudo-conservatives" who are willing to sell out the principles of the Founders in pursuit of personal celebrity.
How they think such a compromise of the American nation will benefit freedom, justice and mankind is beyond me. Dumbing American citizens down to the educational and cultural level of a gauche hoi polloi is devastating us individually in this country, and dumbing our nation down to the level of Central America will further the process in sickening ways.
Daily Bell: How is the austerity meme being received in the EU?
Nelson Hultberg: Very badly it appears. But this is the nature of the modern social welfare citizen. He has been taught to believe that his entitlements are rights, and when he must give them up or accept a decrease in them, he is outraged at the lords of government who have the audacity to demand such a thing.
Daily Bell: What about China? We think its financial underpinnings are far less healthy than advertised. Agree? Disagree? Why?
Nelson Hultberg: I agree. China has built its economic power on the backs of cheap labor and massive inflation. These are not permanencies to be counted on over the long run. China's workers will eventually sour on their lowly wages and rise up in protest, which will bring a disruptive crackdown by the rulers in Beijing. Most important, however, is the blindness that their monetary authorities have regarding currency inflation. They are no more immune to the laws of economics than we in the West are. They will pay for their adoption of the Keynesian myth just as we have. How long they have before they must pay, I couldn't begin to know. But pay they will.
Daily Bell: Are gold and silver going to continue to head up pricewise?
Nelson Hultberg: I believe they will rise as sure as saplings grow toward the sky to become mighty oaks. We are enjoying a powerful bull market in precious metals that has many years to run. It must extend because there is no way out for the world's governments from the dilemma of currency debasement in order to service their debts. As the world's investors begin to perceive the damage that this debasement brings to conventional investment vehicles such as bonds, massive monies must pour out of these havens and into the only money left on the planet that has stability -- gold and silver. I believe that the Dow and the price of gold will eventually reach a 1 to 1 ratio as they did back in 1980 when the price of gold reached $880 per oz. Only this time the price will be somewhere around $4,000 to $5,000 per oz.
Daily Bell: What do you expect in the near future, inflation or deflation?
Nelson Hultberg: I expect both deflation and inflation over the next 10 years. I think Franklin Sanders first coined the term "hyper-inflationary depression." That is what will probably unfold. John Williams of ShadowStats.com recently gave us a very prescient peek into the future, and he thinks that there will be such a combination of inflation and deflation. Edwin Vieira thinks so also. As does James Sinclair. These are not minds to be taken lightly.
The reason why such a scenario is the most probable outcome is that the debt situation is totally unserviceable here in the U.S. by taxation and borrowing. There must take place large doses of "quantitative easing," to use the despicable euphemism of the elites and their lackeys on Wall Street. It's either print massively, or declare bankruptcy, i.e., default on the debt. Well, Washington will no more default on the debt than Hillary Clinton will heap hosannas upon Ron Paul and his laissez-faire philosophy. Default would ruin America's ability to continue selling its Treasuries to a gullible world, which is totally unacceptable to the elites. Thus printing becomes the only option. They will, of course, try to stretch it out and try to withdraw liquidity intermittently with their new money injections. They will bring all the contrivance and gimmickry they can to their efforts. But print they will; and it will bring a wildly fluctuating gold market, but a market that moves steadily higher over the next 10 years.
There are those like Bob Prechter who think we will incur a protracted case of the Japanese disease and succumb to massive deflation. But in my opinion, they are overlooking the fact that Japan's crisis was nothing like ours. The Japanese had a serviceable debt through taxation and borrowing, and their citizens had huge reserves of savings, so they did not need to print large amounts of new money. Consequently they delayed printing for many years as their crisis was unfolding, and when they finally got around to it, it was too late. They were mired in an irreparable deflation.
But what is not grasped by the Keynesians is that the printing will not do any genuine good. Once a bust cycle begins, it must play itself out through liquidation of the overhanging debt that is stultifying the economy. I devote an entire chapter in my book to discussing this, and it's in layman's language. Only by clearing out all the malinvestment and excessive debt can the economy regain its strength and begin anew the growth cycle. Keynesians, with their propping up schemes for the dinosaur banks and corporations, can only delay this process and extend the misery. This is what FDR did during the 1930s, and it is what Bernanke & Co. are repeating. This is the power of ideology. If it is false, as is the case with Marxist-Keynesian ideology, it warps the minds of even those who are highly intelligent to where they grossly misperceive reality.
Bernanke has already indicated many times that he will not follow the path of delay as the Japanese did. And he backed up such indications in February of 2009 when the Fed monetized over $300 billion in Treasury bonds. So despite the fact that they will not do any good, more monetizations are coming as sure as Mexicans are coming north.
Daily Bell: We hold that in a fiat-money economy real deflation (a shrinkage of the "true" money supply in Austrian terms) is a difficult thing. Agree? Disagree?
Nelson Hultberg: I agree, but money has several definitions, so it depends on how we define it. Is it M1, or M2, or M3, or MZM? Also when we are talking about deflation of the money supply, we are talking about a quantitative shrinkage. You can still get the devastating effects of a deflation without "quantitative shrinkage" if the velocity of money slows down enough. This is what is taking place to some degree now in America, and it is outside the control of the Fed. Velocity of money is slowing because fear now consumes the people, and they have undergone a dramatic change of mood in which they refuse to borrow and spend in any substantial amounts. They are ignoring the credit offerings of the Fed in order to bring back fiscal sanity to their lives. They are holding onto their money. This is bringing us the effects of deflation, i.e., a severe recession that might morph into a depression.
But I think it can be safely said that as long as the money masters have badges on their chests, guns on their hips, and a printing press in their basement, they will use such powers. They will inflate. Thus full scale quantitative deflation in a modern economy is very difficult.
Daily Bell: Any other thoughts you want to add? Important points you want to make?
Nelson Hultberg: I would like to urge your readers to join our efforts and help promote the Conservative American Party to the nation over the upcoming years. Our film on the potential for a third-party revolution in America is in the process of being made, but we need help in getting it completed. So all patriots out there, please come to the film's website, view the trailer, listen to the script narration, and make a contribution. Our country needs this film to show how the Demopublicans are robbing us of our rights, our money, and our freedom. Come to www.SpoilerUSA.org.
For a further look at what the Conservative American Party is all about, visit the AFR website at www.afr.org and read our Mission Statement.
Daily Bell: Thank you for your time and efforts to support freedom. Good luck!


We've presented several interviews with Nelson Hultberg who in our opinion has truly brilliant libertarian/conservative insights. We think the interview speaks for itself. It deals with many of the pressing issues of today's events – including deflation, velocity of money, polity and philosophy. A true Renaissance person from our point of view. One quote from the very beginning of the interview leaps out at us though.
The Greek and Roman republics, the flowering of the late Middle Ages, the Elizabethan Age, Jefferson's Republic of States were but brief interludes. Tyrannical collectivism has dominated the societies of the world throughout history via the Pharaohs, the Caesars, the Byzantine Empire, the Inquisition, Rousseau and the Jacobins of the Enlightenment, Comte and Marx of the 19th century, the communists and fascists of the 20th century, up to the velvet glove totalitarians of the Nanny State today working so relentlessly to spread coercive egalitarianism to all mankind.
This could perhaps use some clarification. The periods of modern human society are not black and white perhaps but shades of gray – differing in various regions at various times. In other words, freer epochs blend into more totalitarian ones, and then back again. We believe we are headed into an epoch perhaps of increasing freedom, though of course we are aware that many others would hold an opposite point of view.
Nonetheless, we would like to point out that humankind's history is probably one of struggle between elites and those who are not. Without a time machine it is difficult to say exactly what took place when. But we are not so sure that the history of freedom throughout human history is quite so gloomy as it is made out to be. Just a thought.
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||


Posted by Avram on 08/24/10 07:45 AM
please see Click to view link ABOUT CMBS BOND AND THE JUNK BOND AVRAM
Posted by Dan on 08/23/10 08:55 PM
Excellent interview Bell.
"believe with Burke that "men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites."
Here, we come to the crux of a large problem.
The new U.N. bill for the protection of children would allow any child to demand redress by the authorities for any action by the parent that the child did not like.
The state would like to provide the inculcation and education for all children. Imagine the psychosis that would result if children were indoctrinated in state institutions to be later harvested by the corporatocracy. The state would destroy the family to eliminate any competing hierarchy.
1% of American adults are already in the prison system. What can we expect with further destruction of the family? Power corrupts and attracts the already-corrupted. With high-level corruption as a role model, what can we expect in general society? Just how much higher can our crime rate climb?
Do the elites expect to destroy all morality and still have a functioning society? We have many millions surviving on anti-depressants. We have hundreds of millions surviving on escapism.
The elites may be trying to perfect the "anthill society" [corporatocracy]. They may be trying to dumb-down and pacify the ants. Like Marx, they hope to accomplish their goals without providing any incentive. The USSR was a good role-model as to what results can be expected when you remove all incentive.
The elites can push and pull the economic levers. They can destroy morality and the family. They can kill billions and destroy economies. They can sift through all the ashes and they will NEVER find a viable collectivist phoenix.
Posted by BornConservative on 08/23/10 07:54 PM
I would ask Nelson what he thinks of the Rothschilds and their mysterious history? Does he really think it all started with Neitzschie or Marx? Seriously?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Don't think he goes there.
Posted by Tom Nacey on 08/23/10 07:01 PM
I just watched your trailer, Spoiler. I offer two thoughts.
First. I remember Ross Perot. He asked all the right questions. He pointed out the debt growth. He pointed out the balance of trade problems. He was right! I don't recall him ever offering any specific answers. Then it turns out that a lot of his money came from the same government contract spending that he was against. I know people who still think he was a democrat plant. Therefore, I am not sure that Ross Perot is the example you want to follow.
Second. About the debate itself: How do you know that 15% in the polls will get you into the debates? What stops them from changing the rules? How about you get into the debates and they don't ask you any questions? Or, they give the other candidates 10 minutes to answer questions like, "What will you do to strengthen the American economy?", and you get 10 seconds to answer,"What do you think of UFO's?" I watched as Ron Paul got a question about fencing Canada after Julianni (sp?) got 20 minutes to talk about terrorism.
I just watched Peter Schiff get totally ignored by the media in Conneticut, frozen out of every story, so a wrestling promoter could be nominated for the Republican senate seat. I fear the process is so corrupt that the American people will never again be offered a real choice of governance.
Note: Actually, Linda McMahon is a perfect candidate and accurately reflects our political system. Her wrestlers pretend to be in opposition to each other amid lots of lights and hoopla even though they work for the same people.
Reply from The Daily Bell
"I know people who still think he was a democrat plant."
Then there is this from a FreeRepublic poster:
Click to view link
"To: rface
Those who voted for Perot gave us Hillary now. I firmly believe that Perot was a fraud and a setup. He had some grudge against the Bushes, and Clinton used that. Perot also stood to make a ton of money from big government, as his company processed all the data from welfare programs. And, as McCain said, he was nuttier than a fruitcake.
Not surprised that Perot's shiny dome has popped up again in this race. Hillary is using all her go-to guys to take out Obama, and then will concentrate on whoever the GOP nominates.
42 posted on January 17, 2008 5:11:47 PM GMT-02:00 by Defiant (Hillary needs Obama in the race to make it seem she has experience by comparison.)
Posted by Samuel Adams, Jr. on 08/23/10 06:15 PM
David A has a point:
History shows government is NOT to be trusted with power. If checks and balances are ignored long enough, the pressure must release in some manner.
As much as Nelson Hultberg is correct is his critique of collectivism, he's way off track on his solution.
He thinks in terms of policy points & ways of tinkering with the bureaucracy (switch this tax rate; tweak this one, etc), and this is purely diversionary, considering the moral crisis of our times.
The last thing we need is one more political party " what is needed are honest & courageous individuals who press their God given Rights with gentle ferocity " who look evil in the eye and refuse to blink.
An armed society is a polite society. Good must resist evil.
You seem to agree with that, no ?
The difficulty lies in not that Principle, but it's application:
What is a citizen's duty when their own government become Lawless & turn aggressive towards their Unalienable Rights ?
According to our Declaration of Independence,
"...when a long train of abuses by that entity can be shown to be acting to reduce them under Click to view link is their (our) right, and their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security...."
Words of sedition ? No, words of Wisdom & Warning.
We desire a peaceful end to the tyranny " therefore we must discuss & persuade " and take effective action, and that must, at some point, include sanctions if our Liberties are continually violated.
Did you guys notice, from your view in the Alps there, the full court press to crush the Liberty movement, during the 2008 election ?
I mean the collectivist drubbing our champion, Dr. Ron Paul received, when despite support from millions of us " the media & both party higher-ups shut down all coverage " in effect denying us our right of speech & representation.
Dr. Paul has been proven prophetically correct by ensuing events.
He has more supporters than ever. More than half of those I tried to convince to support him in '08 (but didn't) have since come to me & confessed that he was so right on, that they won't consider supporting anyone else BUT Dr. Paul this time 'round. AMAZING !
But, will the power brokers deny him & us our rights coming up in 2012 ?
Time will tell.
Both parties are but opposing wings on the same bird of prey. They simply play on opposing fears, and loot everyone in the middle.
One thing is sure: If the elites pull more dirty tricks, they will reap as they have sowed, from from an angry citizenry.
State Secession Movements are gaining steam.
here: Click to view link
Firearms Freedom Acts " states allowing their citizens & companies to manufacture & sell 'in-state' guns, free from Federal Controls, already passed in Tennessee, Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, Utah & Idaho.
The citizen sovereigns are waking from their slumber & do their duty, under God.
Please tell Mr. Hultberg if he'd like to be one of America's 'Re-Founding Fathers', there is plenty of room in the "Campaign for Liberty " Patriots In Action Division".
To weed out Armchair Theorists and "summer soldier & sunshine patriots",
Mr. Hultberg could prove his worth to be a leader if he dares to become a trained Rifleman at one of our numerous Appleseed Shoots.
Click to view link
The real Patriot is one who can think & act bravely:
"The greater difference a nation puts between it's fighting men & it's thinking men, the more it will be led by leaders who are cowards, and fighters that are fools."
Thank you for your past support of Dr. Ron Paul & Free Market Principles. Remember, Our Essential Liberty, is a complete package, not just ala carte !
Samuel Adams, Jr.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thank you for the post and all you do. Ron Paul is a great man. Nelson Hultberg has been slaving away in the vinyards of freedom for almost as long. Just for the record, the Daily Bell does not endorse violence.
Posted by Bill Ross on 08/23/10 04:28 PM
DB: "The problem is getting them to stick."
Yep, as may oldest daughter quickly discovered when she struck out on her own to seek freedom from my "oppressive" rules / responsibility:
Freedom IS NOT FREE. Your freedom is directly proportional to the responsibility you assume. Your rights are directly proportional to the degree with which you are willing to defend.
Now, she's just as anal as me...
Posted by David A. on 08/23/10 04:24 PM
Daily Bell:
Good for you. I think it is always wrong to initiate violence, too.
Q: Was the American War for Independence morally right, given your stance ?
Were your own countrymen right to promise Hitler & his troops a Just Response " if they set foot upon Swiss soil ?
(The story goes, as you are likely aware " "During WW2, a German general was being told of the might of the Swiss Citizen Militia, of their ability to muster 500,000 men at arms for National defense.
The German general replied: 'Very impressive " but what will you Swiss do if Germany decides to invade with our Million Man Army !? The Swiss Militia commander replied: 'Well, then all of our men would have to fire twice !")
But seriously,
How are good men to respond to aggressors, then ?
This is the fundamental moral dillema " If one foreswears violence of any type, under any circumstance, is he not allowing, even approving of unremitting violence of predatory men upon innocents ?
Friends, I'm not trying to argue here, I mean this question in all due respect.
Best Regards, David A. Texas Republic
Reply from The Daily Bell
Most would defend themselves against violent aggression aimed at one's family and one's society. We cannot deny it, nor would we try.
But generally, large societies are better changed by persuasion and protest than violence - which leads to unexpected results that history shows us are usually are not good.
-----
Q: Was the American War for Independence morally right, given your stance ? Answer: Canada.
Were your own countrymen right to promise Hitler & his troops a Just Response " if they set foot upon Swiss soil ? Answer: One is surely entitled to defend one's culture, land and family from real and present dangers (not ones created by demagogues).
Posted by Bill Ross on 08/23/10 04:15 PM
@Noone
Now you're cooking...
The reason that order comes from chaos is that non-linear (discontinuous functions) systems seek the closest "attractor", a stable state of affairs which is as close to steady state as possible, where "balance of powers" is maintained between opposing tendencies. This has to do with the energy available to the system. In the absence of perturbations (additional energy), there is no energy available to sustain chaotic behavior. A steady state must be found. If there is no steady state attractor solution, the system just runs down, dissipating whatever energy it has, becoming inert.
Our far wiser ancestors were far from stupid. They KNEW that stability and peace is required for any civilization (peaceful trade for mutual self-interest). They KNEW that civilization is a non-linear dynamic system (different terminology, of course) and that it was intolerant of perturbations (criminal predations).
For this reason, the scales of justice DOES NOT MEAN: a bunch of pompous self-decreed intelligent a**holes weighing the facts / opinion and coming up with what they choose as a "moral" opinion. Justice is blind because it is not concerned with opinion (rule of man). It is concerned solely with "balance of power" (hence the scales) between conflicting viewpoints where all have equal powers and basic right to "choose to live". Note: does not mean entitled to be provided with the requirements of life, at the expense of others, just the opportunity to choose to live.
And, for completeness, the downed sword of "lady justice", stands idle, unused and unnecessary UNTIL someone initiates aggression or causes harm.
In other words, the "rule of law" prevents chaos. When it is absent, we have chaos, because criminals are tolerated to perturb the system (disturb the peace), with impunity:
Click to view link
Just as is happening NOW...
Posted by Bill Ross on 08/23/10 03:46 PM
DB: "We have trouble envisioning a brand "new" form of governance anyway."
The veracity of Buckminister Fuller: "To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."
Is the advice I operate on and, is also the reason that the internet has removed a crucial lever of central command and control: a unified, restricted vision (collective delusion) of reality, maintained by subverted MSM gatekeepers controlling a dinosaur method of information dispersal. They are extinct unless they join the new paradigm. Murdoch knows... THINK about it:
Click to view link
It is only a matter of time before elites cry "uncle". We won't hear them, of course. We will just see the "rule of law" "rediscovered" as elites realize, without it, they have zero hope of saving their skins, let alone wealth. With objective law, at least they have a chance:
Click to view link
Let the elite betrayals, blame shifting and finger pointing begin...
Reply from The Daily Bell
Fine. But we would argue such concepts as you and others advance are not new. The problem is getting them to stick.
Posted by David A. on 08/23/10 01:30 PM
Posted by Jacob on 8/22/2010 5:51:19 PM, Jacob wrote:
....The power elite have possessed one weapon throughout history that has made their predation of the masses nearly 100% successful: willingness to threaten and employ violence.
.....The schoolyard bully never stops until he's taken down.
Who will take him down? Who will take the next bully down? It seems to never end.
War is the [violence] tool that enables the power elite to establish and maintain that threshold of fear required to pacify, neutralize and feed, feed being the operative word.
I have searched for non-violent measures. I see none. Mohandas Ghandi comes to mind, but today's predation is so much more sophisticated and cunning.
I'm plumb out of ideas. END OF QUOTE
Jacob, you are not alone.
We The People, the sleeping giant, are waking up. This interview, & resulting conversation are a key part of that process.
The apathy of the common man (someone above pointed this out already...) is the strength of these elites.
Lose the apathy & fears and they lose their power.
The answer to your quandry is in your own example:
Use your own metaphor of the playground bully.
Who will take him down ?
The first person who decides to put himself at a genuine risk, despite his fears & demand justice, that's who !
If we show fear, it shows we think we are the keepers of our own lives, and we are not, in the ultimate sense.
God, the God of Justice, the the keeper of ALL our lives.
Stand in His strength, and stand firm.
No mealy mouthed, wimpy, limp wristed phony 'churchianity' here !
Point is, True Faith is about Justice, first, then mercy.
The order of Principle is laid out in Micah 6:8; see the whole context.
Our duty is "....to DO Justice & LOVE mercy, and walk humbly with our God..."
No Arrogance, but also no Fear, when we do this.
Just powerful righteous confidence.
Mercy will flow in plentiful supply to those who do JUSTICE first, but don't forget that they, and others need mercy.
Even the bully needs mercy " but he must be shown Justice first " knocked on his Butt by the principed, fearless man who is risks self-sacrifice.
The pacificism of Ghandi worked for it's setting " he knew the British mind (despite it's overlay of tyranny) operated from broadly Christian Principles, and their conscience KNEW that murder was a serious moral wrong.
Thus, British troopers & commanders Consciences' would be pricked & eventually refuse to slaughter innocent, unarmed Indian citizens.
Ghandi, wisely, and understanding the Christian & British mindset, forced the British into acting consistent with their ingrained Moral Principles.
Had he tried that with Hitler's German War Machine, likely, they'd have rolled their tanks right over him & his countrymen.
How does this apply to our situation ? Our would be enslavers can only prevail if they think we are apathetic & asleep " we wake up " as the TEA party movement proves, they feel fear.
On 9-12-09, almost 2 million TEA party protestors showed up in DC " no overall organizer " the big O was out of town (yeah, right) " The Congressional leaders of both parties were in town, but out of sight !
It put the FEAR into them.
Of course, our US media lied about the #'s " Even the 'conservative' Faux news only admitted 10's of thousands " Only the British media admitted approx 2 million (US Park Police agreed with this #, but very quietly.)
As Thomas Jefferson said: "It is best if the leaders KNOW the people retain the spirit of resistance, and the best insurance of that is for people to take arms..."
If you are armed, you are bulwark against tyranny. Only slaves can't be armed. There is a growing number of Americans who are pressing their rights to resist tyranny " with guns if & when necessary.
I see this as a healthy sign.
The playground bully you cited is only tough when unopposed " his (false) confidence cracks the moment a Principled person returns his unjust threats upon him.
Even if not immediately defeated, just the simple act of one outraged person WILLING to fight the bully, gives vast strength to the others " they now KNOW that they can be victorious " and his game is nearly over.
At the metaphysical level, fear must give way to Faith " Faith that Justice wins over evil & injustice every time someone employs it.
It's just seldom employed, as we've become conditioned sheep " following each other by repeating the same fears.
Those who generated our heritage of Liberty on these shores faced & defeated that same fear. The Colonial militia was tiny & sparsley supplied, compared to the might of the British Regulars.
Yet their righteous outrage at the abrogation of their 'Inalienable God granted rights', plus their skill with Rifles at 200 yards , routed the British on 19 April 1775.
This 'playground bully' was routed, (at the cost of many Colonial lives), and in time sent packing " Liberty was won.
Today, there are millions who possess the same Spirit, the same skills.
The media hope you NEVER learn of them " but I'll tell you.
They're called the "3 percenters", or "3 % er's" or just simply 'III- we are everywhere '
I ran across their creed, and admire it.
Found here: Click to view link
The Doctrine of the Three Percent.
The Three Percent are the folks the Founders counted on to save the Republic when everyone else abandoned it.
And we will.
There will be no more free Wacos and no more free Katrinas.
For we are the Three Percent.
We will not disarm.
You cannot convince us.
You cannot intimidate us.
You can try to kill us, if you think you can.
But remember, we'll shoot back .
We are not going away.
We are not backing up another inch.
And there are THREE MILLION OF US.
Your move, Mr. Wannabe Tyrant.
Your move.
END QUOTE
There is an organization to help train Americans to be a nation of Riflemen " I've told their motivational story of 19 April 1775 " 'The Revolutionary War Veterans Association'.
They have shoots & training in most states & regions. Great fun " women & children shoot free " Volunteer, expert instructors:
Click to view link
(The Appleseed Effort is akin to the Swiss Citizen Militia that has keep that people free of invasion for Click to view link was the one tiny, courageous nation that Hitler feared !
All because the Swiss KNEW the evil men don't want to meet God " but it's a polite thing to offer to make the introduction, just the same.)
Sorry so long " lots to unpack here " God bless our Republic !
Reply from The Daily Bell
The Daily Bell does not advocate violence as a solution to sociopolitical and economic issues.
Posted by Noone on 08/23/10 12:55 PM
Order can come from chaos.
The quote below is from Theory, Justice, and Social Change, Theoretical Integrations and Critical Applications by Christopher Williams and Bruce Arrigo. A part of the book is posted at
Bertalanffy's (1968) general systems theory was a pioneering step toward understanding the emergence of order from chaos. According to Bertalanffy, there are two basic states that define a system's behavior: steady and transformative. The transformative state ensues when the system is perturbed to such an extent that its parameters (i.e. those mechanisms in place to maintain its steady state) are unable to successfully manage the disorder. These perturbations which propel the system into a transformative state are, ultimately, positive influences.
The state of imbalance forces the system to regain some degree of control by assuming a different, more flexible position. In other words, the transformative state is a "passageway to a more adaptive steady-state" (Butz, 1994: 692). We note that the trasformative state is always but a temporary state of disorder giving rise to a new, more effective, order.
In the late 1960's, Ilya Prigogine engineered a pioneering study in non-linear dynamics and found that disorderly systems tend toward the production of order rather that ascending into further chaos. His subsequent text, Order Out of Chaos (Prigogine and Stengers, 1964), examined the chaotic behavior of complex systems and disclosed the natural order that emerges above and beyond any imposed order that may have defined the system. The order-out-of-chaos thesis developed in non-linear dynamics systems theory has become one of the defining characteristics of the field as we know it today. In exploring the adaptive capacities of systems in a state of disorder (often referred to as "far-from-equilibrium" conditions). Prigonine and Stengers realized the emergence of a certain pattern. In short, steady systems were sufficiently organized adaptively to meet the current needs of the system. Under different conditions, however, such steady states would be "knocked off balance," forcing the system into a state of disorder. The stability of the system was increasingly lost until, if not re-stabilized, the system reached a point of chaos. The importance of their work rests not so much on their empirical findings describing the onset of chaos, but, rather, on what they found followed this chaos. They found that when a system was disturbed (i.e., propelled into far-from-equilibrium conditions) it did not break down into complete disarray. In fact, the system was much more likely to evolve into a higher, more adaptive capacity (Butz, 1994: 694). In other words, a new state of stability self-organized from the chaos.
Posted by Frederik on 08/23/10 12:37 PM
What all of the above authors and writers seem to discard from their thinking is, that the all overpowering force in human behaviour is GREED. The utopian ideas about the achievement of happiness for mankind,i.e. religion and communism, are dead and buried.
The present human condition has to live with almost seven
billion global inhabitants, spread over many different civilisa-
tions. The "Western" civilisation, or Anglo-American one, anchored in the "Magna Charta" and the "Constitution of the USA", has brought mankind the credo: "What do I get for my buck ?".
Sadly enough, the buck's value is almost gone. Considering the fact that 85% of the world's population is not anchored in "Western" civilisation, raises the question about the validity of the ideals written into the constitutions of 15% of the global
population, in the near future. Utopists always hope.
Posted by Marilyn Byrd on 08/23/10 10:17 AM
After a thorough study during 50 years, I reached the exact conclusions of Mr. Hultberg's. I at last have found my party.
Posted by Weeble on 08/23/10 05:35 AM
The whole thing got picked up on the spellchecker. it should have read:
"....in my extraordinarily humaritarian-with-a-guillotinian, Randianistic, pacifi-narchistic memolatarianismic musing philosophy."
That "Memolatry" word has been running around my head all weekend, and has finally fallen down the memory hole.
Posted by Rolland Carpenter on 08/23/10 12:46 AM
It's great to see a young (younger than I am) intellectual movement the DB is helping to advance. But please don't credit the PE with adhering to any social or economic theory.
Fidel Castro is an excellent example of how "Marxism" actually works. Yet it seems reasonable to the masses--even today. The same is true with calling America's economic destruction "Keynesian Economics". Maybe the limited period government deficit spending still is a semi-credible theory. A country having over 50 consecutive yeara of deficits can hardly call it's mongrel politicalization by any theoretical name.
I was again disappointed with the NYT article concluding fear of risk is the reason so many have given up on the stock market. Please! If we didn't already know Wall Street was extracting any amount they could from small investor transactions, they surely know it now.
Terms lik naked short sellin, front running, pump and dump have almost gone uncriticized. Editorials condeming "greed" or even "excessive greed" is about as far as our headline analysts will go in describing the ongoing fraud, that more recently includes direct raids on the secretive Fed and US Treasury--its insiders passing funds to their hands by the hundreds of billions tell us they had to save those "Too Big To Fail".
Posted by Weeble on 08/22/10 11:38 PM
I read some of the Alternative Economy site and have deduced that it is simple barter, or more fiat currency. That is illegal in the US of A, even though there may be a loophole (fiat paper, not coins). It would be shut down in the blink of an eye if it caught on. The IRS has guns now...
I think R Buckminster Fuller would brush that one off if he were alive today. Let the current economy fail is what I say. Actually encourage its failure is optimal, in my extraordinarily humaritarian-with-a-guillotinian, Randianistic, pacifici-narchistic memolatarianisimic musing philosophy.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Ha, is this a word? "Memolatarianisimic ..."
Posted by Bruce Colley on 08/22/10 11:25 PM
My comment that was referenced above was not directed at the idea of a new form of governance but at an economic model (designed, online, operational and ready for implementation) which can operate in parallel within any existing national economy (assuming lack of government interference) but free of the constraints, corruption and ruinous Keynesian philosophy which seems to permeate almost every national economy.
Posted by Lila Rajiva on 08/22/10 10:40 PM
@DB
Re Bruce Colley's observation and cite from Buckminster Fuller,
A higher level of order has to be envisioned from where the lower level problem no longer exists or is bypassed. A machine can only understand a machine less complex than itself.
Reply from The Daily Bell
We have trouble envisioning a brand "new" form of governance anyway.
Posted by Bruce Colley on 08/22/10 10:33 PM
While I admire Mr. Hultberg's intelligence and insights, he is no doubt aware of the obstacles he is facing in establishing a new political party in light of the entrenched interests of the existing wealthy, powerful, and corrupt political parties. He might consider the advice of someone who was perhaps equally or even more insightful and intelligent than himself: "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." " Richard Buckminster Fuller
Fuller would not have a "strategy of incrementalism". I think that he would design an entirely new system which would enable intelligent people of conscience to disengage from the old order and start with a clean slate (nonviolently, of course). Such an idea is espoused in a concept called The Alternative Economy.
( Click to view link )
Reply from The Daily Bell
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."
This is a very interesting observation.
Posted by John Danforth on 08/22/10 10:17 PM
Thank you all for your great input.
@Jacob:
They need us, and we don't need them. Nobody puts up much resistance as long as they can live their lives in relative peace. But now, they have overdone it, screwed the pooch so to speak. The results of their blundering is causing them to lose the apathy of the common man which is their main strength. That's why they are justifiably alarmed that millions of people are getting involved for the first time. They cannot enslave us all. They dare not try it. It's too late in the game for them to try that. We just need to watch out for people with dangerous ideas who will attempt to seize the opportunity to grab power. I see the article here as a warning. I am comforted by the responses.
|
|



l 











