Editorial
Remobilize Gold to Save the World Economy
An open letter to Paul Volcker, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, 1979-1987; Chairman of President Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, presented to him, in person, last year.
Dear Paul:
In 35 years our paths have crossed for the second time. In 1974/75 you and I were Visiting Fellows at Princeton University. Now, in 2009, both you and I are attending the Santa Colomba Conference on the present debt crisis at the invitation of Bob Mundell.
In 1975 you conducted a seminar on the international monetary system and invited me to contribute a paper on gold which I did. Those were halcyon days by comparison. The United States, after the turbulence of 1971, successfully consolidated the international position of the dollar and could confidently lift the 42-year old ban on the ownership and trading in gold. On December 31, 1974, trading of gold futures contracts started in New York and Chicago. It showed a robust contango at full carrying charge, that is to say, the gold basis (the spread between the futures and the cash price) was at its peak. It indicated that monetary gold was available in great abundance to meet any demand for any reason. It showed that the gold futures markets could serve as the fulcrum in seeking out the equilibrium between the supply of and demand for gold. They could act as a safety valve, releasing occasional pressures that, in the absence of paper gold, may be a threat to the monetary system. It looked as if the gold problem has been solved for once and all.
But as I feared, and as the intervening 35 years have proved, rather than moving towards equilibrium we have been constantly moving ever farther away from it, as measured by the gold basis. The secular vanishing of the gold basis is a most ominous danger signal. It indicates that monetary gold is increasingly unavailable, and in case of a crisis it can no longer be relied upon to come to the rescue. Basis started out at 100 percent of the prevailing interest rate, but has been steadily eroding all the way to zero percent today. Permanent gold backwardation (negative gold basis) is staring us in the face. The gold basis is trying to tell us something. It heralds the greatest monetary crisis of all times. It warns about the possible collapse of the international monetary and payments system.
Let me explain. Gold is the only ultimate extinguisher of debt. Other extinguishers do, of course, exist but they are not ultimate in that they have a counterpart in the liability column of the balance sheet of someone else. Gold has no such liability attached. Gold is where the buck stops. It is this property that makes gold unique as a financial asset. Historically, gold discharged its function as the ultimate extinguisher of debt through the gold clauses written into the bonds of the U.S. government before 1933. Gold could also discharge this function, albeit rather imperfectly, under the gold exchange standard of 1934 with gold redeemability limited to foreign holders. It could still work under the system of fluctuating gold price introduced in 1971, thanks to the availability of paper gold. Imperfect as though these stratagems were, they served as a pacifier to the bond market. But as the threat of permanent backwardation indicates, all offers to put monetary gold at the disposal of the international monetary system could be abruptly withdrawn. In that event there would be no ultimate extinguisher of debt. The world is totally unprepared for such a momentuous development. I ask: are there contingency plans in the U.S. Treasury and in the Federal Reserve what to do if backwardation makes monetary gold unavailable for the indirect retirement of debt?
The message to debt holders would be: suave qui peut. There would be a rush to the exit doors and people would trample one another to death in trying to get out. The debt crisis of 2008 was a dress rehearsal. It gave the world a foretaste. This crisis is a gold crisis. It is a crisis indicating the threat of a shortage of the ultimate extinguisher of debt, without which our runaway debt tower is doomed. When it topples, it will bury the world economy under the rubble, as the Twin Towers buried the people working inside in 2001.
All kinds of ad hoc explanations have been offered for the debt crisis. But the real explanation is that under the threat of gold backwardation creditors are scrambling for liquidity. There will be no recovery unless provision is made for the orderly retirement of debt through a mechanism using gold as the ultimate extinguisher. The alternative is a Great Depression worse than that of the 1930's. To understand this we have only to contemplate the shock to the world if it was all of a sudden revealed that the debt of the U.S. government was in fact irredeemable. The Emperor is naked. As long as bonds carry a gold clause, or the bond market is supported by the trading of paper gold, bonds are deemed redeemable. But once permanent backwardation makes monetary gold unavailable, debt becomes irredeemable in the eyes of the bondholders. Paying U.S. bonds at maturity in F.R. notes does not establish redeemability. The latter is just evidence of debt secured by the former as collateral. This reveals that bonds are not really redeemable at all. At maturity, an interest-bearing bond is replaced by non-interest-bearing debt, that is, by an inferior instrument. All you do is shuffle various forms of irredeemable debt. When the world wakes up to this prestidigitation, the international monetary system will not be able to survive the shock-waves. The chaos that will engulf the world is appalling.
The solution is evident. The world's monetary gold should be remobilized. This can be accomplished by opening the U.S. Mint to the free and unlimited coinage of gold. There should be no attempt to fix, cap, or otherwise control the dollar price of gold. The gold coins of the United States ought to be made available to bondholders in order to provide for an orderly retirement of debt, if that is what the bondholders want. When they become convinced that this avenue is open to them through the unlimited availability of gold coins of the realm, the scrambling for liquidity will peter out and stability return. If other great nations wanted to join, and open their Mints to the free and unlimited coinage of gold, so much the better. It should not be beyond the power and the wit of the U.S. government to rein in this crisis and make a decisive move in the direction of full recovery through opening the U.S. Mint to gold, as demanded by the Constitution.
Gold is a great world resource. It would be foolish if, for parochial or ideological reasons we failed to enlist it in the cause of economic development and stabilization — even in the absence of a great crisis. But given the present unprecedented crisis, remobilization of gold is imperative.
Yours very sincerely,
Antal E. Fekete
..........
Volcker: "The financial system is broken." In a bleak assessment delivered on September 23, 2010, he also said, among other things, that the financial system is as broken today as it was in 2008. The real economy was in disequilibrium, and that's why it is so difficult to get out of this recession. He was chastising banks and CEO's, he trashed regulators and inept business schools. He had a broadside on the Fed; he bombed money market funds.
In fact, Volcker spared no one in his broad critique — except himself. He was present at the Camp David meeting, as the Undersecretary of the U.S. Treasury for Monetary Affairs that, where the decision was made to default on the international gold obligations of the United States, as announced by president Nixon on August 15, 1971, almost forty years ago.
Volcker still does not see the connection between that fateful decision and the present crisis. Once you remove gold from the international monetary system and prevent its rehabilitation, as the U.S. has been doing it through chicanery, duplicity, and arm-twisting, you have in fact removed confidence, and prevented its return, to international relations. It started as a slow process as it was turning the granite at the foundations into putty. It took forty years, but it has happened. Volcker still does not see that, and he still could not bring himself to uttering a word about gold in his assessment of the crisis at the 13th annual International Banking Conference.
..........
Volcker: "The financial system is still at risk!" Yes, indeed, and only bringing gold back as the ultimate extinguisher of debt into the international financial system will change that.
If the United States government hasn't got the moral fiber to admit its past mistakes, and make the necessary changes to correct them, then other countries will bypass it, as will history. Then the United States can join the Club of Disgraced Empires, and the U.S. dollar can join the garbage heap of worthless fiat currencies of history, right next to the Zimbabwe dollar.
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Gary G. Golay on 09/27/10 03:44 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
CAPS OFF!
Posted by William on 09/26/10 10:28 PM
Just to be clear, I believe the end game of TPTB is to institute financial panic and ...surprise, they'll then be there with a "solution". That will be a worldwide central bank (i.e. the Fed on a global level), and a new bogus fiat currency. Along side of this will be a bevy of new taxes and regulations (and for sure a bias against gold) covering the nations of the world who (in their desperation) embrace the new Central Bank and its new fiat currency solution.
A banksters wet dream come true to be sure.
Doubt me? ... then consider this.
Do you really think Ben Bernanke sets monetary policy all by himself? Remember, the Fed is a PRIVATE entity. That means it has owners (and no, I don't mean the 13 regional banks that 'supposely' compose the Fed).
After all, keep digging down and you'll find that behind it all those layers are individuals, the owners (and WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE). These folks who operate behind the scene are the movers & shakers behind US government policy (and likely the EU too).
They are the ones calling the shots and giving Ben (and timmy and BO) their marching orders. They control the US Government because they have bought off the politicians with campaign donations (bribes) via the significant holdings they have in major corporations and the leverage (and anonymity) that gives them.
I would say that PM believers still have the bulk of the fight ahead of them. The banking oligarchs will not easily let go of the power fiat gives them and go quietly into the night. Indeed, that is why the US is becoming more of a police state with every passing day.
Posted by Lila Rajiva on 09/26/10 06:32 PM
You write: "fiat money is NOT the problem"
Not sure what you mean. Fiat, meaning by legislative order, unbacked and without competition.
Surely that IS the problem.
Posted by Bionic Mosquito on 09/26/10 01:23 PM
"So a justified question is how gold under a gold standard could take care of that economic growth, if gold's own yearly growth is less than 2%."
Who says real economic growth should be something other than 2%?
In any case, what would happen is prices stay stable or slightly go down year after year. This incentivizes savings, which is required for investment, which is required for productivity improvement, which is required for an improved standard of living.
If there is some fallacy in this chain of natural outcomes, I am open to hear it. I am only not open to the idea that spending and consumption produces wealth. A more laughable idea in economics cannot be imagined (well, maybe there are worse), but it isn't so laughable because we all suffer consequences from this joke.
I am also not open to a monetary standard controlled by a few wise men. We have seen the results of this countless times in history. The burden of proof rightly falls on those who deem this better than a market driven standard.
Let general prices stay stable or slightly come down, and the world would generate wealth (in all forms, not just financial) far beyond anything we can comprehend today.
Posted by Peter J. Ritter on 09/26/10 04:27 AM
1. Paper money racketeers who profit from fiat money. They will use any excuse to avoid a new gold standard.
2. Those who say a gold standard limits and constricts economic growth.
This group is split into A B. A actually belongs into Group 1 who uses the limited economic growth arguments as excuse, whether it is really true or not.
B truly believes that the argument is true. And there is a kernel of truth there. Gold mining grows less than 2 percent per year. But economic growth can be much higher than that at times. So a justified question is how gold under a gold standard could take care of that economic growth, if gold's own yearly growth is less than 2%.
Comprehensive answers are still outstanding. Part of it could be revaluation of gold when it runs short. But how long can you revaluate?
Another part is the Real Bills Doctrine. But more clarity is required.
Posted by Acudoc on 09/26/10 02:07 AM
"It would have those hoarding all the gold now, holding all the cards, and they know it, that's why they want it. It would devastate the debt based economies, ruining millions of little people in the process. there is simply not enough gold to go around, those holding it realize that, making them the new power elite."
Return to a gold standard would indeed cause the price of gold to go through the roof, and the people "hoarding all the gold now" would be in a position of advantage. But in order to enjoy that gold, they would have to spend it, and therein lies the beauty: once they spend it, it leaves their hands and they lose control of it. In our present system we must wait around until someone goes to the money masters for a "loan", which then causes money to circulate, but when that loan is repaid, the money is extinguished and we must go through the process again and again. We don't have a stand-alone money so we can never wrest control from the issuers of money.
The idea that there is "simply not enough gold to go around" overlooks the natural adjustments in price that could occur. I think it was in the pre-Revolutionary War period that a paper inflation occurred in Massachusetts (?), an inflation which rectified itself very quickly when the offending paper script was removed from circulation and a gold and silver money system re-constituted itself.
Reply from The Daily Bell
"But in order to enjoy that gold, they would have to spend it, and therein lies the beauty: once they spend it, it leaves their hands and they lose control of it."
The more they spend, the more the price goes down! It is likely impossible to have a manipulated monopoly for any length of time in a truly free market.
Posted by Philip Mccormack on 09/26/10 01:55 AM
Similarly he feels that silver will be necessary for small change. Read the archive in TDB by Dr Edwin Vieira-superb. Paul Volker has had his chance more than once to stop financial markets going into chaos. Go to Click to view link its a great site an education and free. He would like people to understand the Real Bills Doctrine and at the same time read his wonderful theory of interest and more.Happy days Philip
Reply from The Daily Bell
Yes, in a truly free-market economy, gold and silver are used together historically. It is the people's protection. Any change in the ratio lets people know that the powers-that-be are trying to tamper with one metal or the other ...
Posted by Jim Stanley on 09/26/10 01:23 AM
Click to view link
The American dream is now officially a financial nightmare.
Posted by Peter J. Ritter on 09/26/10 01:20 AM
... there is simply not enough gold to go around, those holding it realize that, making them the new power elite...."
That is exactly true, there is not enough gold... now and under current circumstances. But that can be changed. 1. Gold would have to be valued at anywhere from $10K-50K/oz. to carry world trade.
2. The big (private) gold hoards in the world (that were obtained thru abuse of the predatory paper money system) would have to be confiscated and channeled into the economy and to the people. That would prevent the same SoB's who profited from the creation of the paper money racket to float to the top again under a new honest money system.
But the SoB's will not relinquish their wealth without a fight. And even less will they accept honest money that would make them ordinary people and force them to work for living like everybody else. Bad kings of ye olde times had to be deposed to get rid of them. Nothing much has changed.
3. Gold should not be the only honest money. A number of other materials/tangibles are suitable, too. The point is that no private cabals should ever get control over money creation again. The group that is allowed to pay for real things with paper money they print in their basement will always end up owning the world, which is a highly unnatural condition.
![]() |
Posted by Kriss Robin on 09/25/10 11:54 PM
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Dear DB, has it ever crossed your mind ...
That we ought to be aware of the phrase, ""Out of chaos comes "order?"
------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, "The Order is not that which can be imposed" neither is that of "wishful thinking". The Answer precludes the question, but it seems the Answer must be sought through questioning, rather painfully it appears.
Posted by Bruce on 09/25/10 10:54 PM
Why would you give up your silver in order to extinguish a fraudulent mortgage? The bank put nothing at risk. You, have all the risk, and the bank has all the benefits.
Also, Fekete's point is that no matter how little gold there is, the price of gold in terms of fiat paper will rise until all debts are satisfied. Thus, one ounce of gold could satisfy all the debt, if that is all the gold there is.
Consequently, the creditors will get shorted their expectations, and everyone holding gold will be greatly enriched. It's about time that those who have been frugal and saved received their just rewards.
Posted by Bill on 09/25/10 10:51 PM
Posted by Lorenzo on 09/25/10 09:32 PM
Click to view link
Pay particular attention to concepts such as declining marginal utility and why gold is best suited as money; and the real bills doctrine.
Posted by Tuco on 09/25/10 08:57 PM
Posted by Blondie on 09/25/10 08:30 PM
cornered:Click to view link
There will always be enough gold, as long as its price is free; ie. not restrained by a standard of any sort. One must always be careful to differentiate between paper gold and physical gold when considering "gold".
Posted by Will Wohler on 09/25/10 06:36 PM
Gist of the key parts of an e-mail received by Dr Gary North (Click to view link) on Sept. 19:
A reporter questioned Paul Volker one-on-one about gold and fiat currencies after Volker's recent speech at a "Seminars at Steamboat" event.
In his responses to the reporter (directly, not before the audience), Volker admitted that using gold would allow "control of the government" (presumably against destruction of wealth by inflation).
The reporter pressed Volker further; Volker went on to observe that fiat money has not done well historically, then said flatly, "You know, fiat money is the problem" (!)
However, Mr Volker apparently declined permission requested by the reporter to include Volker's comments in the reporter's article for a LOCAL newspaper. Volker said that he didn't think it would have any impact, but he still declined permission to publish the comments he'd just made.
Further details in:
Click to view link
(available only to Dr North's current subscribers " $15/ month)
Reply from The Daily Bell
This is a great post, thank you. Is Volcker wrong on this? A free market gold and silver standard would likely resist control. He speaks of course to a state generated and manipulated gold standard, which is what he assumes will come next, perhaps. Our argument would be that fiat money is NOT the problem. The power elite is the problem, and the problem THEY are having is that people are gradually rejecting the manipulations ... In other words, what makes anyone so sure that having generally protested a fiat money standard, people will then turn around and accept a manipulated gold one.
Posted by Lila Rajiva on 09/25/10 05:20 PM
Did you see the piece by Janet Tavakoli, posted at EPJ on How to corner the gold market? This is what worried me at this time.
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
Yes, but as you know, private monopolies are likely impossible to sustain. Thus the powers-that-be would have to start another worldwide manipulation. Noth saying it's not possible. But then there's the Internet ...
Posted by Lila Rajiva on 09/25/10 04:20 PM
What if that were released into the market?
Reply from The Daily Bell
That is why a privately-based gold and silver standard is preferable to a gold standard, perhaps ... Also, there is such a thing as hoarding, and mining as well with requisite consequences. Perhaps those who own gold will find that market forces make it difficult or impossible (in a free-market) to manipulate prices.
Posted by Brian H on 09/25/10 03:11 PM
|
|

l .jpg)


