News & Analysis
Goes the Dark Leader? ...
A follow-up to a previous a story entitled "Comes a Blond Stranger ..."
Years later (present day) ...
The two sat at a table in the large basement cafeteria of the Agency's Washington DC headquarters. It was late afternoon, and they were drinking lattes instead of coffee, as in years past. The basement had been remodeled: soft lighting; beige carpeting. Even the chairs had gone upscale, expensive and over-stuffed. A lot of money sloshing around Capitol Hill these days.
The worse it got outside, the better the Agency seemed to do.
The senior man missed the look and feel of the place where he'd spent much of his spare time. He felt his age; the junior man, opposite him, looked as young and dynamic as ever.
"Remember right here we talked about finding a guy and turning him into a star years ago," the junior man said, adding too much sugar. "He's sure blown up since then. Makes me nostalgic."
"He's the biggest thing in the world right," the senior man said, ladling a little honey. "That was one sweet concept."
"Lucky I had a brainstorm," the junior man needled.
"Sure, you were on the verge of washing out," the senior man teased back. "I gave you the credit because you needed a boost and you ended up with a real humdinger, my son." His smile ended up as a grimace. Out of practice.
The junior man took a cautious sip. "And now he's everywhere. He's all over the news just about twenty-four-seven."
"Well, we own the goddamn mainstream media," the senior man said, trying his own latte. "Are you surprised?"
"It's strange to watch," the junior man said. "I know it's all an act, but the left wing wants him deified and the right wants him shot."
"That's part of the dialectic. We need to control both sides of the argument. Our guys need to capture the most radical sentiments in order to control them. Has to do with credibility."
"But our own presenters are sounding like anarchists. It's almost counterproductive."
"Don't think the higher-ups aren't aware," the senior man said, wondering if his drink had cooled. "But nobody expected the Internet to be so uncontrollable."
"We ought to just shut it down," the junior man said. "If it were up to me." He drew his finger across his throat.
"That's easy for you to say." the senior man said. He took a sip. Better.
"But how are you going to do it practically?" the older man continued. "It's a balancing act."
"Give me three or four days," the junior man muttered. "I'd take care of it."
"I bet you would," the senior man said. "You and DARPA. They invented the Internet but they didn't count on two fellows in a garage coming up with a personal computer. Once everyone plugged in ... game over."
"Idiots," the junior man said heatedly. "They should have used better judgment."
The senior man took another sip. "You can't fight the market. Nobody can anticipate everything."
"What're you kidding me?" The junior man was startled. "It's OUR narrative, man! Everybody else just keeps score."
"I used to think that too," the senior man said. He felt suddenly weary. "But we can only go so far and then there's a setback. Now they're building a decentralized Internet. It's going to make things even harder to control. The pirates – the Pirate Bay folks. It's on the news."
The younger man looked surprised.
"What's that?" he asked finally, after collecting his thoughts. "I doubt it will work."
"I'm afraid you're wrong. You can't control this technology, not in its beginning stages. They couldn't control the Gutenberg press, either."
"The Gut ... what?"
The older man sighed and drank more latte.
"Look," the junior man said, settling back in his comfortable chair. "When it comes right down to it, we work for the people with the money. We're just ... enforcers."
"Sure," the senior man agreed, settling back too. "But people with money tend to be arrogant. You can't beat the market. Not in the long run. The Invisible Hand gets you every time."
He put his own somewhat mottled hand up to his throat and made a choking noise.
"I'll play for the side with the money," the junior man said. "Wealth always wins." He leaned forward and slurped.
"Does it?" the senior man asked. "New technologies can even-out the playing field for a while."
"All I know is our guy is blowing up big," the junior man said, looking up. "We want a war, well, these leaks provide plenty of reasons. He's giving us an excuse to crack down hard on the 'Net. License every user, track every domain ... And we got good partners. The Brits. Mossad. Tavistock doesn't fool around," he added with a final slurp, like a coda.
He drummed his fingers on the table. "Just like with the Beatles when they blew up. Or Operation Gladio."
"That was pre-Internet," the senior man pointed out.
"Come on! It's been set up brilliantly," the junior man said. "Everything that's come out has basically reinforced our policies. And we're getting publicity that we could never have paid for in a thousand years. "
"So far so good," the senior man said, playing with his cup. "You can't count on the success of an operation until it's over," he cautioned. "Too many things can go wrong."
"But look what we've ended up with!" the junior man said, leaning forward. "We got a sex addict charged with rape running an Internet leak program that is putting international secrets at risk – and jeopardizing the lives of soldiers and diplomats around the world. We want to crack down on the Internet now, there's every reason to."
"Perhaps so," the senior man said quietly. He didn't sound convinced.
"He's even changed the color of his hair," the junior man pointed out. "Now it's black. Looks a lot more dangerous. I don't know what you're so worried about."
"What am I worried about?" The senior man considered. "Well ... look around you. Not here! I mean look at the big picture. The economy is a mess. The world is a mess. Europe's in flames. America's getting there. We got employment numbers last put up during the Great Depression."
"Of course things are chaotic. That's part of their plan. You can't build a world government without breaking a few eggs."
"But China is going to go down. Inflation's out of control in that big country and sooner or later China's problems will bring down all of Asia. Now the entire world's in a slump."
"Game on!" the junior man cried. When the older man winced, he added, "Oh, I understand the causes – central banking and delinking from gold. You've taught me that. There couldn't be any other outcome."
"That's true," his mentor confirmed. "This was the strategy. Out of chaos, order. Central banking made the global meltdown inevitable, just as planned. But the higher-ups, they didn't understand about the Internet. That's exposed us. Our ideas are regularly discussed now and even anticipated ..."
"... But I don't see anyone backing down," the junior man interrupted. "I think you're worried about nothing. That's your personality. You've always got find the fly in the ointment."
"I disagree. We're approaching an inflection point. When China goes down – either through inflation or interest rate hikes – the world is going to be a terrible mess. And even without China, we've already got riots ... civil disobedience. Some think Western capitalism has failed, it's true. But people are not so uneducated anymore, thanks to the 'Net. And some may understand that 20th century economics was closer to communism than capitalism. They may riot for freedom this time, for a real marketplace with real money, not for bigger government."
"Look," the junior man said, ready to drop a name. "The Red Shield is pretty good with this sort of thing. I personally leave it up to them. They've managed the conspiracy rather well. And our guy is certainly helping. That was the whole idea wasn't it? We came up with it, and now I've even heard his role may be expanded."
"Yes ... I've heard the same thing," the senior man admitted.
"He's the focus of worldwide attention," the junior man pressed. "Before they're finished, he could be the most famous and heroic person in the world. Nothing will stick, or nothing big, even if he does go to jail for a while. And before he does, he'll release that insurance package of his. So who cares if he wanted to get laid? He's just going to look persecuted, like he's stood up to the most powerful bullies on earth. When the nation-states implode he'll be the most important person left standing. A war or two later, and people will look for leadership ... They'll virtually be begging for someone like him. He could lead the way to ... to ... "
"Yes, yes, of course" the senior man said. "A kind of new world order."
"His goal is to make closed societies more open," the younger man said emphatically. "People misunderstand his message. He doesn't want to do away with government, even big government. He just wants to make it better. He's playing a part, and we've got everyone watching. It's incredible. All over the world. Same techniques they used with the Beatles, and Lady Gaga. Mainstream media coverage 24-hours a day."
"Hm-mm. Hope he can be counted on."
"He's staying on the reservation," the junior man replied, feeling inexplicably a little defensive. "No question about that. He's sticking to the script, saying all the right things. He's even explained that he doesn't want to disseminate through the 'Net because he needs 'professional journalists' to work with him, like those at the Guardian and the New York Times. He's singlehandedly resuscitating the reputation of mainstream journalism. Plus he doesn't have any problems with the official story about 9/11 – so that's off the table."
"Well, I hope you're right," the senior man said, feeling suddenly gloomy. "Say, did you buy liability insurance?"
"Huh?" the junior man asked. "Oh, yeah – the new program. I looked into it."
"Do yourself a favor," the senior man said. "Revisit it."
"You serious?" asked the junior man.
"What if he's playing a double game?" the senior man probed, looking right in the eyes of his protege. "We've seen it before. What if he's going along with it now but when he's decided he's got enough clout to make a difference, he leaves the reservation – does things his own way? Maybe he forgets who his friends are and starts taking it all too seriously ... "
The young man looked pale. "Like a double agent? That wouldn't be very good for my career."
"No, you'd be blamed."
"You, too," the younger man said hurriedly, looking downcast. "It was YOUR idea."
"It wasn't," the older man said. "Anyway, I'm retiring."
"That's true," the junior man muttered. "How can we be sure?"
"Can't be sure of anything," the senior man said. "The balls are in the air. Where do they land?"
The above is a work of fiction. It is NOT about Julian Assange; though certainly it is an exploration of how elite promotions could animate an Assange-like figure. As for Mr. Assange himself: We will only state at this juncture that we admire his tremendous courage and what appears to be his almost Christ-like willingness to sacrifice his very life on the altar of his cause – for all of us, for a better society; we are very sorry he is in jail and hope he gets out shortly. Why on earth did he head back to Britain?
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Mr. YesYes O. Fcourse on 12/09/10 11:28 PM
Posted by Al Kyder on 12/08/10 02:37 PM
You missed that meme, you were to concerned about trying to discredit the non-American Julian Assange. This has caused you to fail at your meme watching task.
You beed to do better DB if you want to call yourself "professional meme watchers"
Your coverage of the Wikileaks cablegate has been worse than the MSM. I have not seen DB analyse a single leaked document.
This is not just bad journalism, it is bad for the site, as it makes you look unprofessional. I have noticed though that Americans in general have a lot of trouble separating the wheat from the chaff.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Well sorry I cant translate it into American. I have never learnt how to speak it, as it changes every other day.
DB: Actually, you are no better at writing feedbacks than writing English.
You missed that meme, you were to concerned about trying to discredit the non-American Julian Assange. This has caused you to fail at your meme watching task.
DB: Of course you have never mentioned what the meme is. Probably because there isn't one.
You beed to do better DB if you want to call yourself "professional meme watchers"
DB: If we "beed" any better maybe we can make a necklace.
Your coverage of the Wikileaks cablegate has been worse than the MSM. I have not seen DB analyse a single leaked document.
DB: We're not in the business of analyzing documents. We analyze dominant social themes. Look it up.
This is not just bad journalism, it is bad for the site, as it makes you look unprofessional. I have noticed though that Americans in general have a lot of trouble separating the wheat from the chaff.
DB: Ha, not really. Daily Bell - wheat. Al Kyder - chaff. (Oh, by the way, the Daily Bell is not American ...)
Posted by Al Kyder on 12/08/10 02:07 PM
Q; Well, thanks for trying to enlighten us. Perhaps your point is we should ignore Assange and concentrate on safe sex, as it is one of the "big guns."
What a stupid thing to say. DB
You have missed this one entirely. You have failed as a meme watcher. So you are not professional meme watchers, you are a bunch of rank amateurs if you missed this one.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Ah, a guessing game? ... 21 questions? ... We give up.
Posted by Cat Writer on 12/08/10 07:32 AM
I have not read everything Julian wrote, but some of this material is so 18th century. Earlier in the day, I came across this quote by General Nathanael Greene (1742-1786):
"Learning is not virtue but the means to bring us an acquaintance with it. Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful. Let these be your motives to action through life, the relief of the distressed, the detection of frauds, the defeat of oppression, and diffusion of happiness."
I am rather impressed that in 2007 someone could come up with material at that level. And also impressed that Americans are not capable of doing that.
The retracement towards 1776 will be necessary in my view.
Posted by Jeff Albertson on 12/07/10 10:54 PM
Posted by Jeff Albertson on 12/07/10 10:43 PM
Click to view link
I've read through most of it and have to conclude he's the real thing, or that he's been turned in a very elaborate manner. How about this for a forehead slapper...
Sun 31 Dec 2006 : Doing the pentagon poker
All who spend time in the spy world soon come to the view that the rest of the population lives their life in a sea fog as a tiny piece of cork buffeted by a vast ocean of concealed truth. True enough, but economics and scientific progress still dominates the spy world as every black budget bureaucrat finds to their classified horror when budget time arrives and they 'do the Pentagon poker'. "
Posted by John Danforth on 12/07/10 10:42 PM
In my fantasy, the two protagonists are having burnt, stale coffee in a dingy little office in the corner of an old building left over from WWII in a forgotten corner of an Army base, talking about how an impossible long shot had turned into the biggest bulls-eye in their obscure Army Intel careers, lamenting how they would never get recognition for it, and chuckling over how their little plant had rippled into an international sensation while they sat back and watched.
All they had done was to take a bunch of routine communications, sprinkled in a few spicy details to make it more enticing while supporting the cause, marked it 'secret', and left it in a poorly secured but supposedly official hard drive where people were sure to stumble upon it. They thought they would catch any opportunistic wanna-be spies. Sure enough, someone came along and lifted the file, and they fingered him. But how were they to know the thing would be released and catch the world on fire?
At the end, they chuckled over how everyone was playing the roles they had assigned themselves so seriously, and wondered whether Assange was owned by CIA, speculating that if he was, they might knock him off to secure his credibility before he could spill the beans, and figuring that if he did get knocked off, then he was their man for sure. They laughed uproariously at how the press shivered in delight at the salaciousness of the most trivial and outrageous lies they had planted in the material. Then they went back to lamenting how they would never get credit, never get a raise, and couldn't even dare try to get their own commanding officer to believe them.
Well, thanks for sparing me the effort of fleshing that out in a readable form.
And thanks for another great bout of paranoia, DB!
Reply from The Daily Bell
Obviously great minds think alike, though your version certainly points up the irony of what's taking place. So ... you and the elves ... Hey, wait a minute! Sorry for the back-handed compliment ...
Posted by Jeff Albertson on 12/07/10 09:57 PM
It's true, I guess, but ambiguously... from his blog in 2006-
"Sooner or later the message will sink in that Kyoto and other conservation efforts are too little, too late (and too expensive)."
He definitely understood international politics, though.
Thu 08 Jun 2006 : The history of warfare
The history of warfare is similarly subdivided, although here the phases are Retribution, Anticipation, and Diplomacy. Thus:
Retribution:
I'm going to kill you because you killed my brother.
Anticipation:
I'm going to kill you because I killed your brother.
Diplomacy:
I'm going to kill my brother and then kill you on the pretext that your brother did it.
Posted by Philip Mccormack on 12/07/10 09:35 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
He stops by here too now and again. We await YOUR website as well ...
Posted by Breck on 12/07/10 08:30 PM
Casting about for ways to "get him" they come up with this silly charge, and no one says, "What a coincidence! No connection of course between being a leaker and being a sexual criminal"! This is so transparent as to be asinine.
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 12/07/10 08:24 PM
PandaLabs -- 'Tis the Season of DDoS ' WikiLeaks Edition
DDoS attacks are flying across the Internet like there is no tomorrow.
Update ' 12/7/2010 ' 9:44 AM
The target has switched over to aklagare [dot] se, the Swedish prosecutors.
Update ' 12/7/2010 ' 10:16 AM
Over 1000 people have joined the chat to participate in the attacks against anything anti-WikiLeaks.
Update ' 12/7/2010 ' 3:51 PM
The target has now been changed to lieberman [dot] gov. This marks the first time Operation Payback has targeted a government site.
Update ' 12/7/2010 ' 4:56 PM
Operation:Payback has been under a constant DDoS counter-attack, but the attacks against the site intensified shortly after announcing the attack on Senator Liebermans website. We're not sure who exactly is involved in the retaliation against the group, but we suspect that it may be a group of patriots attempting to protect the greater interests of the United States of America.
Check back frequently for updates.
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks. It's starting to sound like those big ole 1990s science fiction novels...
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 12/07/10 08:14 PM
"This is so fascinating by the sheer deepness of this game and the intriguing possibilities."
Yes, indeed. And agree on the untruth. But this...
"The state will most likely start to fall apart now. They are paralyzed."
I think a distinction needs to be made between the state (all non-voluntaryists) and the government.
The "government" can fall apart, but if people still believe in violence: support for "government", democracy, entitlements, free lunches, leaders, slave-on-slave stockholm-syndromed abuser-love, then violence is what they'll get.
The state IS violence.
You see, the discussion just not at the level of rational argument yet. And why not?
YouTube: The Bomb in the Brain Part 1/4: The Effects of Child Abuse
Click to view link
Whilst some can THINK about, others cannot.
Posted by Bill Ross on 12/07/10 07:56 PM
Untruth:
"His absence, says the source, is being felt acutely. "The organization will most likely start to fall apart now."
Truth:
The truth and uncertainty of what Wikileaks has, their time schedule and trigger points for release is being felt acutely. The state will most likely start to fall apart now. They are paralyzed. Their formerly private quid pro quo's, schemes and current inability to know who to trust has shattered their ability to conspire and to remain as "thick as thieves". Every state sub-group has potential leakers, dissidents, the morally outraged or, just plain opportunists who realize that switching sides is NOW the path to survival.
The possibility exists that elites consider the criminal waste of states to be competition to their predations. They may want open or, no states.
The possibility also exist that some spooks are taking seriously: "from all enemies, foreign or domestic"
This is so fascinating by the sheer deepness of this game and the intriguing possibilities. Stay tuned...
Posted by Breck on 12/07/10 07:39 PM
"Say did you buy liability insurance?
"Huh?" the junior man asked.
"Oh,yeah?the new program. I looked into it."
"Do yourself a favor," the senior man said.
"Revisit it.""
This program may be "revisited" in one verse,
John 14:6.
Folks, this article is not about Assange, it is about a one-world ruler that is likely alive today, but does not yet know his destiny. This article declares itself to be fiction, but it reads almost exactly like the many end-of-our-age-of-mankind prophecies found in the Bible. One other observation, the "new program" as stated is not new; it has been known for 2 or more millennia.
I have let your regular postings go by without a word. So, apparently has everyone else. I am probably just being my foolish self, treading where angels daren't, but...I find it hard to believe that a fellow writing about Jesus 60 years after the event is going to be presenting bona-fide insights.
It is pretty well established by most biblical scholars that John's Revelation is about the Roman Empire and specifically the latest emperor (Domitian?). It was very much an immediate message to the Christians of that day and not some magically prophetic piece about the "end-of-our-age-of-mankind" in our day. Heck they didn't even think that anyone would be around now!
It really comes down to your conception of how the Spirit works. Or even better the nature of God. And that is a really big subject! In any event, please know Macdonald that I used to believe in the "message" in Revelations, but upon reflection and study I have changed my mind. I am, these days, eschewing magical thinking based upon how the Bible might be interpreted.
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 12/07/10 07:31 PM
'...midlevel WikiLeaks staffers have been mostly cut off from communicating with hundreds of volunteers whose contact information was stored in Assange's private online-messaging accounts, and never shared with others.
"There is an ongoing plan, but that plan was only introduced to a few staffers " key staffers," explained the source. "We are experiencing chaos.
...when Assange's autocratic leadership style was challenged by some staffers last year, he described his importance to the organization in no uncertain terms. "I am the heart and soul of this organization, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original coder, organizer, financier and all the rest."
His absence, says the source, is being felt acutely. "The organization will most likely start to fall apart now."'
Click to view link
There is truth and there is untruth.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Click to view link
"Anonymous' Launches Operation Avenge Assange
Tagged with: Anonymous cyber attacks DDoS attacks Julian Assange Operation Avenge Assange WikiLeaks
Hacker coalition Anonymous has launched a slew of cyber assaults against what it perceives to be enemies of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, including a DDoS attack on PayPal, which recently stopped processing donations to WikiLeaks in the wake of the release of U.S. embassy cables.
Anonymous said it will 'offer Wikileaks an additional mirror and have it Googlebombed and 'create counter-propaganda, organized attacks (DDoS) on various targets related to censorship. The group also encourage its members and supporters to spread the cables freely: 'The end goal is a human DNS " something that can only be stopped by shutting off the entire internet," the collective stated on a poster.
The group also encouraged voting for Assange as the TIME's 2010 Person of the Year, to give the exiled Australian 'much needed public exposure, and threatened ramifications for opponents of the whistle-blower organization.
Posted by Philip Mccormack on 12/07/10 07:06 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
He is also "warmist." Say, that's a great Elvis Costello video on your son's blog. (Son, right?)
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 12/07/10 07:01 PM
'"Leaking is inherently an anti-authoritarian act. It is inherently an anarchist act," Assange says.'
Click to view link
Which is it, Mr Assange?
You're a libertarian who thinks markets should be forced to be "free".
Click to view link
You're a statist who believes 'nations' exist and that some wars are "just".
Click to view link
And now you say you're an anarchist?? An anarcho-triplespeakist?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks, good links today ...
Posted by Gavin on 12/07/10 06:46 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks for the link ...
Posted by MSM on 12/07/10 06:44 PM
According to your "reasoning" you get to dictate what people in your house can or can't say. I doubt many people would be willing to visit a petty tyrant like you.
Oh, and I never said anything about a "right to enter my/your house" so that counts as misrepresentation on your part.
Regardless, your irrelevant analogy Click to view linkrelevant. I wasn't discussing your amazing powers to 'legislate' in your little plot of land (LOL)
Posted by Ben on 12/07/10 06:09 PM
|
|

l 


