News & Analysis
The Greatest 21st Century Privilege
Despite its growing horrors, the 21st century has proven a profound blessing in the sense that we can see, step by step how tyranny is being implemented around the world and especially in the West. In doing so, we can chart its pathways and intricacies. Some may not consider this in any sense a blessing but we do. To watch the descent of tyranny on the Western world is a startling sight, which plumbs the depths of the human spirit and provides us with spectacles of evil and good, cowardice and courage. It is a great (if sad) time to run a free-market website that reports on libertarian social and economic trends.
I used to wonder how a financial depression took hold and what it would look like. I used to wonder how a society would lose its moral and social underpinnings and lurch toward authoritarianism. I wondered, even, what it would be like in pre-war Germany when the Nazis were coming to power. But the past decade has offered an education in all these concepts. Anyone paying close attention does not need to wonder anymore.
The first decade of the 21st century has been a time of resonant, historical themes, broadly observed. It is a truly historical struggle between those who wish to control and manipulate human societies and those who wish to make human societies, especially Western ones, freer. In the 20th century, one might anticipate going to a ball game or an elaborate black-tie social event, but nothing is more fascinating than watching this great game unfold early in the 21st.
It is not a comfortable experience of course. The forces seeking to shut down civil discourse and stifle dissent seem to come from all sides, and their power is discouraging. Increasingly, they seem to pervert the basic institutions of civil society: schools, media, government and even religion. Each element of perverted society now has an elaborate rationale for why freedom needs to be pruned. The children need to be made safe. Society needs to be made safe. The workplace needs to be secured.
In fact, the proximate reason to write this article comes from news that government approval will be needed for certain kinds of employment. There are at least two programs involved; both, of course, coming out of the Department of Homeland Security. The acronyms are TWIC and SWAC: Transportation Worker Identification Credential and Secure Worker Access Consortium. Infowars.com, which seems to have broken the story, explains the following:
TWIC “is a biometric credential that ensures only vetted workers are eligible to enter a secure construction site, unescorted,” Ironworkers Local 361 in Ozone Park, New York, explains. “Before issuing a TWIC, TSA must conduct a security threat assessment on the TWIC applicant. An applicant who, as a result of the assessment, is determined to not pose a security threat, will be issued a TWIC card.”
SWAC is even more draconian. It is “a large-scale collaborative effort among public and private authorities, facility owners, contractors, and labor organizations who are partnering to prevent terrorist activity by creating a trusted contractor community. Over 500 organizations, including the Port Authority of NY and NJ, which manages and maintains the bridges, tunnels, bus terminals, airports, PATH, and seaports that are essential to the bi-state region's trade and transportation capabilities, have joined this effort,” according to the union website.
These two programs constitute a considerable escalation in the intrusiveness of government. Were it to stop here, it would be bad enough. But Homeland Security never stops. The department recently partnered with WalMart to set up a program to encourage shoppers to report any incidents they might consider dangerous or even out-of-the ordinary. The kinds of programs Homeland Security is rolling out now will surely create an ever-more paranoid, inequitable and ultimately unlivable society. It will be one where citizens will be scanned, photographed and ultimately tagged and labeled – all in the name of “keeping the homeland safe” from terror.
The ground upon which this society is being built is shaky indeed. Most if not all of the terror incidents that have taken place over the past few years have at the center of them some sort of incitement. The poor, young people (most US and Western terrorists are young and impoverished) have been manipulated, funded and literally shoved in the direction of violent acts that they probably would not have undertaken if not for undercover American and British intelligence agents. It is, in a word, entrapment over and over again.
It is easy to see that the dramatic escalation of government intrusiveness has occurred since 9/11. Since there are many questions that still swirl around 9/11 itself, the enthusiasm with which Western governments have clamped down on their citizens is even more remarkable. It goes far beyond what is just or necessary.
Fortunately, there are counter-trends. Readers of the Bell will be aware that we believe the Internet itself is acting as a kind of modern-day Gutenberg press, revealing much that was hidden during the 20th century. Its truth-telling is arrayed against an intergenerational, familial, Anglo-American elite that wants a New World Order and uses fear-based promotions – dominant social themes – to push Western middle classes into giving up power and wealth to globalist facilities such as the UN, WHO, the IMF, etc.
Offering a website that covers freedom issues and free-market concepts at this point in time is actually quite humbling. The opportunity to tell the truth about what is going on in the West is something many do not have the opportunity to do. They are trapped in situations where they must keep quiet to care for themselves and their families. However, there are also a growing number of voices around the world that are making their disapproval with current authoritarian trends increasingly clear. The ability to add one's voice to this swelling chorus is perhaps the greatest privilege of the modern era.
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Alan on 11/06/11 09:04 AM
"Unbridled free market, meaning zero governmental regulations and oversights, is not all rosy, but it has severe downside of letting crooks run wild. When the cat is away, the mice play and rip-off."
I suggest that the free market, often refereed to in DB, as a utopian good needs to be replaced by an honest market.
I define an honest market where trades operate based on honest supply and demand with honest prices. This honest market needs protection from frauds such as Ponzi scheme ala Madoff and the selling of things not owned. To many self serving idiots support short selling for their own ends and are to stupid to realize that short selling is a gross violation of property rights.
One major issue with corporations is Limited Liability. They can con money out of you, work out of employees and contractors with complete impunity. If the shareholders are happy to have a con-artist running heir business to cheat people, they along with the con-artist should be held fully responsible, both in financial and punishment terms. If I commit fraud I go to jail. If I am a "Bankster" I seem to get tens of millions as a bonus. Why does the corporation not get wound up, sold off, with all the money derived from the sale, used for essential public services.
Posted by Bill Lopotko on 12/25/10 09:43 PM
Posted by Glenn Bisset on 12/21/10 09:08 AM
Posted by Loise on 12/20/10 07:38 AM
Posted by Maritzanita on 12/20/10 07:16 AM
Posted by Lance on 12/20/10 02:44 AM
Posted by Lance on 12/19/10 09:39 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
What are you talking about? Oh, yeah ... you never told us what you were smoking ...
Posted by Chuck Smith on 12/19/10 07:57 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
He gets many scoops. We just wish he would rename his site. Too late now, eh.
Posted by Puck T. Smith on 12/19/10 01:05 PM
Confirmation number: 7VB38037V9015984T
I really do value the DB. I've been known to characterize it as "Lew Rockwell without the vitriol; Alex Jones without the rant."
Success and joy in all your endeavors.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Well, we have our moments. But thanks.
![]() |
Posted by Mully on 12/19/10 01:02 PM
Being a believer in free markets -Libertarian-has little to do with believing that there should be no "police" or government oversight imho.
There are, after all, people who will do immoral deeds such as Madoff. All but the most naive surely believe so. The naive must also learn this the hard way if necessary. Sad but true.
The point is, "buyer beware". Let me learn the hard way if necessary. It is generally not the governments job to protect us from ourselves. I will take care of me and mine, thank you anyway.
Posted by Ingo Bischoff on 12/19/10 10:58 AM
The perfect description of an "Alptraum" from which I suffer.
I hope and pray for the repeal of the 17th Amendment as the only possible deliverance from the nightmare you describe.
Posted by Bill Ross on 12/19/10 10:21 AM
So, let me state it unambiguously: I appreciate the privilege and tolerance GRANTED to me by DB and fellow posters (to use their PRIVATE property and share a portion of their time) and allow me to state my POV.
Reply from The Daily Bell
You and Lila come from the same seed. it is kind of funny. Oh, well ... Our elves are stubborn too.
Posted by Lance on 12/19/10 03:40 AM
The first thing that needs to happen is for the world to forget about that event. We don't know what it was, why it happened, or even if it happened.
But we can't stop picking at the scab, and until we do it won't heal. Never forget? We may as well just shoot ourselves now. The time has come to forget and the sooner we get started the sooner it will be over. Next time you start to say "911", just stop yourself and make the point another way.
Reply from The Daily Bell
"The first thing that needs to happen is for the world to forget about that event. We don't know what it was, why it happened, or even if it happened."
Here's the deal: We'll send you an address if you send us whatever it is you've been smoking ...
Posted by Bionic Mosquito on 12/19/10 12:43 AM
So I am not remiss in answering your query: "Is the Islamist attempt to institute sharia law worldwide motivated by poverty?"
Very likely yes; under the guise of religion. Religious fanaticism is often used by those in power to take people's minds off of their overall subjugation.
But I will ask a more basic question: Weigh the relative power of the west to the power of those states nominally Muslim. Please explain how this relationship could result in the "institution" of anything by the weaker power...unless you are a tin-foil-hat type who believes those in power in the west WANT this outcome!
Posted by Bionic Mosquito on 12/19/10 12:10 AM
As with Ric today, I do not hold any hope to sway you from your views. But, as with Ric, this is not my intent.
In both cases, for one to hold to these respective views requires avoiding any research beyond the six o'clock news, or the NY Times. Your comments, while sprinkled with tidbits of almost-truth, result in interpretations that boggle the mind to those who have done more research than merely scratching the surface. For others more open to alternative views of these events, I would offer the following thoughts on a few of your points:
1) WWI, someone involved was supposedly a Muslim? I heard a rumor that some Christians were involved as well. 2) Brits would be speaking Deutsch without US involvement in the war? Hitler couldn't cross the channel and never wanted to in any case. 3) People who happen to be Muslim have committed acts of violence? I would be surprised if Muslims (or any other "group") were somehow exempt from a few bad apples.
In the end, the scoreboard doesn't lie. In the west, perhaps 100 million or more are dead at the hands of western governments during the last century, always funded by fiat currency supplied by central banks. At worst, you could point to a few thousand in the west killed by Muslims.
Posted by JOHN ROSSI on 12/19/10 12:09 AM
Posted by Freemarket on 12/18/10 11:20 PM
Actually, the free market would work and work against those who are unscrupulous without government regulation, if we just had a non-corrupt government. Madoff would have actually been investigated if we had not had the government intervention to NOT investigate him!
Posted by Gene on 12/18/10 10:32 PM
"Democracy is governance by the majority vote".
Majority vote is mob rule.
"Does history record any case in which the majority was right".
Robert Heinlein
Posted by J Smith on 12/18/10 09:58 PM
"Democracy is the worship of jackals, by jackasses."
Posted by Kelley on 12/18/10 09:45 PM
[Face palm]
At least one, and possibly more, of the plotters to assassinate Archduke Ferdinand, which started WWI, was a Muslim. The US joined that war only after our civilian ships were sunk.
In WWII, we were attacked by Japan. Twenty-five hundred Americans were killed in that attack. One of my uncles was wounded in that attack.
Germany declared war on the US a couple days later. Should we have shirked those wars and let the UK fall under Hitler's control? Islamic leaders, including Haj Amin al-Husseini, sided with Hitler, of course.
Would South Korea be better off if N. Korea had prevailed and Kim Jong Il were running the show?
Neither the US nor the West had any involvement in any of Israel's wars. The fact that you tossed Israel into this is puzzling, especially since you mistakenly think the US was involved in any of Israel's wars. What should one make of your insertion of Israel into this discussion?
Meanwhile, Islam has started wars and genocide all around the world, including Sudan, Somalia vs Ethiopia, Ceylon, Indonesia, Philippenes, and the US. (Yes, it was Islamists who killed 3,000 people on 9/11 in a surprise attack, and attacked the US Cole, two of our African Embassies, the US Marine Barracks, and the Iraqi UN office " my sister was there and injured, so that murderous attack has particular meaning to me. The UN was attempting to FEED Iraqi's suffering from the war.)
Muslims killed 1,500 non Muslims in Kenya after the last election there resulting in the formation of a coalition government.
Islamists have also attacked Spain, the UK, Israel, Bali, Mombai India, etc. I'm mostly focusing on the last ten years. Surely, you are aware of those many battlegrounds that were all instigated Islamists.
Of course we are killing terrorists in Pakistan. Why the heck wouldn't we " that is where AlQaeda is hiding and reforming. Remember we are fighting terrorism and the nations that support it. That job isn't done and probably won't be done for many decades.
All that said and done, your comment has no bearing on the question: Is the Islamist attempt to institute sharia law worldwide motivated by poverty?
I've already answered the question quite conclusively, so you've decided to pick new fights. Now that your extraneous questions have been answered, I hope you've learned some history.
Reply from The Daily Bell
[Face palm]
At least one, and possibly more, of the plotters to assassinate Archduke Ferdinand, which started WWI, was a Muslim. The US joined that war only after our civilian ships were sunk.
DB: It was a Western war.
In WWII, we were attacked by Japan. Twenty-five hundred Americans were killed in that attack. One of my uncles was wounded in that attack.
DB: It was a Western war. The US dropped two nuclear weapons on Japan.
Would South Korea be better off if N. Korea had prevailed and Kim Jong Il were running the show?
DB: It was a Western war.
Neither the US nor the West had any involvement in any of Israel's wars. The fact that you tossed Israel into this is puzzling, especially since you mistakenly think the US was involved in any of Israel's wars. What should one make of your insertion of Israel into this discussion?
DB: You've got to be kidding. Who funds Israel, even today.
Meanwhile, Islam has started wars and genocide all around the world, including Sudan, Somalia vs Ethiopia, Ceylon, Indonesia, Philippenes, and the US. (Yes, it was Islamists who killed 3,000 people on 9/11 in a surprise attack, and attacked the US Cole, two of our African Embassies, the US Marine Barracks, and the Iraqi UN office " my sister was there and injured, so that murderous attack has particular meaning to me. The UN was attempting to FEED Iraqi's suffering from the war.) Muslims killed 1,500 non Muslims in Kenya after the last election there resulting in the formation of a coalition government. Islamists have also attacked Spain, the UK, Israel, Bali, Mombai India, etc. I'm mostly focusing on the last ten years. Surely, you are aware of those many battlegrounds that were all instigated Islamists.
DB: Score: thousands of dead from Muslim attacks; millions from Western aggression.
Of course we are killing terrorists in Pakistan. Why the heck wouldn't we " that is where AlQaeda is hiding and reforming. Remember we are fighting terrorism and the nations that support it. That job isn't done and probably won't be done for many decades.
DB: Yes, endless war for endless peace.
|
|

l 


