News & Analysis
NATO on the Ground in Somalia?
American Boots Hit the Ground in Somalia After Drone Attacks ... Somalia is now the sixth country over which the United States is flying attack drones. Last month, the same Special Operations Command unit currently operating in Yemen carried out an attack on two leaders of the Somali militant group al-Shabab in a June 23 mission. The Washington Post reported the attack on Wednesday, and on Friday, Somalia's defense minister says that American military forces touched down to collect the bodies of the insurgents. – The Atlantic Wire
Dominant Social Theme: NATO is at war with numerous states now, but these wars are not its fault. They are defensive struggles.
Free-Market Analysis: Are America's wars expanding? NATO's wars are really America's wars, so that in a sense wherever NATO goes America's military-industrial complex follows. NATO is an engagement force of the Anglosphere. We would argue (as we have before) that as the size and intensity of these wars increase, the Anglosphere power elite behind them is gradually creating a regional World War III.
It is difficult to tell in this day and age why wars are being fought. The answers given by the powers-that-be have not proven especially convincing in the past decade. NATO is said to be bombing Libya to protect citizens, but sometimes it seems as if the bombs are murdering more civilians than strongman Muammar Gaddafi.
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that there is some level of an economic component to these wars; Western economies are so bad that any distraction is good. And with what now seems to be six separate engagements in and around the Middle East, there are plenty of such distractions.
The wars are increasingly hard to track. America's (NATO's) current engagements apparently include Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen and now Somalia. What is the common denominator? it is not merely economic distraction. In our view, Western powers that be are trying to wipe out the last vestiges of resistance to a one-world order. They have declared war on tribal culture.
Tribal culture is resistant to Westernization. Somalis, Pashtuns, Bedouins and Punjabis (if one includes Pakistan) are tribes with millennial cultures. Uprooting persistent cultural trends is a long-term project. First violence is applied to fracture the culture and then massive amounts of foreign aid to rebuild it. What looks like generosity is actually self-interest. The powers-that-be use aid like gesso, whiting over what once was to paint an entirely new picture.
Look back in time and we think there is plenty of evidence the ongoing and expanding wars may be part of a long-term project. World War I we could speculate was designed in part to overwhelm German culture. World War II shattered Japanese culture. The Korean and Vietnamese wars did the same in Asia. Only the Middle East and Africa are left.
Is it a coincidence then? Or is it the start of a kind of regional World War III, as we have suggested in the recent past as these regional wars have gathered force. America, Britain and NATO are acting especially belligerent these days. The article excerpted above from The Atlantic Wire (Atlantic magazine) shows us that not only has the American military begun to use drones dropping bombs, they have no compunction about "touching down" on Somalia soil to take the bodies of the enemies, presumably for identification of some sort.
In addition to this, there are numerous reports that NATO (basically an American invention) is about to launch a ground war in Libya along with the British and French. This makes sense; this seems to be the national trilogy driving the Anglosphere elite's wars around the world. The Germans, ironically, remain uncooperative.
We noticed Nicolas Sarkozy's increased belligerence when French troops took the lead in the Ivory Coast incursion that deposed lawfully elected President Laurent Gbagbo. France charged that his opponent Alassane Ouatarra (a former IMF bureaucrat) had won the election even though an Ivory Coast electoral commission had denied him victory and claimed his campaign had participated in electoral fraud.
It seems clear that Sarkozy, more than any other French president in recent memory, is willing to join France in common cause with Britain and America in what is basically a one-world quest of conquest. People – especially in the West – don't want to admit it (or may not be paying attention to it), but the Anglosphere elites seem to have embarked on the final leg of a globalist consolidation.
After observing these wars carefully, we believe we discern a deliberate strategy behind how they work. First of all, the actual objective is never explained anywhere by anyone. There are apparent phony objectives floated by the US and British (and now French) governments. The mainstream media presents these justifications as true even though it is increasingly obvious they are obviously not. This happened in Afghanistan and iraq.
Next comes the alternative media, leftist-influenced in some cases; the blogs and websites echo with analyses that feature Anglosphere corporate greed. The reasons for the invasion have to do with oil and gold, the alternative media darkly mutters. (It may, but again in our view these are not usually the primary reasons, or not now anyway.)
Yes, when one examines the actual operative procedures a DIFFERENT operative pattern emerges. In any recently attacked state, a central bank is the first thing set up. And then a private banking industry (fiat money distribution network) is created. It may have Islamic aspects or not, but it is intended to introduce (drown) the populace to (in) Western style banking (debt).
What else is set up immediately? Public schools with elaborate facilities for girls, as girls may not receive much formal education in Muslim nations. (Nor may boys for that matter.) The education they do get is usually surprisingly nationalistic. The idea is to break down tribal identity. In order to facilitate this, foreign aid is brought to bear.
Increased literacy has other benefits from the point of view of Western elites. it allows the whole mechanism of elite mind-control to be leveraged, from faux-history about Western superiority to the role of Keynesian economics in the "success" of the nation state. It evidently and obviously uses divide and conquer tactics in which women in tribal states are encouraged to see their roles not as traditional but as repressed.
The Pashtun in particular have a culture and society that has granted a kind of individual (or at least tribal) freedom for 2,000 years. Let Western powers-that-be provide "literacy" and "education" to the Pashtuns and they too can participate in the "advantages" of Western civilization, including massive militarization and a prison-industrial complex that incarcerates millions.
Western civ surely includes good things like the scientific method and free speech. But as we have seen in the 21st century much of the most impressive elements of Western society were apparently tolerated by elites that needed a positive mythos to counteract the authoritarianism to come. it was a kind of "beard."
Today, those depredations have arrived with a vengeance. A central-banking-based regulatory democracy is simply not sustainable, or at least not as regards prosperity. The ramifications of the Western system include foreclosures, currency debasement, endless elite corruption, growing authoritarianism, etc. Eventually, as in the Depression, it may include sickness, starvation and general uprootedness. One could argue that even the Afghans, in all their supposed cultural debasement, have it better than this.
How many Afghans lost their houses to foreclosure in the past millennia? How many will likely lose them in a "civilized," Western society? The Western banking system that Western powers-that-be implemented in Kabul has just collapsed entirely. The Afghan head of central banking has fled to the West, citing assassination plots. Hundreds of millions or billions are missing.
Literacy no doubt makes such evolutions possible. But can some within the Pashtun community be blamed for asking whether literacy Western-style comes with an extraordinarily high price tag? Is the literacy now being inculcated in Kabul truly a selfless act or are there other motives?
It is said that literacy is important to create a successful Afghan army and civil police force. But in fact, literacy in this case will only provide the building blocks for civil war as recruits are drawn primarily from Northern, non-Pashtun tribes. Those who join are of course encouraged to think of themselves as Afghan rather than Northern. The idea is to pretend that Afghanistan is a nation like European ones. Again, how helpful is literacy in this case?
Of course European nations are tribal too, and in fact elite depredations are regularly being launched on European (and American) culture as well. All cultures surely need a kind of metaphorical tenderizing in order to create a truly globalist one. In Europe and America thus far the weapons are economic and social; immigrants not bullets are the weapons of choice, but the effect is the same.
Finally, there is the issue (in these current wars) of Al Qaeda itself. We continue to have a good deal of difficulty believing there is a formal al Qaeda. Al Qaeda in Arabic means fundament or base and the CIA apparently came up with the name after cataloguing Arab fighters that poured into Afghanistan to fight the Russians long ago. But whether what was a book-keeping exercise morphed into a fighting force divorced of the CIA remains to us an open question, at least.
What if one of the objectives of maintaining and building a myth of a terrorist "al Qaeda" was to generate a justification for the current wave of tribal attacks? Wherever there is a tribe that needs to be confronted in order to ease the way for world governance, NATO can simply discover "al Qaeda." Is it a coincidence that al Qaeda has suddenly been found in places like Yemen and Somalia?
Regardless of the underlying mechanism, the larger question is whether or not this expanding military effort will have the desired effect of consolidating Western control. (If indeed that's what is going on.) We're not sure. Afghanistan hasn't worked out so well. And other wars need to grow in intensity, some of them anyway, to have the appropriate reengineering effect. Such an expansion can be fomented, unfortunately, via a false flag attack in America or Europe.
Conclusion: We would tend to believe – if the above speculation is correct – that the ultimate prize is Iran. Engaging with Iran and the former Persian Empire would likely bring a kind of regional World War III to fruition.
Edited on date of publication.
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by Bikkhu on 07/07/11 08:26 AM
Don't forget that "Congress is the best what could banks buy for their fiat money". What you need most to win election? Money, and a lot of it. If you are obedient enough, you get a sponsorship. One congressman is not enough, for example Ron Paul. And Obama's campaign was backed up by Goldman Sachs, I heard.
 |
Posted by Summer on 07/06/11 12:49 PM
Oh my word it's been kicking off here! DB most certainly does not have some lowly racist, crass perspective, quite the opposite.
I missed this article yesterday, A+!
DB Yes, when one examines the actual operative procedures a DIFFERENT operative pattern emerges. In any recently attacked state, a central bank is the first thing set up. And then a private banking industry (fiat money distribution network) is created. It may have Islamic aspects or not, but it is intended to introduce (drown) the populace to (in) Western style banking (debt).
Correct, the key to enslavement.
DB What else is set up immediately? Public schools with elaborate facilities for girls, as girls may not receive much formal education in Muslim nations. (Nor may boys for that matter.) The education they do get is usually surprisingly nationalistic. The idea is to break down tribal identity. In order to facilitate this, foreign aid is brought to bear.
Actually Islam encourages equal education of girls and boys and says: even if one has to crawl on his hands and knees to China, one must seek knowledge. The problem of lack education (girls) for certain cultures is that it has been used as a means of controlling women by men, plusthe main role of women was as mothers so education was not viewed as important for women. The elites however wish to educate as it brings birth-rates down, when girls are on the education ladder for longer, delaying marriage etc.
In Pakistan girls and boys are educated in separate schools, as they should be in my view. I was surprised to learn that as Pakistani policy (Women's' guard or something) my mother was taught to shoot a gun in school (in case India attacked), she excelled and moved up to automatic gun level!!! Lol.
DB The Pashtun in particular have a culture and society that has granted a kind of individual (or at least tribal) freedom for 2,000 years. Let Western powers-that-be provide "literacy" and "education" to the Pashtuns and they too can participate in the "advantages" of Western civilization, including massive militarization and a prison-industrial complex that incarcerates millions.
Ha, let them try! The key to resistance is not to have an inferiority complex as some south Asians do, not with Pashtuns, they have pride in their values.
DB One could argue that even the Afghans, in all their supposed cultural debasement, have it better than this...How many Afghans lost their houses to foreclosure in the past millennia?
;)
DB Literacy no doubt makes such evolutions possible. But can some within the Pashtun community be blamed for asking whether literacy Western-style comes with an extraordinarily high price tag? Is the literacy now being inculcated in Kabul truly a selfless act or are there other motives?...All cultures surely need a kind of metaphorical tenderizing in order to create a truly globalist one...
This is so true! DB should look into CEDAW and its social engineering facets. It's astonishing. For example in Belarus mother's day was deemed as inculcating negative stereotypes! Click to view link
DB We would tend to believe - if the above speculation is correct - that the ultimate prize is Iran. Engaging with Iran and the former Persian Empire...
Absolutely correct and for Israelis Purim would be a poetic time to launch it. They may do it within the next couple of years... Scary.
 |
Posted by channa on 07/06/11 10:23 AM
Never heard of scum until now. I don't know any women that want to take over the world, except some weird types. Never hear of this stuff. You are worried over nothing. Are you saying you are a victim of women?
Whatever....Remove my name from your database.
Reply from The Daily Bell
No, we're suggesting that by using words like "whitey" and quoting from a woman who shot Andy Warhol and believed the world would be better off without men, you are presenting yourself as an seemingly intolerant person. Yet this is what you claim upset you within the context of a comment at DB. We removed your name.
|
Posted by channa on 07/06/11 01:02 AM
I notice there are a lot of masculinists on this site, too.
Reply from The Daily Bell
"An advocate of male superiority or dominance" (Merriam Webster Dictionary Online).
A straight white man who insists against all logic and evidence that straight white men are "oppressed" in a world where straight white men have a disproportionately large share of power.
Masculinist = "an advocate of male superiority or dominance" = Scum
----
So now you are referencing SCUM?
See here Click to view link for description below ...
"S.C.U.M Manifesto is a feminist tract written in 1968 by Valerie Solanas, the woman who made an attempt to assassinate Andy Warhol in the same year. It contains "the rationale and program of action of S.C.U.M (Society for Cutting Up Men)," which eliminates through sabotage all aspects of society not relevant to women (everything), brings about a complete female take-ove [and] eliminates the male sex ...
|
Posted by channa on 07/06/11 12:53 AM
btw, call me racist all you want; my son is 1/8 Iroquois and my grandmother was 1/4 Lakota, so I have no reason to be racist against part of my ancestry. I was going to contribute by won't now.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Your comments here have always been received respectfully until for some reason you made the surprising charge of racism. We have rebutted it. So have some others on this site.
Why return to it? Do you wish to make a continuing issue of it? That would be as wrong as the initial charge.
|
Posted by channa on 07/06/11 12:48 AM
Just censorship to those that disagree with you or call a spade a spade!
|
Posted by channa on 07/06/11 12:45 AM
The DB is the one that likened immigrants to bullets. You are not talking about white immigrants from Euro-ville or Russia. I'm all for the immigrants of Mexico and other brown nations coming here.
Already more hispanic babies are being born in the U.S. than whites. Do the math. It is too late to harp on "immigrants", they are here to stay and they WANT to stay here. If it is a PE tactic this one will back fire on the whites for sure, because soon there will by far more browns than white, including the increasing inter-marriages that produce brown babies. And also your beloved Euro-ville will go the same way. England, France, the talk there is about the Muslims from ME countries...they hate it.
From what I've read, your free market includes the abrupt end to social security, food aid programs, and all social services to disabled and to the "immigrants". This is promoting the PE culling factor. Let's see...The white guys set up a lucrative capitalist system, create a welfare state to appease the "lessers", then proceed to loot the wealth that has flowed upward....Then when things aren't working so well anymore, they cut the nanny strings and say "sorry, we are going free market now"....You're all on your own.
It all feeds right into the PE hands. At least Faber has the intelligence to see that free market is not necessarily right for all countries...and they he listed some success stories.
Go ahead and cut me off. I stand by what I said. It was thoroughly racist.
The browns will keep flowing in, they will keep having children...then the chinese will come. It is over for whitey. But after the mass slaughtering over just the last century that has killed hundreds of millions, will anyone really miss us?
Reply from The Daily Bell
"It is too late to harp on "immigrants" you write.
1. Again, we were not harping. We were pointing out that immigration plays a role in PE strategies of breaking down culture and encouraging hostilities between races.
2. To repeat a point we made previously: The PE USES immigration as a weapon, to dilute culture and reconfigure society. Immigration should be a private-market matter, dealt with privately, not through inevitably divisive government programs. We have suggested this in numerous articles. To suggest that the private market can solve the issue of immigration tensions is not racist; it is innovative and in keeping with our free market brief.
3. Also, you keep accusing us of racism while making statements like this: "It is over for whitey."
4. And we have never advocated "the abrupt end to social security, food aid programs, and all social services to disabled and to the 'immigrants.'" In addition to making racist statements (and then accusing us of the same) you are now accusing us of advocating a kind of genocide.
5. Theoretically, we are in favor of private markets across-the-board. This is a statement of anarcho-capitalism. But your sentiments, if followed logically, place you in a position of claiming racism when it comes to libertarians, anarchists and even those who believe generally in cutting government programs.
6. Finally, we have never suggested "cutting you off." You are "projecting." You used a phrase of that sort in reference to US.
|
Posted by Pete 8 on 07/05/11 09:29 PM
I would recommend that DB remove channa's racist post, as this will foul up the search engines, nanny-filters etc, making them block and de-rank.
I would not urge censorship in any form, but channa's post causes electronic harm to DB and the GREAT THOUGHTS herein.
So I would vote to remove it for Thought's sake, and to avoid having to un-troll something so banal, which is a total waste of time.
Keep up the good work DB & Commenters.
Hidden above in the main Article, and the first few comments, is actually a new methodological precedent, can you spot it?
Pockets of Pure Prosperity Patched Parentally to a Wonderfully Woven Wall-to-Wall.
I am smiling widely!
|
Posted by sparky on 07/05/11 08:30 PM
@ Channa
This was lifted directly from your post
"As they are the ones (mostly) that you folks call lazy because they have medicaid and other government handouts."
If I may comment on this with all due respect. I have been reading the "Bell since the beginning of the year and I do not recall the "Bell" referring to recipients of the aforementioned aid as "Lazy". Furthermore, I don't recall the "Bell" using derrogatory commentary to describe ANY recipients of government wealth transfers.
Thanks again DB for continuing to provide your thought provoking commentary.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks. We have again responded to Channa's unexpected accusations below, in this thread.
|
Posted by JCC on 07/05/11 08:20 PM
This just sounds absurd. You actually said "nothing frightens whites more than being overwhelmed with another race." Why would that be something that could hold value? Is there a concept hidden between the lines? America is a melting pot. It is not race against race as you so simply see it. Hope you had a healthy and happy 4th of July.
|
Posted by geodinok on 07/05/11 06:37 PM
I also think one of the objectives of promoting the communist Russian revolution was the destruction of their traditional culture. While we're on the topic, you can add the promotion of the Greek and Turkish revolutions in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (respectively) as having the same objective.
|
Posted by Bluebird on 07/05/11 06:36 PM
@ channa,
How sad that you bring your racist tripe to this site! It is always the racists who yell "racist". The staff of the Daily Bell are the kindest people on the net. They are on the side of the oppressed, no matter the color. It matters not which color of people predominate the US, the end result is the same. The wealth is extracted from all colors. And there are plenty of white folk on "handouts" also. In fact, it is the PE who are fueling the "race" issue. You are shooting the messengers! I hope you are just having a bad day.
|
Posted by channa on 07/05/11 05:14 PM
"It is a baseless, ignorant"
Call me ignorant all you want, anyone can do the math on browns versus white. Browns are having far more children than whites. And many whites in N. America are already of mixed race.
If anything brings on the demise of your PE friends, it will be the browning of America and Europe. in the lust for power the PE's plan will backfire due to the numbers. Anyone can see it. The comment on immigrants is assumed to be those of brown skin. And you know that.
Nothing frightens white's more than being overwhelmed with another race. GB, France, etc, have made it clear that N Africans are not welcome, although the N. Africans are suppose to tolerate the bombing of their lands by NATO.
If you are so supportive of tribal life, why don't you go live it? And we the ignorant (those that do not agree with your particular brand of ideology) know that your idea of free market will result in a blood bath and deaths of millions of browns...As they are the ones (mostly) that you folks call lazy because they have medicaid and other government handouts. These "tribal" people are being used by all sorts of ideologists to "prove" their way of thinking, in more ways than one.
Reply from The Daily Bell
You decided to call us "racist," but you have race your mind ... You are evidently indulging in what Freud called "projectionism."
----
"Anyone can do the math on browns versus white."
DB: Not us. We've never written about "browns" in these pages. Not once.
----
"Many whites in N. America are already of mixed race."
DB: Who cares? You sound like some sort of eugenist.
----
"If anything brings on the demise of your PE friends, it will be the browning of America and Europe."
DB: Our PE "friends?" You sure you have the correct website? As to browning of America and Europe, again, who cares? Our point was that the PE USES immigration as a weapon, to dilute culture and reconfigure society. Immigration should be a private-market matter, dealt with privately, not through inevitably divisive government programs.
----
"Nothing frightens white's more than being overwhelmed with another race."
DB: This sounds like something out of some racist, Aryan tract. Again, who cares about race. It is culture that is at issue.
----
"As they are the ones (mostly) that you folks call lazy because they have medicaid and other government handouts."
DB: Once more, you attribute sentiments and dialogue to us that we did not use. Where on earth did we call people of brown skin "lazy." It is another ugly canard. What we observed is that the PE pits cultures against each other and dilutes them for purposes of implementing the NWO."
----
"Your idea of free market will result in a blood bath and deaths of millions of browns."
DB: Given your complete ignorance of our point of view, we reject the idea that you can speak for us, let alone predict what "our idea of a free market" will "result" in.
----
"The comment on immigrants is assumed to be those of brown skin. And you know that."
DB: We made no mention of brown skin. You've brought it up suddenly (out of the blue) to accuse us of racism, which is ludicrous. Many of our articles endorse a form of tribal culture and the Pashtuns in particular might not be considered entirely caucasian.
|
Posted by steveg on 07/05/11 03:11 PM
Another great article by Daily Bell. Nato is financed by the tax dollars of us all. Now, I believe it has become. the proxy army of the the New World Order.
Here are a couple of satirical links.
Click to view link
Click to view link
|
Posted by Jonathan on 07/05/11 02:56 PM
I, too, would be more than keen to have the DB's opinion on South America. Colombia is an interesting country as they are conservative in quite a socialist continent, and Santos (the president since 2010) is a globalist, I am sure. He travels constantly and since he took office there has been a regrouping and resurgence of guerilla violence, even though this is mainly restricted to certain depts (Cordoba, Caqueta, etc), and doesn't affect big cities.
It is also at a low level due to the fabulous contribution of Alvaro Uribe in this respect (president 2002-2010), whose father was killed by the FARC. Santos travels constantly, has his tongue hanging out for a free-trade agreement with the US (which none of the farmers want in Colombia), he has stated to the UN that he has the best experience to be on the UN security council, has facilitated further unification of the stock markets of Ecuador, Colombia, Peru and Mexico, and his approach to the violence is not enough. He has just signed a Victims Rights and Land Restitution Measure into law, which is putting lipstick on a pig, as when the displaced people get back to their property, the paramilitaries kill them or chase them off and take it right back. His popularity has dropped sharply since he took office. Just FYI!
Also, I highly recommend the web site run by the amazing Bob Chapman, who writes financial reviews which include the Rothschild global spider's web (there's even a PDF showing the fine detail of the spider's web itself - companies, businesses, John Paulson, etc, etc), and plans for one world government. These are all free (including gold and silver mining stock picks) at Click to view link. Well worth a visit.
|
Posted by channa on 07/05/11 02:46 PM
"In Europe and America thus far the weapons are economic and social; immigrants not bullets are the weapons of choice, but the effect is the same."
The best thing the globalists ever did was create the climate for "immigrants" pouring into the U.S., most of whom have been on this land before the whites. This will be the death of white "culture" in the West as the browns become the dominant race over time. Likening immigrants to bullets is rather racist in my view. And trying to take a natural free-market theme which the indigenous adhere to for millenium and try to mold it into a Western style loses its "free-market" value. It appears that Western lower-class elites are just using for means to more domination. scratch this site. I do not tolerate racists.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Sorry to hear, Channa. You'd have a point if we made a specific remark aimed at a specific ethnic group. We didn't. We simply made the point that immigration was a PE weapon. We cast no aspersions on any ethnic group. In fact the whole article is a defense of tribal cultures. As we have stated many times in the past, Immigration should be a private affair, wholly divorced from government manipulation and responsive to the free market. We entirely reject your accusation. It is a baseless, ignorant canard.
----
This however is an unabashedly racist statement:
"The best thing the globalists ever did was create the climate for "immigrants" pouring into the U.S., most of whom have been on this land before the whites. This will be the death of white "culture" in the West as the browns become the dominant race over time."
You have hoisted yourself on the proverbial petard.
|
Posted by jf on 07/05/11 02:14 PM
I am compelled to share this with all of you because OldDog brought out some very important questions. Those questions need to be answered...
First, throughout history,Satan has maligned Jehovah God.(Proverbs 27:11)Why is this important? Because Satan has influenced a large part of mankind. 'The whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one,' states 1 John 5:19. The scriptures say that Satan offered Jesus the authority and the glory of 'all the kingdoms (governments) of the inhabited earth.' (Luke 4:5-7). They are his to give but Jesus was not corrupted and refused it all.
The apostle Paul said that the truth is being veiled by the "god of this system of things(Satan)" and he has blinded the minds of unbelievers so the illumination of the glorious good news he preached might not shine through. (2 Corinthians 4:3, 4) He has the power to blind the minds! Satan is 'a liar and the father of the lie,' yet he is the great deceiver because he portrays himself as 'an angel of light.' (John 8:44; 2 Corinthians 11:14) He has the power and the methods needed to blind the minds of the world's rulers and their citizens with propaganda and religious myths and lies.
Do not be misled, Satan's power and influence are evident. Consider this event... Jehovah God sent an angel to deliver a message of encouragement to Daniel, the angel encountered resistance from 'the [spirit] prince of the royal realm of Persia.' God's faithful angel was held up for 21 days until 'Michael, one of the foremost princes,' came to help him. The same account also speaks of 'the [demon] prince of Greece.' (Daniel 10:12, 13, 20)
Revelation 13:1, 2, portrays Satan as 'the dragon' who gives to the political wild beast 'its power and its throne and great authority.' The apostle Paul wrote this warning: 'We have a wrestling, not against blood and flesh, but against the governments, against the authorities, against the world rulers of this darkness, against the wicked spirit forces in the heavenly places.' (Ephesians 6:12) Even today, demonic forces under the control of Satan the Devil are behind the scenes, exercising influence on human rulers and on mankind in general, prompting them to commit unspeakable acts of genocide, terrorism, and murder. Let us now examine how we can successfully resist these powerful spirit forces.
 |
Posted by OldDog on 07/05/11 12:17 PM
One can safely assume that in many cases rage and murder our joined at the hip, and in some cases, the reason for the rage provides justification for the murder. In other cases, murder is committed with no rage at all, just a cold calculation that it will result in profit of some kind. Without the moral roadblock of Christianity the traffic in murder becomes epidemic. One needs only to read the daily paper to confirm this statement.
As I write this the United States Government is killing thousands of people under the orders of their Banker masters for no other reason than monetary profit, and has been since the get go. Yet we peons celebrate these atrocities as if it was the direct instructions of God. So much for, 'Thou shalt not kill'.
If you counter that God has instructed past leaders to kill, and sometimes in the most barbaric fashion, you would be correct, but to assume that God is talking directly to any of Americas leaders is really stretching cognition to the breaking point.
What has contributed to this acceptance of government murder among the peons, besides a lifetime association with murder as entertainment? One can only wonder how Americans can dare show their face in worship, while consistently supporting murderers in government. One can also wonder how any preacher can be theologically obtuse enough to fan the flames of government murder.
Unless someone has committed an atrocity that begets rage, and the evidence is unmistakable, I contend that absent direct orders from God, there is no justification for murder, and even what appears to be unmistakable evidence, or direct orders from God, must be thoroughly examined.
This is why God established governments among men, so that truth will prevail, and justice be served. What kind of lunatic would justify a government that murders for profit, even when the supporting majority is intellectually underdeveloped? Has humanity lost the basic instinct of compassion? Have American's lost all common sense?
Did Jesus say 'go and spread democracy over the whole earth? IT DOESN'T IN MY BIBLE'S, and I have all the translations. So, any Christian acceptance of government murder is lacking any biblical support, and only government manipulated RAGE must be the cause of Christian involvement.
This can only mean that American's are intellectually incapable of inspecting the evidence, or there is evil in their soul, and probably both. Another great tragedy that confounds me is, why do Americans, especially Christians need some National Hero to serve as their leader? What is wrong with being served by an intellectually superior group of History scholars? Erudite Men and Women who can articulate lessons learned from history, and present alternatives to those mistakes of past governments.
Why have American's not demanded that all government leaders must first publish their comprehension of the laws and morals they will adhere to? Since the oath of office has become meaningless, why don't we insist that all government leaders sign a contractual oath of performance, with clearly defined objectives, rewards, and penalties? If a man or woman cannot clearly articulate in writing and speaking how they perceive the Nation's needs, and also clearly explain their proposed solutions to Problems, why would any thinking person support them? I conclude that America is sorely short of thinkers, and has a pandemic of self-serving ignoramuses'.
One can also construct a convincing argument that the learning disabilities so prevalent in America are the result of government planning. Ignorant people are so much easier to manage and control. But then again, what kind of intelligence is needed to perceive danger? Do people need to be educated to perceive personal danger, or is it a natural intellectual attribute? If people who borrow money from a loan shark with no intension of paying the debt need an education to prevent that mistake, then God help us. If people need an education to prevent them from strolling on a busy interstate highway, then God help them. What the hell has happened to the American comprehension of danger? Continuing to support this federal rogue government is ludicrous!
We have abandoned God, logic, and common sense in our pursuit of profit.
Money is not the only, or even a justified objective of labor, investment, or any other pursuit. Personal safety is, or should be our instinctual objective.
Now back to RAGE, and its necessity for justification of murder.
Can any learned person object to the murder of all of the international bankers, when their exploits are so well documented? Does their exploits not justify Rage? Where is there a Grand Jury that will investigate the banker's atrocities and indict them for crimes against humanity? There is no other group of people in all of history more deserving of murder than these scumbags, and the entire population of America is sitting on their ass and allowing it to escalate.
With each passing second we the people are being murdered by this evil leviathan called central banking. Its monstrosities are legendary and the most putrid example of human action. Yet, where is the cry for revenge? Where is the person who will stand up and shout 'YOU ARE FOUL AND DESERVING OF DEATH?'
Even Present Kennedy did not have the good sense to construct a grand jury, and instead tried to beat them at their own game and print our own money. Like Lincoln, he paid with his life for that mistake, and the cover-up that followed should have ignited a raging storm of protest, but Americans sat on their ass and accepted the bankers sovereign right to murder. If they can do it, why the hell can't our government murder them, unless of course our government is controlled by them? Go ahead sheelpe, and vote for another hero, and I guarantee you the world will not forget, or forgive our cowardly acceptance of this tyranny. We personally will suffer the consequences of our blind acceptance of these scumbags as our leaders.
Unless a hundred million Americans do not understand that, and become enraged enough to take action that will result in the International Bankers being indicted, prosecuted, and murdered for their global genocide, then we are the dumbest of humanity and deserving of the coming destruction.
America, the land of the free, and the home of the brave, my ass!
|
Posted by timothyprice on 07/05/11 08:31 AM
"...the ultimate prize is Iran. Engaging with Iran and the former Persian Empire would likely bring a kind of regional World War III to fruition."
By that I assume he means, a full scale world war would be launched. He is not suggesting the successful conclusion of such a war, and I am hard pressed to imagine what one would look like.
The West, wanting a one world government, with the European Union, the North American Union, and so on, to Asian, and African Unions as well, I suppose. All with a single currency and under a debt based financial structure dominated by the Bank of England. The legal system would be under UN charter, which does not include any form of a bill-of-rights. Is this what is in mind?
Reply from The Daily Bell
War has traditionally been the means, apparently, by which the Anglosphere elites have consolidated their putative and emergent world government. That is what "we" mean.
|
Posted by bionic mosquito on 07/05/11 08:12 AM
"But can some within the Pashtun community be blamed for asking whether literacy Western-style comes with an extraordinarily high price tag? Is the literacy now being inculcated in Kabul truly a selfless act or are their other motives?"
Western-style education (could rightly be called Prussian-style) is meant to produce conformity, citizens who follow direction, look to superiors for positive feedback, answer memorized facts without understanding premises, do not think critically, are not taught logic and reason, etc. They learn to fit in a box, a box conducive to order.
They learn the curriculum that the state wants taught. "The state will educate your children" is the most fiendish concept, yet most blindly accept this outcome.
To paraphrase R.J. Rushdoony, conservatives complain about taxes, yet gladly tithe their children to the state.
Yes, the price tag is high, and yes there are other motives. I have yet to settle in my mind which is the larger curse to society - central banking or public education. They are linked - one supports the other and likely one cannot survive without the other.
|
|
