News & Analysis
Reality of US Policing
Embarrassed Justice Department officials rushed on Tuesday to correct their own filing in a lawsuit over the 2001 anthrax letters after learning that it appeared to contradict the Federal Bureau of Investigation's conclusion that Bruce E. Ivins, an Army scientist, prepared the deadly powder in his Army laboratory. Lawyers for the department's civil division wrote in the July 15 filing that the Army's biodefense center at Fort Detrick, Md., "did not have the specialized equipment in a containment laboratory that would be required to prepare the dried spore preparations that were used in the letters." – New York Times
Dominant Social Theme: Police work in the US is as good as it gets.
Free-Market Analysis: The New York Times recently reported on the case of Bruce E. Ivins, who committed suicide after being pursued by the Federal Bureau of Investigations over sending anthrax-laced letters to members of Congress and others.
According to the filing, which was required by a Florida lawsuit from a victim of the anthrax letters, the Army lab "did not have a lyophilizer, a freeze-drying machine, in the space where Dr. Ivins usually worked." It is true that there were such facilities elsewhere in the building, but Dr. Ivins did not have direct access to them and it would have been difficult, apparently, to have gained that access, surreptitiously or not.
The news about Dr. Ivins was notable because the FBI has been fighting off allegations that they had targeted the wrong man. Dr. Ivins killed himself in 2008 while facing a murder indictment as the sole actor. The FBI brass has never accepted that they might have been wrong about Dr. Ivins.
Even after this death, they continued their investigations, ultimately releasing a report that delved deeply into his personal life and presented a profile of a man with a troubled personal life; the FBI reportedly pressured the Ivins family as well in an attempt to generate a confession.
FBI top guns remain confident they had the right individual. "We are confident that we would have proven his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a criminal trial," a department spokesman, Dean Boyd, said, according to the Times. The Times also noted the following:
The flap was only the latest in an investigation that some members of Congress have accused the bureau of bungling. Before focusing on Dr. Ivins, the bureau spent years pursuing another former Fort Detrick scientist, Dr. Steven J. Hatfill, before exonerating him and paying him a settlement worth $4.6 million. More recently, a National Academy of Sciences panel criticized the bureau's technical work on the case, saying the investigation of Dr. Ivins was not as airtight as the government claimed.
The Obama Administration itself has not wanted to see the case reopened. Reportedly, the President threatened to veto an entire intelligence authorization bill because it was going to come to his desk with a bipartisan amendment funding an independent inquiry into the FBI's anthrax investigation. "The commencement of a fresh investigation would undermine public confidence in the criminal investigation and unfairly cast doubt on its conclusions."
The FBI has been in the news for another reason recently. The agency has been in court explaining it cannot find videotapes from the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing sought by a Utah lawyer for an ongoing lawsuit over the attack. "[The agency does] not believe another records search is reasonable or will uncover the information, the agency has told a federal judge," according to AP. Here's some more from the AP article, which appeared online on July 5:
FBI officials are "unaware of the existence or likely location of additional tapes" that would fulfill the Freedom of Information Act request filed by Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue, agency attorneys said in court papers filed last week. Trentadue sued the FBI and the CIA in 2008 to get the videos and contended the FBI's efforts to locate the information have been inadequate. He is looking for surveillance tapes taken the morning of the bombing from exterior cameras on the Murrah building and dashboard camera video from the Oklahoma Highway Patrol's arrest of Timothy McVeigh. McVeigh was convicted of and executed for the bombing.
Trentadue asserts that the videos exist and will expose that others were involved in the domestic terrorist attack that killed 168 people. But attorneys for the agency said the electronic databases have not turned up the records, nor have manual searches of FBI crime labs, evidence centers or a warehouse in Oklahoma City. A further search of a records cache totaling an estimated 450,000 documents — from just the first 14 days of the investigation — in the warehouse would be "unreasonably burdensome" and could take a single staff person more than 18 months to conduct, court papers said ...
Trentadue said in an email to The Associated Press that the government's explanations don't provide any new information. "In short, nothing but more of the same institutionalized dishonesty, deception and disrespect for the Constitution," Trentadue wrote. Trentadue also said the explanation downplayed the purpose of various FBI electronic databases and that a declaration from an FBI official in charge of FOIA responses conflicted with former agents and officers who have provided information in the case.
While these are disparate incidents, they are merely the latest occurrences in a series of unresolved issues that go back many years. Beginning with the FBI's inexplicable determination to maintain the Mafia did not exist during J. Edgar Hoover's lengthy leadership, questions inevitably crop up in major cases.
The assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy and M. L. King have been embroiled in considerable controversy. According to the government, James Earl Ray shot Dr. Martin Luther King, but there was never any physical evidence and James Earl Ray immediately retracted a confession he claimed was coerced into giving. Dr. King's family later won a civil court case proving there was a conspiracy. A photo shows witnesses standing over Dr. King after the shooting and pointing in exactly the opposite direction from where Ray was supposed to have fired. It would seem there was another shooter.
Then there is the infamous "magic bullet" that caused so much damage to John F. Kennedy and others driving in the car with him on that fatal day. Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested as the lone gunman but many have never believed that he acted alone, or that he even fired the fatal shots, which could have been delivered by snipers located behind the "grassy knoll." Here's a description of the single bullet theory from Kennedy researcher Gerald McKnight:
According to the Warren Report the missile hit JFK in the posterior neck, then without striking any hard object passed through the neck to exit at the front of his throat. It then entered Texas Governor John B. Connally's back at the right arm pit, sliding along his fifth rib, demolishing four inches of the rib before it exited his chest below the right nipple. The bullet then allegedly struck and shattered the radius of the right wrist on the dorsal side, then exited at the base of his palm and hit his left thigh just about the knee.
The Report then asserts that CE 399 traveled about three inches beneath the surface of the skin, hit the femur and deposited a lead fragment on the bone. Then, sometime later, with a spasm of reverse kinetic energy it spontaneously exited the hole in Connally's thigh and neatly tucked itself under the mattress of a stretcher parked in a hallway of the Parkland Memorial Hospital that the Report asserted was linked to the wounded governor. There it rested calmly under the mattress waiting for its rendezvous with history.
In March 2011, a lawyer for Sirhan Sirhan – confessed assassin of Robert F. Kennedy – presented new evidence at a parole board hearing claiming he was potentially brain washed and could not remember the shooting. "There is no question he was hypno-programmed," lawyer William F. Pepper told ABCNews.com. "He was set up. He was used. He was manipulated."
Pepper introduced new evidence that there was a second gunman who was fatally shot after his victory in the 1968 California presidential primary. According to ABC, Pepper believes Sirhan was "hypno-programmed," essentially brainwashed to kill Kennedy and his memories were then erased.
The attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan has strange twists. Here's a description of his wounding from "Killtown, The Reagan Shooting Conspiracy." It has similarities to the Kennedy magic bullet hypothesis: "Hinckley supposedly hit Reagan with his sixth and last shot. Not only that, but this lucky last shot supposedly flattened to the size of a dime after it ricocheted off Reagan's limo and bounced 90 degrees and in between the narrow gap of the open rear limo door (opposite opening), hit Reagan underneath his left armpit, glanced off a rib, turned over like a coin then tumbled into his left lung barely missing his heart, all the while his arms were being pinned downed by a Secret Service agent who was hustling him into the limo."
Dozens of witnesses to the infamous public school Columbine shootings claim that there were many more shooters than just Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. A summary entitled "Columbine: What Really Happened," posted at the alternative news site "What Really Happened," lists testimony from over 100 eye-witnesses claiming multiple additional participants dressed in black trench coats and carrying rifles and bombs in knapsacks.
9/11 is just the latest and perhaps most controversial in this sad litany of questionable, high profile shootings and bombings. With a majority of 9/11 Commission members now saying their conclusions are in doubt because of false testimony apparently given by the George W. Bush administration and US Intel agencies, a new investigation is called for.
The narrative is flawed and the facts are in question, to put it mildly. But the chances appear unlikely. The poisoning of the good faith of the body politic will apparently continue. President Obama may be concerned, but the actions of those in power are reinforcing public skepticism and alienation.
There is more of course, much more – a melancholy catalogue of questionable occurrences surrounding numerous high-profile criminal incidents. Most recently, the US and the world witnessed the killing of Osama bin Laden. Yet bin Laden's death had been reported by Fox news over ten years ago (based on reports from Pakistan) and more recently as well. He had not made a certifiable appearance in an audio or video presentation for perhaps a decade outside of various tapes that are apparently the false-flag work of American military intelligence. You can see our article here: Osama bin Laden Is Dead Again?
What is notable and disturbing is that so many major deadly incidents in the US (ones that have changed the course of American history and often resulted in a diminution of freedom) are the subject of great controversy. This pattern, clearly visible by now on the Internet, leads to other doubts as well.
We've often voiced our skepticism recently about the NASA moon landings. While on the face of it, such doubts are absurd, given the litany of confusion above, we would argue that a stance of disciplined distrust is warranted. For every piece of evidence that humans went to the moon there is a countervailing one. The arguments are easily found on the 'Net.
Previously, we were puzzled by the arrogance of what seems to be a pattern of violence and deception. But recently we discovered the work of Douglas Reed, who traced the history of money power in his recently released book Controversy of Zion. You can see our article about this here: Anti-Semitism, Douglas Reed and Zion.
What occurs to us now is that the recent history of America and the Western world has at its root a Pharisaical system based on liturgy that goes back thousands of years. The system postulates a chosen few and a mass of "animals" beneath ... both Jews and Gentiles. It has been an extraordinarily successful system, especially in the past few hundred years, but its reign may be coming to an end as the Internet Reformation exposes its manipulations.
Depersonalize the mass of people on the planet as unworthy and unclean, and these deceptions become far more comprehensible, as do the constant assertions of the elites that there are too many people on the planet. Plans for a "culling" within this context become explicable, as well. (The rage that must reside in the human heart is less understandable.)
Conclusion: When one steps back and reviews the pattern of the occurrences mentioned above, the amount of questions that arise is truly startling. One can draw conclusions – certainly hypothetical ones – that do not bode well for the future of the US and some of its highest institutions, as well as the citizens who have offered their trust.
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by AbuAardvark on 07/22/11 05:32 AM
Hi Bob!
I wonder how, exactly, your arrived at the conclusion that "these people are barking on a wrong tree".
1. All the links I provided in the post you responded to are leading to the writings of ONE individual.
So, whom do you refer to by using the word "these people"?
2. All the points you listed - and much more than these - ARE actually addressed exhaustively by Peter Dale Scott - a fact, that seems obvious even at a cursory view on the articles
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/22/11 12:16 AM
DB (and interested feedbackers), I hope that, following my list of questions posted earlier about the faked Moon landings, you can now see why I emphasized that "the key was to ask the right questions".
DB made the point that "For major objections on the 'Net about the possibility of landing on the moon, NASA debunkers have proposed countervailing arguments." and that "There is no 'key'."
Obviously, I disagree and I stand by my earlier statement.
I should perhaps have explained what I meant by "right questions". This is still a learning process, by the way, and I'm sure other readers can add other questions to my list or refine my definition of what are "right questions". The way I see it now, there are three important elements:
1) Start with solid, serious, well-defined, sourced, verifiable, non-debatable points that are also accepted as "true" by the mainstream.
2) If possible, aim toward questions which address the issue of the faked Moon landings from the largest possible perspective.
This is where, in my opinion, all the arguments about flags, shadows in the pictures, etc..., fail. At the very least, these should not be used as a starting point. Indeed, DB is right to point out that, for such questions, defenders of the Moon fiction will always be able to find obscure technical counterarguments.
3) The questions should not implicitly endorse or suggest the idea of a conspiracy.
Not only does this make them unacceptable for the mainstream, it also shifts the burden of the proof onto those who claim that there was a conspiracy. This is playing right into the defenders' cards. Again, our job is not to prove that a conspiracy took place (interesting as that may be), but simply to show convincingly that the defenders of the Apollo fiction have a lot more work to do to convince us that the landings really took place.
I hope that I have been able to show that not all questions about the Moon landings are created equal and that questions that fulfill the three characteristics indicated above are likely to be much more difficult to answer for the defenders of the alleged Moon landings.
DB, what says you?
Reply from The Daily Bell
"DB is right to point out that, for such questions, defenders of the Moon fiction will always be able to find obscure technical counterarguments"
This was our point.
See, also, today's article. We suggest approaching the apparent hoax systemically, using the patterns the Internet has made available ...
|
Posted by bob on 07/21/11 09:46 PM
All these people are barking on a wrong tree.
JFK assassination was too well and very high-level organized and executed (the same goes for the 9/11):
- It was not a simple or easy job to
-- find someone as Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO)with such a "perfect" traitor resume who just recently came back from USSR
-- get LHO a job in a place from which an assassination could take place and
-- keep LHO this day in a town without an alibi of his innocence (at the moment of the JFK assassination, LHO could be in a company of his co-workers in some place else)
- Somebody worked on JFK body during his flight back to Washington to hide his wounds from shots fired from the Grassy Knoll
- the Warren Commission ignored the testimonies from 96 eyewitnesses that shots were fired from the Grassy Knoll
- the list going on and on
For almost 50 years since the JFK assassination, the US government and its agencies were doing everything to review the JFK assassination.
IMHO, such job was done by a very special team of government hired and protected people. There are two reasons:
1)the JFK executive order to "close" the FED and
2)his constant confrontations with the Zionist lobby in America
 |
Posted by Siegfried on 07/21/11 08:25 PM
Karen's article is wonderful in the use of language, its clear message and its frank optimism!
|
Posted by John Danforth on 07/21/11 08:00 PM
The titanium vaporized.
|
Posted by John Danforth on 07/21/11 07:47 PM
Don't misunderstand me too quickly, Bill. It's misused power of government that caused this. The pre-emptive power you see in my suggestion is of the same type as a bill of rights. To RESTRICT power. In this case, lots of people are having to suffer the consequences of choices of unaccountable others. If any compensation is paid, the victims themselves will be taxed to pay it!
This is a toy the bureaucrats can't understand, and it probably should be taken away from them. The first reaction to the meltdown was for the Japanese authorities to send in bureaucratic thugs to clamp down on information. And they began lying immediately. For the first month, the only clues we had on what has now been confirmed to have happened (which is that the worst case scenario was exceeded) was when the techies slid data to the official announcers that they didn't understand. But the techies knew, and it was code for anyone else that knew. When it slipped out that daughter elements with exceedingly short half-lives were being measured, the code was: runaway meltdown with chain reactions still occurring.
The political control and bureaucratic entanglement of the industry is absolutely stultifying. That's why these obsolete first-generation reactors are still in use. They should have been replaced with better designs decades ago. But it's impossible. In the name of 'safety', we have been burdened with extremely risky ancient designs and prevented from devising methods to recycle the fuel. And so now we have a worse-than-worst-case disaster. It hands the anti-nuke people the tool they need to get them shut down. Given the political nature of the management of power companies and nuclear power, it's just as well, until such time as some kind of sanity can replace corrupt bureaucracy. No matter that the regulations made Gulag economics and rule-skirting inevitable, as any kind of corruption does. Quasi-public corporations (which really means government-owned when something bad happens) need to go the way of the USSR before any improvement can be made towards the scenario you describe, which I agree with, by the way. Until then, they probably shouldn't be allowed to have the capacity to make mistakes with such dire consequences. These obsolete reactors dot the landscape in the U.S., too. Same design. Not too far from the New Madrid fault, which rarely slips but the last big one reversed the course of the Mississippi, knocked down trees, and created a lake. In the Fukushima event, the quake broke the cooling pipes. No contingency plan for that, not in that design! These drawbacks were known and the designers resigned over it. It's foolish to have fools in charge.
"Thirty-five years ago, Dale G. Bridenbaugh and two of his colleagues at General Electric resigned from their jobs after becoming increasingly convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing -- the Mark 1 -- was so flawed it could lead to a devastating accident.
Questions persisted for decades about the ability of the Mark 1 to handle the immense pressures that would result if the reactor lost cooling power, and today that design is being put to the ultimate test in Japan.... (it failed -JD)
"The problems we identified in 1975 were that, in doing the design of the containment, they did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of coolant," Bridenbaugh told ABC News in an interview. "The impact loads the containment would receive by this very rapid release of energy could tear the containment apart and create an uncontrolled release."
I hate bureaucrats. Their favorite sport is overruling reason.
|
Posted by John Danforth on 07/21/11 07:19 PM
That's odd. I've always viewed the MSM as having a permanent tilt towards anti-nuke fearmongering. Even going so far as to stifle evidence whenever it contradicts the zero-threshold proposition.
Then, along comes this huge event and they are pretty much dead silent. When they do mention it, there is never any hard data. The implication is they'll tell you what they think you need to know.
|
Posted by AbuAardvark on 07/21/11 06:40 PM
Great Video. Chilling. Thanks.
However, as indicated earlier, I doubt that the Pharaohs were the first elite to consider farming human livestock.
It just seems so ... human, I'm afraid.
 |
Posted by Dave Jr on 07/21/11 06:27 PM
With all the advanced teloscopic instrumentation nowadays, it seems it would be easy to obtain a photo of the lunar module's lower half still sitting on the moon? They spend money on documentary after documentary to debunk the conspiracy theorists, but don't do the easier thing.
Like a simple snapshot depicting a Boeing 767 engine wreckage being draged out of the pentagon would certainly have shut me up. Maybe they don't do these easy things because they are not possible?
|
Posted by AbuAardvark on 07/21/11 05:15 PM
DB: "The assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy and M. L. King have been embroiled in considerable controversy"
While I'm uncertain if Peter Dale Scott actually COINED the phrase "Deep Politics", his work on the subject undoubtedly helped me further my understanding of the overall ponzi.
Click to view link
The following audio interview was uploaded just three days ago:
Click to view link
This interview, "The "Deep State" behind U.S. democracy", on the "Voltaire Network", three months ago:
Click to view link
A few PDS articles on "Deep Politics":
"The Assassinations of the 1960s as "Deep Events"
Click to view link
"9/11, Deep State Violence and the Hope of Internet Politics"
Click to view link
"The Doomsday Project, Deep Events, and the Shrinking of American Democracy"
Click to view link
"The JFK Assassination as an Engineered Provocation-Deception Plot"
Click to view link
"Deep Events and the CIA's Global Drug Connection"
Click to view link
 |
Posted by clark on 07/21/11 05:10 PM
Need Facts on Fukushima Disaster?
This blog seems very good, based in Japan, it's written in both Japanese and English:
Click to view link
 |
Posted by rossbcan on 07/21/11 05:00 PM
"to just deny them the ability to screw things up so badly."
Oh, a liberatrian needlessly restricting choice, implying the "neccesity" of "premptive power"? This faulty thinking leads to exactly where we are NOW. Best to remove foot from mouth and think clearly. I KNOW these crimes make us SO ANGRY, but, control and calm required.
Far better to have accountability: YOU screw up and harm anyone, well, YOU will be enslaved until your victims have been compensated with triple damages PLUS the cost of dealing with your irresponsible / stupid / criminal actions.
This was once called the now rationalized away to "quaint and unfair" concept of justice:
Justice Defined: We are all free to profit or suffer and learn (adapt to excellence) by facing the consequences of our OWN choices. Injustice is to be forced to suffer the consequences of choices of unaccountable (irresponsible) others.
|
Posted by JM on 07/21/11 04:48 PM
For several years I have believed that the Petrodollar (centrally controlled fiat money plus the elite-controlled energy industry) was the major key to our enslavement. Got a lot of dumb looks in response. Now I have a soul mate!
"Paul Hellyer: Abolishing Fed and new energy disclosure key to U.S. survival"
Click to view link
But I still get dumb looks. :-)
|
Posted by tawny on 07/21/11 04:35 PM
@ John Danforth
See short vid below on nuke industry's corruption, threats, intimidation of employees/whistleblowers... this is from Click to view link If you go there also check out the article about the New Mexico haz mat head honcho 'mysteriously' and suddenly quitting. Los Alamos and environs are a toxic mess, getting into ground water. Reader comments on this website are also sometimes informative.
I've (tawny, that is) been anti-nuke power for a long time, ever since I learned that there is NO good solution to the nuclear waste problem. It lasts pretty much forever,is hugely toxic in small amounts (there is NO safe/harmless dose) will outlast any containment and inevitably get into the biosphere - air, soil, groundwater, oceans, plant and animal bodies, etc.
Very short video, definitely worth watching, link below.
Interesting that MSM news sources are coming out of the woodwork on this now (after decades of silence on the dangers of nuclear power and the corrupt industry) Click to view linkems that after a certain 'tipping point' is reached, appearances demand that they make a show of presenting important unbiased news reports, are not totally slanted to aid and abet big money (as their record clearly shows MSM news to have been consistantly over many decades - after all, the MSM are themselves "big money").
Click to view link
Whistleblowers 'terrified' at TVA nuke plants?, CBS News, July 20, 2011
Silkwood-style threats and intimidation and worse on the part of the nuclear power industry have been going on all along.
 |
Posted by Leonardo Pisano on 07/21/11 04:32 PM
@Kelly:
Your link is ok, but indeed to save it as one doc is a hassle. FWIW, two years ago I printed the 54 page document "The protocols of the learned elders of zion" to pdf. It's not a pretty format but AFAIK it's complete. The download link it contains is now dead... Anyone interested can drop me an email at leonardo (dot) pisano57 (AT) gmail (dot) com, and I'll be happy to send the document.
|
Posted by John Danforth on 07/21/11 04:10 PM
Maybe fascists shouldn't be in control of technology they don't understand. I never started out anti-nuke. But seeing the cover-ups and incompetence leads me to believe it's probably better to just deny them the ability to screw things up so badly.
Those aged plants should have and would have been upgraded to better, safer designs if it were not for the gridlock between the greenies and the fascists. That was the thesis and antithesis, so the synthesis we got was inaction and pretending everything was fine. It wasn't. Their own documents prove it. The scientists and technicians are there to keep the crap running. They dreamed of a technocracy, an impossible contradiction. They are out of the decision making loop, except where information is demanded of them. And the blame will be laid at their feet, naturally. Through information control.
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/21/11 04:03 PM
The next climate debate bombshell, by Dennis Avery:
Click to view link
"Get ready for the next big bombshell in the man-made warming debate. The world's most sophisticated particle study laboratory-CERN in Geneva-will soon announce that more cosmic rays do, indeed, create more clouds in earth's atmosphere. More cosmic rays mean a cooler planet. Thus, the solar source of the earth's long, moderate 1,500-year climate cycle will finally be explained.
Cosmic rays and solar winds are interesting phenomena-but they are vastly more relevant when an undocumented theory is threatening to quadruple society's energy costs. The IPCC wants $10 gasoline, and 'soaring' electric bills to reduce earth's temperatures by an amount too tiny to measure with most thermometers.
In 2007, when Fred Singer and I published Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years, we weren't terribly concerned with cosmic rays. We knew the natural, moderate warming/cooling cycle was real, from the evidence in ice cores, seabed sediments, fossil pollen and cave stalagmites. The cycle was the big factor that belied the man-made warming hysteria of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change."
|
Posted by tawny on 07/21/11 04:02 PM
@ memehunter
I puzzle and ponder the same question.
We know they have their well-stocked underground bases, not just in the US but in many places around the world. Also, I have read that the Bushes have bought a huge amount of land in So. America, Bolivia, I believe it is. Obama just coincidentally took his family to So. America for 2 weeks of the heaviest Fuk. out-pouring. Israel seems to be creating a kind of center for themselves in Patagonia (Adrian Salbuchi has mentioned this).
Also there are things we don't know, of course. Do they have antidotes? I don't see how that would be possible, but who knows ... however I think that IV chelation might well rid the body of radionuclides. It is the treatment of choice for heavy metal poisoning.
If anyone has info on this topic, please post it here.
In a nutshell what we need to do is 'chelate the isotopes out' and best way to do it is take in a lot of anti-oxidants (found in fresh fruits and veggies). Best now to drink purified water, at least RO and ideally RO and then distilled. Stay out of the rain!, take off shoes and outer clothing when coming indoors, get a hepa filter. Clean more often. Dust with a damp cloth.
Try to eat produce from S.A., avoid leafy greens now and all dairy, also animal products, they have a lot of radiation (living bodies tend to concentrate radiation and other toxins - like mercury in salmon). Eat root crops, and things with thick peels like citrus, melons. Chlorophyll is great and best thing is grow and juice wheatgrass indoors, which I do (it is actually easy to do), being a long time 'health food nut' and also Gerson Therapy alumnus. There is a documentary on the Gerson Therapy on Netflix, I am told. It is over-all the best holistic therapy for detoxing and healing degenerative illness.
HOWEVER -- this has shown me that all along the game as I said has been fast and loose, over-arching control of the elites has become great but is not and has never been total. And actually the story of human life and interaction on this planet is that it has been one big grab-fest. Get there first, plunder is easier than working to produce wealth, and it has been an open game. Do unto others before they do unto you, and take what they got.
Technology has exploded in the equivalent of a few seconds, when looking at the timeline of history. And technology has given us a huge destructive power on a global scale.
My conclusion tentatively is that the road to our perdition (we could be looking at a massive die-off or extinction event) has been paved 'one good ol' boy deal at a time'. There has been no 'control central.'
Even without the nightmare of nuclear radiation, the biosphere is already dangerously poisoned and out of balance. Oxygen levels in air and oceans are very low, life forms are mysteriously dying (bats, bees), Monsanto is experimenting globally real time with GMO organisms, the elites are spraying us with chem trails (aluminum, barium, etc. plus the mysterious and scary nano-critter called Morgellons.)
Things were not looking good before this (some believe HAARP-triggered) big quake... and now...
Creepiest thing is to mention this to people and see their blank incomprehension. Talk about information and mind control.
Time to watch the original INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, THE CHINA SYNDROME, THE ROAD, SILKWOOD, DR. STRANGELOVE... and enjoy the bitter satisfaction of 'I told ya so' --- but the mind-contolled masses, up to the bitter end, will be, as I like to say, a day late and a dollar short.
Maybe it's not that bad, and I hope not, but it is not lookin' good. Das why I so depress', Brah...
|
Posted by JM on 07/21/11 04:00 PM
Re: "...do they have a way to cope with the radioactivity?"
You may have stated the reason.
|
Posted by memehunter on 07/21/11 03:16 PM
I don't believe that Fukushima was simply an accident (I can also post info and links in support of this, but readers can do their own research).
What I don't understand is how the elites protect themselves from the radiation. I mean, if their goal is to poison our planet forever, fine, I can believe that - after all, depopulation is one of their goals. But isn't it their planet too? Or do they have a way to cope with the radioactivity?
|
|
