MEMBER LOGIN  l  FREE REGISTRATION
The Daily Bell Newswire

Editorial

Thursday, August 25, 2011

The Proposed UN Small Arms Treaty; Pushed by Hillary Clinton

By Adrian Krieg
37

Dr. Adrian Krieg

The greatest gun grab in world history is in the midst of debate in the UN and is being pushed by Obama, Holder, Clinton, and all of Obama's Czars. Citizens of the United States, in fact citizens around the world, deserve to know what this treaty, if ratified by the Senate, would mean to Americans. Here is a brief synopsis:

• If ratified by the Senate the treaty would void the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.

• The Treaty would violate the Tenth Amendment transferring and federalizing gun ownership, regulation and licensing nationally.

• Require the establishment of a national data bank (federal) of all gun owners.

• Ban the sale, transportation and trade of all semi-automatic guns that have been in use since the 1890s.

• Confiscate all "UNAUTHORIZED" (a word not defined in the document) civilian firearms.

• Require a federal license for the purchase and ownership of any gun.

The fact is that were this treaty to be ratified it would fundamentally change America, giving it the appearance of Australia and England where gun ownership is restricted and crime statistically has risen drastically since their gun bans. England has clearly demonstrated the failure of this during the recent riots in which merchants were unable to defend their property, which the police were unable to do.

The argument by proponents of this treaty is to stop the unauthorized sales of guns across international boundaries that they claim are arming criminals and terrorists and leading to gun violence. In order to bolster that argument, Eric Holder and the US Department of Justice engaged the BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) to set up operation FAST & FURIOUS in which thousands of small arms were sold across the Mexican border, supplying the Mexican drug cartels with weapons. This was done with strong opposition by FFL licensees (gun dealers) who were in some instances told that their licenses would be reviewed if they did not cooperate with Fast and Furious. Over a dozen murders and the deaths of two federal agents are directly linked to Fast & Furious, which is now under review by congress.

The largest volume of small arms flooding the world markets are produced in China, the old Soviet republics, Israel, France and the United States. Since governments make all these sales, the treaty, which only regulates small arm sales to the private sector and to individual owners, will have no effect at all in the international arms bazaar. This treaty represents the elites' final move to disable people's resistance to the New World Order, something that they have been setting up for many decades.

For eons the global elite have had their eyes on everything that they desire to control. There appears to be nothing off the table. From arms for self-protection, to the seabed, the air, the climate, everything must be controlled by the power hungry elites. After all, we are far too stupid to fend for ourselves. Well, with what they have accomplished in the realm of education, bringing America from fourth in the world to 34th in just 30 years, you can gain understanding of their position. The nanny-state must protect you from your fellow citizens.

Well, not really. The enemy, as demonstrated in the immediate past, has not been our fellow citizens but in most cases their governments. Considering that in the 20th Century governments killed more people than all the wars including WWI and WWII, one can gain an understanding of the issue. In the Soviet empire alone from 1919 to its end over 200 million were killed, in China during the "Great Leap Forward" (Cultural Revolution) over 100 million were killed, in Germany and Italy perhaps ten million were killed. Frankly and honestly ,I would much rather trust my neighbor or even a stranger with a gun than any government agent.

This proposal, and let's hope that's all it will ever be, is the most massive attempt to control humanity undertaken since the beginning of recorded history. We have been told by no less an expert than Hillary Clinton that this is a fight against terrorism, insurgency, and international crime syndicates. It is in fact none of those. The world is awash with small arms, 98% of which were provided by or sold by governments. The control and/or elimination of private ownership of firearms will have zero effect on any of the aforementioned issues.

Let's make this abundantly clear. The Taliban, since the NATO incursion, facilitates the production of heroin, making Afghanistan the number one supplier of illicit drugs in the world. Before the NATO incursion into their country the Taliban had eliminated heroin production. They reinstated it to produce money to buy guns and munitions. Almost all guns of the Taliban are AK-47s and various versions of Kalashnikovs produced in China, Bulgaria, Russia and almost all of the old Soviet satellites. Other weapons used by the Taliban are American made, which they got from Afghan army deserters and theft. On our side of the pond the largest supplier of small arms in the past ten years to the Mexican drug cartels has been the BATF through operation Fast and Furious. France has supplied the Libyan rebels and when confronted by the gun-grabbers in Europe, the French government stated that they were not directly supplying the rebels but had no objection if other states in the Middle East supplied them with French arms.

On the Israel front, the Israelis have a long history of supplying their Lebanese Christian militias with arms and amendments and in fact using those militias as a surrogate captive army to destabilize Lebanon. The Israelis have also acted as intermediaries in small arms supplies to Central America, South America, various places in the Middle East, and in fact any place they can turn a shekel.

So the entire red herring of the proposed UN treaty on small arms is nothing but a veiled effort to establish world domination by removing the most obvious impediment to centralized control, the small arm.




Adrian Krieg:   View Bio  l  View Site Contributions
Hillary Clinton:   View Bio  l  View Site Contributions
Latest Daily Bell Articles
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits.
Want to learn more? click here
 
NOT A MEMBER YET?
Join The Daily Bell and take full advantage of the benefits TODAY:
MEMBER LOGIN:
USERNAME:
PASSWORD:
REMEMBER ME
LOST YOUR PASSWORD / USERNAME?
Showing 1 - 20 of 37 - Newest on top - Reorder Feedback
  Posted by jdwheeler42 on 10/01/11 02:26 AM

You are thinking of money as if it were something real. The Federal government doesn't need our tax money, they can just print up more. What income taxes do is help destroy the money supply ao inflation doesn't get unmanageable.

  Posted by bewer on 08/29/11 07:46 PM

exactly!

  Posted by bewer on 08/29/11 07:26 PM

Agreed. Fact--Individual income taxes are unconstitutional anyway. When you pay same, you are supporting the corrupt US Govt, including the massive debt.

  Posted by tone-bone on 08/27/11 11:48 AM

Want to see the Federal government dry up and blow away? Stop paying federal taxes. If 50% of Americans did this, in 30 days the federal government would shut down. By 3 months most of the armed servicemen would just go home to their families. Keep paying State taxes in order to continue continuity of services in your town, city and county.

It's that simple. They need our money like a drug. It's time for the feds to go to rehab.

  Posted by rossbcan on 08/27/11 06:51 AM

Interesting, but in essence a series of decrees, or, opinions which remain of real force and effect only so long as there are sufficient guns, trust and resources to enforce them, when, the very act of enforcement has the long term (NOW) attrition consequences of destroying the resources (trust, productivity, requires absolute property rights, or, why bother?) required to maintain the hierarchical power structure.

Not to mention that power is running out of resources to bribe and maintain the allegiance of their minions who must, out of basic survival considerations either go "free agent", or, align with other powers, with resources. We saw this happen at the dissolution of the former USSR. In actual fact, states inability to "collect" what they consider "sufficient" taxes is the basis of the Faustian "bargain" they have made with fraudulent interests (central banks, running amok, counterfeiting fiat), organized crime, tyrants enslaving their peoples for cheap labor / resource extraction, drug money, ad infinitum.

It comes down to this: Private entities have decreed and made allegations that others are serfs, chattel with absolutely no rights save WHAT they find expedient to grant or provide the illusion of (so you make the expensive / futile mistake of arguing on their terms, on their turf, with their agents - lawyers), enforced by YOUR guns, pointed at you, that it is also decreed that you must pay for, but do not own, nor control.

Truth is: The ONLY rights (including to life) that YOU have are those that you are able to personally and successfully defend.

Whether you CHOOSE to do so, is, as with ALL CHOICES, a matter of survival:

Click to view link

Predators can only prey so long as the survival cost to the majority is "tolerable". Cross this tipping point and, people become compelled to THINK:

Click to view link

... then ACT, leading to different CONSEQUENCES in our action precedes consequence REALITY.

You can either ponder the near infinite complexity of the Gordian Knot of your cage, or, you can shatter the bars that are real and see the lie (not real) of those that are not.

  Posted by David_Robertson on 08/26/11 05:16 PM

Thanks for the link. It appears that the ratification of international treaties does not supersede the Constitution as I believed. The Article in the Constitution that deals with this issue is Article VI which states inter alia:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

My remaining concern is whether nevertheless the present Constitution is the same Constitution that was signed in 1787. It is my belief that it is not but that it is in fact a corporate constitution for an entity called the UNITED STATES CORPORATION. Click to view link

Here is an excerpt from that link:

Here is a Timeline of events that lead to the current United States.

In 1788 (January 1), The United States was officially bankrupt.

In 1790 (August 4), Article One of the U.S. Statues at Large, pages 138-178, abolished the States of the Republic and created Federal Districts. In the same year, the former States of the Republic reorganized as Corporations and their legislatures wrote new State Constitutions, absent defined boundaries, which they presented to the people of each state for a vote…the new State Constitutions fraudulently made the people 'Citizens' of the new Corporate States. A Citizen is also defined as a 'corporate fiction.'


In 1845, Congress passed legislation that would ultimately allow Common Law to be usurped by Admiralty Law. Click to view link explains this change. The yellow fringe placed at the bottom of court flags shows this is still true. Before 1845, Americans were considered sovereign individuals who governed themselves under Common Law.

In 1860 - Congress was adjourned Sine Die - Lincoln could not legally reconvene Congress.

In 1861, President Lincoln declared a National Emergency and Martial Law, which gave the President unprecedented powers and removed it from the other branches. This has NEVER been reversed.

In 1863, the Lieber Code was established taking away your property and your rights.

From 1864-1867, Several Reconstruction Acts were passed forcing the states to ratify the 14th Amendment, which made everyone slaves.

In 1865, the capital was moved to Washington, D.C., a separate country - not a part of the United States of America.

In 1871, The United States became a Corporation with a new constitution and a new corporate government, and the original constitutional government was vacated to become dormant, but it was never terminated. The new constitution had to be ratified by the people according to the original constitution, but it never was. The whole process occurred behind closed doors. The people are the source of financing for this new government.

In 1917, the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) was passed. This insightful video from [link to Click to view link] states the following: 'This act was implemented to deal with the countries we were at war with during World War I. It gave the President and the Alien Property Custodian the right to seize the assets of the people included in this act and if they wanted to do business in this country they could apply for a license to do so.

By 1921, the Federal Reserve Bank (the trustee for the Alien Property Custodian) held over $700,000,000 in trust.' Understand that this trust was based on our assets, not theirs.

In 1933, 48 Stat 1, of the TWEA was amended to include the United States Person because they wanted to take our gold away. Executive Order 6102 was created to make it illegal for a U.S. Citizen to own gold. In order for the Government to take our gold away and violate our Constitutional rights, we were reclassified as ENEMY COMBATANTS.'

In 1933, there was a second United States bankruptcy. In the first bankruptcy the United States collateralized all public lands. In the 1933 bankruptcy, the U.S. government collateralized the private lands of the people (a lien) - they borrowed money against our private lands. They were then mortgaged. That is why we pay property taxes.

From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33, page H-1303, Speaker Representative James Trafficant Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House states:

'…It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: 'The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States…

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens of mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) 'Hypothecated' all property within the Federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. Citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a 'beneficiary' of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the Federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets, and labor of their 'subjects,' the 14th Amendment U.S. Citizen to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States Corporation all of the credit 'money substitute' it needed.

Like any debtor, the Federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the Federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their 'economic slaves,' the U.S. Citizens, as collateral against the federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks, forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have exchanged one master for another.'

  Posted by buffalobob0709 on 08/26/11 02:20 PM

Thanks. I have learned to take Snopes with a couple grains of salt and I usually check truthorfiction also. Both of which I didn't do with this article.
No matter absolute truth or falsehood, articles like this keep us looking for information which we might not do.
Thanks again

buffalobob

  Posted by Steve L. on 08/26/11 01:24 PM

Snopes, particularly with its responses to politically-charged issues, needs to be calibrated just as any other informational/media source. Of late they appear to have taken a decidedly left-friendly tilt in the way they "discern" the truth or falsity behind claims and events. The FALSE flag they applied to this one was primarily because the email example they trotted out claimed that the treaty has been signed, which it has not. Their article on this topic was last updated in May 2010.

What they did NOT discuss was the Reuters article embedded at the bottom of the example email which was, in fact, a real article based on State Department sources. Here's a link to that article:

Click to view link

There are other sites out there that seem to have a less politically-influenced perspective of 'internet rumors' such as Click to view link. Here's a link to their article on the subject.

Click to view link

Barring some series of international small-arms-related terror events (i.e. here we go again), this issue would not be made public about this before the 2012 U.S. elections. The American populace would not merely roll over for a shakedown of their Second Amendment rights.

The gun-owning portion of the population is among the best informed as to what really is going on. This group that is the sleeping giant no politician wants to antagonize, as they adhere to Teddy Roosevelt's axiom of speaking softly but carrying a big stick.

  Posted by buffalobob0709 on 08/26/11 11:45 AM

Click to view link

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - by Adrian Krieg
Dr. Adrian Krieg
The greatest gun grab in world history is in the midst of debate in the UN and is being pushed by Obama, Holder, Clinton, and all of Obama's Czars. Citizens of the United States, in fact citizens around the world, deserve to know what this treaty, if ratified by the Senate, would mean to Americans. Here is a brief synopsis:

• If ratified by the Senate the treaty would void the second amendment to the US Constituion.

• The Treaty would violate the 10th amendment transferring and federalizing gun ownership, regulation and licensing nationally.

• Require the establishment of a nation data bank (federal) of all gun owners.

• Ban the sale transportation and trade of all semi automatic guns that have been in use since the 1890's.

• Confiscate all "UNAUTHORIZED" (a word not defined in the document) civilian firearms.

• Require a federal license for the purchase and ownership of any gun.
========================================================

SNOPES response to the above article

Click to view link

FALSE

Can someone explain this please ?

  Posted by speedygonzales on 08/26/11 09:32 AM

On September 19, 1989, hurricane Hugo slammed into the Virgin Islands, an American territory in the Caribbean Sea near Puerto Rico. In the aftermath of the hurricane, looting and anarchy erupted along racial lines. According to the New York Times, "Armed gangs of 100 or more plundered the streets." There were "roving, machete-wielding gangs ... " Whites were "punched, clubbed and driven from their homes." The whites had to arm themselves with machetes to defend their lives and their homes. When local authorities called out the mostly black National Guard to restore order, the guardsmen revolted and joined in the looting. These revolting national guardsmen were American soldiers who had sworn a military oath of loyalty and obedience. It meant nothing. Numerous eye witnesses reported that the national guardsmen and police robbed stores and drove off in national guard trucks they had loaded with the merchandise they had stolen...

Y'LL 'LL Love story as continue @

Click to view link

  Posted by David_Robertson on 08/26/11 07:44 AM

My thought was that they believe they now have everything in place to accomplish this goal. Foreign policy is the domain of the Executive Branch. International Treaties once ratified are regarded as superior to the Constitution. (This is how many unconstitutional regulations have been promulgated and implemented in America.)

The recently created Super Congress may well be used to ratify the Treaty. If not the recently created voting procedure of disapproval may be used to ensure ratification. I would never underestimate the legal chicanery of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION (i.e. the alien entity that governs the American people from Washington D.C.).

In the past decades there has grown a large opposition to gun ownership in America and this can easily be used by the controlled media to drown out any organised protest against prohibition. Once ratified the Treaty and the regulations growing out of it will become the means whereby the Executive Branch will implement the disarming of the American population through the numerous law enforcement agencies already in existence for this purpose.

What surprises me is the belief that this cannot be done in America. As I have said before the American people are in a state of denial when it comes to recognising the extent to which their country and its original principles have literally been stolen from them. Most of them would now go quietly. The ones who resist would be demonised and incarcerated or killed with the approval of the majority.

  Posted by bob on 08/25/11 11:03 PM

The more I read the more I am convinced that people are stupid & lazy fools.

The greatest weapon of mass destruction was a promise of something for nothing. It worked perfectly in Russia back in the Bolsheviks times and it equally perfectly works now in America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Did I forget somebody else?

  Posted by acomfort on 08/25/11 08:33 PM

"There's no links to this treaty or other supporting links, so this could be hype"
Maybe if you read about it in Forbes you would give more confidence. . .
See: Click to view link
or
Click to view link

  Posted by FrankHenry on 08/25/11 08:24 PM

"... Obama has found several avenues that he can use to get around that pesky Constitution... "

The above quote by one of the feedbacks... .seems to be true.

Take his very own qualification to be president... it seems many don't believe
he meets the "natural born citizen" criteria. Here it is August 2011 and
there are active court cases, as we speak, questioning his legal citizenship
status. He is not born of US citizen parents.

Why has Congress not initiated impeachment process?

  Posted by tittiger on 08/25/11 07:44 PM

Sounds to me that it is way past time to arrest a few politicians for treason. WTF you couch potatoes?

  Posted by Dave Jr on 08/25/11 06:21 PM

I wouldn't need an atta boy from law enforcement. If they left the cuffs off me, that'd be good enough. It would be traumatic enough already.

  Posted by speedygonzales on 08/25/11 05:50 PM

"Even if you were totally within your rights, you might still have to fight a state prosecuting attorney." In Massachusets.
In Texas el sheriff will come, kick to death body on ground got thumb up and say: Good shot, boy! There is no Marx and commies are here.
Click to view link

  Posted by speedygonzales on 08/25/11 05:44 PM

"The enemy, as demonstrated in the immediate past, has not been our fellow citizens but in most cases their governments. Considering that in the 20th Century governments killed more people than all the wars including WWI and WWII, one can gain an understanding of the issue. In the Soviet empire alone from 1919 to its end over 200 million were killed, in China during the "Great Leap Forward" (Cultural Revolution) over 100 million were killed, in Germany and Italy perhaps ten million were killed. Frankly and honestly ,I would much rather trust my neighbor or even a stranger with a gun than any government agent."

Social theme: Who created Soviet Empire, WW1, WW2, who is responsible for Chinese commies actions and genocide of civilians generally?

Genocide is very old tool how to manipulate massees. Actually it is part of propaganda. Vatican paganized christianity and christianized pagan Mithraism. To make sure they will rule they persecuted pagans.
The persecution of pagans by the Christian Roman Empire began late in the reign of Constantine the Great, when he ordered the pillaging and the tearing down of some temples. The first anti-Pagan laws by the Christian state started with Constantine's son Constantius II, who was an unwavering opponent of paganism; he ordered the closing of all pagan temples, forbade Pagan sacrifices under pain of death, and removed the traditional Altar of Victory from the Senate.
This also holds true for the later medieval Emperor Charlemagne, who in September, 774, decided that the Saxons (Westfali, Ostfali, and Angrarii) must be presented with the alternative of baptism or death. and is also reported as having 4,500 pagan Saxons beheaded in the Massacre of Verden. According to the historian Ramsay MacMullen, a council of bishops at Toledo in 681 called on civil authorities to seize and behead all those guilty of non-Christian practices of any sort.
Later Vatican genocided Cathars in Langdueoc. Jonathan Barker cited the Albigensian Crusade, launched by Pope Innocent III against followers of Catharism, as an example of Christian state terrorism. Cathars were actually follower of Jesus Christ, since Jesus was gnostic Essene and Cathars are direct followers of Essenes. So pagan Mithraic Vatic had to destroy Christianity. Before they burned library in Alexandria, to make sure there is not much left from ancient world. They did not know what one day archeology will find.
Vatican contunues go genocidal by inquisition after reconquista of Spain. Who was not in Vatican pack paid no taxes.
These is real foundations for police state and genocide as tool.
England learned: Couple stages of Irish genocide, To Hell or Barbados, up to Potato Famine. During Boer 2nd war concentration camp for woman and children was set. The war ignited gay Cecil Rhodes to fill his idea from Cap to Cairo. Rhodes scholars rule america.
In India britain comited 2 great genocides:
"(The Indian Mutiny) of 1857 was the world's first holocaust, resulting in the loss of an estimated 10 million Indians", stated Indian historian Amaresh Mitra. In and around the same time the same British precided over a 50% reduction in the population of Ireland. Follow by The 1877 Genocide of 30 Million Hindus by the Christian British Rulers.
We can count French Revolution as well.
Then created Federal Reserve, 1913, and WW1 followed. They also send bolsheviks to Russia. Actually it was Kahazarian revange to Russia for them 980 defeat and dismantling Khazarian empire.
Guernica, WW2 and countles bombing of civilians: Dresden, Japan-Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but many more.
300,000 ethnic Kikuyu of Kenya, the torture of hundreds of thousands more, and the internment of the entire Kikuyu population, in mid-20th-century Kenya. As Elkins reveals, the Brits simply destroyed every record of the massacres they could find, and -- unlike the French, Germans or other conscience-harried colonials -- kept the settlers' oath of Omerta, never revealing what they did to the "Kukes" to anyone except other vets whose anecdotes were as bloody and full of blame as theirs. The difference between the British Empire and other fascist empires is not that these guys were nicer. Nobody who reads this book could continue to believe that, if they were fool enough to believe it beforehand. The difference is that the Brits were good at it, and had no conscience to trouble them. Thanks to that careful incineration of records and highly adaptive national sociopathic disorder, "... there would be no soul-searching or public accounting [in Britain] for the crimes perpetrated against the hundreds of thousands of men and women in Kenya." Click to view link

We can go by false flag operation, guinea pigs tests on american population, fiat currency, ponzi schemes, fractional reserve banking.

All links lead to very very narow link and into one nest. And what do you think whom Obama, Holder, Clinton, and all of Obama's Czars serve?

They are scared. They loosing power but they can not create war against Russia or China due they will be destroyed as well. Al what they can do is enslave their own population as did once before. They economical power is declining, home population is not loyal at all. All is left is Patriot Act, domestic spying, terrorist list and disarm people so they would pose no threat to rullers.

I do not waste my time to show you how I learned history at my elementary school. But am afraid thet we all can end up as those mentioned above. Learn history before repeats on you.

  Posted by Dave Jr on 08/25/11 05:04 PM

That is true, and always inform the perpetratror that you are armed and instruct him to leave your property, and let him go.

The best thing to back up defensive firearm use is a security camera with a wifi link to an offsite video recorder. Even if you were totally within your rights, you might still have to fight a state prosecuting attorney.

Hey, I just got a marketing idea. Along with enhanced night sights or laser sites for your gun, how about a mounted web cam?

  Posted by TeresaE on 08/25/11 04:34 PM

This is my fear, this will pass and "we the people" will do what we always do... nothing.

After all, if you aren't a criminal, why would you care?

We have routinely allowed our Constitutional protections to be removed in the guise of safety - I doubt this one will be any different.

As to the Senators saying they won't vote for it, no problem. As with most things like this the vote will be called during a vacation, on a Friday, hopefully when some other thing (underwear bomber anyone?) is being paraded about to distract us.

Worked really well for nearly every horrendous thing the CONgress passes. Research the Freddie/Fannie debacle if you don't believe it.

At what point does ANY citizen wake up and realize that everything we "believe" about America is bs. We have been duped and soon we will find out the true costs.

1 2 Next


ABOUT US ARCHIVE THINKTANK   MEMBER ZONE
Editor's Message
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Contact
News & Analysis
Editorials
Exclusive Interviews
Videos
Special Reports
Polls
Biographies
Glossary
Links
Books
MEMBER LOGIN
© Copyright 2008 - 2013 All Rights Reserved.
The Daily Bell is published by High Alert Capital Partners Inc.