News & Analysis
DB Briefs: Undermining Bitcoin and the American Justice System / Desperate Bankers Damp Lending in China / Does a Clean Environment Preempt a Healthy Economy?
Undermining Bitcoin and the American Justice System
Bitcoin: FBI Admits To Engaging In Infiltration, Disruption and Dismantling of Competing Currencies ... In a March 18, 2011 press release regarding the Liberty Dollar case, the FBI admitted to waging a secret war against any private currency system that competes against the US Dollar. In the press release, the FBI equates the use of sound money to an act of domestic terrorism. The FBI states that it uses methods of infiltration and disruption against private citizens engaged in the use of voluntary currencies. – Libertarian News
Dominant Social Theme: The FBI is a good and patriotic organization.
Free-Market Analysis: The author of this article believes the FBI has declared war on Bitcoin, using the rationale enunciated in the Liberty Dollar Case. He writes, "I think this open admission by the FBI that it engages in acts of domestic terrorism against private currency systems bears a particular importance for users of the Bitcoin monetary system. If we look at the history of Bitcoin since it gained notoriety, we see a slew of hacking attacks against major exchanges that have indeed disrupted and undermined the currency system."
Regardless of the specifics regarding Bitcoin, there is no doubt that the FBI in particular is being increasingly used by the powers-that-be to cover up America's growing authoritarianism and the federal government's role in imposing it. In Columbine, more than 100 eyewitnesses saw numerous gunmen and bombers invade the school, but years later there still hasn't been a significant re-investigation. 9/11's problematic official story virtually begs for additional clarification, but the US's federal policing efforts won't be turned in that direction. The FBI top brass just announced that they would not bother to look for videos in their possession that might show the Oklahoma bombing was the work of more than one bomber.
There is a suspicion that such events might be labeled "false flag" if they were re-examined. Whether or not this is so, the lack of official zeal in following up on additional leads only provides people with yet more reasons to be cynical. Ultimately, this is not a stable situation. Post-Internet, too many people know that something is not right with American justice and federal policing. This will have significant ramifications over time.
Desperate Bankers Damp Lending in China
China Central Bank Moves in Secret to Curb Lending ... Unconfirmed Central-Bank Memo Changes Bank-Reserve Formula; Stark Contrast From West's Openness, Easing ... BEIJING – As policy makers from the U.S. and Europe gathered in Jackson Hole, Wyo., to discuss ways to revive a fragile global recovery, China's central bank was issuing a secret memo to further rein in lending in the world's second-largest economy. The tightening move by the People's Bank of China, which was reported Monday by the official Xinhua news agency, highlights two key points about China's economic management: how starkly it is diverging from that of other big economies – which continue to seek ways to pump money into the financial system – and how it remains shrouded in secrecy that some call unbefitting such an important global player. – Infowars
Dominant Social Theme: They know what they're doing and who is the West to question it?
Free-Market Analysis: We've been writing a lot about China lately – maybe because as with the EU, we believe that something may happen to the economy sooner rather than later. Obviously, top Chinese central bankers agree with us, because according to Xinhua, rates are being tightened again. Presumably this is because food prices remain very high, because real estate is all but unaffordable in major cities or even because China's serious problems in dealing with broad civic unrest haven't eased.
We don't believe that China's bankers are in charge of the economy anymore, or are able to "manage" it successfully. These days the ChiComs raise and lower rates with the desperation of those who are looking unsuccessfully for a magic key that will unlock perpetual prosperity. In fact, images of the bust that is to come must haunt every top level apparatchik. It may be staved off for a while but, in our view, come it will.
Does a Clean Environment Preempt a Healthy Economy?
Obama's proposed regs would cost billions annually ... President Obama told Speaker John A. Boehner in a letter Tuesday that his administration is considering seven regulations that would each cost the U.S. economy more than $1 billion per year, although he added that these rules are "merely proposed." All told, the seven proposed rules cited by Mr. Obama would cost companies at least $38 billion per year and could cost as much as $100 billion annually. "Before finalizing any of them, we will take account of public comments and concerns and give careful consideration to cost-saving possibilities and alternatives," Mr. Obama wrote to the Ohio Republican. – Washington Times
Dominant Social Theme: It is important to pass more laws to clean up the environment.
Free-Market Analysis: This is really an incredible story. With the US teetering on the edge of Hurricane Reality, President Barack Obama apparently wants to continue digging a hole from which the American economy may never emerge.
It is not enough that the administration recently loaded on an even more socialist health care system, or that its latest financial and accounting rules have further damped what little entrepreneurship was taking place. Now the administration is contemplating various regs that will further erode the ability of businesses to expand and thus begin to drive the economy upward.
The president listed four proposed Environmental Protection Agency rules and three in the Department of Transportation as having potential cost. An EPA regulation on air quality standards could cost between $19 billion and $90 billion per year.
The Obama administration has countered criticism by pointing out that President George Bush also enacted costly regulations during his administration. This is true, but it does not excuse what is going on. In fact, it would only tend to confirm that the leaders of both parties are engaged in the ongoing, wholesale destruction of the US economy and that both are two sides of a controlled conversation.
Only when the US is entirely weakened and its citizens virtually bankrupt will the powerful banking families of the world be able to proceed efficiently and quickly toward their goal of world government. Time and the indignation of US citizens will determine if their momentum can be halted.
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||


![]() |
Posted by clark on 08/31/11 10:08 PM
Frequently I read in places such as thehousingbubbleblog that real estate is being bought up by Chinese investors in places like Washington state, and Vancouver, Canada.
The rallying cry of many sellers, promoters and other upside-down owers is, the foreigners will buy it and come to their rescue. The denial of any problems with real estate in Canada seems strong, even more-so than in California before the housing bubble burst.
A comment was made that the U.S. housing bubble isn't going to be allowed to completely deflate until this buying dries up.
I guess you could say the easy money policies of the Chinese Central Bank are partially supporting the the on-going price fixing of the U.S. real estate market in place of the U.S. Fed, was it a kind of, QE part one, unknown?
At the least, it certainly helped to lift consumer expectations.
For Many, This Reality Show Has An Unhappy Ending
Click to view link
Also, nervo wrote, "We ended the Clinton administration in prosperity & optimism... "
You lost me there,... that should be, "the illusion of prosperity and misplaced optimism." The housing bubble is proof enough of that, for one.
I tried to read more, wow, "With FEMA rebuilt and effective as a Federal disaster relief agency" Are you kidding? Effective as a hole in the ground maybe.
When I see this comment, "He's a "Socialist" because he wants to get back some of what was stolen?"
What I understand that to mean is, he wants to steal the loot from those who received the loot which was stolen from others so it can be given (with a percentage cut of course) to yet another group. Mafia writ large, a.k.a. socialism, or fascism, or corporatism, so many flavors, so little time to take from the productive.
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 08/31/11 04:59 PM
Clinton did nothing for us. He was the puppet in charge during the pump stage for the proceedinding dump stage of our controlled economy.
Ten years of descending interest rates, credit windows flung wide open, fuel cheaper than ever before in history (adjusted for inflation), a last blizt in manufacturing as we built the machines and tooling to be sent to Mexico. What part of this was the work of Clinton? We know what Clinton was working on, or was She working on him?
Posted by nervo on 08/31/11 04:28 PM
I'm trying to grasp the bias here... ... ... ... ...
We ended the Clinton administration in prosperity & optimism, with full employment and a 1.5 TRILLION dollar surplus. With FEMA rebuilt and effective as a Federal disaster relief agency (do ANY of you believe that there ever was or will be a private entity that will help ANY of us at ANY time - for less than TEN TIMES what it costs us to do it collectively?) Here's the proof of the premise: It costs the IRS 4 cents of every dollar to collect delinquent taxes - using Federal employees {this is a cost accounting assessment that includes ALL the employment costs for the government employees who do this work}. The privatization of collections now costs the government 25 cents of every dollar collected. Privatization is ALWAYS a better deal. The government is ALWAYS the inefficient, wasteful enemy. Right...
The Bush/Cheney junta was installed by an act of virtual treason by a corrupted SCOTUS, and proceeded to lard every Federal agency with sleazy, incompetent political hacks - with the goal of wrecking the government and achieving Grover Norquist's fantasy.
At the same time, using 9-11 as a pretext, lied us into two unfunded wars at a cost of 3 TRILLION, passed an unfunded Medicaid Swindle that netted the drug companies hundreds of billions - and pumped up the deficit.
And used 9-11 as a pretext for passing the totalitarian & unconstitutional Patriot Act.
Passed the Big Tax Swindle that squandered the surplus by giving it to the top 1% and further pumped up the deficit.
Then colluded in collapsing the economy just in time for the naive and clueless Obummer's advent into the Presidency.
And then - the slithering dimwits in the rethugnican party (some party - no one's having ANY fun) and the Teabaggers publicly commit themselves to the goal of obstructing ANY attempts to fix the wreckage left by the brainless, gutless, cynical, proudly ignorant, mass-murdering, mendacious, heartless, smirking, monkey-faced, frat-boy punk pretending to be from Crawford - but rather, the ONLY aspiration of the Senate Minority leader is to make sure that Obummer is defeated - and the best way to do that is to make sure things are as bad as possible for as long as possible for as many people as possible - so they'll vote for one of these rethugnican IDIOTS trying to outdo each other in the race toward terminal, drooling stupidity.
And this is all Obama's fault?
He's a "Socialist" because he wants to get back some of what was stolen?
Jesus - do you idiots have any idea how idiotic you sound? Try reading Adrian "Blitz" Kreig's last article... ..
Reply from The Daily Bell
Is your argument that Democrats can administer the US$3 trillion federal government more efficiently than the Republicans?
Are you sure? Seems a "stretch" to us. And casting "Billary" as a "good" president is one as well ...
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 08/31/11 04:04 PM
The regulatory agencies, however they got their start, are not constitutional. They are not serving the people. Large corporations invested in technology ask for the regulations that shut the door on upstart competition. The regulatory agencies protect their source of income.
In a bygone era, no one thought much of the environment. Households dug pits and dumped their wastes into it for years. Industry was the same way. Today, we know better. Industry wouldn't get away with nearly so much without government protection. You and I can not sell a product that emits so many PPM of a toxic substance, but industry can if they pay a fine for each unit sold. The cost just gets passed on to the consumer. Industry writes the rules and government enforces them. Monopoly is the result.
If a corporation is selling to the public, then is the operation wholly private? I say no. It exists for the purpose of interacting with the public for the pupose of profit. Profit is OK, so long as it is not gained under the veil of secrecy or government protection. Should not the citizen be allowed to question the corporation without relying on the idea that government is taking care of it, supposedly in their interest?
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 08/31/11 03:38 PM
"How about the Invisible Hand and competition, Dave Jr? Isn't that better than government administered transparency?"
I didn't say a damn thing about government administered transparency. I said LESS government protection for the offenders. PEOPLE will judge and act to the benefit or detriment of the corporation.
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 08/31/11 03:21 PM
"Corporations will get away with all they can in the name of profit."
And people as a pecentage of the population don't? Corporations are made up of people too. Oh, we have to find the right people, the good people to regulate. Didn't we try that also?
I think the answer is transpancy. Public operations need the veil of secrecy removed, LESS government protection, else it is a private operation, and not for sale.
Let it be known what is being discharged into the environment and lets see what happens to the naked offender. We haven't tried that yet.
Reply from The Daily Bell
How about the Invisible Hand and competition, Dave Jr? Isn't that better than government administered transparency?
Posted by Jackson on 08/31/11 01:41 PM
Since the days of Rachel Carson and Paul Ehrlichman the socialists have been on a crusade to de-industrialize the U.S. and eliminate our capacity to produce. Without production, we are just another third world country needing the guidance of an all-knowing and all-controlling elite.
Given the state of the economy in the wake of fifty years of militant environmentalism, the green weenies recognize that the Obama presidency is their endgame and their opportunity to destroy our wealth forever.
Posted by Avatar on 08/31/11 12:34 PM
Regarding the regulations proposal, perhaps the USA could simply cut a billion dollars from its over trillion dollar yearly military machine costs. We have demonstrated that unregulated or self-regulated banking, trading and pollution control will never work. Corporations will get away with all they can in the name of profit.
Posted by Frank on 08/31/11 11:06 AM
"... the FBI admitted to waging a secret war against any private currency system that competes against the US Dollar."
Yep, the Power Elite who control the paper money Ponzi schemes in central banks around the world do not want any competition from sound money. They don't want the masses to be able to protect themselves from the Power Elite's ability to transfer wealth unto themselves virtually at will via their paper money manipulation schemes.
![]() |
Posted by Iapetus on 08/31/11 09:54 AM
Liberty Dollar Case: Just had lunch with Bernard and Tillie yesterday and she said that it was unbelievable as to the lies the Prosecution has made in the case. Real shocking since they have total judicial immunity. She said that unless you actually where at the various hearings and had some grounding in Constitutional law, the average person just wouldn't believe or understand it. Two Amicus briefs have been files in defence of the guilty verdict and everyone can follow it at Click to view link - The Judicary is our most problematic deterent to liberty and it probably always has been as Jefferson noted and warned. I keep proposing a potential Free Market solution but it keeps falling on deft ears/minds. Click to view link - I'm not trying to make a money. I'll help or let anyone take over if they can prove to me the commitment. We need to get this or something like this accomplished and I'm highly open to help and suggestions. This has to be a grass roots effort as I fear for those who politically get in their way. They will do the unspeakable.
![]() |
Posted by mulen on 08/31/11 07:19 AM
The average six pack joe never trusted the gov. and with the internet it reaffirms our suspicions. Listen most americans are honest and when called upon charitable people there is pushback coming .Most people who have an addiction especially to money are sad spiritual bankrupt people how sad there like selfish chidren who never grewup but there dangerous there time is coming.The internet like you fellows always say is a game changer i meet every day folks who up to a couple of years ago didn't have the info we talk about today. The second amendment and education almost guarantees a peaceful solution and one day an independent money system free from tyranny of the few.I probably won't live to see it but we have to tell the future eneration the mistakes and greed of the people in power just lt them keep their wealth they'll go away hopefully peacefully sounds naieve but its better than staying in the negative see ya.



l 















