News & Analysis
Wall Street – Off With Their Heads
Occupying Wall Street, demanding accountability ... Occupy Wall Street is a protest movement covering a range of issues, with no clear leadership. Many of the protesters are upset with growing wealth divide in the United States Nobody's being held accountable, one protester complains ... What does it all mean? "We're here for different reasons," said Vincent, whose father is also unemployed and recently went through a home foreclosure. "But at the end of the day, it all boils down to one thing, and that's accountability. We want accountability for the connection between Wall Street and the politicians." – CNN
Dominant Social Theme: Put them in jail or punish them for a long time. There will be blood. Or there should be.
Free-Market Analysis: There will be blood? During the French Revolution, the authority of the State was used to power the guillotine; CNN is happy to advance that same proposition in our view. Of course, the writer of this CNN story, Alan Silverleib, doesn't exactly verbalize it, but Roseanne Barr was happy to bring it up in an interview on Russia Today.
Ms. Barr was not entirely vindictive. She would allow a selected few on Wall Street to make compensation, perhaps in the US$100 million range. But eventually, she said, the guillotine would have to come into play.
Now, Ms. Barr, being a comedienne, was perhaps exaggerating for comic effect (or perhaps not) but Occupy Wall Street is certainly raising the level of rhetoric. The crowd is turning restive, even vengeful. CNN is right on the scene to document such sentiments.
Is this good? Ultimately, we wonder how much of a difference it will make and whether the emphasis, therefore, might be misdirected. Here at DB, we promote private justice anyway. One of the reasons Wall Street gets away with what it does is because people have been deprived of the opportunity to take the law into their own hands.
If people, especially within the context of tribal and clan configurations, could administer justice as they did for tens of thousands of years, then many modern abuses might simply cease to exist or would never have come into play to begin with. People wouldn't tolerate them. There is nothing like the prospect of a potential duel or vendetta to concentrate the mind.
The issue at root is how to fix a system that is broken. But a fixation on catching "evildoers" may actually play into the hands of an Anglosphere power elite that intends to ensure that the REAL"fixes" never get implemented. The Anglosphere wants world government and it uses the ability to print money from nothing to gain it. One of the time-honored ways to ensure that no REAL change takes place is to encourage scapegoating.
The "public justice" meme in Western society is a very strong one. The idea is that one makes examples of certain people in order to frighten everyone else. There is, of course, absolutely no documentation that this works but like many other things incorporated in the Western world view, we're supposed to take it on faith.
It's a dominant social theme, of course, and it's on display in this CNN article. Punish 'em in order to send a message that Wall Street corruption simply won't be tolerated anymore. Put enough bankers in jail and the system itself will change. But will it? Here's some more from the article:
"Something has to change," he told CNN. "We're out here because we're tired of what's been going on." Giles Clarke, a 46-year-old freelance photographer and father of two, echoes Vincent's call for greater accountability. "People have simply had enough," Clarke said. "We're living in an age where the inequality between high-end Wall Street and the (rest of us) is simply a gap that has become too big. Millions of people have lost their jobs. Millions of people have lost their homes."
There's been, Clarke said, "way too much cloak-and-dagger activity within the corridors of Wall Street" in recent years. "This is about raising awareness and a change of political discourse." The average person, according to Vincent, "is just fed up because there's no more middle class. The margin between us and the employers is so great now. Where will we be in a couple of years?" ...
If Vincent, Willies and Clarke have their way, there will be plenty of time for this movement to continue to grow and evolve. Some observers question if it could become a liberal counterweight to the conservative populism of the tea party. For his part, Clarke predicts the movement will go international in the next few months. "Let's get talking," he said.
In this article, the elite's misdirection is in full flower. The Tea Party wasn't initially conservative and populist; it was libertarian and free-market and in many ways still is. Anyway, we're not accusing the writer of providing this meme on purpose, but it's certainly presented in a comprehensive manner.
Sure, the Wall Street system is terribly abusive and greedy, but we'd argue the real issue is systemic, not judicial. It has to do with the fundamental building block of society, which is money stuff itself. Remove central banking and many of the abuses might wither as well, starved of cash and therefore the wherewithal to make mischief.
The leftist move-maker Michael Moore came to address the Occupy Wall Street crowd and said that the issue of central banking was an incidental one. That's the Left's point of view. It's also CNN's, we have a feeling; at least it's a point of view that CNN, as an elite-media mouthpiece, wants to encourage.
Central banking, the ability of the Anglosphere power elite to print as much money as it wants – tens of trillions during this current crisis – in order to prop up the current system, is the real problem. In a sense, it is the ONLY problem. Fiat money offered within a monopoly context and delinked from any underlying asset creates inflation and inevitably powers the business cycle, turning wealth into debt and prosperity into poverty.
The subsequent rage and ruin works to the advantage of those who seek to build world government and who can propose further globalism as a solution to the phony economic crises they are helping create. We're sure this mechanism will be increasingly on display if the Occupy Wall Street protests continue to grow, as they seem to be.
Conclusion: The great central banking families that run the world understand exactly what central banking does and how over time it ruins middle classes and concentrates more and more control within corporations and governments. The Anglosphere would like nothing more than to see a vast Wall Street bloodletting, a criminal purging, one that entirely distracts participants and the media from the larger issues that need to be addressed. The CNN article is vehemently promoting this meme and we have no doubt there will be more such to come.
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Danny B on 10/04/11 10:08 PM
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 10/04/11 01:53 PM
Click to view link,anonymous-hackers-set-up-activist-hedge-fund.aspx
'The best that can be said at this point is that Anonymous Analytics is a secretive trading syndicate that is seeking to profit from the publication of damaging speculation about a public company - while at the same time claiming to promote 'access to information, free speech and transparency'. The problem with such cloak-and-dagger outfits is that it is impossible to tell if they really are what they say they are.'
http://bit.ly/oAjJzT
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 10/04/11 01:52 PM
Click to view link,anonymous-hackers-set-up-activist-hedge-fund.aspx
'The best that can be said at this point is that Anonymous Analytics is a secretive trading syndicate that is seeking to profit from the publication of damaging speculation about a public company - while at the same time claiming to promote 'access to information, free speech and transparency'. The problem with such cloak-and-dagger outfits is that it is impossible to tell if they really are what they say they are.'
![]() |
Posted by TimurTheLame on 10/04/11 12:56 PM
I disposed of the article. It can be found by googling "zerohedge oct 10 operation-invadewalstreet' The commentary on ZH is irreverent but most seem to have seen through the charade at once. I came upon the article only after I had posted my finding them associated with OWS.
Timur-The-Prescient- ha!
Reply from The Daily Bell
OK, thanks.
![]() |
Posted by rossbcan on 10/04/11 12:18 PM
We can only change this system by diverting the system, not fighting it.
Click to view link
versus
"We can only change this system by starving the leeches, not fighting it."
Click to view link
... the economic stats say: whether they agree, know, or not, atlas has shrugged.
it's only a matter of time before "they" cry uncle and are forced to sacrifice many of their own, to the alter of public wrath, this time fully informed, as opposed to pawns.
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/04/11 12:10 PM
... othertimes, I just chalk it up to an improbable situation where your subjective interpretation of my objective terminology makes sense to you.
... no slight intended, we just appear to occupy vastly different spacetime continuums.
We can only change this system by diverting the system, not fighting it.
Click to view link
![]() |
Posted by rossbcan on 10/04/11 11:57 AM
... othertimes, I just chalk it up to an improbable situation where your subjective interpretation of my objective terminology makes sense to you.
... no slight intended, we just appear to occupy vastly different spacetime continuums.
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/04/11 11:50 AM
Do an "Off with their heads" to the groups whom are behaving badly and, this just creates a vaccuum in the system, opportunities for new players to prey and be lightening rods (pawns) for public wrath. Meanwhile, the game and "proceeds of crime" continues unabated and, fools chase the new pawns (scapegoats) with the false hope of change, completely oblivious to the basic fact that the system (set of forcefully imposed rules) favoring some (including granting FED the right to debase our wealth) and penalizing others (the productive) IS THE PROBLEM. If we are all "equal under law", how come some can do what we cannot? How come some can deem themselves unaccountable? Aside: Obama may have just passed the tipping point with his decree that extrajudicial killing is legitimate, so long as suspicion (and legal rationalizations) are claimed to exist, no proof required.
And, these civilization destroying problems were once solved by the "rule of law" before it was rationalized away by predators on the bench and, this crime against collective survival is still tolerated by "we, the serfs":
Click to view link
![]() |
Posted by rossbcan on 10/04/11 11:32 AM
Do an "Off with their heads" to the groups whom are behaving badly and, this just creates a vaccuum in the system, opportunities for new players to prey and be lightening rods (pawns) for public wrath. Meanwhile, the game and "proceeds of crime" continues unabated and, fools chase the new pawns (scapegoats) with the false hope of change, completely oblivious to the basic fact that the system (set of forcefully imposed rules) favoring some (including granting FED the right to debase our wealth) and penalizing others (the productive) IS THE PROBLEM. If we are all "equal under law", how come some can do what we cannot? How come some can deem themselves unaccountable? Aside: Obama may have just passed the tipping point with his decree that extrajudicial killing is legitimate, so long as suspicion (and legal rationalizations) are claimed to exist, no proof required.
And, these civilization destroying problems were once solved by the "rule of law" before it was rationalized away by predators on the bench and, this crime against collective survival is still tolerated by "we, the serfs":
Click to view link
![]() |
Posted by TimurTheLame on 10/04/11 10:35 AM
Well lookie here. A message from Anonymous is " On Oct. 10, NYSE shall be erased from the internet." ( in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street).
Further to that, for those so interested, google "CIA+AYM+Anonymous" and see all the information.
DB, this is your bailiwick more especially since identifying AYM and CIA months ago. Will this be the event that brings in internet restrictions? The shadow knows... ..
Reply from The Daily Bell
Link?
![]() |
Posted by Adam on 10/04/11 09:21 AM
Revolution consultants are the worst nightmare of every regime. Srdja Popovic was a founder of the organisation 'Otpor', a revolution training school. It was instrumental in the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic in the 1990s and has now inspired a new generation of activists.
Political commentators like William Engdahl are convinced Otpor is being financed by the USA. "The people from Otpor gave us a book in which they described all their strategies", says Ezzedine Zaatour of the Tunisian uprising. That book was written by an American, Gene Sharp, and is now considered the "revolution guide book", being used by opposition movements worldwide.'
YouTube: The Revolution Business
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
And of course you know about AYM and other State Dept./CIA sponsored youth movements around the world? ...
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/04/11 09:17 AM
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/04/11 09:16 AM
Forgiveness is in your hearts.
Just let us change the system pecefully . . . leave them be. They will come around to the new normal.
![]() |
Posted by DwightMann on 10/04/11 08:33 AM
Reply from The Daily Bell
The people at the crux of the shenanigans are the immensely powerful central-banking controllers - the intergenerational elite families. Good luck punishing them. We'd settle for just ending central banking as we know it.
![]() |
Posted by TimurTheLame on 10/04/11 08:02 AM
The Canadian group that organized this on Wall Street (!), not Bay street is Adbusters an anti-consumerist group. Among things to notice are that they got their inspiration from the 'Arab Spring'. They were also vilified by jewish groups for being anti-semitic in that they published an article documenting how many Edomites were in the Bush administration. ( so all you nasty anti-semites - nothing to see here, move along.)
But wait, they are somehow conjoined with Anonymous (Group) , a civil disobedience entity that has tentacles all over the world. I stopped reading the huge wiki page on them when their involvement in the Iranian election and Julian Assange came up. DB might want to peek into this group seeing as their activities are all centered around using the internet.
And so, my nasty suspicions appear to be correct. Anyone with an IQ higher than a chimpanzee's knows that social actions that involve some policy, travel, sustenance, taking time off etc etc require some central organization but they make a special point of saying they are 'leaderless'. Try to organize anything that involves more than two people
without a leader and see how that goes.
There is a story here... ..
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks, think we've reported on the Adbusters connection elsewhere. There have been questions raised about Anonymous as well, though their public stance seems libertarian.
![]() |
Posted by TimurTheLame on 10/04/11 06:57 AM
One question occurred to me in that The French revolution was mentioned, has anyone, anywhere identified who the real organizers of the Occupy WS movement are? If so, it might not be so hard to trace associations and funding etc...
I believe that the real perpetrators and sacrificial lambs of the French Revolution have been historically documented.
Unless I am reading quack material it seems to me that it was the first successful revolution fomented by the ancestors of DB's version of the PTB. It has many parallels to what is unfolding these days.
Identifying the real source should be the least to be expected from 'the internet reformation' no? ( if this has already been done, I withdraw the question. I have not had time to read everything)
Reply from The Daily Bell
It is clear that a leftist Canadian newspaper had something to do with initial formation of the protests. And they are even now being co-opted in part by unions, democratic political campaigners, etc.

l 





