News & Analysis
Occupy Wall Street – Libya, Adbusters and Should Libertarians Get Out Now?
"Occupy" protesters garner increased support ... In New York, the protest is called "Occupy Wall Street" – but around the nation, where the movement is picking up steam, it's being called "Occupy Together." This week, CBS News correspondent Michelle Miller reported on "The Early Show on Saturday Morning," demonstrations were held in more than a dozen cities, from Los Angeles to Richmond, Va., to downtown Minneapolis, Minn. In Minneapolis, one demonstrator told CBS News, "We're here because we want the big dudes to start paying." – CBS
Dominant Social Theme: Occupy Wall Street is unstoppable, a spontaneous force of nature.
Free-Market Analysis: Occupy Wall Street is not what it seems, or what the mainstream media is portraying it as. Occupy Wall Street is perhaps part of a pincer movement utilizing "directed democracy" and the "transparency" meme, which we have analyzed in previous reports.
Over at websites such as those controlled by Alex Jones there is interesting reporting on a socialist takeover of Occupy Wall Street. But from what we can tell, there's something even deeper going on within the ranks of Occupy Wall Street, something that's been there from the beginning.
It's a NEW dominant social theme in our view, one that's now apparently to be promoted by the Anglosphere power elite as part of the advancement of the gobalist movement. Of course, one could argue that socialism and communism use the paradigm of "direct democracy" as well. But in these political movements, direct democracy was just one part of a larger, communal philosophy – one, of course, that never worked out.
In fact, the emphasis on direct democracy provides the powers-that-be with a kind of political portmanteau. It may serve as a one size fits all solution that can be exported throughout the world within the context of global government. The "transparency meme" we've written about seems to be a restatement of the problem (government corruption, etc.) that "direct democracy" will address.
One of the main modern proponents of direct democracy was Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Gaddafi's famous Green Book (like Mao's little red book) was a revolutionary primer. His idea, apparently was that Libya would be run via direct democracy; this sort of organization would inform the the "brother-leader" of what to do.
This could be one reason why Gaddafi has been hounded out of office – presumably to be shot. If the Western elites are about to adopt his ideas wholesale, it doesn't really make sense to leave him hanging around, agitating for the credit.
Nobody ever said the Anglosphere power elite in aggregate was stupid – and its fear-based promotions can work at a fairly sophisticated level. This direct democracy meme is not only a sophisticated one, it's one of the most ambitious we think we've seen yet. This is the shot heard round the world. The Big Kahuna. This may be the beginning of the final push for world government.
The whole scenario puts us in mind of one of the very best big-budget movies ever made, "Mars Attacks." Given what we've just suggested, free-market types are understandably having trouble making their voices heard and we thus present the script of a tiny "Mars Attacks" vignette to remind them of what they may have to do ...
US President Jack Nicholson on the phone to France: "Hallo, Maurice. Ca va?"
Maurice (from France): "Bien! I have some good news for you. The Martian ambassador is here and we have negotiated a settlement."
Nicholson (quite perturbed): "Maurice, get out of the room, get out now!"
Small-bodied, big-headed Martians begin to shoot their ray guns at the French diplomats and in the background, the Eiffel Tower topples.
See, it may be the best thing free-market types can do at this stage – GET OUT NOW. We keep discovering more and more about the "spontaneous movement" that makes us uneasy. In fact, we want to thank DB feedbackers David Robertson and "concernedforfreedoms" for providing further insights into Occupy Wall Street's obscured beginnings
Just the other day, he posted a feedback linking Gaddafi, Occupy Wall Street, Adbusters (the organization behind it all) and the professional, academic "anarchist" David Graeber who ties the various (apparently elitist) components of this enterprise together. The initial key is that Adbusters is apparently being funded in part by the same elitist foundation crowd that funds PBS and other power-elite promotional media, including the George Soros-funded Tides Foundation. InfoWars and the New American, among others, have reported on this funding stream.
Professional, academic "anarchist" David Graeber and his (Gaddafi-like) "direct democracy" ... provides us with the spectacle of supposedly leaderless groups making decisions that then through some sort of osmosis become the standard for the larger whole. Again, Graeber defines himself as an "anarchist," though some of his solutions, theoretically, might find a home in Marxist or socialist practices.
The emphasis on consensus is startling. It's very clever, too, a way of exercising dominance without seeming to. There are now Youtube videos in which you can see the chanting ritual that takes place between the supposedly leaderless groups and "moderators," leading to an eventual "decision." Matt Drudge (Drudge Report) posted one on his website last night: "VIDEO: 'Occupy Atlanta' in strange group chant, ritual ..." (See today's featured video)
Oh, poor children! Youngsters are so impressionable at that age stuck between childhood and adulthood. They are being manipulated in our opinion. This direct democracy didn't work in Libya and it won't work anywhere else. All it does is provide a paradigm for world government.
So ... Graeber, who used to work for Yale and now works for another academic institution as a "social anthropologist" is the inspiration behind this theorizing. But there sure are questions about the implementation. We recently posted an interesting report from Webster G. Tarpley of alternative webblog Tarpley.net, as follows:
Occupy Wall Street: Who Wants to Hijack the Movement? ... Eyewitness observers suggest that the deliberations of the general assembly are largely a diversion, and that real power is being increasingly concentrated in the hands of about 20 mysterious and anonymous individuals who appear to make up a kind of covert steering committee that pulls the strings on the general assembly, or else goes around it completely. The members of this cadre of mysterious operatives are not as young as the average demonstrator. The secret leadership is made up of people ranging in age from 25 to over 40, with the older ones occupying the key posts. Many of them appear to be active duty or recently retired military ...
OK ... 'Nuff said. Let's look at the other side of the pincer. Recently, we analyzed a New York Times article on the blossoming protest around the world. The article seemed to come from nowhere and made a series of curious statements. We wrote: "The closest the article comes to providing a clue is in a paragraph toward the end stating that, 'emerging movements, like many in the past, could end up being absorbed by traditional political parties.' But the paragraph ends with a dangling statement, 'Yet purists involved in many of the movements say they intend to avoid the old political channels.'" (Read the article here: Transparency Meme Creeps Closer.)
And we added, "Now, what the heck does that mean? Who are these 'purists' and what are the 'new' political channels being contemplated? This is a pure promotion being rolled out, cold-bloodedly and with cold calculation. Promotions never reveal the solutions all at once. There has to be a steady drumbeat of 'problems' first to capture the attention."
Well, now we think we know. The solution is to be direct democracy. Libertarians who want to reduce the protest to one basic, powerful theme – end central banking – are likely going to find out that it will be impossible to make their voices heard. They are going to be drowned out by the screamers who want corporate blood and want the bankers "punished."
Direct democracy is the vehicle that will accommodate these elitist-backed aims. It is "the people" that will speak, demanding that "their" government "do something" about private sector corruption. Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank will be glad to oblige, of course. They're taking orders from the Anglosphere power elite and could care less about the private-sector business of intermediation.
They'll be happy to put Wall Street crooks in jail all day long. Corporate executives, too. Everyone will feel better but nothing much will change. In fact, it is the power elite that will benefit. After all, in the long run, money and power controls governments, especially "democratic ones." Nothing is much easier than buying a vote (and a politician), so long as you have the money. And if you run central banks around the world, you will ALWAYS have the money.
Libertarian, anti-Fed types that understand the criticality of reducing the clout of central banking may want to form their own parallel protest, even link to Alex Jones's "End the Fed" efforts somehow. It may be important to do it now before the Occupy Wall Street protests are established at an international level and create a voice that drowns out everything else.
This may be the plan: Another bloody French Revolution, on a rhetorical level anyway. a final push to ensure the State is empowered globally by civilian anger at the so-called private sector. Direct Democracy could be presented as the solution, the vehicle (along with the Internet) whereby "transparency" is facilitated.
Of course, who knows if the Occupy Wall Street protests truly have "legs." Will they expand into an international movement as seems planned? Will they travel down a direct democracy or socialist path? Will the protests take a true libertarian turn? Time will tell. What we do believe, surely is that the globalists are committed to their goals and that the current demos increasingly seem to represent an expansion of elite manipulations.
Conclusion: And yet ... as we've written regularly, this is the era of the Internet Reformation. The powers-that-be may find manipulation a lot more difficult in the 21st century than the 20th. Yes, there may be (generally) considerable pushback from libertarians, free-market thinkers and those who believe in the re-establishment of liberty rather than an expansion of globalist corporatism via central banking mercantilism. Maybe these forces will upend Occupy Wall Street as well. Or maybe it will prove impossible to work within the protest's current paradigm. Get out now, Maurice, and go it alone?
Editor's Note: Over at HenryMakow is an article claiming that Occupy Wall Street is the work of Serbian contract revolution organizers in Belgrade and their field operative organizer company,"OPTOR!" The article is entitled "Occupy Wall Street is COINTELPRO (Phony Opposition)" and tracks what we mentioned on Saturday, that Occupy Wall Street seems to have elements of the worldwide "youth" movements organized in part by the US State Dept. and AYM. Webster Tarpley obviously believes something along these lines, as well. (See our Saturday's video introduction "Interview Raises Interesting Questions about Occupy Wall Street Volunteers.")
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||


![]() |
Posted by James Jaeger on 11/21/11 01:05 AM
There is a way the millions of people potentially or actively involved with the Occupy Wall Street movement might be able to be quite effective: they could purchase common shares of stock in the public corporations and banks they disdain.
One only needs to own one share of stock in a publicly-held company to vote by proxy on corporate matters. One share of stock in most of the major corporations and banks is within reach of most people -- $25 to $125 per share. If suddenly millions of Wall Street protestors each bought even one share of say an Exxon-Mobile or a Goldman Sach's common stock, they could influence or dominate the corporation. They may even be able to shut down the companies over time.
When you own even one share in a public corporation, you get an annual 10-K and report telling you everything you want to know about the company, its officers, their pay, their bios, their posts, what they have done in the past . . . you name it.
You also get voting proxies from time to time and these ask you to vote for, or ratify, new board members or officers and all sorts of other internal company matters. Usually each voting proxy is a punch card that gives you suggestions on how the Board recommends you vote on this or that matter, appointment or financial issue, etc.
Think about it: if millions of Wall Street protesters each own a share of stock in the major corporations and banks -- especially the member banks that OWN the Federal Reserve System -- they could vote out officers taking excessive salaries, influence lobby practices, block merger and acquisition plans and close down product lines they didn't like. They could essentially do anything, even vote for the winding down and dissolution of the corporation.
If common stock in the top corporations in the military-industrial complex were acquired by millions of Wall Street protestors, the weapons divisions could even be shut down. The U.S. government could possibly be starved of weapons it is using for imperial over reach and to fight wars undeclared by Congress.
As the movie THRIVE says, for every member of the power elite there are a million of us. So use your numbers to acquire interests in the corporations and banks you feel are not operating responsibly or against the will of WE THE PEOPLE and in violation of the U.S. Constitution.(1)
James Jaeger
-----------------------
(1) And don't suggest that this is already done with mutual funds. I used to work for a mutual fund and I can tell you the Fund is dominated by the resident, or out-of-house, guru. In order for the Wall Street Occupiers to dominate the corporations, not be dominated by some apologist fund manager, each individual would have to DIRECTLY own shares in the offending corporations and banks, NOT via mutual funds or any other vehicle.
Posted by NAPpy on 10/11/11 09:44 PM
"A constitutional republic is also a trap."
DB: Didn't work last time? (!) It took a civil war with literally millions dead to kill it. It seems to have worked fairly well until it was taken down amidst a bloody genocide.
So it worked fairly well for 80 years. I'll concede that. Then, a civil war ended it. I'll concede that as well. Weren't individual liberties eroded from day one (Whiskey Rebellion, etc.)? It still ended, wouldn't you agree? Do you honestly think that without a civil war we wouldn't have government creep followed by an inevitable collapse?
I believe that it was from you or some of your feedbackers that I learned that moving from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution was something of a manipulated event. I would find it very interesting if you would discuss Confederations at some time on your site. The PE obviously rushed to get rid of the U.S. Confederation. The Swiss confederation has lasted for hundreds of years, but it has also suffered from government creep. Theory--small governments creep slower, but they still creep. If governments creep larger, then a collapse is inevitable. This is the point I have been trying to make.
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/11/11 11:28 AM
Love the new style . . . kinda spurs us from banterin', to canterin', to gallopin' . . . hold on, am I continuing the bathroom humour from yesterday?
So, Hoss . . . amanfromMars and I are still talking about this subject elsewhere.
![]() |
Posted by Hoss on 10/11/11 10:46 AM
Roun' these parts, iffen a man's got sumpn worthwile to share, he comes right out with it. Iffen' he's beatin round the bush, he's got sumpn else in mind.
![]() |
Posted by David_Robertson on 10/11/11 10:19 AM
@DB
"* Free health care for every American,
* A free 4 bedroom home for every American family,
* 5% tax rate for 99% of Americans,
* Drastically improved public education and free college for all,
* Significantly improved public transportation and infrastructure,
The list goes on…
This is not some far-fetched fantasy. These are all things that Franklin D. Roosevelt talked about doing in the 1940s, long before the explosion of wealth creation in our technologically advanced global economy. "
David DeGraw is on a learning curve. If there were some libertarians at the general assemblies maybe they could correct some of his assumptions. To be fair Webster Tarpley whom you quote is also New Deal enthusiast. The FDR myth is fairly powerful in America.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Yes, we know about Webster. Was hooked in with LaRouche.
![]() |
Posted by David_Robertson on 10/11/11 10:01 AM
@DB "Re-read the article. Adbusters stepped in back in the summer to declare a September "Occupy Wall Street" protest. That's the name the protests have. Whatever DeGraw had in mind with Anonymous is in the process of being co-opted. Anonymous was there almost from the beginning according to DeGraw. There are questions about Anonymous as well ... "
Yes I agree. I wrote the comment before I had finished the article. However DeGraw and his people were planning a similar event for September 10 at Liberty Park so Adbusters' call for action fit in well with their plans. There are now many groups involved. The 99% idea came from DeGraw but all the other direct democracy content came from Adbusters' organisers in the ways we have discussed. I agree about Anonymous but at this point it doesn't matter who is doing it.
The question is what are the IDEAS being promoted and how are they being implemented? At least that is what interests me. The people I have read about and commented on are people with IDEAS that they wish to implement. That is why I have suggested that libertarians get involved in the general assembly process to influence the discussion with their IDEAS. The Marxists who are involved may be "reformed" since I noted in another feedback that Gadhafi had left Marxism and called it "reductionist". His insight was correct and this reductionism is what gave rise I believe to the millions of deaths associated with the implementation of communism. Slavoj Zizek is I believe a reformed Marxist.
I notice in one response to a feedback you opined that I was "weirdly hopeful". (From that I take it you see no hope in these events?) I am definitely optimistic. There are a number of strands of meaning that I perceive that fit in very well with certain spiritual antecedents that I am aware of that came to completion on September 17th. This is when the OWS events began and one of the signs being held up in a photo said Bring Down The Wall.
This fit perfectly with a seven day prayer campaign that had just ended related to bringing down the walls of Jericho (Babylon) so it was an indication that these events are connected with the original collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11 and the prayer at that time issuing forth from many hearts and voices "God Bless America". There have been many other contingent indications of the moving of the Holy Spirit in the affairs of men in a very powerful way at this time and over the past ten years. Whether this will culminate in the manifestation of the sons of God remains to be seen but I believe it is connected.
This is why I mentioned the speech of Slavoj Zizek and his reference to the Holy Spirit and the meaning of Christianity being love for one another in which observation he was absolutely correct. The early Church acted in this way for a time, "having everything in common and being of one mind (consensus)" which reflects what is happening right now and what God's will is for the future of mankind. The people taking part in these events are almost certainly oblivious to these spiritual foundations but they are nevertheless moving under the influence of the Holy Spirit and seeking God's will in the overthrow of Babylon. The source of my personal hope is "Christ in you, the Hope of Glory". This is what makes direct democracy possible, when everyone has the Mind of Christ. This will only happen when the sons of God are manifested and humanity will be transformed into the image of God in Christ.
"Then his voice shook the earth, but now he has promised, 'I will once more shake not only the earth but heaven too.' Now this phrase 'once more' indicates the removal of what is shaken, that is, of created things, so that what is unshaken may remain. So since we are receiving an unshakable kingdom, let us give thanks, and through this let us offer worship pleasing to God in devotion and awe." (Hebrews 12:26-28)
Reply from The Daily Bell
OK, perfectly lucid until the spiritual stuff at the end, as usual. Anyway, we are trying to be hopeful and thank you again for all your contributions and commentary. You and other feedbackers on this forum make it it far more useful and helpful, on the whole ...
![]() |
Posted by David_Robertson on 10/11/11 05:21 AM
Here is the summing up of the article by David DeGraw's AmpedStatus website:
"Ultimately, all of the groups mentioned throughout this report were just the seeds that helped launch what is now known as the #OccupyWallStreet 99% Movement. As the occupation of Liberty Park continues to grow and enters it's third week, with no signs of protesters even considering leaving, the people most actively taking part are committed to remaining a decentralized leaderless movement based on the direct democratic process of deciding on future demands and actions through a consensus of those participating. In the spirit of the movement, people acting on their own have begun like-minded actions and occupations throughout the country.
The only unifying call to action seems to be:
'Anything you can do to rebel against the system of economic tyranny in a non-violent manner is welcome.'
As Anonymous A99 wrote in response to questions about their movement:
'We are a DECENTRALIZED non-violent movement. If you are looking to contact one of our leaders, go to the nearest mirror and peer deeply into it. It may take some time, but, eventually, one of our leaders will appear with answers to all of your questions.'
What more can you say?
As I'm typing this, the NYC General Assembly meeting just came to an end, I hear the sound of drums, looks like it's time for another march. An NYPD officer who supports our efforts just gave me a nod and said, 'Hey man, you better get back to the frontlines. The troops are on the move.' It's another day of battle at Liberty Park.
The occupation of Wall $treet rages on…"
Reply from The Daily Bell
We'd like to know more about DeGraw as well. Here is something he wrote:
Click to view link
What could be done with all the money that has been hoarded by the Economic Elite is extraordinary!
Let’s consider what we could do with the money that has been stolen from us. On top of what should be our average six-figure yearly income, we could have:
* Free health care for every American,
* A free 4 bedroom home for every American family,
* 5% tax rate for 99% of Americans,
* Drastically improved public education and free college for all,
* Significantly improved public transportation and infrastructure,
The list goes on…
This is not some far-fetched fantasy. These are all things that Franklin D. Roosevelt talked about doing in the 1940s, long before the explosion of wealth creation in our technologically advanced global economy. The money for all this is already there, stashed into the claws of the Economic Elite. The denial of wealth to the masses is the key to the Economic Elite’s power. Outside of outdated and obsolete economic models and theories — and incredibly short-sighted greed — there is no reason why all this money should be kept in the hands of a few, at the immense suffering and expense of the many.
![]() |
Posted by David_Robertson on 10/11/11 05:05 AM
Excellent! This should also put paid to the rumour that David Degraw is hiding the role of the Federal Reserve. Here is a Youtube that is featured at the article you posted:
Click to view link This launched the campaign back in March.
AmpedStatus is clearly the originator of this movement and their target is also clear: The Global Banking Cartel centred on the IMF the BIS the Federal Reserve and the World Bank.
This is as the DB has said The Big Kahuna. They have even introduced a new currency at OWS and of course the permabank. I hope the libertarians are paying attention and get involved.
I still believe that the real rulers at the centre of the web have decided to destroy their creation and replace it with a new formulation that will leave them in charge. I made this observation many months ago. Nevertheless the best laid schemes o' mice and men gang aft agley and I am convinced that this will be true in this case also much to their chagrin.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Re-read the article. Adbusters stepped in back in the summer to declare a September "Occupy Wall Street" protest. That's the name the protests have. Whatever DeGraw had in mind with Anonymous is in the process of being co-opted. Anonymous was there almost from the beginning according to DeGraw. There are questions about Anonymous as well ...
Posted by NAPpy on 10/11/11 05:00 AM
A constitutional republic is also a trap. It didn't work this last time. Why on earth would you expect it to work the next time? People love the anarchy they have in their lives now--marriage, jobs, kids, location choices, vacations, etc. People fear the anarchy they don't yet have. I personally choose to deal with my fear of the unknown rather than relive the mistakes of the past and their easily predictable failures in the future.
Reply from The Daily Bell
"A constitutional republic is also a trap."
Didn't work last time? (!) It took a civil war with literally millions dead to kill it. It seems to have worked fairly well until it was taken down amidst a bloody genocide.
![]() |
Posted by memewatchers.com on 10/11/11 03:21 AM
Oh no, Gerald Celente is calling for Direct Democracy now on Zerohedge:
Click to view link
Beware the call for Direct Democracy, it is a trap. Instead we need to return to the original idea of the United States government, A Constitutional Republic. The founding fathers created 'a republic, if you can keep it,' as Ben Franklin said, when asked in Philadelphia what kind of government they had given us.
The founding fathers understood that democracy was a trap,
'A democracy is nothing more than mob rule,' said Thomas Jefferson, 'where 51 percent of the people may take away the rights of the other 49.' James Madison agreed, 'Democracy is the most vile form of government.' 'Democracy,' said John Adams, 'never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.'
Reply from The Daily Bell
Yes, this has deep roots. Thanks for pointing it out.
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/11/11 02:27 AM
I take it you haven't watched the movie then.
Posted by gethky on 10/11/11 02:23 AM
See the report on the origin of OWS by David Degraw at
Click to view link
Posted by speedygonzales on 10/11/11 01:11 AM
Professional, academic "anarchist" David Graeber and his (Gaddafi-like) "direct democracy" ... provides us with the spectacle of supposedly leaderless groups making decisions that then through some sort of osmosis become the standard for the larger whole. Again, Graeber defines himself as an "anarchist," though some of his solutions, theoretically, might find a home in Marxist or socialist practices.
Dominant social theme: You can not disconect time with ideas.
Work of Marx and Engels are based on industrial revolution in England. Friedrich Engels published In 1845 "The Condition of the Working Class in England", based on personal observations and research.
How this condition loox like?
Before British slavers traveled to Africa's western coast to buy Black slaves from African chieftains, they sold their own White working class kindred ("the surplus poor" as they were known) from the streets and towns of England, into slavery. Tens of thousands of these White slaves were kidnapped children. In fact the very origin of the word kidnapped is kid-nabbed, the stealing of White children for enslavement.
According to the English Dictionary of the Underworld, under the heading kidnapper is the following definition: "A stealer of human beings, esp. of children; originally for exportation to the plantations of North America."
Michael A. Hoffman II: "They Were White and They Were Slaves."
Tristram Hunt, author of Marx's General: The Revolutionary Life of Friedrich Engels, sums up the disconnect between Engel's personality, and those Soviets who later utilized his works, stating:
"This great lover of the good life, passionate advocate of individuality, and enthusiastic believer in literature, culture, art and music as an open forum could never have acceded to the Soviet Communism of the 20th century, all the Stalinist claims of his paternity notwithstanding."
During German revolution 1919 was set Bavarian Soviet Republic. But those guys in Germany strictly disconected their goals with bolshevix in Russia. While at the time there was still white children slavery in USA, thanx revolution 1919 there was set 8 hours working day in Germany and so on.
Story continues to this days:
Edgar Aracena, a New Jersey-based organizer for the Health Professionals and Allied Employees union, has been an activist since he was a student in the early 1980s. He said many Americans have an ideological problem with economic-based protests. "There is a fantasy in the United States that we are all middle class and we will all be the boss one day. People buy into that," he said.
Aracena said as he tries to organize workers he would characterize as the working poor, they question whether they need the protection of a union, telling him, "We are not the working poor, we are professionals."
In Europe, by contrast, Aracena said, workers proudly identify themselves as working class. So when something happens to spark potential outrage and protest, workers are clear which side of the system they stand on.
Any political and econimical system has some roots in the past. Like communism in China has roots in British colonization era, opium wars and deindustrialization of China and India.
But Tristram Hunt argues that Engels has become a convenient scapegoat, too easily blamed for the state crimes of the Soviet Union, Communist Southeast Asia and China. "Engels is left holding the bag of 20th century ideological extremism," Hunt writes, "while Marx is rebranded as the acceptable, postpolitical seer of global capitalism."[18] Hunt largely exonerates Engels stating that "in no intelligible sense can Engels or Marx bear culpability for the crimes of historical actors carried out generations later, even if the policies were offered up in their honor."
You simply can not connect everything with everything what is said. We can not blame ideas of freedom and democracy with criminals as well as we can not connect Marx and Engels with bolshevix and we can not connect national and socialism with nazis. This is area of propagandists a la FOX News. If Marx, Engels or idea of national and socialism are wrong then FOX News icons are on the same path. Nothing else just baseless ideological propaganda to cover crimes.
Go ahead and start quoting from "The Condition of the Working Class in England" and "They were white and they were slaves," White cargo, To hell or Barbados.
We can also look at Ludlow massacre; Rock spring,WY massacre; or West Virginia coal miners war. Were there Marx/Engels involved? I 've never heard about it. I would like learn something new.
When people are tryin' to protect themselfs from borderless exploitation and crimes there is easy to mark 'em as commies, marxists, nazis, bolsheviks. Then it is not understandable why there is so much hallo about 1%-5% versus rest of american folx. If we take it by historical reality then those people who do it are marxists and commies and it is OK that american dream is shrinking. Seems to me that occupy Wall Street has the same backround as Marx/Engels were talking about. Like it or not.
Posted by speedygonzales on 10/11/11 12:02 AM
"Over at websites such as those controlled by Alex Jones there is interesting reporting on a socialist takeover of Occupy Wall Street."
Dominant social theme: MIDDLE-CLASS FANTASY?
For all the sympathy it inspires, the movement may struggle to build mass participation.
Edgar Aracena, a New Jersey-based organizer for the Health Professionals and Allied Employees union, has been an activist since he was a student in the early 1980s. He said many Americans have an ideological problem with economic-based protests. "There is a fantasy in the United States that we are all middle class and we will all be the boss one day. People buy into that," he said.
Aracena said as he tries to organize workers he would characterize as the working poor, they question whether they need the protection of a union, telling him, "We are not the working poor, we are professionals."
In Europe, by contrast, Aracena said, workers proudly identify themselves as working class. So when something happens to spark potential outrage and protest, workers are clear which side of the system they stand on.
Click to view link
Dominant social theme2: Alex Jones is lost in labyrint of ideologies.
Alex Jones reminds me one of the greatest books: FROM THE ASHES OF ANGELS, The Forbidden Legacy of a Fallen Race, By Andrew Collins.
Click to view link
From Click to view link: "First and foremost, you have to be able to put aside what is considered to be mainstream thoughts and beliefs about archeology, human evolution, and the beginnings of this world to even begin to enjoy Mr. Collins' fine work. His work is set up to help you question, think and most importantly, challenge the norm. From the Ashes of Angels is no different. Admittedly, some of the chapters repeat previously mentioned information, but it's organized to help even the most ingrained, stubborn believer in seeing that there is more to our past than what's found in the history books. In fact, history books don't even cover 1/10th of the truth. Remember, history is written by the victor's and I believe that most of Collins' work sees both sides, presents it in a concise and easy to follow package and allows the reader to make his/her own mind up."
Instead of DB Mr Jones strictly follow indoctrination from elementary school where they explained him how is capitalism gr8 and commies are from hell.
After I send him few emails Mr Jones in one of his interviews when was refering to Wall Street as commies added:"... they even are not commies."
Good morning Mr Jones. But thnx Mr Jones, I love this song, american workers are lost with him in labyrinth of ideologies and misleadings.
Always keep in mind: DAP later NSDAP was created by elitist Thule Society to break down movement of working class and put them to each other throat. Final stage was done when baron Rudolf von Sebbotendorf set fire on Reichstag, was arrested, but innocent commies had been executed. The same commies who were protested against WW1 and organized German revolution 1919.
I guarantee you that Mr Jones have no idea about it.
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 10/10/11 11:40 PM
"The object of our ARG is to have fun playing it. If it catches on, then we will have won."
OK then. I wish you fun. You understand that as far off as we have been dragged from the original monetary rules by central banking gamers, your solution is pretty much the same as their goal. Is that how you intend it to be?
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/10/11 11:11 PM
Risk is war. Agent Weebley is Peace. Sure, it's a Great Game, and we're all playing it, whether we like it or not.
The object of our ARG is to have fun playing it. If it catches on, then we will have won.
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 10/10/11 11:04 PM
Ever play the game of Risk? I wouldn't trust my Mother in that game.
But I see what you are doing, life is just a big game to you? What is the object of the game? How do you win?
Posted by Agent Weebley on 10/10/11 10:25 PM
Ever played Monopoly? I thought so. Were you ever the banker? Thought so. How did you act? Did you steal from the pot? Thought not. Everyone began with the same amount of money, but some people did better than others. That's life. But it was fair.
The thing I have learned very recently, is that Metaforia is a template. Not mine, but everyone's.
Have you spent much time researching the history of money? I suggested that Ingo go here to watch an almost 2 hour video "The Secret Of Oz," by Bill Still, but he has not got back to me yet. It makes a lot of sense.
Watch it here, on amanfromMars' site:
Click to view link
You should ht the hay right now and watch it tomorrow, then find me somewhere on the interweb to talk about it. amanfromMars' site is a good safe spot for me right now.
Here . . . not so much. DB is going to get angry at me for monopolizing the thread again . . . and you don't want to see him angry! He's worse than Bill Ross! Love ya, DB and Bill!
Bye.
PS: love and trust is earned from 0 to 18 mos from YOUR MOTHER. Do you love your Mother? Thought so.
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 10/10/11 09:55 PM
But we have not got to economy yet.
![]() |
Posted by Dave Jr on 10/10/11 09:51 PM
I'll trust you a little bit. And as you make good, I'll trust you more. And if I want you to trust me more, I'll make good. Nobody programs it, we earn it little by little. Nobody is born with it, it requires effort. Life requires effort. 1/7th means nothing.
Money is not "issued" to begin play. Money represents the efforts of others. If you are entitled to anothers effort, then how much of yours are they entitled to? If you want to be protected from others stealing your production (efforts), then you have to be willing to protect (honor) anothers production.
If we just "issue" money, it will not have any worth. Why would you you give me a cut of your hunt for some fiat that I was issued, when you already have your own fiat that was issued?
Unless we were not created with the equal right to exist on this earth, then we have to start here.
|
|



l 
















