News & Analysis
Western Elites Caught 'Red-Handed' in Iran?
A Game As Old As History: The Globalist Hand Behind The Iranian Mullahs ... Iran's fundamentalist clerics have never been independent and militant vis-à-vis the West, but rather have remained subservient to U.S.-British geopolitical interests and goals in the region while pretending to represent the people of Iran and the religion of Islam. − Samam Mohammadi/The Excavator/PrisonPlanet
Dominant Social Theme: Islam is an enemy of the West. Iran is Islam. Iran is the enemy. Bomb it.
Free-Market Analysis: Wow, an important article by Samam Mohammadi based on other equally important articles that Mohammadi cites. He basically lays out a case that Iran is a phony US enemy and that the Iranian Revolution was actually Western-inspired.
There are few higher callings than this – writing articles that seem to debunk the "directed history" charades of Money Power while revealing the grim skull-like grin lurking bloodily beneath the surface.
We've pointed out many times now that we believe much of what passes for the Western historical narrative – especially over the past few hundred years – is what we call "directed history." That is, the power elite that today seeks to run the world has been creating economic, political and military incidents that it then enshrines as "accidents of history."
But they are not accidents of history. They are seemingly deliberately planned provocations that result, almost always, in increased globalization. It is the Internet that shows us this fearful pattern and seemingly reveals to us the irrevocable and breathtaking influence of Money Power.
Once these incidents have been created, the great families that run the world's central banks turn to their bought-and-paid-for media and court historians to write narratives that enshrine their globalist narratives via magazines, novels, textbooks and, ultimately, historical presentations.
To add credibility, they invent and create literary and historical prizes including the Nobel Prize. Then they dress up their narratives in the entertaining cloak of Hollywood movie-dom. It is an all-inclusive "matrix."
In Iraq, the US "embedded" reputable journalists with the troops. But the result of such reporting was merely fact-based. It seemed genuine but did not deal with the larger issues of the war or its inception – or even Saddam Hussein's past history with Western intelligence that, for all intents and purposes, may have placed him in power to begin with.
"I know history will be kind to me," Winston Churchill reportedly said, "because I intend to write it." This phrase, apocryphal or not, is good for a chuckle but history, it turns out, is far more serious. The wars of the 20th century alone provide us with a toll of horror that is difficult to imagine. The number of people killed – fairly directly – by the state in the 20th century is in the area of 150 million, apparently.
Try to explain World War I, please. Or how about World War II? Or the USSR? Or China? Turns out in every case the Anglosphere power elite that wants to run the world apparently "funded" the "other" side. There were massive investments made in Hitler's Germany right up until the war, and then apparently afterwards as well. Western elites funded the USSR "Reds" and probably Mao and his cadres.
Of course, this is the way of the world. Money Power's directed history is surely not a modern infestation. We are simply not confident in our modest abilities to make even hypothetical pronouncements about what happened several hundreds years ago or longer.
But we can guess. We figure that what works today has been working on and off for thousands of years. But the closer it gets, the more recognizable it is. The mechanism is more clearly visible.
And thus we are not surprised that more and more is emerging about the phony nature of the Iranian threat. We are not even surprised at the amount of detail that is becoming clear. Several years ago we pointed out reports that Iran's clerical revolutionary Rouhollah Mousavi Khomeini's father was British MI6. There are other apparent anomalies.
It is important to note that such revelations are a direct result of the Internet – the Internet Reformation, if you will. It is NOT a hypothetical concept. We've also pointed out that damage control, when it comes to the Internet, is exceptionally difficult.
The Internet is a process not an episode. It mimics the first information revolution sparked by the Gutenberg Press. Ultimately, the ramifications, in our view, will be just as resonant. At this point, no matter what the powers-that-be try to do, it's probably too late.
The evidence of the power elite's failing dominant social themes is all around us. And now information about the Anglosphere's incredible, mind-boggling war-time lies are becoming clearer. What is emerging about Iran is stranger than any James Bond fiction or CIA narrative.
Once again we see Western power elites creating the enemy they then claim to wish to destroy. Really ... we don't know of anything in modern history that compares to this! We hardly have the words to describe it.
The US and its allies are threatening to become involved in a MAJOR war at the same time that CREDIBLE EVIDENCE is apparently emerging that the people in charge of the West, certainly behind the scenes, have SUPPORTED THE ENEMY.
Thanks, DARPA. That was a swell "Net" you invented.
Of course, it's not just Iran. We never thought we would conclude that the entire recent past of the human race was apparently a kind of fictional device, a made-up narrative designed to increase globalism and bring the backers of the narrative ever more power and wealth. We still find it hard to believe.
What's HARDER to believe is the malevolence marshaled by this sort of directed history. The top people – and we figure there are only a handful (apparently worth trillions, by the way, thanks to the central banks they control) – really don't care much about human life. They create wars the way other people create arguments. Or that's how it seems.
We've covered the emergent narrative of Western involvement in the Iranian mess in some detail but we did so within the context of our textual approach, through analysis of dominant social themes. These themes yield patterns that are becoming increasingly clear as the flow of information posted on the Internet continues to build.
The information doesn't need to be "alternative" in nature, by the way. Once one knows what patterns to note, even mainstream events, properly reported, can prove useful. This is another complication for those attempting to control the 'Net's newsflow. The incredible aggregation it offers is nearly as important as the alternative points of view. Here are a few of our articles over the years about the Iranian hoax:
This past week, as we note in our initial quote, Mohammadi provides us a useful additional resource by pulling together the growing literature exposing the West's Iranian manipulations. He cites authors who are digging up more definitive details ...
Francisco Gil-White's series of investigative articles at his websiteHistorical and Investigative Research goes into great detail about the complicated relationship between the Anglo-American shadow ruling elite and the Iranian mullahs. His investigations feature many links to news articles and other historical material that prove his thesis that "US policy towards Iran has been pro-Islamist since 1979, and that the Islamist Iranian mullahs have been US assets from the start," (The Big Picture: US policy towards Iran in the broadest historical perspective, January 5, 2006).
In "The Big Picture," article, Gil-White writes that "the basic structure of the relationship between the US and Iran did not change in 1979, with the exception that the puppet government in Iran, since 1979, has pretended in public to be an enemy of the US ruling elite."
According to this narrative, the Iranian mullahs were hand-picked in the late 1970s to rule over a government that is still in a colonial relationship with America and Britain. The research done by Iranian political dissident Fara Mansoor, which I have highlighted before, backs up this narrative.
Mansoor said that elements in the U.S. intelligence and foreign policy elite gained knowledge of the Shah's cancer in 1975 after General Hossein Fardoust, the Shah's right-hand man and longtime friend, informed then U.S. ambassador to Iran, Richard Helms.
The knowledge of the Shah's cancer was political and intelligence gold, and it fell into the greedy hands of Helms, who was quick to use it to outmaneuver his political enemies abroad and at home. Helms was well experienced in secret espionage and engineering back-dealing conspiracies, having played a key role in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the subsequent CIA cover-up.
I've summarized some of his main findings in my articles: The British And U.S. Governments Installed Khomeini Into Power In 1979; A Rigged Revolution: How The Shadow CIA-MI6 Network Put Khomeini And Militant Islamists in Power; and Hostage To False Flag Terror: The Link Between The October Surprise And The September Surprise.
Also, read Harry V. Martin's article from 1995 called, "The real Iranian hostage story from the files of Fara Mansoor," and listen to radio host Dave Emory's 1993 interview with Mansoor on YouTube.
This is so very important. Never, so far as we know, has a credible alternative history circulated while the elites were actively engaged in contemporaneous agitation.
So here is a question for those who will immediately claim this is further evidence that the 'Net is being "used" by the elites to disseminate only information they "choose." Our question is, "Why?"
Why would the Anglosphere power elite choose to circulate such damning facts at the same time as they embarked upon an effort to paint Iran as a terrible enemy of the West – and militant Islam generally?
The answer to us is obvious: These stage-managed conflicts are increasingly being revealed nearly as fast as the elites create them.
There are those who will maintain that such exposure does little to harm the larger malevolent mechanism. But, in fact, such revelations are incredibly damaging. We cannot establish it for a fact but we are fairly well convinced of a kind of operative human "hive mind."
For some reason, information disseminated in one place has ripples – ramifications – far beyond its immediate absorption. This is the phenomenon that the elites are struggling with.
Call it the Emperor's New Clothes phenomenon. A single child pointing out the obvious can have a convulsive effect on the larger polity and populace. The emperor, you know, continued his parade but he was abashed and ashamed. Everyone knew, somehow.
Given what we are now learning, here's another question: What is more important than some of the journalism taking place on the Internet at "alternative news" websites? (Not all of such information is credible, of course, and some of it, in fact, is misinformation. You will have to sort through it yourself.)
It's really amazing. In only a few short years, in our humble opinion, a small group of intrepid, amateur sleuths, using only Internet tools and the patterns they reveal, have exposed to us history's greatest hoax – the directed history that a powerful handful of elite families have secretly been inflicting on everybody else.
This is an ineffably important insight for anyone who wants to live their life within the larger context of human civilization – such as it is or pretends to be. Why should we care? Because we ought to understand our place within life's larger context. "Know thyself," Socrates said.
Conclusion: We may not wish to understand. We may regret the journey. It may sadden or repel us. But, by God, let's not stop! Let us know!
Posted by patriot01 on 02/10/12 01:12 PM
Obama is out to destroy middle class America at all costs. What happened to our great country? Our we all just content to suck on it. Lets hear from you, citizens.
Reply from The Daily Bell
This feedback was edited.
Posted by peacenik on 02/05/12 11:55 PM
I agree with you , Bob . How would a War with Iran play out ? It is kind of a macabre question , like watching a horror movie . I read somewhere that the Iranians have very swift small boats that could surround a U.S. carrier and take it out . I just have this funny feeling that a war with Iran could end very badly for the U.S. I think we underestimate the Persian people . I think Iran will fight back , and perhaps in an unconventional way . Remember the fancy Apache helicopters in Iraq ? Iraqis took some of them down with bows and arrows !! Israel could end up getting its butt kicked also . What do you readers think ?
Posted by rmp on 02/05/12 12:38 PM
The Evans book on Carter seems to suggest that we did in fact help with the current regime in Iran, by first throwing the Shah under the bus, and that we did supply funds to Khomeini for his trip from France to Iran, and that there's evidence that either he or his father was a memeber of MI6.
That we initally did this to promote hedgemony against the Russians when they were in Afghanistan is also the idea propagated. This idea of hedgemony supposedly came from Brzezinski, which also gave birth to the Taliban and El--CIA-DUH.
I don't think it's stretch to think that the Anglosphere in their quest for global government would not link with, or use Islam and terror to advance that goal, to bring that area of "lessor includeds" (Military term) into what the military also calls the "core", all the while advancing a NWO.
Posted by Summer on 02/05/12 11:53 AM
Wow, fantastic article!
Elites had a choice - A communist or 'Islamic' Iran.
Posted by memehunter on 02/04/12 12:26 PM
DB: You have a tape? You have a letter? A confession?
DB, I have to point out the disingenuousness of this statement. Most of the things discussed here on the DB are difficult to prove, and certainly not by means of a tape, letter, or confession. So this strikes me as a kind of double standard to ask Bob to provide such evidence.
In fact, there are fairly obvious reasons to believe (see my earlier post) that Hitler eventually came to see "the Zionist banking cartel as this primary enemy" (dixit Bob).
Posted by memehunter on 02/04/12 12:21 PM
DB: "You DO NOT KNOW that Hitler and Stalin broke with their Western backers anymore than you know whether this is true of the top people of Iran."
Hitler: "'Break down the thralldom of interest' is our war cry."
From: "Hitler and the banksters: The abolition of interest-servitude"
Click to view link
More from the same article:
"On August 30, 1939, in an act of great statesmanship, Hitler again offered to the Poles the Marienwerder proposals,(21) namely retention of the existing 1919 borders, the return of Danzig (97% German), the construction of a 60-mile autobahn and rail link connecting West and East Prussia (from Schoenlanke to Marienwerder) and an exchange of German and Polish populations. On the orders of the international bankers, the British Foreign Secretary, Lord Halifax, strongly advised the Poles NOT to negotiate. This is how and why World War II was started. The ensuing forced war resulted in victory for the international financiers and defeat and slavery for all the people of Europe."
Posted by rossbcan on 02/04/12 10:31 AM
DB: "We differ with you, Bob."
Not taking a position pro Bob / con DB, nor the converse. Just pointing out that the answer to the puppet / not question is not binary. Sure faux "rulers" may be installed as puppets, but whether they remain so is a matter of "what they can get away with" on an issue by issue basis both in term of their personal ambition / greed and what their slave populations are willing to tolerate them to get away with. What is certain is puppets, or not, when they bite their master's hand, especially in the areas of sharing natural resources with their people, stepping away from $US hegemony (oil in other than $US), or, the African Gold Dinar (Ghadaffi), which would have diverted planetary investment to Africa, killed fiat $US... , they are gone.
13.3.1 Fatal Disadvantage of Rule by Force
If physical strength is the means of control, the ruler must be physically strongest. Given the fact that the environment of rulers and their agents leaves them at a numerical disadvantage, it is necessary for the ruler to recruit the strongest as agents.
The ruler must share enough power to keep the voluntary allegiance of his agents, who are fully capable of forming common cause to seize control themselves. This is the agents best survival choice, limited only by the requirement to maintain enough cooperation to control the workers
From the ruler's survival perspective the conclusion is that exclusively relying on force as a means of control is a poor survival choice for the simple reason that your physically strong agents will inevitably want to occupy your position. In addition, the workers are always numerically superior, motivated and perfectly capable of organizing to achieve your demise.
Some other means of control must be found by rulers to maintain power without relying exclusively on dangerous force.
From: The Purpose and Nature of Civilization
Click to view link
Posted by speedygonzales on 02/03/12 11:51 PM
Persians come to the place of our days 2000 BC from southern Russia today. This area is now considered as cradle of civilization. Persians are aryans. Iran= Ayran=arian. This folx created Aratta, 22 000 BC,and Arkaim.
C Map Click to view link
Aratta Click to view link
Arkaim, academy of magi, Click to view link
Wise man @ jesus cradle were magi.
Persians created first monotheistic religion: Zoroastrism. Zoroaster was prophet of god Ahura Mazda. His civil name was Ibrahim Zeradust aka Brahma aka Abraham. Abraham had 2 sons Isaac/judaism and Ishmail/islam.
All doctrines of judaism/christianity are Zoroastrian: Good/bad,hell/heaven,angels/devils,god/lucifer and so on.
Actual founder of judaism is Cyrus who allowed israelites to join Zoroastrism. This opened them doors to state administration of Persia. Zoroastrians can mary zoroastrians only. We know it from judaism.
Religious thoughts to Tibet and China were brought by guys who wore white dress and white head covers form Persia who spoke strange language-avesta.
Pharisees from bible are parsees or persians. They also spoke avesta.
Second temple was build by persians. When Rome took over Judea brutal barbaric rules and high taxation took over. So israelites prayed for savior and called Persia for help. It happened in 68. When Rome recognized treat from church they ruined temple. Similar happened in 144 with Bar Kochba etc.
Biblical jews are palestinians. Click to view link
Jesus religion was Essene.
10 Commandements are from chapter 120 of Egyptian book of dead. How they got 'em? When Santorini caldera erupted Hyksos folx from judea invaded Egypt and ruled there for 400 years. Akhenaten or his bro Tuth-mose-s are probably biblical Moses. Akhenaten tried to change religion to The Sun god. Akhenaten and Nefertiti are parents of Tut-ankh-amun. They are not african nor semite DNA. Religion of magis was Mithraism and The Sun.
Origins of gnosticism are @ Lake Urmia under Ararat. Ararat is place where Noahs Arch landed. And this is real cradle of civilization. Not Greece not Rome. Persia.
From magi we can go to Essene. Essene to Mani. Mani to Bogomils. Bogomils to templars. Essene to Cathars. In 13 century Khazarian elite moved to Catalonia. language in catalonia is Occitan or Lingua d' Occ or Languedoc. Templars helped in reconquista for 30% conquered property. In Spain they created alumbrado and jesuits. After inquisition khazars moved to Turkey created Donmeh. Donmeh stands behind Armenian genocide.
One of the founders of DAP latter NSDAP was Rudolf von Sebbotendorf, turkish citizen, memeber of Thule Society. As Sefik Husnu he was arrested for Reichstag fire. All was turned on commies. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht oposed WW1 and were arested. Everyone who cross way of elites is gonna get black label.
What is their secret? Gnostic texts. Like Dead see scrolls or Nag Hammdi codexes. Their godes is Baphomet aka Sophia.
This guys tell ye all
Click to view link
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
This is very interesting, thanks.
Posted by bob on 02/03/12 08:56 PM
It is quite possible that Iran's clerical revolutionary Rouhollah Mousavi Khomeini's father was British MI6. But the Iranian Revolution took place almost 35 years ago.
Is it possible that Rouhollah Mousavi Khomeini come to power with a helping hand from the Zionist 'Anglosphere' power elite? The answer: very much possible. Otherwise, Khomeini would not ever make alive to Iran. He could be quietly assassinated long time before he boarded a flight back to Tehran.
But, does it mean that the present Iranian leaders are members of CIA, Mossad, MI6 and/or their sympathizers? I doubt it is a case.
Both Hitler and the Soviet founders were financed by the Zionist 'Anglosphere' power elite. But quite soon
• Hitler saw the Zionist banking cartel as this primary enemy
• As for the Soviet Union, 18 years after the Bolshevik 'revolution', Stalin had a 'second revolution' (aka the Stalin's purges) when overwhelming majority of the Zionist 'Anglosphere' power elite agents and their sympathizers were either dead (including Lenin) or were liquidated (including Trotsky)
In other words, the insinuation that the present Iranian leaders are agents or sympathizers of the Zionist 'Anglosphere' power elite does not hold water. Iran has changed in the last 35 years. Its leaders became used to running Iran and are enjoying benefit of doing so. They are not about to run to the safety of London, Paris, America bringing their families with them.
Consequently, the conflict between Iran and world Zionist criminal masters is genuine and very serious. Is a war a done deal? There are too many variable to be certain.
A war with Iran can be beneficial to the Zionist 'Anglosphere' power elite only under one condition: Iran will not fight back behaving like Saddam and Qaddafi hoping for an honorable settlement with NATO & Israeli thugs and their Zionist masters. In this case, Iranian leaders deserve their destiny and death.
Reply from The Daily Bell
We differ with you, Bob. This is the trouble with over-analysis of directed history. You DO NOT KNOW that Hitler and Stalin broke with their Western backers anymore than you know whether this is true of the top people of Iran. YOU DO NOT KNOW. You have a tape? You have a letter? A confession?
Posted by finninsweden on 02/03/12 09:43 AM
For this excellent article you deserve a bonus! Go here;
Click to view link
make sure it is the 2:nd of february issue and then scroll down to "the funnies". Enjoy!
Posted by Prometheus on 02/03/12 12:46 AM
Well, I have been discussing the possibility with a friend over the years that the depiction of USA VS Russia might be a fake huge PSYOP as well and that China is the dark horse in this grand conspiracy, i.e. the real enemy of NWO and that all chess strategies are leading covertly up to this. It seems also beyond doubt that CIA and KGB are in deep in regard to so-called anti-gravity propulsion systems, many UFOs are in fact our own... .the rabbit hole deepens all the time
Posted by Bluebird on 02/02/12 11:58 PM
This is a great article. I keep coming back and reading it, wanting to comment, but the whole plot sickens me. Such benevolent little leaders, huh? Yes, they will attack Iran. Yapping about Israel doing it in a few months. And for what? To scare us into believing this is the war of Gog and Magog of Ez. 38? I have believed they have planned for a long time doing awful things in 2012 and that is why they fabricated all those end of the world stories surrounding 2012. And Soros with his "yes, yes, yes", he says almost gleefully. They just can't seem to spill enough blood to sate their sick appetites. Expose them for what they are!
Posted by Edgar Westmoreland on 02/02/12 11:06 PM
Just a speculation, but it often seems that Achmadinajhad is not quite as well informed as the president of a large country should be. Perhaps a less trusted tool than is projected?
Posted by MetaCynic on 02/02/12 09:52 PM
I'm confused. If the Iranian Islamic dictatorship is a creature of the U.S., then what's the real reason for all the saber rattling? Is this just theater to frighten the American rubes into giving up yet more liberty and treasure? That would make sense against the background of already exposed and discredited power elite fear mongering.
But what if the U.S. is really planning to wage war on Iran, another of its many covert puppets? Is so, why? Have the mullahs strayed off the reservation on some important issues and need to be humbled? Then why not simply replace them with a more compliant puppet? Such a move would probably even be popular with the Iranian people. Why go to war over the relatively unimportant issue of Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons, thus severely alienating the rest of the world and pushing the tottering American economy over the cliff?
War on Iran might also draw in the nuclear powers Russia and China, triggering a world war. Why would the power elite risk all kinds of horrific unintended consequences that a world war would unleash, especially if it went nuclear, just to get rid of an uppity puppet regime? Perhaps there is an unstated objective here such as controlling the future world power, China, by denying it Iran's oil. In that case the power elite might be willing to risk a nuclear world war, and Iran is doomed no matter what concessions its government makes to the West.
Posted by planet on 02/02/12 08:18 PM
When the Moslems, Serbs, and others I can't think of just now were fighting and the Moslems, and others were winning, the war went on and on and no one complained or seemed to care. But as soon as the Serbs would begin to win, A call and cry would go out for a cease fire. What is it about the Serbs that they are hated so and no one stands up for them.
There is nothing but hatred in this world among our leaders for mankind and a desire for world control and power.And they do not care how many people die or are killed purposfully or accidently to accomplish it. There is no peace in this world and no intention of peace among the world leaders.
The United States Government and it's media create its enemies ahead of time and when they are ready for a war, a situation is created to give a justification for war. The World Trade Center was used as an excuse to attack Afganastan and Iraq. Not once did I read a newspaper article that claimed definitely that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction . Not once. They all said: may, might, possible etc., etc. Now Iran has been made to be a radical country mad to achieve nuclear weapons or power. Last year the Conservatives wanted to attack Iran. Yes! Destroy another country. Who cares . All the Republicans and Conservatives talk about morals and principles and love of the Bible is just talk. Destroy another country and kill the innocent people of your Bible's history that you love to talk of so much. Who gives a damm. The Catholic Church seeks world religious control and power and the Jews want worldly and financial power and control.
We'll see how far away that power is. The Vatican calls for a new currency.
We'll see what event will be created to justify war with Iran.
George W. Bush called this a twenty year war on terror , a newspaper columinist called it a 40 year war on terror and I've even read of it as a 100 year war on terror. So, expect to see more death and destruction on this earth. These wars will not end until there is as Robert Maxwell said : " You will have a one world government. You will have a one world religion. You will have a one world economy. You will have a one world currency. You will have a one world government whether you want it or not." He was drowned at sea shortly after.
This war and others are good to control people, leaders, and control , steal, or give a countries resources away.
As long as the people of this world continue to allow and tolerate these wars, these lusters after world power will win their desire for world power and control.
Whether it is true or not, a radio listener called a talk show and claimed when he was in Russia and a women recognized him as an American, she told him that the Communist had hand- picked their man for President of the United States and he was a Black man. This, he said happened in the early 1990's. We have a world on the verge of bankruptcy due to control of our money system since 1913. They want it to last forever until they control the world and all in it. And we keep bragging about candidates like we are voting for our leaders. The candidates may decide to run for office, but do we really elect them? Or is it the money their campaign has to spend?
All one has to do is to see who our leaders cater to to know, they know, who runs the world.
Why have we built the largest embassey in Iraq? Is it to be the capital of the financial world and the reason our religious leaders love to cater to Israel, is because it is to be the capital of the religious world?
Maybe all those Christians who want to see Jesus or end times will get their wish this year.
We should also see this year if those specially developed BLOCK- BUSTER BOMBS created especially for use against Iran can do what it is hoped they will do - as much destruction as possible. I wonder who is sitting in the wings waiting to take control of Iran when Israel , the UN and US are ready to set up a government in Iran to steal their resources like was done to Iraq? It seems there is always a suitable leader who appears out of exile, etc.
Posted by alexsemen on 02/02/12 07:24 PM
It is wonderful!Great !
I like your words and ideas !
Here in this article I'm home in my family with my family!
Posted by alexsemen on 02/02/12 07:18 PM
More than the truth !
Not Iran is the objective , is just a pretext/ diversion to destroy Russia ,( China will on proper time be the (Brutus)killer of Russia , because Siberia has 1000 time more of all we need than all we knows at this moment in other country from oil , gas, diamonds, titan ... . you name it !
Great analysis DB ! But be aware about Caucasus/ Kaliningrad /Karelia in the next 6 month.
Posted by Christianrealist on 02/02/12 07:13 PM
No I'm not sure... just seems to fit the whole sad scenario..
Posted by Mr. Rogers on 02/02/12 07:13 PM
Let us know... indeed. My problem it seems with it all, is being able to cope with knowning these various planned procations were, and are... deliberate !
It blows my mind to read what I would say is, stranger than fiction.
I've been following Samaram Mohammadi's " The Excavator ", web-site the last year now, and have found it to be one of the most insightfull blogs out there. I understand he is a young fellow who resides in Toronto, Canada ... if I'm not mistaken ?
A suggestion to those of you at The Daily Bell, would be to do an interview with him, if one hasn't been done already ?
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 02/02/12 05:30 PM
"Vis a vis democracy, there must be a formula, a model that must be reached that can be duplicated across the globe"
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, September 21, 2011
Click to view link