Will Chinese and Western Elites Bring Down the World?
As this is apparently "Henry Makow Saturday" (see other article, this issue), I'm going to take the opportunity to comment on an article carried on the Makow website some five days ago entitled "Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati." Written by St. John Bartholomew, the article is interesting whether or not one believes in every aspect of it.
Here at the Daily Bell we've speculated on a regular basis as to whether China's leaders were power elite "insiders" or whether they were native eruptions of Asian totalitarianism. The mainstream media, of course, treats China more and more as an enemy. This suits the Anglosphere power elites that derive additional power and authoritarian justification from creating opponents of the West.
These are actually elite dominant social themes, designed to frighten middle classes into giving up power and wealth to globalist institutions. Knowing this, we finally decided that it was fairly ridiculous to think that the top Chinese leadership existed in some kind of power elite vacuum.
In fact, the Western power elite is a kind of ubiquitous franchise at this point, and has been for close to two centuries. The Anglosphere, in fact, controlled China during Queen Victoria's era – at the height of the Empire – and drugged millions with opium.
Is it realistic to think that the British grip relaxed over time? It is said that the British Commonwealth is a mere formality these days. But a friend of mine insists that top leaders still drop their voices when they mention the term. "They are afraid," he claims.
They are "afraid," then, of the Queen and those who surround her, the great banking families of the City of London. The empire is commonly held to have been dissolved. Winston Churchill participated in this charade. He spent the latter half of his long life bemoaning the greatness that was gone.
At this point I have a hard time believing it. The same Churchill who apparently said, "History will be kind to me for I intend to write it," was a consummate actor and bully-boy for the elite. He played his part, courageously or not, for London's top banking elites. To believe otherwise at this point is somewhat naïve.
It would also be naïve to believe that the Chinese leadership, having been formed and transformed by Western elites, would have no high-level relationships to it now. That's why this article is believable, or one reason anyway. Here's some more from it:
The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control ... the Chinese elite is a merger between the Communist leadership, Hong Kong tycoons, and the criminal Triads. All three factions derive derive their power from Illuminati collaboration. China has appeared autonomous because the Illuminati developed the country internally, funding 'revolutionary' political parties spouting nationalist slogans.
Lord Bertrand Russell revealed this plan in a report on China published in 1920: 'Out of the renaissance spirit now existing in China, it is possible, if foreign nations can be prevented from wreaking havoc, to develop a new civilization better than any that the world has yet known.' The fascist superpower we know today was created in the second half of the 20th century by the bogus Cold War dialectic of communism vs. capitalism.
The stage was set in 1898 when Britain and China signed a contract stipulating that Hong Kong would be handed back to the Chinese in 1997. This meant that the fierce Communism of the mainland and laissez faire capitalism of Hong Kong were always destined to merge. The process of unification gave rise to the current China power elite. What follows is background of the three main factions.
The three elements of leadership, according to the article, are the communist leadership, including Mao who was supposedly a "Soviet agent," the Hong Kong Tycoons (later entrants) and the criminal Triads.
The Hong Kong Tycoons represent Western economic know-how and the Triads provide the muscle that has allowed the Tycoons to thrive within the larger regional environment of the ChiCom-leveling enterprise.
This is slightly different than what we've envisioned, in that we believed that the great Chinese leader-families were indigenous to Mainland China, but it makes a lot of sense. The great Asian families fled to Hong Kong, allied themselves with the Triads and gradually regrouped and took control.
What gained them entrance was ChiCom mismanagement, in my view. The ChiComs ended up with credit for the Great Leap Forward that starved 50 million Chinese as well as for the repression of Tiananmen Square. The only way for the ChiComs to regroup was to implement some form of market capitalism, and this they've done. But that's ending as well, I would think.
The ChiComs have blasted their economy into orbit with central banking super money and the monetary stimulation they've implemented has turned China into a kind of skyscraper graveyard. At this rate there'll be one full building for every man, woman and child in China, with more on the way. Maybe a train per person, too.
The article ends by noting that the mainstream media "portrays China as hostile to Western power." It adds that "by studying the triumvirate Chinese elite and their intimate ties to the Illuminati, it is clear that modern China is an Illuminati creation."
I disagree with this latter formulation, as it's never clear to me why those who write for Makow inevitably adopt the Illuminati paradigm. There is evidently and obviously a kind of criminal conspiracy to rule the world being run out of London, Washington DC and Tel Aviv, among other places. It's really not necessary to confuse the issue, in my view, by adding in complicating factors about the "Illuminati," Freemasonry, etc.
The last sentence reads, "The Chinese elite must never stray from the NWO agenda, for it follows that if the Illuminati made them, they can break them too." For clarity's sake, I would rephrase the statement to read, "The Western power elite that made them can break them, too."
I would also add that understanding China's role within the larger realm of Anglosphere directed history is very important. The Western rulers of this gloomy globe know full well that China's economy is bound to implode sooner or later.
If the top Chinese are actually in league with Western powers that be, we should begin to see a kind of coordinated take-down of the world's economy. In fact, absent China (arguably), this is well on its way. One can argue as to whether it is a purposeful collapse or not but for me the arguing is done.
Once the Chinese economy collapses – and inevitably it must sooner or later – the elites may wish to take the next step toward building a fully integrated global government. This may well include a one-world currency, central bank and political and military structure.
I think China may be key to this because in order to implement such an ambitious structure, the globe's misery level is going to have to be considerably heightened. A Chinese economic collapse would certainly aid the cause. If, in fact, the top Chinese are working in league with top Western banking families, this sort of scenario becomes considerably less far-fetched.
Posted by RF on 02/20/12 06:02 PM
more likely when they can't affors to play anymore !!!! The Native cultures around the globe had 'legal' title to everything- , The English were big on ceremonial fires that "extinguished" prior titles ( ie the French), and re-lit as thiers-(Canada)-Things haven't changed much,--the Media serves the same purpose now--the Grand "Summits" of, 10, 20, 30, and following announcments, they are trying hard not to make it by blood,( and not succeeding at all). If they don't want to play anymore they can find another field?? sure...
Posted by dave jr on 02/20/12 04:02 PM
They won't settle until they have 'legal' title to the world. They are well on the way. The pump and dump method works well. One regions dump can be another regions pump.
Ownership of resource is secured by the rules of the game. What is going to happen when the majority don't want to play anymore?
Posted by RF on 02/20/12 03:40 PM
Of which I agree- playing regions like dice or cards can foster more wealth for those holding the bank( house rules) ... .we revert to a medievil economic syndrome that began our current troubles, little kingdoms at war with each other over gold or whatever currency is considered goo at the time..Consuption will be to those that can steal it, make it or buy it, all others will have to do without- a witches brew for anarchy in any case..
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 02/20/12 12:17 PM
AW: "Will Chinese and Western Elites Bring Down the World?"
How about adding in the Saudis?
"Saudi Arabia Cuts Oil Output"
Click to view link
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 02/20/12 12:15 PM
"deep down you know what I'm talking about, even if you won't admit it"
That's right, deep down I know what you're talking about: They handle THEIR website as they see fit and you don't like that, apparently.
Posted by Kraymer on 02/20/12 12:00 PM
agreed. deep down you know what I'm talking about, even if you won't admit it :) lol i feel im being kind of an a--hole bringing up the elephant in the room. Im sure everyone thought of this. don't get my wrong DB i like reading this site and will continue!!
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 02/20/12 11:38 AM
How about this: It's THEIR website and they handle this as they see fit?
Posted by Kraymer on 02/20/12 11:16 AM
Again you fail to answer the question.. but its ok.. I wont ask you again.. Obviously you have a good reason not to give a straight answer..
Posted by Kraymer on 02/20/12 10:02 AM
off topic, but I wanted to know.. why is it only anthony who is willing to put his name up on his posts.. I asked this question some time ago, DB childishly avoided answering the question by saying "you mean like the economist?" no i mean like infowars, or any other news site in the world.. so i thought i would asked the man himself.. any answers Wile or any of the "staff"? Am I the only one curious about this?
Reply from The Daily Bell
This is really funny considering you use a name that may or may not be yours and your email is entirely anonymous. Chatrooms are filled with contributors using "handles." Many blogs run unbylined articles. You find the example of the Economist to be "childish" but we have always found the Economist to be a fairly serious venture and represents an ancient tradition that we fully understand, though we disagree with most of its content most of the time. If our nomenclature bothers you so much, why don't you start an Internet blogsite of your own and you can place as many names in it as you wish ....
Posted by jurist on 02/19/12 11:53 PM
Disclaimer: Please note that registration is not general in nature, but is for communication purposes only.
What follows is relevant to this discussion.
Click to view link
This appears to be an expose on world finance and the monetary system.
It appears to be well documented. I don't agree with the conclusions asserted necessitating the theft and consolidation of gold into a world bank following WWI and the creation of a fiat money system "for the benefit of humanity," nor the projected solutions to the current Illuminati/ banking cabal controlled world.
Nations should not have central banks where precious metals are held and notes issued based upon the metal. Precious metals should be held by the people, where they would tend to be widely distributed.
The article has some startling revelations regarding the sheer quantity of gold held around the world by the Federal Reserve system, who it belonged to and how it got where it is.
DB, I expect you will want to feature the article and comment on it.
Posted by Danny B on 02/19/12 10:36 PM
Here is a bit of background propaganda.
Click to view link
Posted by dave jr on 02/19/12 08:48 PM
They can have their gold. What they need is cooperation in voluntary forfeiture of wealth creating capability. Consumption is a necessary price to be held to a minimum. So long as fractional reserve is retained, they can still have irredeemable fiat with a gold standard. Stated international gold ratios can play one region against another.
Posted by RF on 02/19/12 08:25 PM
The Power Elite need " the people" working in serf-i-tude to keep the taxes flowing and the goods consumed--most of us realize there are many shams propagated by various government entities- both for and against our better future- managing the currency exchanges give them something to do, like playing dice or cards,without it 'they' would be lost .. the gold currency will not work in this day and age unless it all collapses- no fiat currency , will bring about the gold standard some seek, but they already have gold- the chaos that follows for those without, will be an end to the consumer civilization as we know it- yes another will occur, they will be far more concerned about heat, food and shelter- what we take for granted these days... .
Posted by dave jr on 02/19/12 02:19 PM
PS. I think that the global warming / climate change / carbon credit was supposed to do just that - manage exchange rates. But since their scientists couldn't keep their mouths shut, they may have to settle for an international gold standard.
Posted by scousekraut on 02/19/12 02:14 PM
When I was working at a major commodity broker in the London City in the 1970s we had a guy from the Chinese Embassy spend a year in our trading room - about 1977. He came to work every day in his Chairman Mao regulation Blue Suit at a time when we were all wearing colourful suits, wide ties and had long hair. The language was also more than colourful. No doubt there were a few others planted into offices to learn the business.
Posted by dave jr on 02/19/12 01:38 PM
I don't think there is going to be a collapse, the PE don't need it. 'The People' are the entity that needs the fiat system to fail. But while we are watching, waiting, something else will transpire.
As I have stated before, if the international currency exchange rates can be 'managed' for whatever percieved beneficial reason, then the international bankers will have a defacto world currency. IMHO
Posted by RF on 02/19/12 10:23 AM
I must add I have not the sympathy for the genicide committed during WW2- Genocide has been human behavior since the beginning, perhaps the Reich was too efficient for most stomachs-- Native peoples, Armenians, Chinese, Russisns, have much in common with the Jews-- many were murdered for no real reason- history is full of such behavior..
Posted by RF on 02/19/12 10:18 AM
all the documentries are fakes too??- state of the art rubber factory ???- you were there??? nutcase at its best I have to say your "paper" collects fruits and nuts well..
Posted by RF on 02/19/12 10:15 AM
given economic collapse those empty skyscrapers may find themselves full of pennyless squatters- burning the furniture for heat empty mall economics-
Posted by RF on 02/19/12 10:06 AM
I consider the one world currency- one world banking order fantasy at it's best... Hollywood might gain a bit with movie rights, provided they have any money to pay the actors with-- with the cololapse of economy in China, preluded by Anglo western economic collapses- it would be decades without communication between any of them- the pretense that the internet will still be functional during the collapse is ludicrious to say the least- without economy to monitor -there will be little need or use for the internet- food shelter and survival will play a far greater role in daily life than finding a signal on thier I phones- oh yes don't forget about the monthly bill-without money to pay it there is no access..