Whoops ... 'Rogue' Vaccine Doc Wakefield's Partner Reinstated
"We are absolutely delighted with this judgment, which vindicates Professor Walker-Smith. John Walker-Smith was one of the world's leading gastroenterologists. It was incomprehensible that he should have been threatened with being struck off in the first place. This judgment calls into question the independence and competence of the GMC, which was determined all along to pursue a witch-hunt against Professor Walker-Smith, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Professor Simon Murch after they reported their research into the link between bowel disease and regressive autism." Throughout the hearings (the longest in GMC history) the GMC deliberately chose to cherry-pick the evidence to suit their prejudice against these doctors, who had always acted in the very best interests of the children they treated." – David Thrower, autism father
Dominant Social Theme: What? Huh? What gives? Ridiculous. These men set vaccines back by a century!
Free-Market Analysis: Wow. The first reversal. You can see the report in the video below. What a big one it is. Andrew Wakefield himself, the most reviled medical man of the 21st century, is well on his way to being vindicated now, from what we can tell.
This is surely a big story (though please note the media is not treating it as one). And the import is increased because Big Pharma has literally leveled all its guns at Wakefield in an attempt to discredit his claim that some kinds of vaccines might be involved in the development of autism.
If you examine the unfolding saga, you will be provided not just with tempestuous slander of Wakefield, but a timeline of the Internet Reformation itself.
We are fond of writing that the Internet is a process not an episode, and that the power elite that evidently and obviously wants to run the world (formally as opposed to informally) still has no idea how to deal with its revelations.
What happens is that the top elites – those that control central banking and use the proceeds to nurture world government – continually utilize the tools of control that worked in the 20th century but not the 21st. The fabulously wealthy old men seem to have no idea what to do. Or so we surmise.
In the case of Wakefield, everything was seemingly done correctly. The doctor was pilloried in 10,000 news stories; his research was discredited; he was labeled a cheat and a fraud; his livelihood was reduced; he was chased out of his home country of Britain; eventually he was disbarred and forbidden to practice medicine.
That should have been the end of it. But not now. Not in the 21st century. Thanks to the Internet, the ruckus has only continued to grow. Watch the video (below) to see what we mean. Dr. Wakefield's staunch cadre of mothers of children with autism believe in him more than ever. And there are plenty of sympathetic articles to go around now. A growing number.
Wakefield continues to fight back. He is suing one of his detractors and even the paid hacks that jump to pillory him at every opportunity now sound abashed. Maybe they too are experiencing the rough realities of the 21st century. It's not so easy to be a thug these days.
You see ... the Internet is a process not an episode. Like the Gutenberg Press before it, the Internet is making many of the elite's dominant social themes – fear based promotions – unworkable. As a result the top elites are turning increasingly to age-old tools of control: war, depression and brute state-mandated force.
But it doesn't help when the truth can be broadcast regularly. And thanks to the Internet it can be. Dr. Wakefield can certainly be disposed of. He can have an "accident." But his truth is not so easily silenced as it might have been even a decade ago.
Even a few months ago, those that wish to continue mass vaccination despite growing evidence that such programs are in some cases very possibly ineffective (and now and then even deadly), might have been forgiven for believing the worst was behind them. No such thing.
Earlier this week, a British High Court judge threw out the verdict of professional misconduct against Professor Walker-Smith. This is the man who along with "rogue vaccine Doc" Andrew Wakefield handled tests for a Journal-published paper suggesting that the MMR vaccine might generate the condition of autism. Here's an excerpt from a UK Telegraph article on the subject:
Both Dr Andrew Wakefield and Professor Walker-Smith were found guilty of professional misconduct over the way the research was conducted and were struck off the medical register in May 2010. The GMC panel's verdict followed 217 days of deliberation, making it the longest disciplinary case in the GMC's 152-year history. In 2004, the Lancet announced a partial retraction, and 10 of the 13 authors disowned it. But Mr Justice Mitting ruled the decision against Professor Walker-Smith "cannot stand", and quashed the findings.
This is surely a quasi-mortal day for Big Pharma. Its campaign against Wakefield is in shreds. The truth is coming out – the REAL truth about vaccines. The truth that vaccines may be a kind of "directed history." Whoops.
The truth apparently (see other article this issue) is that NO credible evidence exists that even proves vaccines perform as CLAIMED. The vaunted double-blind tests do not exist. The statistics were fudged. Polio – supposedly alleviated – was confused (on purpose?) with numerous other diseases that still take their toll today. The beneficiary: Big Pharma, of course, and the elites that control the top companies.
THIS is no doubt the REAL secret that Big Pharma has been desperate to hide. It explains the almost inexplicable rage against Wakefield. They've used nuclear weapons on a gnat. Why? They feared the gnat's bite would lead to blood poisoning of the entire, rotten corpus.
And so it begins. Like a crime that gradually unravels even though the perpetrators are desperate to stop the unraveling and will do everything in their power to retard it. Too late ...
Serial damage control – the kind that the elites were so good at practicing in the 20th century – means nothing in the 21st. "No man, no problem," Stalin famously said. But he lived then, not now.
And the Internet is a process not an episode.
(Video from AutismMediaChannel's YouTube user channel.)
Posted by Wrusssr on 03/12/12 11:08 PM
The Internet superhighway is littered with elite wreckage.
This ruling couldn't have happen to a nicer group of psychopaths.
Thank you for being a point man in this fight.
The match continues. But I think I just saw their knees wobble.
Posted by Bobby7 on 03/10/12 01:06 PM
Blair & Bush were NEVER struck off for the SLAUGHTER of MILLIONS of innocent people in Iraq & Afghanistan, but 2 dedicated doctors were maligned as medical terrorists by the GMC.
What is needed now is a "Medical Fatwa" against those in the GMC & wherever they are found, they should be injected with ALL the VACCINES they think are safe for patients.
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 03/09/12 06:11 PM
I'm sorry to hear that, Bluebird. It's revolting. And very sad. The sheer amount of malice can be overwhelming at times - which is it's main purpose , I suppose.
Lord help us.
Posted by Kristen on 03/09/12 05:41 PM
Bluebird, I think your thinking is correct. Those three things sound like a toxic brew. My mom lives in the Midwest and her town has some similar dynamics to what you described with chemical plants and some other toxic sources of waste and cancer is very high in her region as well. People in her area have died from the same type of cancer; it is not coincidental.
Posted by Kristen on 03/09/12 05:28 PM
I'm a firm believer in natural health; treating the cause not the symptoms. I've been caring for my health naturally for years using herbs, homeopathy some vitamins and a good diet and it works! I keep a wide birth of the medical establishment and Big Pharma. I've always had a strong distrust of vaccines, mostly because they were so insistent that we take them. I thought, I smell a rat. It is good to know that light is finally being shed on this dark topic. Thanks for spreading the word on this! This is so encouraging!
And Abu, thanks as always for the great links. They are most helpful.
Posted by Bluebird on 03/09/12 05:16 PM
I should have added there are 3 things that I suspected in the children's cancers in my area. The immunizations, the nuclear plants and the chemical plants that are so numerous. Or maybe a combination of the 3. I do not know exactly what, but those who should know DO and are not saying.
Also, I wanted to thank the Daily Bell for all their research. When the elite fall, you can be sure you were a big part of that.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks for the informed commentary. To bad it arises from personal experience ...
Posted by Bluebird on 03/09/12 03:54 PM
Thank you Abu. :-( I have always known in my heart that this was so. I have spent so much time with suffering children since 2000. (Including my own.) So many did not make it. It tears at my insides every day. But I notice if someone gets TB or an STD, they want to know everywhere you have been and who you have been around. A life history is in order. Not so with cancer. They KNOW. I watched my younger sister suffer for over 20 years with mutiple sclerosis until she passed on. A huge part of me went with her. I am sure it will come out one day that this was also part of the nasties they gave us.
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 03/09/12 11:43 AM
DB: "This is surely a quasi-mortal day for Big Pharma. Its campaign against Wakefield is in shreds. The truth is coming out - the REAL truth about vaccines. The truth that vaccines may be a kind of "directed history." Whoops."
"11 Big Surprises Inside Vaccines"
Click to view link
"Vermont Senate passes bill ending philosophical exemptions from school vaccination requirements"
Click to view link
"Corporate Media Blackout On AB 2109 Threatening Vaccine Rights"
Click to view link
Posted by Bluebird on 03/09/12 07:55 AM
Wow! This is great news! Maybe now some brave doctor will find out if these vaccines also have other results. I am not saying this is so, but I suspect it may have something to do with so many children getting cancer. Childhood cancer gets treatment, but no one seems to want to ask what they may have been exposed to or why did this child get this cancer. It is as though it is just a normal, routine thing in the life of a child. But it is heartbreaking to watch and many do not survive. I want to know WHY! I have seen too many die.