MEMBER LOGIN  l  FREE REGISTRATION
The Daily Bell Newswire

News & Analysis

Monday, July 13, 2009

Bernanke Under Fire as Lawmakers Call for Probe of Fed Role in BofA Merger

By Staff Report
9

Ben Bernanke

House lawmakers are calling for an investigation of the Federal Reserve's conduct in Bank of America Corp.'s takeover of Merrill Lynch & Co. before they consider granting more powers to the central bank. In a letter to President Barack Obama, 14 Republicans and three Democrats said there is a "considerable amount" of evidence that calls into question Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke's testimony (pictured left) last month that the Fed didn't put undue pressure on executives to carry out the takeover. The letter was released by Representative Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican on the House Financial Services Committee, which will consider the measure to expand the Fed's authority. Obama wants to give the Fed more power to oversee the largest and most interconnected financial institutions as part of a plan to overhaul regulation. Lawmakers from both parties have raised concerns about giving the Fed additional oversight powers. – Bloomberg

Dominant Social Theme: All must be held accountable.

Free-Market Analysis: We've written the Federal Reserve is on the downswing and in a fairly big way. We traced the initial impetus to the Internet, which has exposed what central banking actually is (price-fixing) to tens of millions. The specific trigger mechanism is to be seen on the Internet where Federal Reserve Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman splutters through a lamentable confession that she has no idea where up to US$9 trillion in Federal Reserve disbursements ended up. These two youtube.com clips have some two million views between them and counting.

Now comes this report that Ben Bernanke has antagonized Congress to the point where the Fed's usual allies are coming undone. The Fed's additional challenges include a concerted effort to have it audited in a serious fashion and a lawsuit from Bloomberg which the news services reports on as follows:

Bloomberg requested details of Fed lending under the Freedom of Information Act and filed a federal lawsuit against the central bank Nov. 7 seeking to force disclosure of borrower banks and their collateral. Arguments in the suit may be heard as soon as this month, according to the court docket. Bloomberg asked the Treasury in an FOIA request Jan. 28 for a detailed list of the securities it planned to guarantee for Citigroup and Bank of America. Bloomberg hasn't received a response to the request.

We have no idea where the lawsuit stands now, but we are more certain than ever that the Fed is in trouble. In fact, we will go a step further and say that central banking itself is in great difficulty. Central banking's survival is dependent on people's willingness to believe in the alchemy of money control by a handful of top men who know more than anyone else. This works so long as the top men's activities are reported through the dry medium of words. But once people can see top men and women in action and share their thoughts on the bank policies via the Internet, the reverence begins to fade. What is familiar almost by definition cannot be divine.

Nothing lasts forever. Central banks had a good run in the 20th century, but in the 21st century, their invulnerability and majesty has been compromised. The rationale is indefensible and the elitism is difficult to sustain in an era of democratic media. Central banks are necessary to the larger elite because of the money power inherent in the system and the control it grants to a fortunate few. But ultimately, central banks have been badly injured by the Internet just as the Roman Catholic Church was almost fatally injured by the Gutenberg Press. An excess of information has done in the both of them – though the full effects of the Internet have yet to be realized.

Conclusion: This is the biggest story of the first part of the 21st century in our opinion, yet it is seemingly going almost unnoticed in the mainstream media. Central banks are the glue of the modern world and their gradual demise, if it is occurring, is worthy of intense commentary and scrutiny. We will do what we can.




Staff Report:   View Bio  l  View Site Contributions
Latest Daily Bell Articles
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits.
Want to learn more? click here
 
NOT A MEMBER YET?
Join The Daily Bell and take full advantage of the benefits TODAY:
MEMBER LOGIN:
USERNAME:
PASSWORD:
REMEMBER ME
LOST YOUR PASSWORD / USERNAME?
Showing 1 - 9 of 9 - Newest on top - Reorder Feedback
  Posted by Kaydell Bowles on 07/14/09 12:58 AM

You still do not get it. Obama is a Socialist from head to toe. Most of his agenda is taken from the play book of Lewinski and the Liberal press is pushing the agenda for him. Why do you not get it or believe?

  Posted by Vicky Davis on 07/13/09 01:08 PM

It doesn't really matter which edition of 'free trade' you are talking about - the Austrian edition or the London edition. It doesn't work because the world is different than it was in the 1700's. The days of the sailing ships bringing teas and spices from the orient to deliver to western ports is a relic and you can't bring it back. 'Free trade' in whatever form, empowers the mega-corporations to buy up and exploit the resources (especially the people) of the world and the result will be a return to feudalism. And that's just the way it is - money rules.

Reply from The Daily Bell

You have a very strong point of view. But comparing Austrian economics to mainstream economics is an apples/oranges comparison. They are two entirely different animals.

  Posted by Vicky Davis on 07/13/09 11:02 AM

In your conclusion, you lament that the free market model isn't even mentioned in Samuelson's article. As somebody who has been writing about the fraud of "free trade" for years now, I can tell you that the reason it is not mentioned is because of the decision not to kill the golden goose that has impoverished the masses of the world while enriching the few.

FREE TRADE IS A FRAUD!

Since you are a defender of the alleged "free market", I have no doubt that you will take offense at my statement. Tough. As to the reason why economists "failed to see it", the reason for that is obvious. In the incestuous circles of economists, all economic problems and solutions are discussed within the context of how the large corporations can continue to grow and profit. They have become global parasites sucking the very life out of their hosts.

This subject fills me with rage and disgust because of the dishonesty of everybody who promotes "free trade" as implemented in the world today. It was a FREAKING NO BRAINER to see what it was doing to the people of the world. It's a formula for a return to feudalism and while you Brits might want to bow and grovel to a queen, we in America - the true Americans will NEVER bow or grovel no matter how many lying wh*res you produce at the London School of Economics.

Reply from The Daily Bell

The Austrian neo-classical school stand opposed to the London School of Economics, which helped give us econometrics and other ways of "managing" the economy by predicting the economy, none of which really work. You can read all about the Austrian School at Click to view link. The Daily Bell has American editors among others.

  Posted by Noel Berge on 07/13/09 10:47 AM

Understanding banking, especially fiat money and fractional reserve banking, the impact on any economy and the true evil it does by debasing 'exchange' between honest buyers and sellers, all of this, is complex and hard to digest.

Why? Most have not the time to delve into the complexities and scam of money theft, inflation and the ways the bankers and government have colluded to steal money quietly via inflation, and use fiat money to fund excessive government spending and finance wars!

Anyway, reading a novel about it can be one way to gain an understanding. Edward Viera's novel, Cra$hmaker, does the best job, but is 1500 pages of really good story telling and action packed. A newer novel, very recently written, shorter in length, does the job too, but forget the name. In it the Fed Chairman goes rogue and uses a flaming crash to catch public's attention. Check it out on amazon.con

The use of fiat money, just like excessive taxation, have been the twin towers of government gone wrong, and underlies all civilization's demise throughout history. Strange how the average Jane & Joe have remained ignorant about these scams that have held prosperity and peace at bay. Might is Right is the motto of the Dark Conqueror mentality, and all Collectivist Thinkers; but it is Peace through justice, via free markets and trade that will bring prosperity & peace.
Start reading "Finding Freedom" at Click to view link for some insights.

Reply from The Daily Bell

You can see a short story on the subject here:

Click to view link

  Posted by Noel Berge on 07/13/09 10:22 AM

The failure of mainstream economist to see the Perfect Financial Storm this time is consistent with their record. Agreed. It was Ludwig vn Mises who called the 1929 crash and it was the school he represented, now called the Austrian School of economics, that foresaw and warned their followers of the coming demise via the current down turn.

The Austrian School includes the Boom & Bust cycle theory and government interference and fiat money analysis that lead to, for example Malinvestment, that is too often missed by Keynesian, Monetarist, and other Pro-governance models seeking to manage and control the economy, versus allowing the free market to work its marvelous magic.

May more George Mason Austrian leaning professors, et al become household names!

Reply from The Daily Bell

We agree.

  Posted by Joseph Cacciotti on 07/13/09 09:38 AM

The real problem was not the economists, but, rather, the securities analysts. They never really looked at company balance sheets maybe because many didn't really know how to make sense of them. This is evidened by the fact that throughout the 80's and 90's and 00's, they kept writing that balance sheets were improving when in fact they were getting worse. IBM, is an example. Gerstner kept borrowing in order to buy up and retire IBM stock. This was applauded by Wall Street "Anal-lists" who kept recommending IBM stock even while the company's balance sheet was being ruined. Gerstner, in the meanwhile, enriched himself by exercising his options, while the analysts heaped praise on this man, who, in my opinion, should be behind bars.

The credit-rating firms were the other villains of the piece. They simply did not do their homework. The "dismal scientists" hardly deserve any blame. They all studied the wrong school of economics. Few of them even know who von Mises was, for heavens sake. When I say my prayers at bedtime, I never forget to thank God that he gave me the brains to avoid all economics courses in 6 years of college and grad school.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Interesting analysis.

  Posted by Cooper on 07/13/09 04:26 AM

Nobody Likes The Sound of Trumpets.

I don't think people like to hear warnings trumpeted on the Click to view link scares them too much out of their makeshift virtual realities...$500,000 homes on MacDonald's wages.....$5 Starbuck's coffees at breaktime....all terrain Hummers that get 8 mpg, just to traverse freeway 'jungles' on the way to work, while talking up a $400 cell phone bill.

I'm no economist....in fact, I don't even have a checking account anymore.... and when I did have one, I didn't even balance it at the end of the month....I just kept a running balance.... But I did make sure I always had more money in the account than I wrote checks for.... apparently this a very difficult principal to understand and implement.

I also did not add zeros to my account balance to make it seem like I had more funds than I really did. I did not create deposits to my account out of thin air.

I did not practice "fractional reserve checking", which if I did, would have landed me in jail for counterfeiting, illegally expanding the money supply, manipulating the markets, etc.... In other words, I would have been doing what the banks are licensed by Congress to do.....

I'm not sure about US economists, but as I recall there were a number of Austrian economics professors that had been constantly blasting the warning trumpets for a number of years ... I just don't think anyone likes the sound of trumpets anymore.

Case in point: ...the SEC...they didn't see Madoff coming...even though Harry Markopolos, that Greek money manager was hand-feeding them evidence that Madoff's returns were too good to be true....they could not see it if Harry hit them with a baseball bat.

And the same thing will happen when Goldman Sach's and JP Morgan are found out for manipulating the Gold and Silver markets, among others....as GATA has been heralding for a decade.

The real problem? What I think? NOBODY is thinking. They are just doing their job, going through the motions, collecting a paycheck, having a good weekend, and slogging through another week at work, so they can do it all over again.

There's a tremendous brain drain in America....land of the "FED", where nobody thinks, but just does what their boss said.

Sad to say, America the FED is transforming into Amerika the Click to view linkad economy that is. But don't publish this...we don't want to upset anybody too soon....nobody likes the blaring sound of Trumpeted warnings anymore.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Hope you don't mind we published it.

  Posted by Trish Dukas on 07/13/09 03:51 AM

Newsweek is yesterday's paper. Even with its constant redesigns ... Who reads it?

Reply from The Daily Bell

Samuelson?

  Posted by Playem on 07/13/09 03:50 AM

Think you have a good point here about central banks. Makes you think.

Reply from The Daily Bell

Thanks for the kind words.



ABOUT US ARCHIVE THINKTANK   MEMBER ZONE
Editor's Message
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Contact
News & Analysis
Editorials
Exclusive Interviews
Videos
Special Reports
Polls
Biographies
Glossary
Links
Books
MEMBER LOGIN
© Copyright 2008 - 2013 All Rights Reserved.
The Daily Bell is published by High Alert Capital Partners Inc.