Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


News & Analysis

Ditching the Dollar at G20 Summit?

Saturday, September 26, 2009 – by  Staff Report


Seeing Eye

The embattled US dollar is expected to come under scrutiny at a summit of developing and industrialized nations following China-led calls to review its role as a reserve currency. The dollar issue is bound to surface at the two-day meeting in Pittsburgh as US President Barack Obama and other leaders of the Group of 20 economies debate a new framework for tackling the so called global "economic imbalances" blamed for fuelling the latest financial crisis. "Though not clear how the plan would be enforced, it would involve measures such as the US cutting its deficits and saving more, China reducing its reliance on exports and Europe making structural changes to boost business investment," analysts at French bank Societe Generale said in a report. – AFP

Dominant Social Theme: The Chinese hope for common sense.

Free-Market Analysis: There are plenty of calls to get rid of the dollar as the world's reserve currency, and China has been leading the way because the Chinese hold so much American paper. Japan is another country that holds a good deal of American debt, and between them these two countries may hold close to US$1.5 trillion. These two countries along with much of the rest of the world are said to have come to the conclusion that the US dollar is being mishandled in the US, and that a new reserve currency must be created.

The new currency being contemplated is one that would be managed by the International Monetary Fund and would be based on a basket of currencies including the pound, yen and euro along with the dollar. While the IMF currency doesn't seem as if it would circulate on the street, it could be used by nations that needed to make large payments to each other that used to be denominated in dollars. Here's some more from the article:

What is baffling analysts is that a key UN agency -- the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, or UNCTAD -- has joined the chorus of calls for a new reserve currency. An UNCTAD report this month endorsed a proposal that IMF-issued SDRs "could be used to settle international payments."

Until the current global economic crisis, SDRs issued by the IMF have been used by IMF member nation states "primarily as a reserve account to support international trade transactions, not as an alternative international currency available to settle international debt transactions in danger of default," said political scientist Jerome Corsi in "Red Alert," a global financial newsletter.

China, meanwhile, continues to flex its muscle. It has proposed that the G20 economies consider setting up an international wealth fund that would invest a portion of its members' current-account surpluses in developing economies.
"These comments reinforce their desire to diversify out of dollars and to encourage other nations to do so as well," said Kathy Lien, chief strategist for Global Forex Trading.

A few Chinese deals were recently seen accepting payment in the currency of the buyer rather than in dollars, especially with Brazil, which the Asian giant is wooing as a future oil supplier.

It is not baffling to us that the UN would propose SDR paper. The UN is a creature manufactured initially in the United States (a wealthy US family donated the land), and the IMF is controlled out of the US as well. While the dollar is world's reserve currency currently, if the dollar is swapped out for SDRs, even if only in certain situations, then the IMF would gain enormous clout worldwide. If one accepts that the Anglo-American axis is indeed intent on the creation of a more world-spanning governmental union, then it makes sense that certain international agencies gain additional credibility through the legitimization of alternative currencies.

What IS odd about the SDR proposal is that it carefully avoids backing SDRs by anything but other currencies. No basket of commodities, and certainly no gold or silver. We have pointed out that were countries really intent on creating an alternative currency all they would probably have to do is offer a currency backed by gold or silver or both. China's unhappiness with US profligacy will look far more serious were her leaders ever to announce that they were contemplating such a move.

Until China and other countries begin to seriously examine gold and silver-backed currency options (for monetary purposes, not just for diversification), we will continue to believe that the IMF option is mainly a political gambit. IMF money, were it ever recognized, provides that institution with enormous credibility. It further removes money from the hands of any specific group of citizens and puts it under the control of international agencies. It continues the process of severing the linkages between transactional money that was once dug out of the ground, and money that seems to have no relationship to its historical creation.

Conclusion: The US dollar is the reserve currency because countries usually need it – per treaty – to buy oil. The US dollar is backed by the eroding industrial might of America, but also by America's enormous military strength. Neither of these two facts "on the ground" is going to change any time soon. Thus, if countries migrate toward an IMF dollar, it will be with the implicit cooperation of the US and its allies. The obvious solution to the crisis is a gold and silver backed dollar, but it does not seem to be part of the dialogue. For this reason among others we think the indignation over the dollar's erosion is in some sense of a political gambit aimed at accomplishing other goals.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.






View Feedback

Posted by Tektwo on 9/26/2009 10:07:59 AM

Agreed. This is overblown.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Seems a tad.

Posted by George on 9/26/2009 10:11:32 AM

Re:"the dollar's erosion is in some sense of a political gambit aimed at accomplishing other goals."

Yeah, like a one world government... can you say new world order? Doesn't that sound like that conspiracy theory that we all know and love? It doesn't sound much like a theory anymore..

So who's really got the tin foil hats now? People will be in denial about it even if it were to fall right out of the sky and into their laps..


Reply from the Daily Bell:

The trouble with conspiracy theories is that when the mainstream acknowledges them (whatever they are) they somehow cease to be conspiratorial.

Posted by William Chapman on 9/26/2009 11:09:01 AM

What is the meaning of SDR? Thank you for the insightful journalism.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the feedback. SDR is an abbreviation of a Special Drawing Right.

Posted by Ingo Bischoff on 9/28/2009 8:34:22 AM

Could one of the other goals be interference with bond speculators? I think so.....


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Good point, thanks.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
09/02/10 Bank Run 2011?
09/02/10 Mises Shakes the World?
09/01/10 DC Begins the Bust Up
09/01/10 Thorium Cures the Free Market
08/31/10 Boetkke Promotion Redux
08/31/10 Obama Admin Calls US Education Failure
Guest Editorials
09/01/10 Tempted by One Size Fits All, by Dr. Tibor Machan
08/31/10 Iraq - An End or an Escalation? by Dr. Ron Paul
08/31/10 Frank Rich's Prejudice, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
08/29/10 Steve Forbes on Overseas Wars, the Coming Gold Standard and the Rise of 'Citizen Agitation'
08/22/10 Nelson Hultberg on Libertarian-Conservatism and His New Conservative American Political Party
08/15/10 Larry Pratt on the GOA, the Constitution and Gun Control
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Daily Bell website.