Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


Guest Editorial

If the Banks Own All the Gold, Why Would We Want a Gold-Backed Money System?

Wednesday, October 21, 2009 – by  G. Edward Griffin


G. Edward Griffin

One of the most entrenched myths of our modern day is the assumption that (1) the bankers own all the gold and (2) therefore, the concept of a gold-backed money system is a very bad idea, because it would give them even more power than they now have. This view is wrong on both points, as I will attempt to illustrate shortly but, first, let us allow a proponent of that myth to express it in foreceful terms. The follwing letter was received from Brian McDermott, Governor of Central Queensland Free State, Australia:

Dear Mr. Griffin, Please, when you're doing your crash course on money, whatever else you do, DO NOT suggest that America go back on the "Gold Standard." I understand that you are a supporter of going back on to the "gold standard." This is very dangerous, as I will show you.

There are many people in various parts of the world who mean well, but many of them can't see the perils of "The Gold Standard." This is EXCACTLY what Rothschild wants, BECAUSE ROTHSCHILDS OWN ALL THE GOLD! Hope this makes sense, but "money" should be based on real value of productivity. Nothing to do with gold. All the gold in the world could sink below the waves tomorrow, and it would make no difference to our economic situation, or our productivity. It's just a useless, pretty metal, with a "man-made" value. The "gold standard" is a clever hoax. Please wake up, and wake up others.

Did you know that Rothschild sets the price of gold every day, on the world markets? IT'S A RACKET! He's laughing all the way to (his own) bank, at the stupidity of the goyim!

May I suggest that you do a crash course on Social Credit (C.H. Douglas.) It's all there. Please stay in touch.

THIS WAS MY REPLY:

Hello Brian.
Sorry I can't agree with you, but I do appreciate your taking the time to express your view.

The Rothschilds do not own all the gold or even close to it. Most of it is still in the ground, in the ocean, and in private hoards. Even if they did own all of it that presently is in the form of bars, that would just drive up the price and stimulate gold mining so that new supplies would quickly come into production – as now is happening around the world. When the price hits several thousands of dollars per ounce, it will be profitable to extract it from the oceans, and there is a limitless supply from that source. It's just a question of the natural balance between supply and demand – without a committee of politicians and bankers drafting a magic formula and using coercion to redirect human resources.

Bankers may hoard gold (because they understand its value more than most people) but they have always done everything possible to prevent a gold-backed currency. If they wanted it, they could have had it long ago, but (as you may have noticed) they always have worked against it. Why is that? It's because they can acquire far more wealth by expanding the money supply at will and collecting interest on money created out of nothing than they can by having limits on their money supply and collecting interest on a much smaller amount of gold-backed loans. Bankers love to possess gold but they hate a gold-backed currency because that limits their money supply and, thereby, limits the volume of loans.

Any system other than precious metals is dependent on human decree and manipulation. It must inevitably end up no different than any other fiat money. I am familiar with the social-credit scheme and find it lacking in merit. It is a social engineer's fantasy. It does not line up with human nature.

Gold has always worked well as a monetary base throughout history. It can't be improved upon. We must not fall for the line about gold being just a pretty metal, etc. It has intrinsic value even if not used for money, it does not deteriorate, it can be divided into small units and recombined again if necessary, it is scarce so it has great value in a small space, and, best of all, it can be precisely measured for purity and weight, which allows for units that are beyond human judgment and human manipulation. It is the perfect money.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.






View Feedback

Posted by Art Smolensky on 10/30/2009 9:05:30 PM

Another classic by the master himself! Great work Ed.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Mr. Griffin would appreciate the kind words.

Posted by WAYNE on 10/31/2009 5:10:16 AM

This is an interesting point! They have to keep the price of Gold low enough to prevent major new supplies from entering the market/coming out of the ground! Classical Monopoly pricing strategy! This coincides with constantly disrupting many third world countries. Stop that Oil and Gold/Platinum from surfacing. The Oppenheimers kept a death grip on the Diamond market using this strategy.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

It is with of government complicity, unfortunately.

Posted by Jim on 10/31/2009 10:05:13 AM

Money's use as money is not dependent on its composition, and even in a supposed "gold standard", the vast majority of money is credit, which is created by banks through loans.

The word credit derives from the latin credere, which means "to believe in". In other words, the essential quality of money is that people believe in it, not its composition (whether gold, paper, or a number on a bank ledger).

The quantity of gold is completely arbitrary, and may or may not (most likely not) resemble the ability of the country to produce and consume. The purpose of money is to facilitate production and consumption.

While the banks (central banks included) may never own all the gold under a gold standard, they certainly will own the majority of it. However, that's unimportant because even in a gold standard, people do not actually use gold for transactions.

They use bills and numbers that supposedly represent a certain quantity of gold. However, as was found out in WWI, the money in existence is always only a fraction of banks reserves, which in the case of gold is the quantity of gold they possess. If people were to demand gold for their deposit, banks would be only able to supply a fraction of it - that's how FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING works.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Good points.

Posted by CBDenver on 11/6/2009 2:11:53 PM

RE: "Any system other than precious metals is dependent on human decree and manipulation". This is of course quite true. With so many saying today that what we need now is more regulation, it would be helpful if you wrote an article about the self-regulating nature of a monetary system backed by precious metals.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the feedback. We shall suggest your point to Mr. Griffin.

Posted by Saad on 12/23/2009 5:26:49 PM

We as humans do not need gold to survive. We do not eat it, do not make houses and clothes out of it. Industries do not depend on gold. Gold as a metal ofcourse has outstanding properties. The question then is that why is gold valuable, and why people wan't
to invest in it apart from buying it as a jewellery. Because God has put intrinsic value in it. Same goes for silver. The jews (rothschilds) know it and that is why I think they wan't to own as much gold as possible. Once this is done then their dreams of ruling the whole world may not be far off. The daily price fixing of gold and the fiat currency points to this deception.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

The Rothschilds don't fix the price of gold.

Posted by Edward on 5/29/2010 4:19:08 PM

One of the commentators suggests that "the Jews ( rothchilds )" are responsible for the globalist conspiracy, but anyone with even a basic understanding of the situation knows that the international bankers are of all religions.

Many of the global elite are not Jewish-- J.P. Morgan, the Rockefellers, ect. Griffin has also pointed out this fact many times over the past decades.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Yes, and then you get into the argument about antecedents. Those who are convinced that it is all the fault of "the Jews" will argue that Rockefellers are agents of the Rothschilds (were they initially?) and that their "blood" is Jewish - ie, they are of Jewish ancestry. After a while, you are faced with defining Jewishness itself. And thus we see how a family that is not Jewish, nor practicing the Jewish religion, can be considered part of the "Jewish" conspiracy to run the world.

What's the difference? There are powerful families with traceable historical antecedents that seem to make up a power elite. Arguing about Jewishness seems within this context to be a tremendous distraction, offering only circular logic.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
07/29/10 UK Stagflation - Now It Begins
07/29/10 Inflation - India's Turn
07/28/10 Is It a Deflationary Depression?
07/28/10 Comes a Blond Stranger ...
07/27/10 The Spreading Chinese Inflation
07/27/10 The War Falls Apart?
Guest Editorials
07/29/10 Protecting Your IRA - Part 2: Getting Your IRA Out of Town, by Terry Coxon
07/29/10 Gold Basis Screwed, by Dr. Antal Fekete
07/28/10 A Lopsided Warning, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
07/25/10 Grant Havers on Libertarianism, Religion and the Role of the Church in a Free Society
07/18/10 Paul Craig Roberts on Glass-Steagall, Free Trade and the Dangers of an Evolving 'Oligarchy of Private Interests'
07/11/10 Harry Schultz on the Power Elite, Free Markets, the Internet and Why Gold Is Going Much Higher
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Swiss Confidential website. To unsubscribe from the Daily Bell, click here.