Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


News & Analysis

Bloomberg Makes a Boo-Boo?

Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - by  Staff Report


Richard Nixon

Gold stocks are near their most expensive level relative to the price of bullion in 14 months, a sign that they may start to underperform the metal, according to WJB Capital Group Inc. Gold traded at 11.5 times the level of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Gold and Silver Index in October 2008, the most ever, as the financial crisis caused by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s bankruptcy sparked a stock market retreat and spurred investors to buy bullion as a haven. The gap has since narrowed as the mining index more than doubled to catch up with the metal's gain, beating gold's 48 percent advance. The ratio, which never surpassed 6.4 from 1984 until September 2008, dropped to less than 6 in September and was 6.3 today. Its return to the level prior to Lehman's bankruptcy signals that bullion is likely to begin outperforming its producers, said John Roque, managing director in technical analysis at WJB in New York. - Bloomberg

Dominant Social Theme: Things get tricky at the top?

Free-Market Analysis: Ah, technical analysis! So according to numbers that go back to 1984, the ratio between bullion and mining stocks is getting toppy. There is only one thing wrong with this analysis in our humble opinion. It does not go back far enough. To be truly useful it would have to take into account the 1970s. In fact, let us throw out this question: Why on earth would any technician of any sense utilize 1980s numbers when analyzing what is evidently and obviously a 1970s market? (In contemplating this question, we return to a previous thought - that Bloomberg doesn't really "get" the gold market. This article would certainly seem to indicate that.)

The 1980s were many things, but they were not a decade of gold and silver. The 1970s were almost exactly like this decade however in so many ways. That's because we are in approximately the same part of the business cycle (according to free-market but not Keynesian economics) that we were back in the 1970s.

In the early 1970s, President Richard Nixon (pictured above left) delinked the dollar from the final remnants of a gold standard and the entire system suffered from a crisis of confidence and began a decade-long purge of mal-investments that had developed during previous decades of fiat-money overprinting The result was a big devaluation in Western stock markets, rising oil and gas prices, a terrible double-dip economic downturn, and finally rip-roaring price inflation that was only damped, in America, anyway, by 20 percent interest rates.

We've already had a good dose of the 1970s, and we believe that we still have a further ways to travel in the 2000s. Whereas the 1970s was a 10-year shakeout of economic distortions - thanks to central bank overprinting of money - we believe the current purging of mal-investments may last 15 years or even longer if the powers-that-be keep propping up bad businesses with bailouts. We figure this current cycle started in 2000 or 2001 by the way.

Thus we can see that the 1980s, with their securities orientation, the big run-up of the stock market and sharp selloff, the purging of inflation and a rip-roaring economy has little to do with 2000s. The 2000s are the 1970s writ much larger, and if one is to do any technical analysis, the 1970s is the place to start. We would argue that ratios between gold and gold mining stocks that encompass the 1980s, 1990s, and even the 2000s until now, are of little use because they do not include the time period most relevant to what is occurring today, the 1970s.

How does it work? Like this ... During the time in a fiat-money economy such as the West has got - when gold and silver are ascendant and the system is working out the mal-investment of the previous 20, 30 or 40 years - the prices of precious metals eventually go much higher. When this happens, people start buying all sorts of paper gold. Specifically, they buy shares of gold and silver mining companies because the producers will still be relatively cheap. Toward the tippy-tail end of a metals bull market, when prices are really out of control, even the small junior exploration stocks (the last part of the market that's not entirely bid-up because no one trusts them) start to be overbought as well. There's no rhyme or reason to it. It's a mania. And fortunes are made for those lucky enough to get in at the right place and at the right time.

Conclusion: In the junior mining bull market to come, the stocks that do the best will be the best promoted, and it has little or nothing to do with the underlying asset and everything to do with whether the market, and its increasingly credulous and greedy investors, have heard of the play or not. This is simply a fact of life, and we present it to you without any moralizing. Technical ratios and analysis have as much to do with what's going on now - and what is to come - as Ben Bernanke's perception that the economy was in fine shape in 2006. You can analyze trends and ratios from the 1980s and beyond as much as you want. But this is a 1970s market and it will be one right to the top, wherever that is.

Post Feedback

We look forward to hearing your feedback and will respond to you as promptly as possible. Unless you specifically request otherwise, we reserve the right to publish your comments on the Daily Bell website. Please note, harassment, vulgarity and personal attacks are not welcomed.






View Feedback

Posted by WAYNE on 11/10/2009 3:32:29 AM

Now it all makes sense! Once the money changers were thrown out of the temple. Now the money changers own the temple! How obvious!


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Perhaps they have made progress?

Posted by Floyd on 11/10/2009 7:28:22 AM

Amen!


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Godspeed.

Posted by Gul on 11/10/2009 7:55:47 AM

God is content with whatever little amount we donate at the Church, Temple or Mosque. So why should Bank Executives be paid millions and millions?


Reply from the Daily Bell:

They are worth more?

Posted by John on 11/10/2009 10:31:37 AM

While I agree banks do help raise capital and that makes businesses grow. Unfortunately there does not seem to be much of that going on right now. From everything I read small businesses are having a lot of trouble securing loans and personal credit is tight. So using that as a measuring stick they aren't doing a very good job are they?


Reply from the Daily Bell:

No, because in a socialized, fiat environment, banks will treat the central bank as their most important customer -- not the customer desiring bank services. The ramifications should be obvious ...

Posted by ETwing on 11/10/2009 11:08:22 AM

Loyd Blankfein is so full of himself he smells like a pile of human waste !! His God is of greed and power.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Well, he probably wouldn't want you to draw those conclusions.

Posted by Dk on 11/10/2009 12:44:38 PM

Petition to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

Too Big to Fail is Too Big to Exist

http://tinyurl.com/yh2l86t


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the link. The concentration is incredible. An eye opener ...

"Just five banks in America (JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley) own a staggering 95% of the $290 trillion in derivatives held at commercial banks. Derivatives are risky side bets made by Wall Street gamblers that led to the $182 billion bailout of AIG, the $29 billion bailout that allowed JP Morgan Chase to acquire Bear Stearns, and the collapse of Lehman Brothers."

Posted by Bruce on 11/10/2009 3:51:08 PM

Sure, banks expand wealth by supplying liquidity. The problem is that in so doing, they also take title to that wealth. That's why banks appear to own the world while they actually do no work. It's all an illusion. I watched the movie "The Illusionist" the other day. Very interesting! Corollaries come to mind.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

We'll have to take a look. Thanks.

Post Feedback

We look forward to hearing your feedback and will respond to you as promptly as possible. Unless you specifically request otherwise, we reserve the right to publish your comments on the Daily Bell website. Please note, harassment, vulgarity and personal attacks are not welcomed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
03/19/10 Party Time for Anglo-American Elites?
03/19/10 Germany Proposes IMF Greek Bailout
03/18/10 Newsweek: US in Terminal Decline
03/18/10 Afghans Seek More Gov Protection
03/17/10 Chinese Inflation - the Final Unraveling?
03/17/10 US Infrastructure Disintegrates
Guest Editorials
03/16/10 The Free Market of Ideas, by Dr. Tibor Machan
03/13/10 Census: A Little Too Personal, by Dr. Ron Paul
03/13/10 Texas Textbook Troubles, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
03/14/10 Rob Pfaltzgraff on Free-Market Movies, the MPI and the Future of Independent Films
03/07/10 Charles Payne on Business Broadcasting, Stock Picking Strategies and the Promise of Global Investing
02/28/10 Jim Rogers on China Opportunities, the Gold Standard and the Development of his Free-Market Financial Philosophy
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Swiss Confidential website. To unsubscribe from the Daily Bell, click here.