Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


News & Analysis

Women Become Majority Workers

Friday, January 08, 2010 – by  Staff Report


Hillary Clinton

At a time when the world is short of causes for celebration, here is a candidate: within the next few months women will cross the 50% threshold and become the majority of the American workforce. Women already make up the majority of university graduates in the OECD countries and the majority of professional workers in several rich countries, including the United States. Women run many of the world's great companies, from PepsiCo in America to Areva in France. Women's economic empowerment is arguably the biggest social change of our times. Just a generation ago, women were largely confined to repetitive, menial jobs. They were routinely subjected to casual sexism and were expected to abandon their careers when they married and had children. Today they are running some of the organisations that once treated them as second-class citizens. Millions of women have been given more control over their own lives. And millions of brains have been put to more productive use. Societies that try to resist this trend-most notably the Arab countries, but also Japan and some southern European countries-will pay a heavy price in the form of wasted talent and frustrated citizens. – Economist

Dominant Social Theme: Hurray for women ...

Free-Market Analysis: The liberation of women is in our opinion another dominant social theme, one of the longest running of the power elite's promotions. The real push for women to become part of the work force happened in the 20th century. Not surprisingly, this was the century that saw the imposition of full-fledged central banking around the world. At the beginning of the 20th century, it was still culturally a problem for women to work, but the power elite promotion was launched to make women "modern" and it is still ongoing.

If you want to implement global governance, you need to break down the family unit as much as possible. Nothing can stand in the way of the state. From the power elite's standpoint, getting women into the workplace in the name of "equality" solved a lot of problems at once. It left children parentless during much of the day, so that the state itse lf could take over childcare. And without the firm guidance of the full family, many children, especially girls, became much more promiscuous at an early age which also contributed to a fracturing of private culture.

Giving women a sense of employment empowerment also contributed to the divorce-rate as women were more likely to utilize state-provided divorce proceedings that were for the most part favorable to them and therefore facilitated the family break up. But the real reason, in our opinion, that woman's liberation is a power-elite promotion, and a very long-running one, has to do with central banking. The erosion of fiat money earning meant inevitably that to keep up there would have to be more than one wage earner in the household. Woman's liberation was promoted, in our opinion, as a way of making it culturally acceptable for women to work – so as to conceal the degradation of the currency.

Many women want to have a more active role in the family, and even if they don't, there is no guarantee that from a biological perspective the husband is able to do what is necessary on a day-to-day basis. This often may leave the woman with the majority of the household tasks, no matter what magazines say and family psychologists recommend. In fact, women who have trouble with this sort of massive schedule are encouraged to feel subpar – as if something was wrong with them.

Modern Western women may wish to celebrate the ability to have a career and help care for a family at the same time. But now that the Western employment infrastructure has imploded in the late 2000s, a career may have turned into a situation where the woman is merely holding on to a job she neither especially likes nor wishes to pursue. (There are very few women, still, who have glamorous jobs at the top of multinational firms.) Work is not so fulfilling after all, but the necessity remains.

Conclusion: The modern Western woman needs money. Taxes and inflation have wrecked the family budget. Thank goodness times have changed! she is told to think. She may not fully understand what is going on worldwide due to the erosion of fiat dollar, but she sure feels the pinch, and believes therefore she ought to feel grateful for changing cultural mores. She also feels she ought to celebrate her empowerment. If she does not celebrate her increased range of responsibilities and mind-numbing work schedule, there are articles in publications such as the Economist that will be glad to explain it to her and put it in the best possible light.

Ed note: The Daily Bell does not intend, in this article, to imply that women, like men, should not work as they choose when they choose if they wish to or need to. The Daily Bell is all for female empowerment and for human empowerment generally. But what this article does attempt to point out is that a power-elite promotion has been put into place for purposes of justifying central bank fiat-money degradation, and that the "formal" (ideological) feminist work movement has thus been promoted with cynical motives and not for the benefit of women but for the benefit of the banking elite. (1/8/10)


NOTED: "EPA proposes nation's strictest smog limits ever ... It wants to toughen the ozone limit adopted in 2008 by cracking down further on power plants, factories and landfills. Much of the U.S. could then be in violation of federal regulations. ... Environmentalists praised the agency for proposing regulations that match the unanimous recommendations of an EPA science advisory committee. ... Industry groups warned the regulations would increase business costs. ... The proposal now enters a public comment process, which will include open hearings next month in Arlington, Va.; Houston and Sacramento before the EPA makes its final decision." – LA Times

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.






View Feedback

Posted by Iddy on 1/8/2010 5:55:23 AM

I love the photo with this article. Mrs. Clinton is the perfect one to re present this one. Mr. Clinton is the perfect man also while the "wife" is out makin her gash on the world the ole man can sit at the desk and have some one elses daughter do the dirty work. Another plank in the platform. Or in the words of pink floyd another brick in the wall.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks.

Posted by Nelson Hultberg on 1/8/2010 10:36:29 AM

The Daily Bell editors certainly have guts -- to stand in face of today's political correctness in such a forthright manner. The PC poison that dominates our universities and the mainstream media today keeps the overwhelming majority of Americans enslaved to the Marxist ideologies of collectivism, multiculturalism, feminism, etc., which are destroying the foundations of Western civilization.

This ideological warping was spawned in the 1920s in Europe and then spread to America in the aftermath of World War II. Its feminist incarnation teaches that women must go out into society and become "just like men" in order to achieve meaning in life. They must have "economic careers" in addition to raising the children. The feminist movement in America during the 1960s was one of the major instigators of this indoctrination and was Marxist spawned from the start

William S. Lind, in a brilliant essay, "Who Stole Our Culture," shows that by the early 1920s, the Marxists in Europe began to sense that their dream of worldwide socialist revolution was not going to win the world through a workers' revolt. This led the Marxists to forget about Lenin's violent revolution and think long range via a march through the cultural institutions of Western society. In other words, infiltrate the schools and as a result mold the formation of American / European media, churches, publishing, and movies for the future generations. In this way, the fundamental values of capitalist society could be insidiously subverted over the decades.

The plan has worked to perfection. From 1925 to 1975, Marxist sympathizers, such as Antonio Gramsci, Eric Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse gradually took over American and European universities. And strident feminism was one of the uglier results. The Marxist worldview has deposited immense fallacies into the minds of Western women over the past 70 years, and the chickens are now coming home to roost in the pathologies of Western society -- egregious promiscuity, skyrocketing divorce rates, and destruction of the rock of free civilization, the family unit.

Combine this Marxist indoctrination of women in our school system with the Keynesian economic policies engineered through the Fed (which have forced the majority of families to have two bread winners in order to survive today), and you have created a society that is being swallowed up in both economic and cultural chaos, and headed for a dictatorship to restore order. As the famous conservative philosopher, Richard Weaver, put it, "Ideas Have Consequences."


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the kind words and the frame of reference for the feminist movement which did indeed take a good deal of its color from Marxism. Betty Friedan was a good example.

Posted by Adam E on 1/8/2010 11:09:00 AM

I'm glad you guys wrote this. I had been told by an informed person who writes about "these matters" that women's liberation was a scheme to increase the number of taxpayers into the system. It seemed believable to me then, and more so now.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Don't know if the government cares so much about increasing taxpayers so much as it cares about maintaining the central banking/fiat money scheme. But interesting idea ...

Posted by Tom Clark on 1/8/2010 12:32:33 PM

Dear Sirs, Conspiracy must sell. Are you presenting these arguments just to get a rise out of as many people as you can? This idea that there is some sort of 'elite' that is manipulating us like puppets sounds dull IMHO.

Now it's sounding chauvinistic. It sounds like you're saying women, in this case, but people in general don't have minds of their own and don't want to 'empower' - yes, empower themselves to do what they want - even things that are not 'socially acceptable' at the time.

Was the voting right thing an idea of the "power elite" too? Was the idea that people should not own slaves the idea that the power elite put in our collective brain also? What are you thinking? Is there no one there that argues for the free market, yet bounces off when it comes to this conspiracy theory crap?

Do you have women working there? Is everybody there 'down' with 'planned promotion', or is that out of the question? There has to be another way of arguing against socialism, fascism, communism without bringing in the 'bogey man' - power elite. IMHO it brings nothing to the argument but dogmatism.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the feedback. Your point is well taken. The Bell does not mean to imply that women should not work as they wish to, nor that they should not have opportunities to do so. That doesn't change the essential underlying element of the dominant social theme that we believe has penetrated the culture in order to justify central banking. We have clarified the article with an Ed Note.

Posted by Leslie Michelassi on 1/8/2010 12:48:56 PM

Well...of all of the important subjects discussed at The Bell, none of them has ever hit me quite like this one. Now, it is personal!

"Millions of women have been given more control over their own lives. And millions of brains have been put to more productive use."

What in the world could possibly be a more important use of one's brain than raising children that can think and reason for themselves; who are strong, confident, empathetic, kind and independent? In my view, it is the fact that the elite want control of our children's minds through socialistic and even communistic schools that this idealized view of "work" has been so heavily promoted.

It is precisely the goal of destablizing the family, exhausting women and denying them their natural right to choose a mate and be supported in her desire to have children and raise them that has been crushed by this movement.

The downstream effects of this extremely dangerous social revolution can not yet even be imagined. But in the immediate term, our chldren are now the property of the state property and we are allowed to "care" for them within certain limits. If you don't believe me, spank your child and see what happens when they mention it at a state school, or use alternative medicine, or refuse vaccination, or insist that alternative "real" history be taught, or teach them what their real rights are on a jury in the United States.

The elite, through the manipulation of Woodrow Wilson, instilled a state education for the masses that has taken our children away from our direct upbringing and filled their heads with mis-information of the worst kind from fake history, to the homogenization of every individual on the planet, to raising patriotism in the past, and now globalization in the present to an authority level above parents and God, if you still hold to that "quaint" notion (Sarcasm intended).

Our children have been militarized in their thinking rather than learning true inquisition, reason and a love of the truth. Between the schools and the television, parents' input into their childrens upbringing is being damaged as young as pre-school age.
What graduating child today really knows anything about what the Revolution was about beyond a "tea party" or what it really cost the people of that time, what child really knows the truth about why the civil war was fought and so many of our young men on both sides of that war were slaughtered, how many of children really understand how to work, how to make something...anything that they could use to survive without a continual supply of delivery trucks in their neighborhoods, how many know how to think beyond the reactionary level?

That is what the power elite want: malable minds that demand nothing except bread and circuses...and that is what they have succeeded in doing, and between socialist schools and promoting women to idealize self actualization (Maslow) through slaving/working to make some corporation rich and actually believe that that they are the one's who are winning by climbing the corporate ladder. The destruction of our future...our children... is nearly complete.

Wake up women....take your children back, do with less, send your man to work and expect him to support you so that you can raise children that have the ability to detect what is happening around them, think it through and act courageously to fight back.

The power elite are finishing the final gate around a virtual prison where every aspect of a person's (read that unit of produciton) live if controlled from cradle to grave in order to produce the desired result in the population.

I climbed to the highest level of my ability in a corporation ... looked around at the top of my ladder and realized there was nothing there I really wanted. No man can serve two masters.

I argue that women do not have to work. They have to be willing to have less and be proud of having less, be proud of their man who provides as best he can, even if that means two jobs.

Live a simpler, cheaper life style and move if you have to in order to do it. Rent...don't own if you need to. You will not really own the house until you have paid it off anyway...the bank owns it.

Have the courage to stop seeing superiority in others houses, cars and lifestyles where known exists. Live within your means so that your man does not have to die on a hamster wheel of work for the sake of TV. If that means that your children have a cheese sandwhich for lunch, instead of a 'Lunchablewellthey got a better meal anyway without the brand! Teach your children history and economics and if you don't know, go find out the truth.

I have been to the top of my little corporate world...it offers nothing for me worth having and everything (in my case) for the banking industry. Get your children out of socialist schools and eliminate the false pride that comes with "working" ---who are you really working for?

I realize that some of us, including me, are single mothers and have to work, but beyond that...there is nothing that we take my from raising my own children again if I had to do it over. Even now I contract for work at 1/10th the amount I used to make to be able to raise my younger ones and help take care of my father and my grandson.

I am happy now than at anypoint in my life. When I see some young woman in the airport in her little slacks and pulling her luggage cart behind her, I know she is feeling pretty good, pretty powerful and sees a bright future ahead of her. My question is whose future is she really creating, hers and her children or the corporation she works for.

Yes, work can be exciting and fulfilling, but if you are going to be a mother, give your children the very best - You!


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the eloquent feedback.

Posted by Marten on 1/8/2010 3:05:40 PM

Excellent article and a very good feedback....kudos Leslie


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the kind words.

Posted by Bonnie Donaldson on 1/8/2010 3:16:01 PM

WOW!! This article sort of feels better than being poked in the eye with a sharp stick, but just barely!

It sure seems passing strange to me that the Afghani female children rush to the schools, shedding their repressive clothing as they run. And the smiles are a wonder to behold. I'll bet their moms are delirious with joy at the opportunity they never had.

And what do the repressive patriarchs do, they blow up the female schools! Well, of course they do. Bunch of stone-age bullies, as all patriarchs are.

Being a mother is a taxing occupation. But, let's face it, unless you are taking in foster kids, or a similar situation, most of us women, especially with any higher education, are loathe to stay home forever and raise our 2 children. During the agrarian past, women were desperately busy on the farms and raised large families as farm labor force. ( Since I was one of these farm kids, I chose to have no children and to pursue a career that would afford me the liberty I craved. )

If a woman is happy staying home, and if she has financial support that she is certain will last a lifetime, no problem. But so many women have to return to work after a divorce that did not factor into their plans.

My mother ran the farmhouse, raised a garden, and helped out with the field work until the 6 kids started arriving. The minute the last child was in school, mom resumed her teaching career. I never saw her happy until she was working outside the house. It was like seeing a half-dead plant suddenly bloom.

If it is your "secret global power elite" that is responsible for the downfall of slavery, the education of women, and the Western woman's need for money, then more power to the elites!!

How come when we speak about the Western male, we assume he, like you guys, is enjoying his career, taking advantage of technology to better himself so he won't be just another Luddite stuck in a dead-end job. ( You and I both know that the dead-end jobs are just as miserable for men as they are for women. )

But when it's the Western woman you refer to, she is apparently so stupid that she feels she must "celebrate her increased range of responsibilities and mind-numbing work schedule." She sounds like a dolt to me. Is that how you guys picture us women? She is such an idiot that she allows her hubby to sit and do nothing while she runs the home single-handedly. She is too dumb to hire outside help. That doesn't sound like the women I know, who are well able to hold their own in a fight to the finish.

Know this: Depressions bring out the strength in women. Birthrates go down. Those are facts. Women rise to the fore during extended downturns. We might let you guys think you are in charge, but when the s*** hits the fan, we take over. So get out of our way. Quit your whining!

And be nice or I'll wash your mouths out with soap...

Love you anyway...


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the feedback.

You write: "When it's the Western woman you refer to, she is apparently so stupid that she feels she must 'celebrate her increased range of responsibilities and mind-numbing work schedule.'"

Actually, we were paraphrasing the Economist.

Anyway, our point was and is that the power elite evidently encouraged the Marxist-feminist movement for a number of reasons (monetary inflation chief among them), at least partially to provide social cover for women to work as hard as men at outside jobs - even while having children. Now men in the West are starting to work two jobs regularly, we have read. There are "three job" families. It is the Bell's brief to point such things out. And we will.

Posted by Bonnie Donaldson on 1/8/2010 3:21:52 PM

Forgot to say thanks for the pretty picture of Hillary. When she is tired, she does not photograph well, but this one looks fine. I like Hillary a lot, always have. But I realize she is exactly what she says she is: A Rorschach inkblot test for people. She is not a person, she is a symbol, she is whatever gets projected onto her. And to the Bells, she is obviously a symbol of the power elitist, since I doubt you see her as the poor stupid Western woman.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the feedback.

Posted by Tawny on 1/8/2010 3:47:54 PM

Very astute comment here on the snow job called 'women's lib.' Some good things came from the feminist movement, but in general I agree that there was an unstated/hidden agenda behind it just as you outline here.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks. The way these promotions generally work, something good always happens to begin with. The bad stuff starts to happen later ...

Posted by Henk-2 on 1/8/2010 5:00:32 PM

Hurray for Rothschild. Another nail in the coffin of the Noble race. But beware the fury of the quiet man. WOTAN


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Thanks for the feedback.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
07/29/10 UK Stagflation - Now It Begins
07/29/10 Inflation - India's Turn
07/28/10 Is It a Deflationary Depression?
07/28/10 Comes a Blond Stranger ...
07/27/10 The Spreading Chinese Inflation
07/27/10 The War Falls Apart?
Guest Editorials
07/29/10 Protecting Your IRA - Part 2: Getting Your IRA Out of Town, by Terry Coxon
07/29/10 Gold Basis Screwed, by Dr. Antal Fekete
07/28/10 A Lopsided Warning, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
07/25/10 Grant Havers on Libertarianism, Religion and the Role of the Church in a Free Society
07/18/10 Paul Craig Roberts on Glass-Steagall, Free Trade and the Dangers of an Evolving 'Oligarchy of Private Interests'
07/11/10 Harry Schultz on the Power Elite, Free Markets, the Internet and Why Gold Is Going Much Higher
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Swiss Confidential website. To unsubscribe from the Daily Bell, click here.