Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


News & Analysis

Merkel's Germany to Let Euro Die?

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 – by  Staff Report


Angela Merkel

German Chancellor Angela Merkel (pictured left) says Greece's budget crisis puts the euro in jeopardy. Greece's budget deficit has surged to 12.7 percent of gross domestic product, or GDP. Merkel expressed concern about fiscal issues for euro zone members in a recent speech. "The Greek example can put us under great, great pressures," she said. "Who will tell the Greek parliament to please go ahead and pass a pension reform? I don't know that they'll be enthusiastic about Germany giving them instructions." Germany certainly wouldn't be happy to receive advice from Greece if the tables were turned, Merkel said. "So the euro is in a very difficult phase over the coming years." The European Union's rules stipulate that member countries' budget deficits can't exceed 3 percent of GDP. Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou has a plan to cut the gap to 8.7 percent of GDP this year through spending cuts and revenue increases. "We will do whatever it takes," he said in a speech. ... [But] Greece and Portugal may have to raise interest rates and taxes, Moody's says. "Over time, this chain of events would lead to a 'slow death' of an economy within the euro area." – MoneyNews

Dominant Social Theme: Germany punches the alarm button.

Free-Market Analysis: Well, this is interesting. We've written articles expressing the idea that the EU itself is something of a German reconquest of Europe without the messy effects of a war. But even within this context we wondered how much German citizens would be willing to pay for their empire. In fact, German Chancellor Angela Merkel signals, not much. And really why should German citizens pay for such? Does the average German get up in the morning with a grin on his or her face over the idea that Germany may someday, in a back-door sense, gain additional economic sway over Europe? We doubt it.

Absent the world-spanning ambitions of a seemingly sociopathic leader, German people would tend to be like any others, contrary to what Daniel Jonah Goldhagen thinks. They want to be left alone to raise their families and put bread on the table as best they can. Today, therefore, the manifest destiny of Germany is not readily apparent to most Germans. And certainly it may not provide a good enough reason enough for Germany to risk bankruptcy to prop up first Greece, then Spain, then Portugal, then Ireland and finally the whole of the Eastern European bloc. Of course, maybe economies will snap back and the crisis will be averted altogether, but we have a sneaking suspicion that won't be the case. Absent recovery, the pressure will be on German, as the motor of Europe, to make Europe whole. And Merkel has responded – indicating doubts.

You know, it seems to us that the financial crisis was no doubt anticipated by the power elite – the central banking economic system virtually demands this kind of unraveling – but the breadth and depth of the crisis were perhaps a surprise. Merkel's statement is in fact a warming to Europe's socialist brain trust. They may believe that unyielding rigor in the face of unwinding economies and blood-on-the-street is the appropriate response, but Merkel is letting them know that they must consider their posturing within the context of the German wallet. Be brave with your own purse, she is telling them.

Merkel is fairly good as European politicians go. A German friend of ours told us that she is perceived domestically as hard to push around, especially when it comes to positioning herself and her party on the right side of electoral frustration. Perhaps she knows that going on TV to tell Germans that they will have to pay higher taxes and suffer from higher inflation in order to bail out Greece is a non-starter. Germany actually has plenty of problems. The country is used to exporting its way out of a crisis, but its largest market, America, is not keen on consumerism at the moment. And Germany, as an exporting nation, has plenty of competition these days from China, among other players. Jobs and more jobs are Merkel's concern – not bailing out the euro, or perhaps even the EU if it comes to that.

We think Merkel's concerns are not unusual, and are even – evidently and obviously -- shared across the pond. Listen to the Obama administration these days, and the rhetoric sounds surprisingly desperate. The Administration is going to make "jobs, jobs, jobs" its number one priority. The sotto voce admission is that health care reform has merely proved an anger-provoking detour. In our humble opinion, what the power elite fears most is harsh, implacable, public anger. Inevitably this sort of anger turns first against the economic levers of the state – and then eventually against the power-mechanisms, the endless expansions and abuses of the military and internal security authorities. It is difficult to govern behind the scenes absent the money levers of a central bank and the comforting presence of various styles of Praetorian Guards.

So what is next? We don't think Greece will succeed in slashing its federal budget or not for long. The people in power are the ones that created the mess in the first place. Heck, as we understand it, the Greek police are banned from entering Greek campuses of higher learning. If Greek police cannot even enter the austere and smoky halls of academe for fear of riots we don't quite understand how the Greek government is going to enforce its austerity measures on an entire country. Either there will be a great eruption of rioting and consequent blood-letting, or the government will quickly back off. Of course, the Greeks could simply accept what the government proposes. Is that likely?

And how about the Portuguese and the Spanish? And the Irish. These are all stiff-necked people. Eventually, we suppose, the EU itself will have to take up the slack. It will have to stop insisting so determinedly on fiscal discipline. The trouble is, as we have pointed out, that the euro itself operates in a market. So if the EU does decide to change its currency demands, the result would be a weakened euro – not to mention the advent, quite possibly, of dreaded price-inflation.

Shall we then don sackclothes and ashes? No. This currency trap couldn't have happened to a more deserving bunch of people. For decades, the socialist leadership feeding at the trough of the EU has lied and manipulated 300 millions in its quest to reconstitute Charlemagne's empire. The British leadership was supposed to keep quiet about it, while the French were supposed to provide the clever sophistries and the Germans were expected to provide the economic muscle. But a funny thing happened on the way to leadership's ever-expanding Swiss bank accounts. The French people became disenchanted with the whole operation and the Germans are not, after all, ready to accommodate the fiscal demands of the EU's undemocratic captains.

Conclusion: So what comes next? At some point we suppose we would anticipate a loosening of the "courageous" financial rigor that the EU leadership is now exhibiting. But there is much more at stake than the currency itself. The power elite's dream is to establish regional currency commonalities around the world in seeming preparation for global government. If the EU begins to splinter, the dream dies, or at least is far deferred. Of course our perspective is that the elite should consider moving away from its rush toward global gelt. A private gold and silver standard would fit the bill far better than these artificial currencies and would be far easier to sustain. We're not holding our breath.


Barack ObamaNOTED: Scott Brown: Nothin' But Net! At deadline, Scott Brown (Republican) was said to have won the Senatorial race in Massachusetts. There is enormous psychic satisfaction in seeing, as a potential ramification of this apparent victory, the crumbling of the devious and leveling political agendas of the Obama administration. Barack Obama promised change, but he has treated his first year in office as if it were the reign of an uncrowned emperor, in our opinion. His profligacy has been stunning, his "change" proved to be every expansion of state power that he could get away with, and his policies, as a result, have further extended the American depression and doomed more of the hitherto middle class to ruin and misery. We do believe that Obama is fully manipulated by those who helped behind the scenes to assure his victory – and these individuals seek nothing more than the endless, miserable expansion of state power for their own purposes. Meanwhile Obama's teleprompter goes everywhere he does, and when he is without it, he makes gaffe after gaffe. In fact, he appears in many ways to be spectacularly uneducated and insular. He believes in the power of the state, the necessity of waging multiple international wars and despite his reputation as a constitutional scholar, seems to know little about America and less about its legal history. Alternatively, he knows and understands exactly what he is about – but does not care. With this defeat, hopefully, Democrats around him will likely have second thoughts about the radical nature of his leveling agenda and his arrogant determination to shove it down the collective throat of a nation that broadly wants nothing much to do with it.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.






View Feedback

Posted by Gordon Gray on 1/20/2010 1:34:20 AM

Your postscript regarding Obama seems to reinforce my contention made mid 2009 that the Americans are almost certainly looking at a one term president in Obama. Hopefully this is the case meaning that the damage caused by his mal-administration can be repaired without too much damage to the American people.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

There is a lot to repair.

Posted by Adrian W on 1/20/2010 7:53:17 AM

Hopefully, your understandings are correct. The power elite are losing control. Their desperations are being shown through their puppets' actions. Bush and Obama trying to take as much ground as possible before the inevitable retreat or at least 'cease fire'. Until they can figure out another way of continuing on with the one world agenda. After all, you can only eat an elephant one bite at a time or you'll start choking. I think the elite may be starting to choke.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Perhaps they have moved too quickly - out of weakness not strength.

Posted by Bill Ross on 1/20/2010 8:10:46 AM

The message that elites should take is that hierarchical command and control (of anything) is doomed to failure by inability to make correct choices. The bigger they are, the harder they fall when it is no longer in the interests of the productive to feed the beast.

I think they already knew this which is why they tried the hybrid, social meme approach (gain social consensus by fake grand "war on X", poverty, drugs, terror) that centralized mass media and educational control offered to intellectually lobotomize most of us. In other words, restrict choice within a narrow paradigm.

This is also failing because they have lost trust. Our socialized education has destroyed the work ethic and ability to have reasoned political debate, crucial to democracy. MSM and elite proxies will not be believed when they make any argument of the form:Because of "social good X" or "terror threat Y", we need massive resources, power and your tolerance to do Z.In the context of federation of states (empire), the group issues are no different than individual issues: Some (Country X) choose to be less productive or downright parasites, because they can due to legal / organization structuring. Some (Country Y) resent this.

Tolerance of Germany's elite proxies is a choice of the German people. Nobody wants to work for nothing (be slaves) or be put in a position where their efforts do not contribute to their personal well being (self-interest is VERY different than selfishness).

When you try to control (restrict freedom) people to their detriment, this is a cost, contrary to survival, a non-negotiable requirement. The intelligent will always be able to sort fact from fiction:Click to View Link also warned us: Survival EQUALS ability to adapt to environment EQUALS ability to choose correctly EQUALS freedom:

Click to View Link

By my censorship experience, general comprehension of "Mathematics of Rule" is what elites fear most:

Click to View Link

Basic message to elites: Add REAL value to justify your cost, else, you are at war with humanity's survival and will be done in by the consequences of this very foolish action and short term thinking.

Posted by Ingo Bischoff on 1/20/2010 11:49:41 AM

With the creation of the "Deutsch Mark" in 1949, Dr. Ludwig Ehrhard should have stood firm to make the currency redeemable. In light of the circumstances visited upon Germany after WW II, he caved in to the demands of the Keynesians in the U.S.A. and decided to fore go the gold standard. Had he insisted, the questions about the survival of the Euro would be academic.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

A well informed point as usual. Thanks.

Posted by Bowman on 1/20/2010 11:49:48 AM

You are spot on in your analysis of Obama and his agenda. He is not the supperior intellect nor the great oratorial skills as the socialist legions within the media have tried to convince a more doubting America. He is nothing more than a front man for his masters, "the power elite".

There is absolutely nothing in his background that would indicate anything different. In my opinion neither he nor the Democrat party will alter their goal of attaining total control over the American people and the economy in the immediate aftermath of their loss of the senatorial race in Massachusetts. They will change their tactics only when directed by the power elite.

Neither Obama or the Democrat party are the masterminds, or the driving force behind any of the Facist policies being rammed through congress. I believe that Obama will ultimately be thrown "under the bus" by the power elite and there will be a greater effort by the power elite to create a diversionary shift to gain back some of the support they have lost within the ranks of the American voters. I think the power elite will fail in that attempt, because the people are finally "getting it".


Reply from the Daily Bell:

A good analysis - from our perspective.

Posted by Shawn Perger on 1/20/2010 5:53:07 PM

This Victory for the Republican party cannot be over-stated, old Kennedy's are rolling over in their graves and the democrats in office are rolling on the floor feeling a little sick. This wonderfully changes the change Obama promised. The power elite through Obama have run into a snag with this major victory. Like Gordon Gray posted, This will be a short stay for Obama in the white house. Please Palin don't run, I don't think I could take that after Obama. Really like like bits that have been added to The Bell.

Posted by Realecon on 1/21/2010 3:53:46 AM

What you're missing is that the Euro is not like the dollar. You're right that the Elites want regional currencies like the Euro all around the world. And they will get their dream. When the Euro was created it had some pretty smart Currency Architects that thought it through.

Do you think that perhaps these architects knew that one day the COMEX would go bust and the price of Gold would be set free? So do you think that the 15 Gold reserves that the Euro has built into its structure may possibly be a stealth way for the Euro to survive this crack up boom we are about to experience?

When Gold is set free from the COMEX the Euro will soar and the dollar will crash! The Euro and other new regional currencies structured like the Euro will float next to Gold. Gold will be "Wealth Par Excellence" meant for saving, and the Euro will be just a currency meant for spending.

When the EU tries to over inflate the Euro past its 15 Gold reserves, free floating Gold capital will move to another free floating regional currency. It really is a one world currency sort of concept but the Sheeple will think its really great, they will think they have more control of their money. Nothing really changes for us slaves, except for us slaves with Gold and Euros we might be a little higher in the pecking order

-)fofoa.blogspot.com


Reply from the Daily Bell:

You make an interesting point. But when we investigated this closely some time ago, we found out there was no DIRECT linkage to gold, which makes the euro a very indirect play on gold indeed. Additionally, the euro is only as good as the countries using it. If half the euro-zone is falling out of bed, we can't imagine that the world would look too fondly on the euro. But time will tell, and we shall re-examine the gold linkage you mention. Thanks.

Posted by RealEcon on 1/21/2010 7:02:11 AM

To know how important the Euro is, watch what happens with Greece. You will see the Euro system protected at all cost, until that fateful day when the COMEX defaults and Gold and the Euro are set free side by side.

The price of Gold will get cheaper and cheaper and one day soon we will see Gold futures trading at $500-$600! But physical won't even be selling on ebay! And the Dollar will get stronger and stronger, until it just crashes.

There are so many surprizes ahead for the Gold community. It really is going to make ones mind spin! Again, I give credit to fofoa.blogspot.com for revealing all of this.

Posted by Goldfinger on 1/21/2010 8:34:38 AM

What is this supposed to mean? " We've written articles expressing the idea that the EU itself is something of a German reconquest of Europe without the messy effects of a war." Are you on drugs? You must be!

Oh...I get it, Germany is only good enough to pay for everything. Lets just let England, EU Parlament, or the PIIGS decide how to spend the billions Germans are forced to pay into this fiasco called the EU.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Germany is the motor of Europe. If the German elite decided not to participate in the EU, that heinous enterprises would have a great deal of difficulty continuing. Ergo, "Germany" - however you want to define that physical entity - has a good deal of sway over the EU's continued existence. What's so hard to understand about that?

Posted by Goldfinger on 1/21/2010 8:42:20 AM

By the way....the economic future of Switzerland and the CHF don't look that good, especially now that the banking secrecy laws have been changed.

Posted by John F on 1/21/2010 3:40:12 PM

As an American I watched with increasing delight the election returns from Massachusetts. In one night the heart and soul of the United States went from despair to stunned relief. The entire country owes an eternal debt to the patriotic people of Massachusetts for single-handedly pulling us back from the brink.

We have been given a second chance at the end of the 11th hour, and those like myself who had begun to believe that there weren't any people left in this country who truely understood what America stood for were shown that indeed that was wrong; the people do understand, at least to a functional level, and when sufficiently provoked will stand up to a government gone out of control.

On Tuesday night over a million people in the State of Massachusetts stood up, looked Barak Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reed square in the eye and flipped them the bird.

We are far from done. The mid-term elections in November will be most interesting to watch. We have a long way to go, but thankfully it appears that the people are finally awake.Thank you Massachusetts, from Indiana and the entire country.

Posted by Dan on 1/22/2010 2:53:01 PM

Most people complain that since the PTB run both parties, there is no difference. Brown's election may change things for the moment but, I won't be singing hallelujahs until I see some new faces after the mid-terms.

If one looks at Scandinavia and Germany, one sees a lot of discipline and self-discipline. Financial solvency is closely related to discipline at all levels. Ask any teenager with a credit card.

Democracies have always gotten a failing grade at discipline. I lived in Spain. You may think that manana means tomorrow. It actually means "not today."

There are 2 billion people in the world who are willing to work for survival. Open borders and containerized shipping put the West in direct competition. We work for luxuries. Manufacturing will come back to the US when an energy price spike makes long-distance transportation un-economical OR when the West has competitive wages to Asia.

The pensions in the West were negotiated when high wages supported high benefits. Since aggregate wages have gone down, those benefits must be lowered. The US has imported energy and exported jobs. Just how long do you think that can go on?

Aggregate wages and employment have tanked in the West. Japan, being closer to Asia felt the bite first. Do you see any reason that japan should escape? Do you see any reason that America won't follow? The PIIGS have no discipline. You tell them to adjust their expenditures commensurate with their income and all you'll hear is "manana".

The Germans are a very hard-working people. BUT, steal it all from them and you'll see a GDP very much like the GDP of communist East Germany. I was there in '84. There wasn't much of anything getting done. If there is no gain for working hard, the Germans will just work to support their domestic economy. Simple.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

Insightful, thanks.

Posted by Henry Pierson on 1/24/2010 1:36:49 PM

Germany is not in a position to support the rest of Europe. Years ago they imported cheap labor much like we imported or allowed the free flow of Mexicans across our border. In times of prosperity all is well but when the bubbles burst and fiat currencies drift closer to the abyss, when all the imported (cheap) labor is no longer needed, what then?

The cheap labor in Germany, mostly Turks looking for a better life, has become a huge part of the welfare system and their now grown children along with millions of East Germans have become dependent on the productive members of that social state for support; an unsustainable scenario.

My cousin whose husband has lost his job of 40 years is now the sole breadwinner of the family. There is little hope for him to find employment and in Germany he will be able to receive unemployment compensation for two years. He will then retire early at 63 and become dependent on the state for the rest of his life.

Many such scenarios are being played out in that country and then there are the millions of unemployed and their children who already received state support. Is this sustainable? I think not?

Will Germany come to the aid of the EU? A better question might be, who will come to the aid of Germany and the solve the demographic nightmare that is unfolding? Perhaps we should take heed of what is happening in Germany and reassess the migration that continues across our southern border and from elsewhere?

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
07/29/10 UK Stagflation - Now It Begins
07/29/10 Inflation - India's Turn
07/28/10 Is It a Deflationary Depression?
07/28/10 Comes a Blond Stranger ...
07/27/10 The Spreading Chinese Inflation
07/27/10 The War Falls Apart?
Guest Editorials
07/29/10 Protecting Your IRA - Part 2: Getting Your IRA Out of Town, by Terry Coxon
07/29/10 Gold Basis Screwed, by Dr. Antal Fekete
07/28/10 A Lopsided Warning, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
07/25/10 Grant Havers on Libertarianism, Religion and the Role of the Church in a Free Society
07/18/10 Paul Craig Roberts on Glass-Steagall, Free Trade and the Dangers of an Evolving 'Oligarchy of Private Interests'
07/11/10 Harry Schultz on the Power Elite, Free Markets, the Internet and Why Gold Is Going Much Higher
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Swiss Confidential website. To unsubscribe from the Daily Bell, click here.