News & Analysis
Sarah Palin & the Desperation of the Elites
Sarah Palin (left) has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she "would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race. The former Alaska governor, in an interview Saturday on the sidelines of the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, said President Obama's "lack of experience" has held him back his first year in office and that she would put her credentials up against his any day. "I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country," Palin said when asked if she would run for president in 2012. She qualified the statement, adding that she sees "many" other potential candidates who are "in as strong or stronger position than I am to take on the White House and if they're in a better position than I in three years, I'll support them." But the former GOP vice presidential nominee told "Fox News Sunday": "I won't close the door that perhaps could be open for me in the future." ... "I do want competition to allow the cream of the crop to rise (in the GOP contests)," Palin said, adding that her support would translate into everything from donations to campaign rallies. "There are hundreds of candidates on local, state and on the national level that hopefully we'll be able to help." Palin recently endorsed Rand Paul, the son of Texas Rep. Ron Paul, in the GOP primary for U.S. Senate in Kentucky. She said she was attracted to his limited government platform and that she's already donated to the campaign. – Fox News
Dominant Social Theme: A 21st century Joan of Arc?
Free-Market Analysis: Sarah Palin is really a last chance gasp, in our opinion, for the power elite to maintain the integrity of the two-party system in America. We predicted that Palin would run long ago – and that she would set up an alternative political structure in the process. And we received considerable flak, as we recall. But both things are actually happening. Over the weekend, Palin refused to rule out a run for president in 2012 against Barack Obama (who may be unelectable by then anyway) and using the Tea Party movement as a surrogate she's found her third party – though it may not function as a formal entity. See some former articles here:
Saturday, November 14, 2009 - Why Sarah Palin Doesn't 'Get' Free Markets
Sunday, November 08, 2009 - Sarah Palin – A Libertarian in Hong Kong?
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 - Limbaugh: Palin Might Leave GOP for Third Party
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Palin Says She's Not Leaving Politics
For the power elite, Palin is a godsend – and perhaps a last chance. The elite's political meme – that the American two-party system is an inevitable construct of national genius – is falling apart day by day. Turns out that despite ten covers on Time Magazine comparing him to FDR, Obama's popularity lasted about as long as one of Roosevelt's famous cigarettes. The elite's expectation that Obama would be able to ram through an incredible amount of domestic socialist legislation including gun control, health care and vastly increased police-state powers is starting to founder along with Obama's personal popularity.
No, Depression-era uber-regulatory solutions are not popular in the 2000s for some reason. Too bad for the elite. Deep-dish statism simply does not bake well in the United States – nor likely will it ever emerge a perfect golden-brown. The culture precludes the implementation of the recipe, and culture is a stubborn thing. After 100 years of trying, the elite STILL has not confiscated guns in the US – ergo much else that is on the menu is either stymied or continually unavailable.
So what do you do? Well, you keep going. You double down. And you try to find someone who can play on the national scene who still has some credibility. It can't be a professional politician – because after George Bush's compassionate conservatism and now Obama's yes-we-can-change, the majority of America does not look fondly on mainstream politics. It can't be someone whose viewpoints are well known, especially in the lower 48, because that's inevitably a turn-off. It has to be a fresh face.
Enter Sarah Palin. Her belief structure is perfect. She is attractive, malleable and has the facility of entertaining contradictory belief systems without acknowledging the cognitive dissonance, even to herself. She no doubt believes the free-market rhetoric she spouts, and from the power-elite's standpoint she's no threat – she's been thoroughly vetted and indoctrinated by the military-industrial complex. Heck, she ran as John McCain's VP, and he's a card-carrying proponent of US military power abroad and at home.
No, Sarah Palin won't likely rock the boat when it comes to the US$500 billion that America spends on the military every year. She'll make all the right noises about the American empire abroad as well, whether or not the US is still embroiled in its overseas' "war on terror." We have no doubt that Palin has given the proper assurance to the powers-that-be regarding these matters – and probably the "integrity" of the US central bank as well. And in return she has a best-selling book, a gig on Fox News and sooner or later a higher national profile than even Barack Obama, if she doesn't already enjoy it.
More and more, Obama is looking like yesterday's news. You want to tango with the power elite, you take your chances. He's going to have a tough time of it the next few years – but that's what he signed up for. And whenever he is "retired" the perks aren't bad. He'll write a book, too, and charge a million a pop (allowing for inflation) for speeches abroad, which is in our estimation a fancy way of laundering money for a job "well done."
Anyway, Palin has done it herself, by virtue of her gutsy personality and personal faith in her destiny, and this makes her all the more dangerous. We don't think the power elite necessarily had its eye on her from the beginning. Sometimes these things are luck (or perhaps not as Rove was apparently involved in her selection). But once she burst on the national stage – bold, brassy and "dumb as a stump" – the elite recognized its chance. A main chance. She was perfect. And so they set to work. Here's the brilliant Naomi Wolfe (from a 2008 Huffington Post article) to describe the rest of it:
Sarah "Evita" Palin, the Muse of the Coming Police State ... I realized early on with horror what I was seeing in Governor Palin: the continuation of the Rove-Cheney cabal, but this time without restraints. I heard her echo Bush 2000 soundbites ("the heart of America is on display") and realized Bush's speechwriters were writing her -- not McCain's -- speeches. I heard her tell George Bush's lies -- not McCain's -- to the American people, linking 9/11 to Iraq. I heard her make fun of Barack Obama for wanting to prevent the torture of prisoners -- this is Rove-Cheney's enthusiastic S and M, not McCain's, who, though he shamefully colluded in the 2006 Military Tribunals Act, is also a former prisoner of war and wrote an eloquent Newsweek piece in 2005 opposing torture. I saw that she was even styled by the same skillful stylist (neutral lipstick, matte makeup, dark colors) who turned Katharine Harris from a mall rat into a stateswoman and who styles all the women in the Bush orbit --but who does not bother to style Cindy McCain. ...
Reports confirmed my suspicions: Palin, not McCain, is the FrankenBarbie of the Rove-Cheney cabal. The strategy became clear. Time magazine reported that Rove is "dialed in" to the McCain campaign. Rove's protégé Steve Schmidt is now campaign manager. And Politico reported that Rove was heavily involved in McCain's vice presidential selection. Finally a new report shows that there are dozens of Bush and Rove operatives surrounding Sarah Palin and orchestrating her every move.
We have to note that Palin's support of Rand Paul is prominently mentioned in the article that began this analysis. Rand Paul, the son of libertarian Congressman Ron Paul, shares his father's point of view about politics. And that view could not be more opposed to Sarah Palin's, so far as we can tell.
Here's what we understand: Rand Paul wants an end to the American empire both abroad and at home, an end to the incessant warring, an end to 16 separate spy agencies, an end to domestic warrantless wiretapping and generally to the escalating lawlessness with which the military-industrial complex is now operating. That's what his father wants too. Neither Rand nor his father should be especially welcome over at the Pentagon. Nor likely are they.
Sarah Palin however still supports her old running mate John McCain and is said to count on the elder Bush as a core advisor. These two elderly gentlemen reside at the heart of the American military-industrial complex. It is impossible to serve two masters in our opinion, at least two that are so opposed. To indicate that one has no difficulty integrating these two entirely opposite socio-political perspectives simply means that either one has not thought through one's core beliefs, or one does not really have any.
We would tend to think Palin is mostly after a main chance. She wants the money and she loves the attention. She is indeed a kind of American "Evita Peron" in our opinion, a nationalist by virtue of her rhetoric ... someone who will speak of American virtues, espouse limited government and freedom but at the same time support the endless expansion of the American military state with all its lawlessness and bloodshed. Did Rand Paul make a mistake in accepting her support or funding?
Conclusion: We are not, despite the above, at all sure of a Palin presidency. At the rate the power elite memes are collapsing, we see why eventually Palin's inherent intellectual contradictions should not become evident and obvious to an increasingly alarmed electorate. No, we are not sure that Sarah "Evita" Palin is a shoe-in. In fact, we are beginning to believe that even the most sacred memes – the phony US war on terror, domestic "security," etc. – will be challenged and tested in the near future given how fast things are moving. And if the two-party system in America should founder, or real republicanism become attractive, then the entire faux-financial system of the West would be at risk including central banking and myriad securities and derivatives markets. It would all, in our opinion, be in danger of unraveling. So watch out investors! Keep track of your memes. It's one reason among many to believe in gold and silver.
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Dogwood on 11/17/10 12:55 PM
Hell, if TJ himself rose from the grave and founded a party, you'd lay that back on the elite.
This article is months old. More recently DB has been protraying the TP Movement as a heroic uprising. Here it is portrayed an outlet for the elites for form a new duality now that Dem/Rep has been fused.
And you are even suggesting that Ron Paul would be co-opted or has already. So, you are saying President Paul would not be an upgrade.
Where are your limits?
I'm with you on corporatism and a few of these topics, but your philosophy is far to gellatinous.
![]() |
Posted by Seadragonconquerer on 02/08/10 11:23 PM
Posted by Skrag on 02/08/10 11:07 PM
PS - Palin on the fed: "Glenn I think people like you are doing a great job talking about the Fed, and the fact that few people with your prominent position are talking about it is a good thing.
"Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
Great insights, eh? Thanks for the link.
Posted by @Dick Cone on 02/08/10 10:15 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
This feedback was edited for profanity and general irritation.
As a general note, please try to be civil. Daily Bell feedbacks are often, to our great delight, more instructive than the articles that proceed them, and we'd like to keep it that way!
Posted by TMoore on 02/08/10 09:28 PM
a. Fostering a self-reinforcing mutual distrust among the polity-think Stalinist Russia.
b. Enhancing the "voluntary" surrender of more data that will, paradoxically, make individuals less safe.
Sorry about this being off topic, but I could not find another way to submit this...
Reply from The Daily Bell
Great point in our estimation. Currently, however, would tend to see identity theft as something of a minor meme (a mini-meme?) at least for the moment.
We think food and water shortages may be played up as the next big dominant social themes, or at least they would have been if not for the apparent collapse of the global warming promotion.
You know, it seems the symphony is rapidly falling out of tune, making the seamless presentation of additional dominant social themes more difficult. ...
Posted by Ron Depke on 02/08/10 07:24 PM
Either way, I don't think this power grab works out for them. If the elites continue down this path they'll split their own ticket. That'll work out great for the Democrats. But, the Republicans are so desperate to not let 2008 happen again that they're willing to grasp at that straw.The Tea Party or any other Liberty-minded party will go nowhere without Ron Paul's approval.
There is only one man who carries the respect and devotion of the Freedom movement. He's been consistent all his life. When the elites throw us a goof like Sarah Palin we know the difference.
Here's how to handle this new NeoCon end-around. When a few Republican has-beens eventually try to jump aboard, smile warmly, thank them for their support, but don't vote for anyone who's held a public office above Town Dog Catcher. Just vote them all out!
Posted by Shawn on 02/08/10 07:13 PM
Just as Scott Brown won because the other choice was so weak. She has her name all over the Tea Party now and if not the damage has been done, she said everything they wanted to hear and will be perceived to be part of it.
With the endorsement of Rand Paul, her views by the uninformed will be associated with Ron Paul's and a favor is in order. No Mrs Palin has a future, she has the confidence and likes the limelight. Lets face the facts there is a limited choice of good people to do the job and the masses are not looking for some one with depth, its a pretty talking head they vote for and Palin's a women to boot, many will think its time for women to be president, just that fact I think gets her a shot a being elected.
Obama is a social worker with no experience the only reason he was elected is because it was the democrats turn, he is black, pretty, and can read well. Period.I have read both their books and they are childish promotions. I can't understand who would believe them. Sorry correction I could finnish hers it was really bad.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Probably not many have read both!
Posted by Duane Bass on 02/08/10 06:51 PM
Posted by Eric Parks on 02/08/10 06:35 PM
Palin is a neocon and not considered viable in the view of the original tea party members. If this means that the GOP wants to run neocons and lose due to an absolute refusal by the libertarians and free thinkers who have had enough of their lies, then so be it.
It's not as if the neocons are any better in our eyes. We will simply vote third party or abstain from the process altogether. They can't win without us. Their options are to either move toward and embrace the socialist agenda already espoused by the progressive democrats (if so, why should anyone vote for them when they can get the same from the dems?) or they can make large concessions (read: running proven libertarian minded candidates) to those who believe in liberty - offering a clear choice at the ballot box.
In my mind, with the Austrian school finding traction due to this entire financial mess, the GOP would be wise to lean our way.
Posted by Silverliberty on 02/08/10 06:15 PM
There is nothing Rogue about her. If the neocons do take over the tea party, then those who are pro-liberty will simply pull out and leave her with an empty husk.
There are better candidates out there. I would rather have a dead Ron Paul than a live demopublican candidate anyday. Liberty is the goal. It can not be fostered nor protected in government. It can only be properly defended and propagated by the individual. Let's end this fraudulent and murderous experiment called government.
Love Liberty,
Rebecca Click to view link
Posted by Art Solvason on 02/08/10 02:38 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
Our readers tend to have extraordinarily high IQs - not that it makes any real difference.
They are certainly "a cut above."
Click to view link
Posted by Glenn Williams on 02/08/10 02:11 PM
Posted by Adrian W on 02/08/10 02:10 PM
A vote for Sarah is a non-vote for a Ron Paul. Perhaps, the next false flag terrorist attack on America (see 9/11 controversies) will work in persuading just enough ignorant and fearful voters onto the Obama ticket.
Again, a vote for Obama is a non-vote for a Ron Paul. Divide an conquer is a theme that the elite have played out well in the past.
Posted by Kp on 02/08/10 12:42 PM
After all what could go wrong ?
Posted by TMoore on 02/08/10 12:31 PM
We are living in the Truman Show...
Posted by Frank Ross on 02/08/10 12:21 PM
Reply from The Daily Bell
Evita or Isabela? The point is she is appealing as a populist candidate however it turns out.
Posted by Sean M on 02/08/10 11:09 AM
Posted by Dick Cone on 02/08/10 10:50 AM
The Tea Party folks understand what she's all about I think. At least I do and I have no problem at all knowing precisely what my world view is. From the article either you didn't listen to the speech or your cynical view of Sarah Palin has clouded your opinion on this one. There are many shades of worldview even among those you might think would be able to coalesce around major themes.
Here are examples: Beck endorses the apolyptic view which others of us reject while appreciating his explanation of collectivist philosophy for those who never grasped it.
Ed Griffen can be admired by covenantalists while not accepting his staunch libertarian position that requires an oath to his cause (see his website). That view accepts the dualistic theme of collectivist vs libertarian without seeing there is a third position.
Sarah Palin is certainly no collectivist nor is she libertarian so she is in that vast area where people are working out their world view by seeking a comprehensive covenantal view that includes the individual and the state without doing violence to either.
That was a major viewpoint at the time the founders formed our republic. It stands against statist thought originating with the Greek philosophers. So I very much appreciate the Bell, but will stand my ground for the viewpoint that is comprehensive, requires personal responsibility and avoids the cult of personality centered around certain self appointed elites.
It takes that to make a republic work and there is a place for everybody who wants to participate in that goal regardless of party or the right to remain independent of party until it clearly supports the American republican form of government free from elitism.
Reply from The Daily Bell
You write eloquently and from an informed point of view. But we are Jeffersonians as well as libertarians and it is fairly clear that Jefferson warned against "foreign entanglements." He didn't do such a good job during his own presidency, but the warning stands.
Certainly, despite Ms. Palin's sentiments, there is little we can find to justify a US$1 trillion military industrial complex with all its accoutrements and domestic spying apparatus. It is, in fact, late in the game for Ms. Palin to be "working out her world view" - and we, too, stand our ground as regards her ill-thought-out militarism and apparent affection for the growing US police state. Just yesterday she seems to have declared war on Iran.
See: Click to view link
Posted by Kp on 02/08/10 10:34 AM
Posted by Phil W on 02/08/10 10:13 AM
Reply from The Daily Bell
|
|

l 


