Editorial
Texas Textbook Troubles
In my own field of work, university education, there are a great many who scoff at the idea of privatization, something that is exactly how a free society should handle all education from primary to post graduate schools. There is no excuse for government to be responsible for educating young people or anyone else for that matter. Not only is it destructive of educational impartiality to entrust schools to governments – only if there is variety can impartiality be at least approximated – but the threat of out and out indoctrination is most real when one monolithic agency, with the power to coercively collect funds for its operations and conscript its students, runs "education."
Yes, thousands of professor and teachers want the government to be in charge but after this has been accomplished, as it has for a couple of centuries throughout America and elsewhere, there is no escaping the turf fight that takes over educational policy, especially when it comes to such courses as history, civics, and even biology and the textbooks teachers are required to use in them.
In a free and open society there will be a great variety of ways that people, even the most highly educated ones, will see the country's history, especially when it comes to politics and economics, as well as whatever other disciplines study. Few Americans could miss the current fracas about whether, for example, the New Deal was a valuable or destructive policy of the federal government. Yes, even Prohibition, with its bloody history, has its defenders. A good many scholars and citizens in general find themselves in different camps about the civil war, so much so that there is much controversy even about whether it should have as its name "Civil War" or "The War between the States." Innumerable other topics covered in various elementary, high school and college courses are fraught with controversies among sincere minded citizens and scholars – no one could miss the battles fought over the nature of biological evolution.
The idea that one can simply override all this with some kind of governmental policy – as it is being tried right now in Texas where there is a fight brewing among those who have their agendas concerning what should be taught to students in all sorts of subjects – is absurd. One need not be a subscriber to post-modernism – with its claim that there is no objective reality at all and the world as all in the eye of the beholder (be this in history, English literature, philosophy, or government studies) – in order to admit that there are many seriously divergent educated opinions and beliefs in what is the truth of the matter in a discipline. And in a free society the way this is supposed to be dealt with and acknowledged is by making it possible for all of them to compete in the marketplace of ideas without even a whiff of government intrusion (i.e., censorship).
No such marketplace can exist, however, if government education dominates, as it does everywhere in the country. The United States of America is practically not much different from the old Soviet Union or the current North Korea when it comes to how young people are being educated – they basically get some politically palatable stories, some banal compromises reached within the halls of government, instead of the outcome of scholarly and academic conferences where the different sides of the various controversies are presented and from which scholars return to their classrooms throughout the academic landscape and proceed to teach what they earnestly believe students should learn. What some of them will teach will dismay, even outrage, certain others; although often teachers know well and good how to give different sides a fair presentation and thus make it possible for their pupils to arrive at answers of their own.
But this cannot go on with government ordering what is to be taught and what the textbooks must contain. The wielding of political power in the field of education is no less insidious than it would be for government to run the profession of journalism, the publication of books and magazines, and so forth. None of that is acceptable in a genuine free country. Nor should government-run schools be.
Latest Daily Bell Articles
Feedback


Posted by Rage on 03/13/10 09:48 PM
Posted by Ken on 03/13/10 10:37 AM
Home-schooled kids average 85th percentile on the standard achievement tests - regardless of the educational level of the parents, whereas govt schools average 50th percentile.Yet, the average home-schooling family spends only $500 per student per year, as compared to the government schools which spend $12,000 per student per year.
You can look around today and see home-educated people are the cream of the crop in fields ranging from spelling bees, to bluegrass music bands, to college entrance exams, to Whitehouse internships. They also have the highest rate of participation in service organizations and voting.
For more stats on this see: Click to view link
Posted by Susan on 03/13/10 09:43 AM
The fault lies with the people, for not following their own law, for colluding with government against their own children. Government edicts in the form of compulsory attendance statutes have led to a disconnect between what parents are (guardians of the gift of life) and what they are now by many seen to be (extensions of the state).
"The Encouragement of Literature, etc.
"Wisdom, and knowledge, as well as virtue, diffused generally among the body of the people, being necessary for the preservation of their rights and liberties; and as these depend on spreading the opportunities and advantages of education in the various parts of the country, and among the different orders of the people, it shall be the duty of legislatures and magistrates, in all future periods of this commonwealth, to cherish the interests of literature and the sciences, and all seminaries of them; especially the university at Cambridge, public schools and grammar schools in the towns; to encourage private societies and public institutions, rewards and immunities, for the promotion of agriculture, arts, sciences, commerce, trades, manufactures, and a natural history of the country; to countenance and inculcate the principles of humanity and general benevolence, public and private charity, industry and frugality, honesty and punctuality in their dealings; sincerity, good humor, and all social affections, and generous sentiments among the people."
Posted by S Wilcox-Sollof on 03/13/10 08:48 AM
f the school system had no standards of education as you suggest, every "teacher' would inculcate his or her own system of prejudice into our children. Take Pakistan for instance, where many Madrassas produce students brainwashed to kill Westerners.
I would agree to a Free Market supply of education because although a Government should fund the education of all children through the raising of Taxes for the benefit of those children and our future society, it does not have to be the provider of those educational services. However the removal of all Educational Standards is the precursor to Educational Anarchy. Are you suggesting Anarchy or have I misunderstood you?
Posted by Rabc on 03/13/10 06:53 AM
In order to create these consumers, the mass had to be educated to follow authority and to be dependent on others for ones goals. It is unlikely that the Power Elite would allow their system to be broken by allowing masses of people to be educated without their supervision, as they would be potential rebels against their power.
In a State free society most people would not need or require education for 20 years of their formative lives, this would be completely un-necessary. State Schools are designed to regiment and drill people and they also keep lost of people employed who help to reproduce the System in the next generation.
Posted by Peter M. Lutterbeck, M.D. on 03/13/10 05:29 AM
The ever more polarizing and confrontational issues will probably one day, sooner or later, cause the country to split into several regions or off shoots accommodating their citizens with whatever policies they prefer.
This feeling is inculcated in Europe where there are glaring differences among its members. The latter are well aware of the dangers submitting their lives to a single governing body.
Watching America from afar only confirms the need to maintain one's own identity and self determination. Of course, it may not be efficient in terms of monetary policies, but losing one's independence and personal dignity has been realized in Europe and still hold sway over "financial efficiency." Just look what the latter has sown and continues to hover as a black cloud above millions in the fray suffering from ever more dominating corporate greed.
Posted by Juantio on 03/13/10 05:12 AM
The State and federal governments should hold only a minimal place in education. Local taxpayers,the parents, the people who actually foot the educational bills, should have the first and last say on what their children should be taught with perhaps some input from top teachers -- unions be damned.
G Bush, B Obama and their more recent presidential ancestors have used education as a money machine and a political football. They may have collected school bus loads of cash from needless tests, but they have lost the game. They have continued the ruin US public schools. They have extirpated creativity and above all critical thinking in most disciplines and prevented it in others through forced test teaching and test taking.
![]() |
Posted by M on 03/13/10 03:22 AM
So even those of us in private schools can have a tough time because our owners demand that we be just like government schools.
I'm going to leave my job as soon as economically feasible because I cannot in good conscience give kids a government education for a private school price tag.

l 


