Silvio Berlusconi (pictured left) has attempted to fend off allegations that preparations for the G8 summit have been so chaotic that Italy's membership of the group was being called into question. The Italian prime minister said a report in the Guardian, citing senior western officials as saying the US had taken the lead in managing the agenda for the summit, was "a colossal blunder by a small newspaper". Officials from G8 countries, who did not want to be named, told the Guardian that in the absence of Italian initiatives for the summit, Washington had arranged conference calls among the "sherpas" – the diplomats preparing the summit. There was also fierce criticism of Italy's failure to deliver on promises of overseas aid. The Guardian today issued a statement saying it wholeheartedly rejected any suggestion that the news story was unfounded. – UK Guardian
Dominant Social Theme: It's Silvio's fault.
Free-Market Analysis: The fuss over the G8 summit has to do in part with an article in the UK Guardian which suggested that there was a consensus that Italy ought to be kicked out of the G8 for not handling the current summit properly. The complaints in no particular order were that Italy didn't seem to have any idea what the summit was to be about; that Italy did not properly follow through on G8 commitments; and that Berlusconi had scheduled the summit in a live earthquake zone.
Apparently, at least some of these comments struck a nerve. The Berlusconi administration has defended itself (see above excerpt) claiming that it did not need outside help to create the G8's agenda, and that Italy was a G8 member in good standing. The Guardian also suggested that Italy be removed from the G8 and that Spain be allowed to take its place, something else that seems to have infuriated Berlusconi.
In fact, the G8s, the G20s and other various international meetings are often gatherings in search of an agenda. And given that the G8 seems destined to be replaced by the G20, or something in between, this political tempest may seem a bit overblown. But it does provide an idea of how tempers are flaring and how much stress international participants are under currently.
There is increasing pressure from the US and rising powers such as China, India and Brazil for the G8 "rich countries club" to be expanded and for European membership to be consolidated. Bruce Jones, a senior fellow of the Brookings Institution in Washington, said in the next three years European states would come under pressure to decide among themselves who should represent the EU in the G8 or any larger successor group, as well as in the UN security council and the International Monetary Fund. All three institutions are due to be reformed to make them more representative of the 21st-century balance of power, and that is likely to bring a dilution of European influence, with some countries having to drop out. "There is already frustration with the Europeans that they have not sorted these things out," Jones said.
Conclusion: The authority generated by these international get-togethers has much to do with their perceived success and influence. When the West is awash in wealth then these global confabs bask in the reflected glory of the boom times. But during a bust, participants must be seen as generating solutions that work. The trouble is they likely cannot. They are talk shops that really cannot do much to move the global economy. Thus the longer the crisis continues, the more their prestige and power begins to leak away. If the current economic crisis does not get much better over the next year or two these meetings will begin to seem entirely redundant. By then gold and silver may be well on their way to much higher levels, which will pose even more problems for the monetary elite.
Post Feedback
We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.
View Feedback
Posted by Rebecca Iocca on 7/9/2009 12:58:02 AM
The economic crisis was created by government due to its' greed. It believes in the fantasy of getting something for nothing. It prints up imaginary currency (nothing) and gets real things in return. It "gives" nothing back, which is the very essence of exploitation.
The Pope's proposal assumes the best qualities of men and it ignores national and ethnic differences. The average man doesn't love his fellow man enough for this solution to work but you can't blame the Pope for his stand. He has a unique perspective. Each country has its unique difference and they should remain. How boring it would be to all be in the same pot. It would also be dangerous. At least the differences between countries provides some check and balances for the foibles of other countries. The unions are bad enough in the United States and I can't imagine putting them into the same bucket with unions from other countries; this wouldn't be a solution for any thing except for disaster. Globalize everything and no country will survive. Vive la difference!
Reply from the Daily Bell:
He seem to want to globalize.
Posted by Rev. Dean Kavouras on 7/9/2009 8:16:28 AM
As a Lutheran theologian I must object to the pope's teaching here. It's not the church's work to ask governments to impose its ethics on the world. The church teaches and preaches to its people, and any who will listen.
The pope, further, is either unaware of what capitalism truly is, or he ignores the reality of it. It's the only form of economics that can bring God's earthly blessings to people. It takes into account sinful nature, which is self-serving, and builds a system that says: only if you serve others, will you yourself gain anything. And so capitalists work hard and smart to create more economic goods than they need, sell the excess in a competitive market, and use the excess to accumlate wealth for themselves, from which others automatically also gain.
The pope is himself a capitalist. He works to make a profit. He get a paycheck. His paycheck includes money, a place to live, servants, travel, personal satisfaction, fulfillment of duty and vast authority. If he obtained no personal benefit, he'd quit.
Every man who works is a capitalist. He sells his time and talken for a profit to himself. He must, in the process however, provide some benefit to another man that that man wants.
Regulation by government can only dull this sword, never sharpen it.
I highly commend the Daily Bell for its irenic commentary which, while rightly disagreeing with the pope, doesn't editorially assassinate him, and the Christian faith at the same time.
The pope should study Luther's teaching on: the two kingdoms of God, the Right Hand Kingdom (the church) and the Left Hand Kingdom (the world). Both are owned by God, but the two operate by different rules, which dare not be co-mingled.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Thanks for such a thoughtful feedback.
Posted by Helmut Blecker on 7/9/2009 8:59:24 AM
It just goes to show that the church understands nothing about free market economics nor their teaching of morality. As Richard Maybury states, that all religions are based on these two philosophies:
1- do all you have agreed to do.
2- do not encroach on other persons or their property.
These two laws (God laws if you will) are higher then any of man laws.
When gov't (or anyone else) violates these two laws, civilization starts to collapse and is eventually returned to the "Dark Ages". A local gov't is bad enough in violating these two laws, but a global gov't is even worse.
How can the church sanction such a violation of moral laws?
Reply from the Daily Bell:
The Bible itself does not conflate private and public property.
Posted by Ignatius Chen on 7/9/2009 11:54:12 AM
The Holy Father does not support global governance.
Thanks for the link. Interesting. The encyclical seems to use fairly precise language, however, even if the Pope departs from a specific formulation in some areas.
Posted by Albert on 7/9/2009 11:54:22 AM
A world authority to enforce ethics and "regulate worldwide migration" ?
The Catholic churchs ethics? Or who's? Control freedom of movement?
I think this type of control has been tried before, many times, including the 1940"s, when will we ever learn?
Reply from the Daily Bell:
It is a surprising formulation.
Posted by Charles Markland on 7/9/2009 12:05:57 PM
I assume the picture accompanying this article was not the only one available from Getty; smells like a New World Oder from here.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Coincidence?
Posted by Souren on 7/9/2009 12:20:49 PM
Pope's honest proposal could open the door for protection rights of a sheep herd to wolves protection instead of sheep dogs.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
So wolves would guard the flock instead of shepherds? Perhaps.
Posted by Alas on 7/9/2009 10:56:40 PM
Re: Pope calls for global governance
"This is pretty strong stuff."
"Where have we heard this before?"
"To the degree that the Church does not attempt to recognize the reality of what has occurred, the encyclical may be seen as less of a moral document and more as an effort to be a global political factor."
Amen.
And just what, if anything, do we suppose the Vatican Bank has to do with all of this? Perhaps we should consult that fellow who was found hanging upside down from some London bridge.
Alas, in this life we cannot.
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Perhaps there is another ...
Posted by Erick Tippett on 7/10/2009 2:04:56 AM
It seems to my recollection that the Vatican had a scandal of sorts themselves involving their treasurer (or whoever their minister of finance was at the time) when John-Paul II sat on the 'Papal Throne'. Perhaps this has something to do with the present Pope's reticence concerning the central banking system's part in the economic scheme of things in our present 'world order'.
The call for what would amount to a 'World Government' sanctioned by the world community might certainly gain this present Pope some serious billing as a suspect in the World Government-False Profit/Anti-Christ scenerio our right-winged fundamentalist are known to profer forth through the media from time to time, as the 'spirit' moves them to do on occasion with trumpets resounding!
Food for thought and of course only a personal perspective on
my part. Agnostically yours ...
Reply from the Daily Bell:
Riddles within secrets ...
Posted by Bill C. on 7/13/2009 3:06:22 PM
Ah yes, all we need to do is put a host of virtuous, incorruptible angels in charge of those immoral capitalist devils, and utopia will, at long last, be achieved.
When the Pope elects to distribute to the needy masses the profits of his own massive religion business, I will at least forgive his hypocrisy. Meanwhile, I will turn to Ayn Rand for lectures on morality instead of to the church in which I was raised. (I am in a position to tempt damnation; in my youth, I paid the dues necessary to obtain a plenary indulgence.)
Post Feedback
We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.