Appenzell
Switzerland
A Daily Compendium
of Free-Market Thinking
The Daily Bell Newswire - It's FREE!    


News & Analysis

It's Not State Subsidy That Creates Art

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 – by  Staff Report


Ben Bradshaw

If you tune in to Desperate Romantics, the new drama starting tonight on BBC2, you might start thinking about the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood: possibly about the integrity of their art, more likely about the steamy carryings-on in their studios. What you won't be thinking is: how did they manage those paintings – and that sex – without the aid of a government grant? Ben Bradshaw (pictured left), our latest Culture Secretary, has said that his main job, up to the next election, is enticing the artistic and sporting elite back to Labour. "We have had a great cultural and sporting renaissance in the past 10 years," he said. A Conservative government, with its programme of spending cuts, would put that at risk. "I hope," he intoned ominously, "the arts, cultural and sporting world will wake up to that." – Telegraph

Dominant Social Theme: Labour supports the arts.

Free-Market Analysis: There is an idea obviously – at least within Britain's Labour party – that the top-level of artistic composition will whither and die if it is not supported by government grants. This idea is on a par with the idea that scientific research is best advanced through government subsidies and grants from universities also intermingled with government. But is this really so? Here's a fairly cogent rebuttal also excerpted from the article above:

The best books and songs and poems and plays do not get written, nor works of art crafted, because of state subsidy. They are born from the talent of the artist. Cutting subsidies might complicate their lives, but it won't necessarily compromise their work. Vote for whomever you like, but don't worry too much about the end of our "cultural renaissance".

An excellent point, and one wishes it were made more often. There is so much money flowing through Western governments these days that there is an endless line of apologists eager to inform the general public that art, science and other kind of human activities are endlessly predicated on government largesse. In fact, the greatest accomplishments of the late 20th and early 21st century – industry-wise anyway – probably lie in the fields of electronic and communications technology where Western governments have little or no influence. Two young men in a garage, after all, created Apple. And Bill Gates needed no subsidies to develop Microsoft.

Conclusion: The idea that many kinds of creative endeavors are somehow linked closely to government funding is actually a surprising one when the scope of history is properly observed. The lone genius, pursuing his or her area of interest, is both time-honored and highly credible. Whether one speaks of Socrates, Shakespeare or Schubert, the profile of creativity is individual and has little to do with the funding mechanism. The results would have happened one way or another because the inspiration was innate and the individuals took human action to realize their dreams.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.






View Feedback

Posted by George on 7/22/2009 6:19:07 AM

Just as Ben Bernanke can not predict the future on the economy and inflation, for that matter neither can Al Gore and scientists predict the future of earth and "climate change". They use the same flawed reasoning. My fear is that any attempt to control the "weather" on earth will be catastrophic much like how the Federal Reserve controls the economy. The fact that scientists managed to "fix" the ozone layer hole somehow now are saying that it now contributes to global warming! Maybe if they would have left it alone we wouldn't have Al Gore wanting to tax our air and if we truly had a free market, we wouldn't be having this little issue with economy.


Reply from the Daily Bell:

The problem is not the prediction in our opinion but the accuracy.

Post Feedback

We look forward to reading your feedback. All comments are automatically posted. However, please note that any posts containing harassment, vulgarity, personal attacks or those which are deemed to be of a violent nature are not welcomed and will either not appear or be removed.








[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

News & Analysis
09/02/10 Bank Run 2011?
09/02/10 Mises Shakes the World?
09/01/10 DC Begins the Bust Up
09/01/10 Thorium Cures the Free Market
08/31/10 Boetkke Promotion Redux
08/31/10 Obama Admin Calls US Education Failure
Guest Editorials
09/01/10 Tempted by One Size Fits All, by Dr. Tibor Machan
08/31/10 Iraq - An End or an Escalation? by Dr. Ron Paul
08/31/10 Frank Rich's Prejudice, by Dr. Tibor Machan

Subscribe to the
Daily Bell Newswire

It's FREE!
Timely email notification of...
  • Breaking News
  • Feature Interviews
  • Guest Editorials
  • White Papers
  • eBooks & Shorts
  • Special FREE offers
...and much much more!
Exclusive Interviews
08/29/10 Steve Forbes on Overseas Wars, the Coming Gold Standard and the Rise of 'Citizen Agitation'
08/22/10 Nelson Hultberg on Libertarian-Conservatism and His New Conservative American Political Party
08/15/10 Larry Pratt on the GOA, the Constitution and Gun Control
© Copyright 2008 - 2010 Appenzeller Business Press AG (ARBP). All Rights Reserved. The Daily Bell is an informative compendium of independent economic views and analysis, which is published by ARBP. The information contained in the Daily Bell is for informational purposes only, is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any particular person and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. ARBP does not accept any liability or responsibility for, nor does it verify the accurateness of the information being provided in the Daily Bell. Daily Bell articles and interviews may include the contributions of several Daily Bell editors and may require factual editing after their initial post. Readers of the Daily Bell or any affiliated or linked sources or sites must accept the responsibility for performing their own due diligence before acting on any of the information provided within the report regardless of the source. In addition to proprietary, internally generated content, the Daily Bell publishes guest editorials from a selection of free-market thinkers, which may have been reprinted elsewhere and are not necessarily representative of ARBP's editorial views. Copyright is attributed to the author of any guest editorials featured at the Daily Bell, unless noted otherwise. ARBP often uses images licensed from Getty Images on the Daily Bell website.