News & Analysis
New Meme? Corporate and Banking Elite Have the Most to Lose from NWO
The world is changing dramatically, and the 'world order' is therefore changing too. The western powers of the United States and Europe are in decline, whilst China and Asia in general are on the rise. Many 'developing' countries, such as the BRIC nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China, are becoming more wealthy and more powerful than the established 'developed' economies of the west. Whereas the old international order saw the vast majority of power wielded by western powers, with America as the undisputed global superpower, a new multi-polar world is now emerging, with Asia as its power centre. This new order will indeed see the importance of international organisations increase. The imposition of Western rules and systems will be replaced by negotiated solutions reflecting the needs and desires of a much wider range of countries. Led by countries such as China, which has always opposed western interventionism, this new way is likely to emphasise national sovereignty and non-interference in other country's affairs. There is one group who has the most to lose from this change – the corporate and banking elite. – World News Curator
Dominant Social Theme: Big bankers are doomed.
Free-Market Analysis: For us, as elite meme trackers, articles such as the one excerpted above are interesting to identify and analyze. You can almost see the proverbial wheels spinning as Tavistock pounds out one dominant social theme after another, hoping to confuse what the Internet has clarified.
There is, from our perspective, an effort to create global governance and the only sensible conclusion to reach is that those who control central banks are behind it. Creating such a scenario demands not just consensus but the manufacturing of consensus on a worldwide level. That takes unfathomable financial resources.
The methodology is what we call directed history and like you we have been successful at predicting certain evolutions because we apply our understanding of current events to the evolution of power elite trends.
The development and application of such insights is useful in terms of understanding the world around us and also for practical purposes such as investment. Once one understands the central banking economy all sorts of possibilities emerge. Many who see the same reality we observe bought gold and silver nearly ten years ago and have reaped enormous gains.
Partly because what we call the Internet Reformation has been so successful at providing us with an overview of power elite activities and the directed history they use to realize their goals, these elites have been busy producing false flags. These false flags are meant to distract us from what is actually happening.
Julian Assange, for instance, is likely a false flag, in our view. WikiLeaks is what you call a "limited hangout" that allows the powers-that-be to control certain globalist messaging in a believable fashion. We predicted several years ago that his saga might include incarceration, a book and eventually a run for political office. Recently, he announced he wanted to run for office in Australia, his home country.
We were able to predict the potential outcome because we are aware that the power elite helped fund National Socialism and was instrumental apparently in the rise of Adolf Hitler. National Socialism is the preferred ideology for the coming world government, we've come to believe. Assange, a massive, handsome man (some say), has been positioned as a potential leader of whatever is going to take place.
Another prediction we made for a long time was that the Muslim Brotherhood was being deliberately empowered in the Middle East in order to create religious tension between East and West. This then allows for the further implementation of anti-terrorist legislation that is extremely invasive and drains freedom from the West. That's happening, too.
The idea is to generate increasing levels of control throughout society. The mechanism is mercantilism, which allows those at the very top to gain and keep virtually unlimited power, as they are exempt from the laws and regulations being inflicted on everyone else.
Those practicing modern mercantilism have MORE power than previous kings and queens, as no one can currently prove exactly who they are and what their standing is. Being unaccountable, they are literally untrammeled.
It is important to note, however, that the topmost element does not work in "jobs" as we conceive of employment. That is, these people are NOT bankers and corporate tycoons.
Using this context, we can see that the article, posted at World News Curator, is part of a larger dominant social theme that seeks to promote the idea of the "one percent."
This is a theme near and dear to the hearts of the elite as it allows them to point fingers at those who have succeeded within the system as it is but have no real power over it. Those who control central banks in the modern era have the power. A handful of enablers and associates are also empowered for certain purposes, and these constitute the inner circle, from what we can tell. Everyone else is basically just a gofer.
When an article like this postulates that Western banking and business elites "have the most to lose" from the coming "new" world order, we consider the concept most questionable.
Another meme that the article promotes is that China and the BRICs generally are rising up and diminishing Western power. But this is by design, in our view.
Europe and the US, from what we can tell, are being brought down while Asia and certain developing countries like Brazil are being raised up. The tool in use is the central bank that can create both booms and busts almost at will.
The West's topmost elites, the ones that control central banking, are as firmly entrenched as ever, in our view. Those who will be inconvenienced by the efflorescence of global government will be a secondary tier of political, banking, military and industrial types – those who may believe they are among the "untouchables" but actually are not. They may find this out over time to their dismay.
As for the emergence of China and other powers to challenge Western "dominance" ... well, this also seems perfectly predictable and we don't believe that such an emergence is in any way an unforeseen or untoward development.
It is all part of what may be called directed history. The creation of global governance demands all sorts of stresses and strains. Only from fear and chaos can a new global society emerge. Enemies are necessary. The Soviet Union is no more, so new enemies have to be identified.
Terrorists are one such enemy. The war on terror is very useful because it is an amorphous one that can be used in any of a number of ways.
A terrorist, after all, is someone who has been branded as such by government officials. In the 21st century, many people who believe in freer, smaller societies will be labeled (ironically) as terrorists. And many bankers and industrialists will be labeled as part of the world's controlling "elite."
Conclusion: As Ayn Rand would say: Check your premises ....
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by alaska3636 on 12/28/12 03:17 PM
DB: ... as Orwell predicted - or was instructed to predict
Are you suggesting that Orwell's dystopian vision might have been co-opted by the power elite as a kind of introduction to a more concerted directed history operation?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Yes.
 |
Posted by rossbcan on 12/28/12 09:15 AM
BR: "and, I didn't state: "powerless", I stated cannot "force", but, "can manipulate". The peoples they have genocided were not "forced" to do anything but "not exist"."
In other words, "you can lead a horse to water, but you CANNOT make it drink"
... an eternal truth.
... calibrate to the EXACT nature of your enemies and, you avoid wasting resources on their bluffs, retaining them for surgical strikes at their most vulnerable points, which is evidence (for the court of "public opinion") that THEY are "disturbing the peace", assaulting civilization, the generalization of TRUE LAW, already "on the books":
Click to view link
 |
Posted by Abu Aardvark on 12/28/12 06:20 AM
"HOT: Facebook Suspends Alex Jones Page and Luke Rudkowski Page ... Infowars reports:
The following is a list of Facebook accounts operated by individuals in the alternative media that have been shut down by Facebook staff over the past 24 hours. Infowars writer Aaron Dykes and political dissident Brandon J. Raub have also had their accounts deleted. Raub was snatched by police and forcibly imprisoned in a psychiatric ward earlier this year for posting political content on Facebook. Infowars editor Kurt Nimmo also had his account suspended this morning.
Kurt Nimmo (account suspended)
Aaron Dykes (account inactive)
Brandon J. Raub (account inactive)
Michael F Rivero (account inactive)
Anthony J Hilder (account inactive)
William Lewis (account inactive)
Richard Gage (account inactive)
William Rodriguez (account inactive)
Infowar Artist (account inactive)
We are Change (account inactive)
Wacboston At Twitter (account inactive)
Michael Murphy Tmp (account inactive)
Robert M Bowman (account inactive)
Peter Dale Scott (account inactive)
Jason Infowars (account inactive)
Mike Skuthan (account inactive)
Packy Savvenas (account inactive)
Sean Wright (account inactive)"
Click to view link
 |
Posted by Agent Revolver on 12/28/12 04:43 AM
Good evening, DB,
"those who evidently and obviously revolve around and control 150 central banks worldwide" [reply from The Daily Bell]" - I would rather vote for replacing "revolve" with "circulate" or "orbit"... though, exterrants would argue the "orbit" as well (-:
|
Posted by jonnyandsammy on 12/28/12 03:56 AM
Hi DB & reader's .
Does Michael Tsarion 'Irish origin's of civilisation' tie in with CS Lewis & J R R Tolkiens' work's ,-that were mentioned below..
..stunning 5-part You-Tube set of video's Tsarion has ; only wish i'd viewed them earlier !
Thank-You-kindly.
|
Posted by bionic mosquito on 12/27/12 10:59 PM
"This is obviously the point."
Yes. I started to realize this about the moment I hit the "Post" button... the more I thought about it the more I decided that I answered my own question.
|
Posted by bionic mosquito on 12/27/12 06:08 PM
"National Socialist Germany was perhaps a dry run for what is to come ... "
I remain open to this, and have read DB's views on this recently.
Up until now, I felt any "ism" would do (and it did not have to be the same "ism" everywhere), as long as the "ism" allowed for centralizing control - certainly of money, but also education.
In fact, the more that the "ism" pretended to allow freedom, the easier the control for the elite (the USA being the best example, where those controlled embrace their controllers; unlike a 'ism' like communism, where those controlled have no doubt about their position in life).
DB, may I ask... I understand the benefits of a fascist model - state and big business, etc. As businesses become global, the "state" will become global as well. This is very compelling.
But there is a part of the National Socialist version that I always felt was un-exportable - the "National" part. There was something inherent in the German / Hitler model of race superiority and therefor race hate.
How do you see this divisive characteristic contributing to the elite desire of common globalization? Or will the divisiveness be used and exaggerated to help perpetuate ongoing, low-grade war?
Reply from The Daily Bell
"Or will the divisiveness be used and exaggerated to help perpetuate ongoing, low-grade war?"
This is obviously the point. Nationalism is indeed a form of divisiveness and any will do. Even when the "world is one" as Orwell predicted - or was instructed to predict - there will still be blocks or factions pitted against each other. The war on terror is one obvious example of a flexible enemy. They will utilize this age-old strategy up until the final culling. That seems to be the way they think ...
 |
Posted by dave jr on 12/27/12 04:52 PM
DB: "But it still seems to us that Germany is closest to the model they have adopted generally for the West".
I think Germany for themselves, China for all the rest.
 |
Posted by Don from the Republic of Lakotah on 12/27/12 03:39 PM
@DB, @dave jr
Each peer server (ie Personal Computer) using the open-source Click to view link software decides for itself what it wants to include in its index and what, if anything, it wants to share from its index. It's open-source software, which means that any competent programmer can easily spot any embedded malware.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks.
|
Posted by dave jr on 12/27/12 03:01 PM
How many experiments were there? East/west Germany, North/south Korea, North/south Vietnam. Some faired better than others. Then they laid the cash down for a contract with the largest human trafficing operation on the planet -China.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Indeed, one could argue they've been experimenting with social control for the entirety of the 20th century. But it still seems to us that Germany is closest to the model they have adopted generally for the West.
|
Posted by dave jr on 12/27/12 02:48 PM
"... to bring the productive populations of Germany and Japan under the control of the elite."
And to weaken the German people, they had to be broken in two, east/west.
Don't forget the resources. The treaty was all about the middle east.
|
Posted by bionic mosquito on 12/27/12 02:39 PM
DB: It's perhaps the only explanation that makes sense in our view ...
BM: I concur. I will add: it was necessary to create an enemy to communism (Hitler / National Socialism) in order for the Anglos to join with communism - thus strengthening communism for the purpose of ensuring a perpetual enemy. The cold war.
Perpetual war for perpetual health of the state.
Click to view link
For those who don't want to click through, a snippet:
I have commented previously that I believe (at least given my current understanding) the main purpose for U.S. entry into the [Second World] war was two-fold: 1) to take the place of an increasingly ailing Britain as the primary tool for the elite to expand global control, and 2) to ensure a new, long term enemy can be made out of the Soviet Union and communism. I will add a third to this list - actually it is a subset of the first: to bring the productive populations of Germany and Japan under the control of the elite.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Just excellent.
4. They apparently do everything several times. National Socialist Germany was perhaps a dry run for what is to come ...
|
Posted by dave jr on 12/27/12 02:39 PM
DB: Maybe someone can explain the decentralization ...
The hubs are not manned, or so were told. But the filters are installed.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks.
|
Posted by urzaha on 12/27/12 02:02 PM
DB- I don't get why you are promoting the idea the the power elite financed the Nazis. Was the total destruction of Germany part of the plan, with the elite of Germany scampering off to Argentina(and Werner Von Braun types smuggled into the USA) later to emerge as masters of the NWO?
Reply from The Daily Bell
Directed history: Hitler was a patsy, manipulated first into power and then into a war that was necessary to create the UN, IMF, World Bank etc. It's perhaps the only explanation that makes sense in our view ...
|
Posted by bionic mosquito on 12/27/12 01:48 PM
DB: Those who will be inconvenienced by the efflorescence of global government will be a secondary tier of political, banking, military and industrial types - those who may believe they are among the "untouchables" but actually are not.
BM: A great paper (actually a graduation speech) given by CS Lewis, directly on this point of 'The Inner Ring':
Click to view link
'There are no formal admissions or expulsions. People think they are in it after they have in fact been pushed out of it, or before they have been allowed in: this provides great amusement for those who are really inside. It has no fixed name. The only certain rule is that the insiders and outsiders call it by different names.'
Lewis captured it well in his novel, 'That Hideous Strength':
Click to view link
Reply from The Daily Bell
Wow, thanks! Lewis knew of course, as did Tolkien. They formed a tiny writing group together. This knowledge informs a lot of Tolkien's writing, it would seem, as well. Interesting that Lewis and Tolkien were Oxford dons ...
"Lewis was a prolific writer, and his circle of literary friends became an informal discussion society known as the "Inklings", including J. R. R. Tolkien, Nevill Coghill, Lord David Cecil, Charles Williams, Owen Barfield, and his brother Warren Lewis." -Wikipedia
|
Posted by Don from the Republic of Lakotah on 12/27/12 01:24 PM
It goes without saying that the DB and I see eye-to-eye on central bankster bullskit. In my humble opinion, misdirection via dilution-pollution poses the greatest threat to our Internet Reformation. Dilution-pollution occurs when the powers-that-be (centralized search engines in this case) muddy the waters by treating one wire story that appears under thousands of different mastheads as unique for each masthead. And thereby amplifying the story thousands of times. A relatively new peer-to-peer search engine named Click to view link may mitigate central search engine pathogens.
Reply from The Daily Bell
This seems great. Maybe someone can explain the decentralization ...
|
Posted by rossbcan on 12/27/12 12:48 PM
DB: "You've got to be kidding. Throughout history Money Power and brute force have "forced" the issue on any one of a number of fronts. Tens of millions died in USSR gulags and tens of millions more may soon die in modern gulags. Somehow you come to the conclusion that elites excercising this power are actually powerless."
"in the long run"
people have died, yes, that is a "permanent accomplishment". However, they have been replaced by new people, with the same longing for freedom, fighting the same battles, this time prevailing. The gulags are gone, replaced by stealth gulags, a loss for elites. If they have to scurry in the shadows, THEY admit the majority will not toleate them.
what you don't seem to get is that elites have struck at the core of humanity, our collective ability to survive. Pushback is and will happen until we "can survive". If elites continue on the "we cannot survive" path, they, as parasites are also insuring their own non-survival. If ANY of them are sane, they will "step back", a prediction that DB also makes.
How can DB square the circle of "omnipotent elites" with "they will step back"?
and, I didn't state: "powerless", I stated cannot "force", but, "can manipulate". The peoples they have genocided were not "forced" to do anything but "not exist".
Overestimating your enemy is just as deadly in war as underestimating your enemy.
 |
Posted by amanfromMars on 12/27/12 12:46 PM
"Dave jr this was the issue we were addressing!
"There is one group who has the most to lose from this change - the corporate and banking elite."
We are arguing the elite - as understood by this author - is not the true elite. It likely refers to the heads of multinationals and the heads of big banks. The "heads" do NOT possess the real power in our view. They are in a sense functionaries.
We tried again to be very clear where the REAL power lies, with those who evidently and obviously revolve around and control 150 central banks worldwide." …. Reply from The Daily Bell
Both Power and Control derive from Intelligence Provided. So who and/or what are providing elites their supposed diamond grade information …. MetaDataBase Core Ore in Quantum Communication Circles of Powerful Control for Perfect Command?
Who provides the state of global plays tomorrow, with one small move that ripples around worlds? That is Source Kernel?!.
|
Posted by dave jr on 12/27/12 12:02 PM
"We tried again to be very clear where the REAL power lies, with those who evidently and obviously revolve around and control 150 central banks worldwide."
I think I agreed?
But is it just the central banks? Could the "owners"/controllers be one in the same, or at least in league with, the biggest multi-national corporations? There is one common trait. They love their monopoly.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Agreed. We often write, "central banks and their enablers and associates." These not need be, of course, the "heads" of multinationals. "Owners" yes - though we question the control of some of these owners as well ...
|
Posted by dave jr on 12/27/12 11:30 AM
It is difficult to read these excerpts from articles pointed out by the DB without flying into a tirade over the inconsistencies and contradictions in that article. This one too, but I see a piece of information that may have leaked through.
'There is one group who has the most to lose from this change - the corporate and banking elite' - World News Curator
This may have some alignment with DB's insight, 'Those who will be inconvenienced by the efflorescence of global government will be a secondary tier of political, banking, military and industrial types - those who may believe they are among the "untouchables" but actually are not.'
What we have witnessed in the last 30+ years is a tremendous amount of mergers, acquisitions, buyouts and outright monopoly building for empire. I call those at the top 'the owners', though maybe not on paper as they prefer to remain behind a curtain; but in the sense of having control…owners of resource and the technological productive capacity.
As far as I am concerned, the NWO is here. It just hasn't been legitimized and streamlined yet. There has an army of useful idiots in banking, industry and government deployed to help bring it about, and who believe they are on the inside…an elite. Maybe there will be a lot of fall out once this army is no longer needed. Elitists such as this author at the World News Curator may one day feel fortunate having a job digging ditches.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Dave jr this was the issue we were addressing!
"There is one group who has the most to lose from this change - the corporate and banking elite."
We are arguing the elite - as understood by this author - is not the true elite. It likely refers to the heads of multinationals and the heads of big banks. The "heads" do NOT possess the real power in our view. They are in a sense functionaries.
We tried again to be very clear where the REAL power lies, with those who evidently and obviously revolve around and control 150 central banks worldwide.
|
|
