Sorry DB. Most Americans could care less about pretty much anything with maybe the exception of the next Ipad or who's gonna be in the Super Bowl. Sure, you can corner them into agreeing with a few things but as soon as they walk away it's down the old memory hole.

Extreme pain economically, militarily or both might temporarily jolt them out of their trance but by then the country and world will lie in ruin. The PTB,,,,, they will probably survive in any scenario. As before, they just pick up the remains and start again...

Reply from The Daily Bell

We have often projected that the best that can be hoped for is that "they" will have to take "a step back" ... Perhaps they shall. Time will tell ...

Clark and his interviewer never get around to questioning at a basic level.
Both rather reflect the elite perspective.

Of course Iran has as much "right" to nuclear power (including nuclear weaponry) in an abstract sense as any other sovereign state.

This does not suit Israel (never mentioned), however, and thus AIPAC dragoons the bought-and-paid-for US congresscrooks to posture belligerently.

It would seem that ONLY the possession of nuclear deterrence (under present conditions) has any hope--apart from submission, of course--of maintaining sovereignty.

Back in 1917-1923, a genocide of the Russian empire people took place. An army of Jewish thugs with American and British Banking Oligarchy money using lies and fraudulent claims that they were socialist who were bringing freedom and prosperity to working people were able to achieve their objectives to destroy the Russian Empire, slaughter its people, and destroy their identities and their culture.

These thugs and their masters (the West Banking Oligarchy - WBO) were able to succeed because people did not have any information about these sadistic gangsters true intention and the West media was, as now, the active player in the crime.

Thanks to Internet, these sources of truth are now/still available to masses. Now, as back in 1917, the West Banking Oligarchy is trying to do something similar to people of America and Europe. However, the availability of information revealing the true objectives, intentions, and plans of the WBO will make their implementation much more difficult. This is only way to save the world from a holocaust of this monsters.

Wow. He sure did a U-turn. I remember telling someone at work we were going to war with Iran in the near future. That was about 2 years ago and he didn't believe me in the slightest.

Ta for the "abiotic oil" pointer as well, DB. This looks interesting!

There have been many reformations; the phenomenon of the Gutenberg press making books so that more people could become educated was one. But the French Revolution, as was the American, were precipitated by the same advances in technology.. printing the ideas of others.. an in the late 18th Century, it was cheap pamphlets which people could print up and pass out. This was a way around the control of the elite who could afford to have books printed. Today, after a century or more of elitist media... papers, radio, television... . we do have the internet. And just as surely as in the past, we will have or reformation/revolution.
Some people have said that huge changes cannot happen overnight. They are wrong. It has taken a long time to prepare for change. But as with past revolutions, when the population has been heated up sufficiently, there is a spontaneous flash-over that nearly instantly mobilizes the population. Leaderless and without taking direction, they know exactly what needs to be done, and they do it.

Yes, I noticed the misdirection about Africa. The Libya war was all about Africa since Libya is the gate to Africa.

Click to view link

The discussion on Iran has thus far focused on whether Iran is developing nuclear weapons and the US war party is using the same intimidation tactic as the Iraq war propaganda, that Iran may use their supposed nuclear weapons against the US.

My own interest has been more in what the Iranians are thinking (not what they are saying in public forums since they may be just as untrustworthy in this regard as the US and Israel).

I watched an Iranian government documentary that gave me a fairly clear idea of what they expect to happen and what they plan to do. I though I had saved it but cannot find it. It was in Farsi with English subtitles and gave the Iranian view of what is happening from the point of view of the Hadith, the Islamic written traditions with especial emphasis on their eschatology. Given that Iran is an Islamic Republic organised along religious lines with the Islamic law as their guide it is reasonable to believe that they view their scriptures as being authoritative and will act accordingly.

The message of the documentary is that all the pieces are now in place for the final war and the return of the Mahdi, the Islamic Messiah. The personalities in power have all been foretold and identified. The most critical fact is that Iran will not initiate any attacks on anyone until they themselves are attacked. They will then proceed with supernatural help to defeat their enemies who include Saudi Arabia and Israel and they will raise their flag in Jerusalem.

The reason I find this scenario persuasive is not because I believe this version of the coming world events but because they have a definite view of who will initiate the conflict and it cannot be themselves. Therefore no matter the provocation, as long as it stops short of an outright military assault on Iran, the Iranians will not be provoked into attacking first.

It has also been alleged incidentally that Saudi Arabia has nuclear weapons and an early warning radar system atop Jabal al Lawz the mountain in Arabia claimed to be the one known in the Bible as Mount Sinai.

I don't think it's taken out of context or fake. Nor does it indicate a conspiracy - at least, not as I understand that term. The job of strategic analysts in the military is to anticipate and prepare for future wars, including some very remote possibilities. The example cited in military courses is Plan Orange, which was in effect between WW1 and WW2 and provided for the possibility of a war with Great Britain. I doubt that any of the military planners who wrote the plan really believed we would end up at war with the British, but due to the conflict at the highest levels of the US government between anglophiles and anglophobes, it was a possibility, albeit a remote one. Likewise as early as the Seventies it became clear that there was going to be more trouble in the Middle East, either from Islamic fundamentalists (e.g. Khomeini) or from secular dictatorships (e.g. Saddam), and that there was a significant probability that the US military would be ordered to intervene. Any senior officer who would NOT prepare for that eventuality would not be doing his job. That is not quite the same thing as saying that the military pushed the country into it.

"... they'll pick up the remains and start again"

and again,... . until they find themselves receiving some of their own Romanoff medicine.

The difference now from the past, is that we didn't know what or who. Now they've exposed their satanic selves and their cruel intentions. When they fail this time, they will pay a heavy price. Their extinction. It's either them... . or US. I have my money... (err... gold), on US.

Good for him.

Good for him.

the US should declare war on Iran. See how long it will take the US to two million like they did in Iraq. Maybe this time if they use enough depleated uranium they can cause one million deformed babies instead of the 500,000 in Iraq. With each war the military industrial complex get better and more efficient at killing while most of America rejoices like they did with the illegal Iraqi war. Maybe the US can create another Highway of Death. The slaughter on this highway was a master piece by our military.

I did a google search "nations without a central bank controlled by Rothschild" and came across several sources that as of 2000, there were only 7: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, North Korea, Cuba, and Iran. These countries somewhat line up with Clark's list. Bottom line, IMO, is that it's all about control. I can see where Syria & Lebanon are necessary to overcome to get to Iran. If the elite subdues the countries on Clark's list, it shouldn't be difficult to pressure North Korea and Cuba into submission. BTW, there's only one candidate for president who is against war with Iran: Ron Paul.

Here is the link to the Iranian government documentary that I mentioned in my previous feedback:

Click to view link