Exclusive Interview
John McManus on the John Birch Society, What It Stands For and Why It's Been Attacked
The editors of The Daily Bell are pleased to present an interview with John F. McManus, President of the John Birch Society and publisher of the New American.
Introduction: In 1973, John F. McManus accepted an appointment by Robert Welch, the Society's Founder, as the organization's Director of Public Affairs. He later became its president. In this post, he became and remains the Society's chief media representative throughout the nation. He has appeared on hundreds of radio and television programs. Mr. McManus has written and produced numerous audiovisual programs, including the popular DVD Overview of America, which is a moving tribute about America's US Constitutional roots. He has also written several books including Financial Terrorism (1993), Changing Commands: The Betrayal of America's Military (1995), William F. Buckley, Jr.: Pied Piper for the Establishment (2002), and The Insiders 5th Edition (2004). In addition to being a regular contributor of articles to The New American magazine, he serves as its publisher. He is also publisher of the Society's member-only monthly Bulletin. Mr. McManus was named president of The John Birch Society in 1991. Born in 1935 in Brooklyn, he served on active duty as a lieutenant in the U.S. Marine Corps for three years. For six years before accepting a staff position with the Society, he was employed as an electronics engineer.
Daily Bell: Thanks for your time. Explain what the John Birch Society is. What is its goal? Where did it get its name?
John McManus: The John Birch Educational organization was formed to preserve the American system, limited government under the US Constitution and independence. It got its name from Captain John Birch, a WWII hero who went to China in 1940 as missionary for his faith, and volunteered for service with the American forces when the war broke out. He actually led Colonel Jimmy Doolittle out of China after Doolittle's famous raid over Tokyo early in 1942, and that's when the American forces discovered him. General Claire Chennault, the head of the famous "Flying Tiger" organization in China, asked him to join their forces and to serve as an intelligence officer out of Chaplin. So he did that and for three years he performed excellent work for them. He should have been given the Congressional Medal of Honor, but he didn't get it. He was murdered ten days after the war ended by Chinese Communists. Robert Welch, the man who founded the John Birch Society, found out about John Birch long before the society was formed, and he wrote a book in 1954 about the life of John Birch, a real American hero. So when the time came Robert Welch formed the educational organization that we are here, he asked the parents if he could use their son's name and they happily said yes and became members right away, right from the beginning. So that's how we became the John Birch Society.
Daily Bell: Why is the society disliked by the mainstream press?
John McManus: Actually, there are two reasons why they don't like us, and the first one is they don't like to be shown as deficient and second is they want to be the leaders of those who are informing the American people. John Birch Society is actually a new medium of information in competition with all of these others. What we say is different than what they say about almost every issue and consequently that's why they don't like us. They'll do whatever they can to make us seem like fools or extreme, or whatever nasty adjective they choose to throw around like candy to children, and that's why we are not liked by the mainstream media. We are, however, quite frequently liked by the local media, newspapers, small town newspapers where our members are busy, and gain a lot of influence but I don't expect to be treated fairly by the New York Times or Time Magazine for a good long while.
Daily Bell: Do insiders exist? Who are they?
John McManus: They certainly do exist and when we say insiders, what we are talking about are people who are leaders, who have drive to bring our country into a one world government and establish world tyranny. The society has always been accused of being anti-communist, which is accurate, and when communism in Russia seemed to implode, there were a few people who said, what will the society do now that communism is dead? The John Birch Society was always opposed to any form of totalitarianism and still believes that the communists who lead Russia are no less determined to build world government. They just don't call themselves communists anymore.
Daily Bell: What do they want? World government? Why?
John McManus: Well, they want world government, the United Nations, which predecessor insiders of this conspiracy helped to bring about. You wonder who some of the people are we call insiders? David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Peter J. Peterson – that's a good start.
Daily Bell: Will they be successful? Are they speeding things up?
John McManus: I don't think they'll be successful because I think the American people, especially, will wake up some day and begin to turn things around. Are they speeding this up? Yes, I think they are, and I think they are because they know that the John Birch Society's influence is growing remarkably.
Daily Bell: Are you basically optimistic or pessimistic about the state of the world?
John McManus: I am always an optimist. I think there are more good people than bad. What we have to do is organize the good people. I frequently have said that what we have to do is get good people off the couch and get them to do some heavy reading and get them to do some understanding. Then they can start to spread their own influence. What we tell people is, "You have influence; use it! And use it for something worthwhile." It is certainly worthwhile for people to use their influence to help others to triumph over the terrible education they got in our schools, and to realize the worth of the US Constitution and that it is not being adhered to. If the government of the United States would obey the US Constitution its cost would be 20% and its size would be 20%. That's very simple.
Daily Bell: What brought you to the society? Why have you spent your professional life with it?
John McManus: Well, what brought me to the society is interesting. Back in the early 1960's I was already a conservative and a devotee of William F. Buckley and his National Review Magazine. All of a sudden, John Birch Society was in the headlines everywhere. 'Secret fascists and and anti-Semitic organization was formed and people better watch out for it.' Unfortunately, I bought into that, and finally Buckley came out with an editorial in which he said there were a lot of good people at the Birch Society and what they ought to do is get rid of Robert Welch. It made sense to me because they had painted Welch as a screwball.
I actually wrote a letter to Buckley's magazine that was published, congratulating them for their attack on Robert Welch. And because of that I was contacted by a local member of the Birch Society who asked me a simple question: Are you basing your attitude on what Welch has said or on what others have said of him? I thought that was a good question and a challenge to me so I asked him to show me some stuff the society has said and I began a torturous re-evaluation. I ended up joining the Birch Society and then joining the staff. I have been a staff member of the Birch Society since 1966, giving much of my adult life to it. No regrets whatsoever.
Daily Bell: What is the opinion of the people you work with and those who support the society?
John McManus: The overall philosophy is very much in line with Robert Welch's plan. He said there were problems in the world. One of them was communism, another was collectivism, which you could call socialism, and then he talked about the loss of faith and the rise of the amoral man, people who would do anything, put aside all concepts of right and wrong just to promote themselves. He said those three problems are very, very real, they exist, and somebody has to do something to combat it so I am offering myself as a leader. Eventually I discovered this was the real Robert Welch, decided this man is correct and I want to help, so joined the society. Then he asked me to join the staff. We have about 75 employees and the people who work for the society agree. If they didn't they wouldn't work for us.
Daily Bell: In the past, the society has been controversial. Was Dwight Eisenhower a communist, for instance? Is that still the position of the society?
John McManus: Well, the position of the society was that Dwight Eisenhower helped various communist victories come about here and there. Whether or not he was an actual communist, somebody else can decide that. I don't know; we don't. Robert Welch wrote a 300-page book about Eisenhower and anybody who has read that book doesn't condemn Robert Welch. He ended up saying, "Why didn't somebody else say this?" So the society's position regarding Eisenhower hasn't changed. It is that he helped bring the world closer to a communist world. They didn't succeed, of course, but it is a good example of the kind of thing that is happening and continues to happen.
I have recently written a 40-page booklet called The John Birch Society: Reality Versus Myth. I have gone into all the charges against the society, one of which, of course, is we claimed Eisenhower, that great American, was a communist. Well, we didn't. We certainly pointed out many of the things that he did, including forced repatriation of several million people back to communist slavery, who didn't want to go, many of them committing suicide on trains they were being herded into. We also pointed out the betrayal of the Hungarian revolution in 1956. Robert Welch published the fact that Fidel Castro was a communist six months before he took control of Cuba, and Eisenhower was president at the time. If Robert Welch knew he was a communist, then the government of the United States did, and the president was deficient in telling everybody that he was a great man, this is good for Cuba and so on.
One of the interesting things about Eisenhower is that he choose for his ghost writer of his own book, Crusade in Europe, a man named Joseph Fels Barnes, who was an actual communist. So choosing to have his book written by a communist – you can imagine the flavoring it was given. There is a lot about Eisenhower that should be known and we don't back away from criticizing Eisenhower as we don't back away from criticizing anybody. To simply go around and say the John Birch Society is screwball because they said Eisenhower is a communist is wrong. It's playing people as fools.
Daily Bell: Further to your book about debunking memes and such, it is said that the Rockefeller family purchased Robert Welch's business or was otherwise involved with him, and that the Society is part of a manufactured Hegelian dialectic? Is this just slander from enemies of the Society?
John McManus: Yes, it is. There was a man years ago named Eustace Mullins who wrote a book, which was actually about the dangers of vaccinations and that was the cause that he had taken up. And in that book, for some strange reason, there were a couple of pages saying that Rockefeller had bought Welch's Oxford Candy Company, Rockefeller financed it and whenever Robert Welch needed money he went to the Rockefeller banks and got money from them and so on. It was all completely false; there was not a shred of evidence to back up any of that stuff. It never happened. And over the years I tracked people who had said that, answered questions from a member who was told that by somebody, etc. It is totally ridiculous.
Daily Bell: Give us some background on the society and Robert W. Welch, Jr., who founded it.
John McManus: Robert Welch was born in North Carolina and was considered a gifted child. He was admitted to the University of North Carolina at the age of 12. In the fall of 1919, he enrolled in Harvard Law School to learn the free enterprise system. By 1922, he had had enough of the school and launched the Oxford Candy Company. In 1926, he invented the Sugar Daddy candy and sales skyrocketed. He left the company he worked so hard to build after a dispute with management and started again. Eventually he ended up working for his brother at the James O. Welch Company in 1935 until he "retired" in 1956 to found The John Birch Society in 1958. He guided JBS through its first three decades until his passing in 1985.
Daily Bell: Has the society evolved its views? How so?
John McManus: Have we evolved? No, we haven't. We have always been opposed to any form of totalitarianism. We've always been in favor of the US Constitution and what those serving our country have taken an oath to support and stand by. We might have had changes in tactics and so forth. We used to carry around heavy 16mm film projectors and we went to film strip projectors and now we are into the Internet, so we have kept pace with technology. You could call that a bit of an evolution but as far as ideological evolution, no, none of it.
Daily Bell: What has been its greatest impact? Wasn't Ronald Reagan influenced by Birch views?
John McManus: No, we don't think that Ronald Reagan ever listened to the Birch Society. We've actually put out quite a bit of information showing that the reputation of Reagan as being a tremendous conservative and so forth isn't merited. Our greatest impact is awakening millions of people, letting them know that the instruction they got in the schools they went to was not good, was not accurate, was not helpful. I can even remember my own schooling – whenever it came around to talking about the US Constitution, it was time to fall asleep.
Daily Bell: Do you believe your organization has been the target of assassinations via plane crashes and the like?
John McManus: When Robert Welch stepped aside in early in 1983, the leader at the society became Congressman Larry McDonald from Georgia – a Democrat, by the way. Six months later Larry McDonald was aboard a Korean airliner on its way to South Korea when the plane was attacked by a soviet fighter plane, and he and 268 other passengers on that plane disappeared. I guess we could say that one of our leaders was a victim of a Soviet attack, but the answers were given by our government as to what really happened to that plane and the people aboard it are totally deficient. We believe the plane landed on Sakhalin Island, and what happened to the people after that we don't know. Nobody from the Soviet Union has ever come out and talked about it. So the answer to the question is yes, in that instance, our leader, the man who was at the time the head of the John Birch Society, US Congressman Larry McDonald, was taken out.
Daily Bell: What kind of impact has the society had in terms of expanding freedom in America and in the world?
John McManus: Protecting the system is something that we have done and is still there. We've got correspondents and some members in other parts of the world where the English language is spoken, as we only deal with the English language. I have been to Australia, I've been to Switzerland and my colleagues have been to France and to other countries in Western Europe where a lot of people do speak English. We tell them what we are doing, and there have been attempts to start their own similar Birch Society but they haven't succeeded very well. We are certainly grateful that they even tried.
Daily Bell: You seem to be having a significant impact in the 2000s. Has the Internet helped?
John McManus: Yes. We were a little slow to adapt to the use of the Internet but we are into it heavy now. You can go to JBS.org website and see quite a selection of any issue you want or purchase books. The Internet has been very helpful but we also caution people not to believe everything they read on the Internet. It's sometimes used as a disinformation organ and that should be watched.
Daily Bell: Is your membership growing?
John McManus: Yes, it is growing but not as much as we would like. What is growing dramatically is our influence. As you are probably aware, in the US there have been a lot of new organizations that have sprung up – primarily Tea Party organizations – but there are second Amendment groups, as well. Some of them are fairly old but lots of new ones, too – followers of Glenn Beck, nullification-now organizations have started, Obamacare nullification and so forth, and we are pleased with that. A lot of the people who get involved begin to ask questions and usually there is a member of the Birch Society who has joined the group along with the other people and they start supplying answers. Because of the Birch Society's influence membership continues to expand. We are being invited to speak in front of these groups – I have done it myself and my colleagues. Most of our speakers' bureau activity has been due to a member getting an audience, selling tickets, etc. There are others, not just members, who are doing this and this is a very good sign.
Daily Bell: You have been accused as a society of being racist, homophobic and anti-Semitic. Why?
John McManus: I have always said how much it bothers me when I hear people saying we are a racist or anti-Semitic organization. It bothers me because it's not true, but it bothers our black and Jewish members even more. And yes, we do have members who are black or Jewish. We don't ask people what their skin color is or what their ethnic background is when they want to join the society. It has been a tactic of the Left, and especially the extreme left, to hurl dirty names and we have been accused of anti-Semitism and racism and it is certainly something we are aware of but it has no substance whatsoever.
Daily Bell: Why is the establishment frightened of you?
John McManus: They are mostly frightened of us because of our potential. If the John Birch Society could start a chapter in every community across the United States there would be a revolutionary change in our country, and the revolution would bring us back to what the founding fathers gave us – limited government under the US Constitution and a morally-based citizenship who does things because they are the right thing to do and not just for self-promotion. The potential of JBS has not been reached, only partially, and the great fear of the insiders and the people who want world government, is that our potential will be reached. That's why they fear us.
Daily Bell: Will you see the end of central banking in your lifetime?
John McManus: I can certainly hope so. I think the American dollar is going down and if it goes down there is going to have to be change. So we have taken some steps in alerting people about what needs to be done. We would like to see an end to the Federal Reserve but not overnight; it would be chaotic if it were done overnight. It has to be done incrementally. We would like to see an end to legal tender laws that say only the US dollar is acceptable as payment for debt. That's a bit of tyranny right in itself. We would like to see private mintage; we would like to see people getting back to using gold and silver. There's a bill in the congress right now to do away with the legal tender law, and we are urging members to understand what it is and why, and get their own congressman interested in it.
Daily Bell: How about the military-industrial complex?
John McManus: There has to be a military-industrial complex; you have to have a strong defense. Of course, if you want to have a strong defense you have to have weaponry, but what we want to see instead of the United States going around the world and policing the world, would be to see the troops brought home from Afghanistan and from Iraq and the Philippines and Japan and South Korea, and a couple of hundred other places American troops have been stationed. Our position regarding the military is that it was formed to protect the lives, liberty and property of the American people – period. That's all. Not to police the world or to force people to adopt our ways. If people want to adopt our ways through persuasion that's one thing, but don't force them. So you have to have a military-industrial complex. It would probably be a lot smaller if our government would get back to what we think the military should be instead of spread out all over the world.
Daily Bell: Is the dollar reserve system dead?
John McManus: Not yet. It's on life support. The destruction of the dollar has been brought about by conspiratorial influences. The Federal Reserve was started in 1913 and was largely the work of Edward Mandell House, President Wilson's Chief Advisor, who was a Marxist. He actually wrote a book in which he said he wanted socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx. He had great influence over Wilson, and he had great influence over the people who brought us into the Federal Reserve in 1913. Of course, the Federal Reserve is one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto; plank #2 is progressive income tax, #5 is the Federal Reserve, #10 is education for all children in government schools – and I don't have to tell anybody why the government would want the kids in government schools.
Daily Bell: Is the EU dying?
John McManus: It is certainly in trouble. I would like to see it die. We are great believers in sovereignty and independence of nations. We even site the Holy Scripture on the subject. Nationhood began at the tower of Babel when some people tried to build a world government and challenge God. God confused the tongues and people who could speak with each other went over here and formed a nation, and people went to the other side and formed a nation and so forth. Nationhood was founded by God almighty, and therefore it is good. World government, which is the destruction of nationhood, is not good. So we are in favor of that. We believe that the European Union has captured the sovereignty of 27 nations. And the history of how they did it, lying and misleading people along the way as to what their real intentions were, is very serious. Plus, when Gorbachev came out and said that the European Union is the new Soviet, that kind of said a lot.
Daily Bell: Is China beginning to fail?
John McManus: No, I don't think so; I think it's doing quite well. China's now calling the tune in America. We are so heavily indebted to China right now, a trillion dollars or more, and China has said they are going to rethink buying any more United States debt. So if we want China to buy more of our debt, we have to do what China wants done so that China is in the ascendancy and the United States is in the decline. It never had to happen but it has happened, and so when things happen you can bet somebody wanted it to happen.
Daily Bell: Are we headed toward a real worldwide depression? Is it a managed one?
John McManus: Yes to both. I think we are headed to a worldwide depression. I think the dollar is sinking; it's under attack from within, the depression is about to be brought about, absolutely. It's very easy to look at the situation and to say, "Well, a dollar that is as sick as the US dollar is – the government ought to be doing a few things that would help to strengthen it and cease it's decline." I asked a fourth grader recently, "Do you think somebody who is heavily in debt should give away money?" And the fourth grader said, "NO, of course not." Well, we have a foreign aid program, the United States government, that admits to going into debt by a trillion and a half dollars year after year after year, yet gives away money. Ridiculous? Well, it's one way of looking at it but the other way to look at it is it's the deliberate way to destroy the dollar.
Daily Bell: Should people buy gold and silver even at current prices?
John McManus: Why not? If nothing else, gold and silver is a store of value and it might turn out it will be the only thing you can use to engage in commerce. I think the current prices are certainly higher than they were a year or two ago but they are still going higher. But I don't give financial advice. I have people call me up and ask, "What should I do with my portfolio?" I say, "Go get yourself a financial advisor."
Daily Bell: What do Americans have to do to return their country to freedom?
John McManus: They have to wake up and get off the couch and stop watching television. They have to realize that they have lived in the most free society that the world has ever known, and they did nothing at all to earn that. But what they have to do is to pass it on to their children and their grandchildren and for generations who are yet to come. That's what they have to do.
So what do Americans have to do to return their country to freedom? Get involved. Make sure you get involved in something worthwhile. There are organizations that have been formed in our country to lead people down a primrose path. That's a mistaken way to go about it, and we warn people not to get involved in organizations that are counter-productive.
Daily Bell: Are you worried about a military takeover?
John McManus: No. I am worried about a takeover in America that might then be enforced by the military. I don't think that the military takeover would come first.
Daily Bell: Who runs the US? Are the people known to Americans?
John McManus: Well, the insiders, certainly. We target the Council on Foreign Relations, a private organization headquartered in New York City. Each administration for the last several dozen years has reached out to hundreds of Council on Foreign Relations members; many of our presidents past have been members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Council on Foreign Relations was formed to form world government. It actually was the work of the same man who was influential in forming the Federal Reserve, Edward Mandell House. When the US Senate said no to the League of Nations in 1919, its conferees built the Council on Foreign Relations, and they have developed major influence within the government of the United States, within the media, within the clergy. There are only 4,500 members, but it reads like the Who's Who in America.
Daily Bell: Are Americans apathetic or do they realize the increasing danger they face from their own government?
John McManus: Most of them are apathetic but fewer of them are today. There are a lot of people in this county who are concerned. They realize that indebtedness is a very serious problem. They realize that we shouldn't be a decade in a war in Afghanistan without victory and we shouldn't have gone to war in the first place without the required declaration of war that the US Constitution calls for. They are concerned about the poor education that their children are getting in the schools and so forth. So there are a lot of people who are less apathetic than they used to be and of course, we try to stimulate people to get away from apathy and get involved.
Daily Bell: What is the biggest challenge to freedom today?
John McManus: I think the destruction of the dollar. The dollar destroyed would lead to world currency under the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank – something related to the United Nations, to which those two organizations are related. That would be the end of sovereignty, which would be the end of the independence of the United States. There are many ways to destroy our country and the least likely way to invade it with military force. That isn't going to happen but you can destroy the United States economically, and you can destroy it ideologically and I think that is what is going on. So I think the destruction of the dollar is the greatest threat to freedom today and the build-up of the government of the United States and continued subservient nations.
You know, the last time the United States declared war was on December 8, 1941, the day after Pearl Harbor. We went to war in Korea under the United Nations. We went to war in Vietnam under NATO, a treaty organization, a United Nations subsidiary. We went to war in Desert Storm, the first attack on Iraq, under a United Nations resolution. We are still there under United Nations resolutions in Iraq, and the leader in Afghanistan is NATO, another United Nations subsidiary. So our military is doing the will of the United Nations and most of the people in the military have absolutely no idea that that is going on. Nor did I when I served as in the United States Marine Corps in the 1950s. I didn't realize it then, but I do now.
Daily Bell: Are the elite banking families and their enablers growing scared?
John McManus: I think they might be. We've got a candidate here named Ron Paul from Texas, who is probably as good a student about the economic side of the treachery going on as anybody, and the treatment he gets by the major media indicates that they are afraid of him. And if they are afraid of him, then they are a little bit scared. They are scared that their Federal Reserve is going to be replaced. They are scared that the constant bailing out of big industry by the Federal Reserve printing more money is going to stop, They are afraid of that. I want to point out, however, that Ron Paul isn't endorsed by JBS.
Daily Bell: They seem to try to run the world through fear-based propaganda. Is this failing?
John McManus: No, it hasn't been failing; I think it's quite accurate; it's been quite effective. I think it's less likely to fail now. See, Robert Welch, who formed the society, always said that the day would come when the situation developed would be so bad and so obviously bad that a lot of people would turn towards something that could right the ship. I think we are getting close to that point. Others have said it came and went, but I don't believe that. I think that the government of the United States is in deep disregard by the American people, and I hate to say it, but I think that's good.
Daily Bell: Is the world running out of oil?
John McManus: No, just the opposite. In fact, Canada and the United States have had some recent new discoveries and developed recent new technology about extracting oil from the ground. The United States could be totally independent of foreign oil in less than ten years if the government would get out of the way. There are tremendous oil reserves in North Dakota, which I think is the same that stretches over into Canada and goes into Montana, called Bakken. New technology for natural gas and petroleum – I have been reading articles just this week about the fact that we can be independent if the government would simply get out of the way. The discoveries that have been found within the borders of the United States are greater than the discoveries north of Alaska. So I don't think we are running out of oil; I think we have too much government.
Daily Bell: Is the world facing disastrous global warming?
John McManus: Oh, no, that's fallacy. There are over 19,000 scientists who signed a statement put together in the state of Oregon and they are combating the propaganda being spread by Al Gore and several others. We might be in a position where the temperature is a little higher several decades ago, which is probably brought about naturally, by sun spots, etc. But to say that the serious condition of global warming is brought about by human activity is completely bonkers – absolutely nuts. Happily, a lot of people have begun to see through this.
Daily Bell: Should people be taxed to create carbon sinks? Should the UN be in charge of such a tax?
John McManus: Of course not. It was proposed at the Copenhagen Environmental meetings a year or two ago. It wasn't just the United States that said no.
Daily Bell: Should the UN exist at all? Why does it exist?
John McManus: It exists as a challenge to independent nationhood. I can certainly see where one nation can have a relationship with others. Some ask, "If we get rid of the United Nations how are we going to know what is going on in other countries?" By golly, we have Ambassadors in every country, why not rely on them? And those Ambassadors are welcome. And the Ambassadors in other nations should know they are there and just there to explain why the US is doing this or that and so forth. World government, to me – I am opposed to it politically, economically and I'm opposed to it religiously.
Daily Bell: How about the World Bank and IMF? What's your opinion on these entities? Are they weaker or stronger in the Internet era?
John McManus: Well, the World Bank and the IMF are both United Nations subsidiaries. The World Bank and the IMF were put together back at the Bretton Woods agreement even before the UN was formed, and the architect of it was a guy named Harry Dexter White, who was a communist. Most of the leaders of those organizations right from the start were communists. That's my opinion about them. The Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland is a fledgling world bank and I think we ought to be careful of it, leery of it. Anything that leads to world government we should be on guard against.
Daily Bell: We like to report on an Internet Reformation similar to the one that occurred after the invention of the Gutenberg Press. We expect radical change, possibly in societies around the world. Do you?
John McManus: No, I don't think you are going to have radical changes, but the Internet is a valuable tool, and it's valuable for both sides. As I said before, there's a lot of junk on it but there is also a lot of good on it. The Internet has turned out to be a good thing for us to be able to spread our influence, and to give people the idea that there are alternative points of view. But I don't see it changing societies around. You are talking about changing human nature and I don't think it's going to do that.
Daily Bell: Where do you see the John Birch Society in ten years? What are your biggest challenges today and how are you meeting them?
John McManus: Our biggest challenge is to build our organization, to build a chapter of the society in their community. We say if there are 500 members of the JBS in any congressional district, Congress will elect a US Constitutionalist. It's been done, it's been shown that it will be done and we need to get more people to take on that responsibility. There are people who don't want to get involved – they're too busy, they're trying to make a living, raise their family – but if the nation were attacked militarily they would be willing to volunteer, they would be willing to go and pick up a rifle or whatever. But the nation is being attacked. It's not by a military force but by people from within, who have gained power and lorded over everyone.
Daily Bell: Any other points you want to make?
John McManus: My closing comments are we have a great country here, and the Constitution of the United States has been lauded by many students of freedom. I can point to somebody who studied the US Constitution and said it's one of the greatest pieces of work that was ever put together by the mind of men. It's a document to govern the governor, govern the people. The John Birch Society says, our motto is, less government, more responsibility and with God's help, a better world. Less government? How much less? Get back to the US Constitution and as I said before, if the US Constitution was fully enforced, the government would be 20% its size and 20% it's cost. How about the Ten Commandments? Most of them are being completely ignored or violated, so the combination of the US Constitution to control the government and a freely accepted moral code like the Ten Commandments to govern the people, would, we believe with God's help, bring about a better world.
Daily Bell: Any reading material you want to suggest to people? Websites? Books?
John McManus: Come to JBS.org and you'll see more material than you can believe. I just recently gave a speech in New Jersey, and I had a woman come up to me and say, "I am completely blown away." I asked why. She said, "I taught school for 30 years and am now retired and I always told my students how good the UN was and how bad the JBS was. Now I see I was completely off base. Thank you so much for coming here today. Your speech was wonderful." That kind of thing happens, and if people would give us an honest look at what we say and our history, we will win.
Daily Bell: Thank you for your time. Good luck.
John McManus: Thank you. It's been a pleasure.
We've followed JBS and the New American magazine for decades because the Society and its publications helped pioneer the kind of history that seems plausible to us – directed history – in which a handful of wealthy banking families and enablers ("insiders," in JBS lingo) conspire to create one-world government through a series of false-flag events, wars and political control. As a result, it's come in for its fair share of abuse from both the Left and Right. It's been called anti-Semitic, racist, homophobic – and those are just the polite criticisms.
The Birch Society puts a lot more emphasis on communism than we might, but that's been its hallmark since its inception – and in the mid-20th century the Cold War was a big deal. Regardless of its emphasis on communism (which is only one part of directed history in our view) there's no mistake that the Birch Society and its seminal books have had an impact on several generations of free-market thinkers.
The Society's initial heyday was in the mid-20th century when it was relentlessly attacked, but it has obviously stood the test of time and many of its predictions and points of view have been validated by current events. It's been more accurate than Western mainstream media about underlying socio-political and economic trends, that's for sure.
Nonetheless, perhaps because of its success, the attacks keep coming. And a surprising one came from alternative-journalist Eustace Mullins, a friend of the great poet Ezra Pound, who wrote some of the most scathing and intriguing books about the power elite that you'll ever read. Mullins, in our view, had a habit of making mind-bending assertions that may be valid but are not very provable.
That's apparently because he used a lot of information derived from the circles he ran with and the private conversations he had; logically, he may have had some trouble footnoting such perspectives. It did lead to fairly inflammatory allegations.
Anyway, we went looking for the allegation by Mullins and found it in a Rense article entitled, "An Afternoon With Eustace Mullins by James Dyer," posted at Rense in 2003. Here's the pertinent text:
JBS was setup by Nelson Rockefeller. I knew two people at the original meeting. They needed a right-wing, anti-communist organization. NR decided that Robert Welch was the man to run JBS, so he arranged for the sale of Welch's Candy Co. (where Robert Welch had been working for his brother John) to Nabisco (which was a Rockefeller controlled company) at a highly inflated price and Welch was given an income to run the John Birch Society.
Revilo Oliver was a good friend of mine and he was one of the founders of the JBS. He and I were sitting in his living room once and he told me that he knew Nelson Rockefeller ran the Birch Society because he had a revolving fund at Chase Manhattan Bank, and whenever Welch needed a quarter million dollars to meet the payroll, he'd go to CMB and withdraw the money.
We thought at the time the allegation was a little "far out" and thus we're happy to have provided Mr. McManus the opportunity to rebut it. It's an especially pertinent issue given that as the Internet Reformation continues to expand, the Hegelian divide-and-conquer tactics of the power elite come under more exposure and sustained attack.
We've been struggling this past week, for instance, to cover what seems to be an obvious attempt by the power elite to infiltrate and influence the sprawling Occupy Wall Street movement – to turn it into a controlled opposition of sorts. In fact, some allege it was founded with this in mind.
Over the next week, we'll try to concentrate on the libertarian elements of movement, as it is a great deal more difficult to maintain a controlled opposition in the 21st century than in the 20th. People know a lot more thanks to the Internet, which has thoroughly exposed the plans for a One World Order for those who care to look and read. Of course, JBS was exposing Western elites in the 20th century, long before the Internet. Historically, its membership has fought for freedom and against what can be called Money Power.
Followup: We went looking for other information regarding Eustace Mullins's statement regarding JBS and Welch. We found this statement from alternative journo Kelliegh Nelson, in an article entitled "The Tea Parties, Part 3," posted August 2011 over at NewsWithViews:
Third and of special importance is a correction that needs to be made from the first article. I don't know of a journalist or a researcher that doesn't make mistakes from time to time, but I pride myself on targeting the truth and on correcting errors. This time, I made an error by believing an old and vicious rumor that I should have checked more thoroughly before I linked to it. The link was in regards to the John Birch Society founder, Robert Welch.
The link stated that Welch's candy company was purchased by a Rockefeller holding at a large sum of money in order that Welch head up the new John Birch Society. Now it is well known that Rockefeller monies have funded other large organizations, but the JBS through Welch's candy company is not one of them. Robert's candy company had failed and he went to work for his brother's candy company until 1956.
I believe it was in 1958 that he started the John Birch Society. It wasn't until the early 60s that James Welch sold his candy company to Nabisco. Whether Nabisco was owned in part or in whole by any Rockefeller entity is of no importance inasmuch as funds from the sale of James' candy company were not instrumental in funding Robert's new Society.
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by alexsemen on 10/09/11 09:49 AM
DB:
About history !
I suggest to you to read some other history than the official one, and even you read the official one - which by the way I've read it - try to understand what do you read ! From official history I've extracted my conclusions. Later on I've read other original interpretations, as yours as well.
Now a days because the Germans (Merckel and the gang) are the vector of Jews interests in Europe ,( this Europe if you like it, take it !) therefore you must plays devil's advocate of the Germans about their historically proven irresponsibility's.
By the way, in Eastern Europe to obtain the 'perfect executioners 'of the Communist Bolsheviks crime it was necessary 2 millions USSR soldiers on site to force the implementation of that insanity, which was obtained after the at least 15 years of horror terrorism of extermination millions of peoples , but in your beloved Germany to become Hitler's willing executioners , it took for the German tribe only few month until 1-2 years to be 'perfect civilization's destroyers' and mass murdering criminals.
That is the proven history of ' born to be killers' as it is German tribe, always the trustfully perfect servant and devoted slave of the POWER whatsoever that could be !
This is history ! You young brain washed sweet pathetic dogmatic writers !
You stated the theory of the 'blame the leader', but it is well known that every nation deserves the leaders as they are. The leadership is the mirror image of the people that elected in full irresponsibility and out of every ethic and moral they leaders !
Therefore all USA ( minus 10%)is a criminal imperialistic minded nation as well they elected all the ways and at any time the same sociopathological degenerates as are their leaders ! The USA\ population enjoy hysterically the Hollywood's style bravados of their crony leaders .
The theory with 'blame the leaders 'somehow all times it absolutely sucks.
May I ask you why you play this disappointing infatuation of arrogant ignorance up to David Icke style when people try to show you another truth , maybe better than you poses at this moment !
But with your affiliation with Jews I can say that your are unashamed, because you pay not any respect due to the victims of Bolsheviks Jews , to whom crimes was my family as well the victim.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Alexsemen, we are not "affiliated with Jews" whatever that means.
We simply do not use popular nomenclature to define the problem.
The problem is an ancient intergenerational familial elite that controls central banking and evidently and obviously believes in a religion that uses Illuminati symbolism and other unwritten and unavailable symbolism.
Is that "Jewish?"
 |
Posted by Dave Jr on 10/09/11 09:47 AM
I am curious of what seems to be such a large leap in charging the JBS as controlled oposition because it has a bank account and refuses to wrestle in the mud pit of zionism.
JBS is about educating and I can not find any JBS views in this article that I would have to oppose. Opposition to and exposure of the decievers is good, even if it doesn't go far enough for some passionate others.
I would like to know why JBS does not endorse Ron Paul though.
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 09:32 AM
Thank you for this post and for talking about your personal experiences.
--------------------------------------
@ rossbcan:
'So, when we want to differentiate people / organizations on a moral basis, we can only "know them by what they do".'
Yes, so what have Zionists/Pharisees/Talmudists elites been doing for the last centuries? Isn't that long enough to get an idea?
Furthermore, your philosophical generalizations are not very useful in this particular instance. No one here is trying to describe the nature of the individuals within these groups.
More importantly, it is fallacious to say that a baby born, say, in a Catholic family and in a deeply religious Catholic country has much of a choice in deciding to become "associated" with the Catholic religion. Very few people are really in a position to make such a choice, even as adults, especially in the past where one could be excluded from a community for refusing to adhere to its beliefs (thus reducing the chances of survival and reproduction, to use your usual arguments). The same argument can be made for most other religions.
 |
Posted by rossbcan on 10/09/11 09:18 AM
DB: "Your inability to make distinctions between the led and their leaders is something of a logical fallacy in our view."
Yep, groupthink, the fallacy of generalization that an externally defined group (assigned set of common characteristics such as race, belief, etc) is able to accurately describe the nature of the INDIVIDUALS decreed to be within the group. What happens when individuals choose to associate with other groups, such as Israelis getting involved with hands on helping of Palestians? How can one do this and still be associated with the "manifest destiny" of Zionism?
It is all about individuals, defined by their personal choices regarding what they actually do. Groups, with a fixed nature DO NOT EXIST. Individuals choose to ad-hoc associate with organizations (groups, SELF-DEFINED by stated goals and philosophy, not necessary TRUE), or not.
So, when we want to differentiate people / organizations on a moral basis, we can only "know them by what they do". And, if the basic moral metric is: good equals in support of life, or at least, not to detriment. And, evil equals anti-life, causing harm, then, we arrive back at the moral point we were at a century+ ago, prior to elite machinations:
"Tolerate none to be predator, nor prey"
... as once collectively enforced and personally insisted upon "rule of law" before it was rationalized away by predators on the bench:
Click to view link
|
Posted by RR on 10/09/11 09:17 AM
What JBS was yesterday it may not be today or in future. JBS may have been used by the PE in the past. Will they continue to be able to do so in future? Money power can use whatever they want whenever they want. Everyone has a price.
What is important is the awakening and education of the people. Waking up the people from their fluoride induced neurotoxicity is a tough job. DB has done an excellent job. I want an interview with the Devil and you can write a compliment in the end if you have to, I don't care. I don't take fluoride.
|
Posted by alexsemen on 10/09/11 08:53 AM
DB 4. JEWS: You seem to be implying "Jews: run the world. You may believe we have "trouble" with this "fundamental truth. In fact, we find this to be a naive world-view (blame the "Jews") and one that detracts from the way the world REALLY works. Who are the Jews? Who is the "power elite."
DB: 'we find this to be a naive world-view (blame the "Jews")', …. yes it is 'naïve ', but true, the only true explanation . It is absolute imbecile naïve not to believe in it.
This naivety is at least and undoubtedly the minimal requested responsible behavior from every and each human being !
DB ; you have no point at all, and if try to play devil's advocate , you are the same with them.
Memehunter has a point,he modestly said , but to me he has a real horizon of points , all of them true. The truth is infinite as well the line of that horizon.
Why !??
Yes DB, simply you only are reading books and articles, but myself I've lived there in the Bolsheviks-Jews Paradise and I know precisely what they did it and what they did it not.
What they did it :
They made from Communism/Socialism the Crime Syndicate Ideology , as the Ottomans(Turks) made from Islam their War, Conquer, Destroying and Robbery Ideology . What's the difference . The common point is : Crimes against humanity ! Constantinople has fallen through the Jews's treason, by the way !
Under the Messianic history 's repetitive tautology and premeditating misleading cover up( former successfully manipulations obliged and peoples as Pavlov's dogs at ridiculous primary reflexes reduced by the absolute messianic fraud ), I am obliged to ask you:
not the Jews and their Banks has implemented their ludicrous ways of non-Communism as a crime against all people of Europe and Asia ! ??? !!!!????
'Naïve' but the only TRUTH; the truth of Bolsheviks crimes against humanity !
If you try to say that the worst and infinite crime against humanity ( the Bolsheviks Communism ) was not Jew , sorry DB but you are absolutely out of reality and your educated and implemented naivety is at least a pathological irresponsibility , to be polite with you.
This was not an accident as the smart Jews try to present now,, it was a very well premeditated way to implement their tribal interests .
I accept lessons from you about other subjects and I admire you about your way of thinking and writing , but I firmly demand you to try to show some respect about the more than hundreds millions victims of the Bolsheviks insanity ( Jews), including my family and my life as well my actual situation .
You at DB you are all of you too young and absolutely inexperienced, , therefore you know nothing , absolutely nothing about the "wrong things= Jews" they made at any moment.
I've grew up and live as long as 40 years in the most obscene and trivial terrorism of humiliating fear and horror facts around me. It was the Jews Ideological and Practical terrorism . at his best. That was not a 'naïve accident' as you try to intimidate me.
And by the way that was the real terrorism ( with a T) , not the fairy-tales about we are hypocritical and ignorant made 'aware' today , because the Jews told us so !
Under Jews Ideology the Terrorism has become the official State politics ,surprisingly but not , State terrorism was accepted by the Western Democracy, who as a 'good behavior Price' sold out half's Europe to Stalin , to implement the terror of absolute crime , that because the Jews wanted and told you so.
Therefore , please don't even mention about 'our naivety' , the Jews rule the world and they rules the world very criminal badly !
Therefore I ask you to grow up and never said such monumental nonsense , take your responsibility an uses it to tell the truth, other way I wish to you to experience only one week from my family life and the atrocity and painfully reality what I've experienced along with other millions of the victims of the Jews insanity .
Reply from The Daily Bell
Sorry you blame "Jews" Alexsemen.
|
Posted by robert wheeless on 10/09/11 08:40 AM
A far more than just interesting interview this morning. For many years I have thought the JBS had slightly left leaning tendencies and stood against anything even remotely resembling our constitution or a free market economy.
That said, it's apparent the mass media did a good job on me for forty years. Only in the past five years, after I finally joined the computer world and found the Bell have I gained a realistic view of world conditions.
Thank you for introducing me to a different John Birch Society.
|
Posted by rossbcan on 10/09/11 08:29 AM
DB: We like to report on an Internet Reformation... We expect radical change, possibly in societies around the world. Do you?
JM: No, I don't think you are going to have radical changes... You are talking about changing human nature and I don't think it's going to do that.
Think again JM. You have fallen for the false meme that human nature is a constant, independent of environmental factors, part of the elite "mankind is evil and needs to be controlled" general promotion. If you grant the fact that "human nature" is what can be observed about any particular human, it becomes apparent that any individual "human nature" is just what people REALLY do, or, the choices they make, in seeking their goals, within their environment which defines the consequences of choice. Since the only constant is change of perceptual environment, "human nature", both individually and collectively is adapting in response to environmental change.
Last century, with elite monopoly control of media, education, curricula, law, they were able to control "human nature" (choice) by "Environmental Control 101", as people made individual summing to collective choices based on false information which indicated within the false elite induced intellectual paradigm (delusions) that their individual self interest required them to make the choices implied by the false information / subverted reality available. Garbage in, Garbage out. THINK about it:
Click to view link
The internet has completely shattered elite monopoly control of information, perceptions, interpretations. It has shown that the "emperors new clothes", as described in glorious adulation by elite propaganda instruments, do "not exist" and, further, the emperor is bright red, has horns and survives by destroying / consuming civilization.
By new, provable information, "Garbage in, Garbage out" is rapidly being transformed to "Truth in, Reality based choices out".
And, Survival EQUALS ability to adapt to environment EQUALS ability to choose correctly EQUALS freedom:
Click to view link
Even though I agree with DB that "radical change is coming" as a consequence of the internet, quality truthful information (for those able to differentiate fact from fiction), and the incredible number of diverse perspectives available describing their slice of the "elephant in the room" and the choices spawned in response, I believe:
I, the elves collective, readers, posters are not intellectually equipped nor able to comprehend the radical scope of the change that is coming.
What is certain, is we are approaching a collective abyss and will be forced to make the choice: "to be, or, not to be?"
If we, collectively, want "to be", we MUST:
"Tolerate none to be predator, nor prey"
|
Posted by RR on 10/09/11 08:07 AM
DB wants an end of central banking and having a gold standard and free competition in currency. I want to mention that these are very important goals but will do nothing to the money power unless coupled with an initial reset of their wealth and the debts of the Nations.
The money changers own nations. For example 90% land mass of Canada. The money changers have more than 300 years of accumulated wealth by deceit. DB has not noticed the need for reset. Makes me think why not. How can you end the money power without taking away the money?
When we are so advanced in the game that the money changers own the whole planet and you are going to pay rent for the air you breathe, none of the DB proposals are going to make a difference. We are unfortunately too far ahead in this game at this point. Free market economy by itself will not reset this wealth concentration in the hands of the few. There is a need to take away their means of funding but also their accumulated funds. Not going to happen. I am not very optimistic in the short term. Who has the will and the power to fight the money changers. I think sadly NWO is coming. Learn to live free in an unfree world. I must add in a world of confusion DB is a shining star. A dimond in the dust. The best insights and great articles. Thankyou.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks, RR. What we want and what we will get are two different things.
There will likely be no need for a reset as this wretched orb is headed for the rocks. What will change the economic system is a meltdown - a crash that unwinds what is currently available. Protests and "actions" - even voting - will likely not change the system.
We try in our very modest way to help educate - for once the system HAS collapsed, education, not violence, will be the key to the "reset" that you rightly consider necessary.
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 07:55 AM
"Your inability to make distinctions between the led and their leaders is a logical fallacy. Would you accuse ALL Americans of being murderers and warmongers just because their leaders continue to prosecute illegal wars? There is a difference between the State and those who reside in it. This distinction is recognized by educated folk of the alternative media right up until the ... Jewish question! At which point it is decided that all Jews are equally culpable for the actions of a handful of families."
Where did I accuse all Jews of anything? Where did I show an "inability to make distinctions between the led and their leaders"? Isn't the fact that I insist on using the word "Zionist" showing that I am aware of this distinction? I already discussed this in a previous comment.
This comment was specifically addressing the historical timeline of these anti-Jews sentiments, I did not accuse anyone or show any inability to make distinctions.
This is bordering on slander. Every time someone brings the Jewish/Zionist topic here on DB, we are accused of blaming all the Jews, even when we did not say anything to that effect (I have seen this happen to me and to other feedbackers several times).
Reply from The Daily Bell
We softened the comment, though you didn't notice.
"Your inability to make distinctions between the led and their leaders is something of a logical fallacy in our view."
As far as slander goes, come on. We are NOT making up malicious falsehoods about you, we are merely commenting on your postings and what they seem to reveal. We even went out of our way to mention you are "obviously an intelligent and well-read individual."
Anyway, what you accuse us of can't be slander since you are publishing under an anonymous "handle." Finally, you should use the libel to refer to written defamatory statements. Slander is for the spoken word or broadcast.
----
We didn't complain when you accused of us deliberately misleading readers. We merely rebutted your perspectives.
You wrote, "I am extremely surprised to see that the DB is trying to defend the John Birch Society ... The little amount of deliberately superficial research that was done, as presented in the afterthoughts, to convince us that JBS is "clean" could have been greatly improved [by going to the source].
Finally, you wrote, "As far as I can see, JBS completely neglects the role of Zionism (a topic with which DB also has difficulties at times... ), which is even more ironic given their emphasis on Communism, and also actively avoids any mention of Freemasonry, even though many of its top members were Masons. I'd like to be proven wrong about these assertions."
Well ... for most readers a mention of Zionism is to be conflated at least partially with "Jews." You deny it?
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 07:36 AM
DB: "The Anglosphere elites evidently and obviously set up a meme "blame the Jews," just as they then set up an "anti-semitism" meme for the modern age. Our ongoing analysis of this dominant social theme was aided by Reed's work. The power elite has always used the Jewish meme as a tool to confuse people about the real culprits."
DB, with all due respect, this is factually wrong, unless you believe that the "power elite has been using the Jewish meme as a tool to confuse people" for the last 2,500 years...
Whatever the reason for these anti-Jews sentiments (I try not to use the word "anti-semitism" which is meaningless anyway), they have existed for a long time before there was an "Anglosphere", and even before Christianity:
Ancient anti-semitism [this is their title, not my formulation]:
Click to view link
Year and region where Jews have been expelled since 250 A.D.:
Click to view link
So, nice try, but this will not convince a lot of people... Some DB feedbackers have also done a bit of reading on the Jewish question (as evidence by the comments by Spectator for instance - though I don't personally endorse most of MacDonald's views).
Reply from The Daily Bell
DB, with all due respect, this is factually wrong, unless you believe that the "power elite has been using the Jewish meme as a tool to confuse people" for the last 2,500 years...
- Obviously Memehunter we were speaking of the modern era. We wrote this: "just as they then set up an "anti-semitism" meme for the MODERN age." Emphasis ours.
- And there is no doubt that the Jewish people have, in part, been led by factions and families that have created considerable antagonism over time. The reasons for this are controversial. In the MODERN age, the great families seem to have further departed from the culture and traditions of the main Jewish people.
Your inability to make distinctions between the led and their leaders is something of a logical fallacy in our view. Would you accuse ALL Americans of being murderers and warmongers just because their leaders continue to prosecute illegal wars?
There is a difference between the State and those who reside in it. This distinction is recognized by educated folk of the alternative media right up until the ... Jewish question! At which point it is decided that all Jews are equally culpable for the actions of a handful of families.
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 07:26 AM
Mr. Lucius,
Out of courtesy, please make a distinction between "slamming" someone and citing material. I quoted material about Griffin, Murdoch, and so on (and obviously I quoted it because I think it provides an interesting viewpoint), but did not "slam" anyone myself.
I find your style highly offensive - implying that I am "suffering from paranoid delusion". My response to your next personal attack will not be as courteous (DB will do with it what it wants).
By the way, there are tons of sources showing that JBS is controlled opposition - it's not about "attempting to undermine JBS by infeering that is is controlled opposition" at this point, we are way beyond that...
Reply from The Daily Bell
He did not mention you by name and there were others who made some of the points you did. So why take offense - especially when you have entered the fray of your own accord with some (at least) mildly antagonistic rhetoric of your own! You are obviously an intelligent and well-read individual. And Lucius' comments are the kind that "come with the territory."
|
Posted by Ralphus Lucius on 10/09/11 07:12 AM
Excellent interview. Particularly of note are are JBS views on peak oil and climate change, in which am am complete agreement, having worked in the oil industry in my own, independent company for more then 30 years.
Mainstream media, the CIA, and most so called journalists in the oil and gas business almost always get it wrong. And most of the purposeful misinformation out there, I am convinced, is driven by a globalist, central banking agenda.
Interesting to see postings attempting to undermine JBS by inferring the organization is "controlled opposition". Even more interesting to see Griffen slammed for not having as "forceful" a work on the Fed as the original expose by Mullins. Really? I have read both books repeatedly over the years, and simply do not see this.
Also took notes on the slams on Hannity, Murdoch and Fox News by one of the posters here. Fact is, there will always be those suffering from such paranoid delusion that certainly a conspiracy of controlling interests must be lurking behind everyone.
But for any truth seeker, thinking is evolutional. Some get part of it - not just all of it. They should not be condemned for having only discovered just some of the truth, but rather, applauded for making the effort toward more full discovery. This is among one of the reasons I enjoy watching Glenn Beck and his path toward discovery, among others.
I applaud the DB for yet another excellent interview in its efforts to help empower truth.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Well, thanks. Even without your laudatory comments, we'd find your stated perspective logical and well thought out. (Though we do have our troubles with Fox and the Neocon approach generally).
|
Posted by alexsemen on 10/09/11 07:06 AM
memehunter and Alan,
you are absolutelly right !
Alex: From the very beginning reading the very chaotic and totally inconsistent ideas about communism/socialism I've seen at once the absolute fraud of such JBS and Mcmanus person, as well all of them.
Of course they are the 'Jewish organized opposition ', it is typical, just follow the history and try to think by your self. Please follow the dialectic of history, the facts , not the invented story, follows the logic of facts and see who is the beneficiary ( Qui Prodest) . The rest is only typical mythomaniacale behavior of the 'chosen people '
Reply from The Daily Bell
Ah, Alexsemen! So which Jewish plumbers carpenters set up the Jewish John Birch Society, eh? And which Zionists? The Anglosphere elite is NOT JEWISH as people usually understand Jewishness. Those who are Zionists are self-identified by their belief in a Jewish state (one we think should be ecumenical). The powers-that-be set up Israel as an irritant and to provoke war. The powers-that-be are apparently intent on SACRIFICING Israel. In fact, the Rothschilds have as much in common with the average Jew as an elephant does with a bug. The Conspiracy HIRES Jews the way the Mafia hires Italians. But please re- examine your history, Alexsemen. And while you are at it, stop blaming the Germans for all the troubles of the modern Western world. The Germans have been as manipulated as any other culture - INCLUDING the Jews.
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 07:00 AM
DB, thanks for the reply and clarifications.
A couple of points:
5. OPINIONS: If people want to conclude that JBS was a controlled opposition, they are free to do so. NOWHERE in our Afterthoughts did we state that JBS was not. We simply stated that we were happy to let McManus rebut a specific allegation.
OK, but the afterthoughts did not provide the "full picture" by not going to the source itself (Oliver). It gave the impression that since Mullins' claims were (apparently) unfounded, there was nothing more to it. I think I was right to point that out, no?
4. JEWS: You seem to be implying "Jews: run the world. You may believe we have "trouble" with this "fundamental truth. In fact, we find this to be a naive world-view (blame the "Jews") and one that detracts from the way the world REALLY works. Who are the Jews? Who is the "power elite."
It should be clear by now after several exchanges on this topic, but when I say "Zionists", I mean "Zionists", not Jews. It is not the same thing. Please do not try to change or distort what I said on this topic. I did not say that "Jews run the world", I said that JBS ignores the Zionist aspect of the NWO. Again, I think I am perfectly right to point that out - it is a fact [i.e., that Birchers neglect the Zionist aspect], as much as I can assess from the Birchers' official stance, and not merely an opinion, whether we agree or not on the importance of the Zionist element.
Speaking of naive worldviews, "blame the CFR" or "blame the communists", as JBS proposes, seem to me infinitely more naive than blaming the Zionists, which may be woefully incomplete and inadequate, but at least closer to the truth in my opinion.
Since DB mentioned Mullins' interview in the afterthoughts, let me quote a few sentences which suggest, to me at least, that Mullins' view was closer to the mark than that proposed by JBS:
"Let's touch on the Council on Foreign Relations...
The CFR was a phoney institution, they've never had any power at all. They take their orders from the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, the Rothschilds. This bugaboo about the CFR has always made me laugh. Back in the 50's everybody thought the United States was ruled by this corrupt, sinister organization. In fact the CFR was a bunch of fatcats that got together in New York City, had dinner in luxurious hotels... they were all wealthy people, CEOS of banks and insurance companies and so forth...
So their place in the scheme of things is... ?
They're strictly a diversion. They had no power, and their policies were always written by the RIIA in London at Chatham House. I can't find an instance where the CFR has inaugurated a policy of any kind. Even today, people read books from the 50's about the sinister CFR and how sinister they are, like a KGB ruling the US... I always thought it a joke.
How deep into American society is Israeli intelligence?
It's universal. All the newspapers. Most of Mossad is volunteer anyway. They don't have to go looking for it. All sensitive, confidential information is coming in from every government office every day. They've got better intelligence than George Bush has."
|
Posted by Spectator on 10/09/11 06:20 AM
One reads DB not only for its own editorial musings, but also (and today especially) for the perspectives provided by its readers in their comments. Very encouraging to find Mullins and Oliver being added to the discussion.
I won't say anything today about "Zionist conspiracy" or "Protocols" etc,. having had my knuckles rapped on earlier occasions by DB staff. Nothing, that is, but to urge that the work of Kevin MacDonald also be thoughtfully considered.
I am encouraged by the recent consideration of Douglas Reed by the Bell that the process of consideration and re-consideration is ongoing.
Thanks again to the Bell and its posters.
Reply from The Daily Bell
"I am encouraged by the recent consideration of Douglas Reed by the Bell that the process of consideration and re-consideration is ongoing."
We have "reconsidered" nothing, though it is true we have continue to expand on our initial formulation as the Internet further educates us.
The Anglosphere elites evidently and obviously set up a meme "blame the Jews," just as they then set up an "anti-semitism" meme for the modern age. Our ongoing analysis of this dominant social theme was aided by Reed's work. The power elite has always used the Jewish meme as a tool to confuse people about the real culprits.
You may see our Reed article here. You may wish to actually read it.
Anti-Semitism, Douglas Reed and Zion
Click to view link
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 06:00 AM
By the way, G. Edward Griffin is also a member of the JBS.
Here are some interesting quotes from an article on the RogueGovernment website about Glenn Beck inviting Griffin to talk about the Federal Reserve:
Click to view link
[... ] For starters, G Edward Griffin is the priest class approved expert gatekeeper on information pertaining to the Federal Reserve. In 1994, Griffin wrote a book called "The Creature From Jekyll Island" which goes over the origins of the Federal Reserve.
The book has been criticized for borrowing much of its material from Eustace Mullins earlier work that was published in the 1950s entitled "Secrets of the Federal Reserve". It has also been criticized for not packing nearly as much punch as Mullins' original work which is a plausible explanation as to why Griffin's book has received far more attention and is now receiving mainstream press from people like Beck.
Griffin has been a decades long member of the controlled opposition group the John Birch Society and even wrote a book praising the group's founder Robert Welch. The John Birch Society has historically been a gatekeeping organization on issues like the staged 9/11 attacks. They have even given credibility to the false terror war which has been a key enabler in the destruction of individual freedom domestically.
Griffin's long time involvement with the group can only lead us to conclude that he is an agreement with many of the organization's views. Oddly enough, early members of the John Birch Society were directly linked to globalist run institutions like the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, the IRS and even the Rockefeller family providing more proof that the group was setup as a controlled opposition front. Despite this, it does not appear as if Griffin has a major problem with any of these easily verifiable facts.
The Mormon's have historically maintained close ties to the John Birch Society with one-time Mormon leader Ezra Taft Benson a big supporter of the Society. This proves that there has been a historical connection between the Freemason founded Mormon cult and the John Birch Society. With this in mind, it makes perfect sense as to why Beck a Mormon would have somebody like Griffin who is directly linked to the Society on his broadcast. Of course Fox News is littered with other priest class stooges like Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly who are both Catholics.
The parent company of Fox News is Newscorp which is run by Rupert Murdoch a man who was given Papal knighthood honors by the Pope. Fox News is a propaganda outlet for the military industrial complex which has links back to people close to priest class run and operated institutions in spades. These people would not have on somebody like Griffin to discuss the Federal Reserve unless this was a planned operation to expand the allowed perimeters of debate within the corporate controlled media.
[... ]
Reply from The Daily Bell
This is exactly the reason we don't get into "naming names" and pointing fingers at individuals (on the whole). It is easy to make furious denunciations and accusations.
And now the dialogue descends into an endless cat fight about who is the "purest" and who is "on the payroll" and the larger issues (the important ones having to do with economic ruin and the starvation, literally, of billions within the context of the NWO) are obscured and even abandoned.
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 04:48 AM
Here is a letter from John "Birdman" Bryant to Mr. McManus (I only copied Bryant's second - and last - letter which is enough to get a good idea; interested readers may read the first letter).
Click to view link
Dear Mr Mcmanus:
Let me begin by saying that my 25 June [2000] letter contained some hyperbole which I would have better made more litotical. But for all that, I think that unpleasant truths tend to be regarded as 'nasty', to use your word, and for this reason I can understand why you were upset.
But my writing style is in no way substantive. What is substantive is that you failed to answer an important question I asked you. In particular, do you deny that you personally believe in the validity of the Protocols, and do you deny that you told JR Nyquist that you did? These questions are important, because if you believe in the Protocols, then it remains to explain why the magazine of which you are publisher, and which specializes in advancing 'conspiracy theory' (your term), never mentions Jewish conspiracy, of which the Protocols is the best-known exposition. It will not do to say, as you did in your letter, that 'the Society' does not regard the Protocols as valid; the question is whether you do.
(For the record, I am well aware of the 'spuriousness' of the Protocols, inasmuch as I have personally verified that they were plagiarized from a mid-19th century French book; but I do not at all discount the intriguing possibility that the Protocols may have significantly influenced and directed the thinking of Jewish leaders in a sort of ironic self-fulfilling prophecy.)
As expected, you deny that the Oliver charges are true, and you attempt to justify your denial by saying that Oliver (1) 'was never able to back up any of his assertions' and (2) had made some 'indefensible claims' concerning the Kennedy assassination which were published in American Opinion, the forerunner of TNA, and which AO had to retract, and you seem to suggest -- but do not openly state -- that this was the cause of Oliver's resignation as AO's Associate Editor.
As to point (1), it is probably mistaken to say that Oliver couldn't back up his charges, but rather only that he did not in fact publish the details. The most likely reason for his behavior, as I see it, is that he held out hope that the Society could be reformed from within once his charges -- backed up by his resignation and prestige -- had become known; whereas if he had published a detailed account, it would have destroyed the Society.
As to point (2), if this is true, I'd like to hear the details, but it sounds like something taken from the 57-page document which was mentioned by Oliver in his articles, which he said Welch showed to big contributors, and which he noted was so libelous that it was never published, but shown only to individuals on an 'eyes-only' basis.
But the important thing about the Oliver charges is not whether we can verify them (a very difficult undertaking), but rather that they act to explain an otherwise unexplainable fact about the JBS, namely, that the discussion of the 'conspiracy theory' which the JBS is so single-minded in pursuing is never allowed to so much as touch on Jewish conspiracy, and members who do pursue it are expelled. The fact is curious not merely because no proper investigation of a subject should automatically exclude any germane area, but also -- and primarily -- because it is usually obvious to anyone who bothers to study the subject that the effect of the coordinated actions of Jewish organizations and individuals (ie, 'Jewish conspiracy') is a major factor in a great many significant events impacting our nation and the world -- a fact to which I have devoted a number of essays posted on my website, Click to view link
What I am trying to say is this: the JBS is lying by omission in making Jewish conspiracy off-limits. This is bad not merely because it violates a fundamental ethical principle (like, I mean, no lying, right, man?), but also because it misleads people and makes them look for the threats to Western civilization in all the wrong places (or at least all the places except the really important one). This badness is of course compounded because the JBS promotes itself as a beacon of morality, which it constantly prates about in the pages of the New American. The significance of the Oliver charges, then, is that they help to make sense of what would otherwise be incomprehensible, ie, why an organization devoted to exposing conspiracy against Western civilization seems engaged in a conspiracy to suppress exposure of what it is supposedly exposing. And this fact -- combined with (1) Oliver's status as a star academic, American Opinion Associate Editor, and founding member of the JBS, (2) the fact that Oliver had no other good reason to resign from the JBS, (3) the fact that his JBS expose -- even if incomplete -- was very detailed, and (4) the fact that there have been other instances of Jewish takeover of supposedly-hostile organizations -- all of these taken together makes Oliver's charges more than credible.
And that, of course, brings us right back to the question you would not answer: Do you believe in the validity of the Protocols, as you told JR Nyquist, and if so, why does the magazine of which you are publisher fail to mention the Jewish role in 'conspiracy theory'? Here again we have a fact supporting Oliver's charges: It seems that you believe in Jewish conspiracy, but are constrained from saying so by some Higher Power whose name seems to be spelled in Hebrew letters, and it isn't the tetragrammaton.
In sum, Mr Mcmanus, your letter neither enhances your own credibility nor does anything significant to impeach Oliver. I am posting this letter on my website, and I will be happy upon request to link any relevant document which you believe will better make your case.
Reply from The Daily Bell
1. WELSH: Our afterthoughts rebutted the SPECIFIC ALLEGATION that Welsh's candy sales was arranged by Rockefeller to help found the John Birch Society. On its face this is simply untrue and is not borne out by the timeline. It was an erroneous accusation, or at least made erroneously. We'd always meant to investigate the allegation and the interview gave us a chance to do so. JBS may indeed have been set up as the controlled opposition but such a dialogue is not served by making obviously erroneous allegations. We had a chance to rebut it and we did.
2. DEBUNKING: We were careful not to get into the larger issue of JBS's positioning as "the controlled opposition." It is not ordinarily our style for the past three years to vehemently attack the people who sit down with us to do interviews. We interviewed McManus- but an interview is not necessarily a confrontation. We do enough confronting as it is.
3. JBS HISTORY: Additionally, what JBS once was and what it is now may be two different things. We are not in a position to evaluate JBS's entire arc of dissent and come to firm conclusions. We know that some of the books published by the Society were helpful to us and others in beginning to understand the world as it is rather than as the mainstream media explains it. The New American's coverage about the wretched Oklahoma City bombing is a good example of this.
4. ATTACKING THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA: We could, if we wished, attempt exposes on almost everyone in the alternative media, from Alex Jones, to Rense to Drudge, to Ayn Rand, to Reason, to GMU ... the list is endless and there is plenty of "evidence" to be had. Are they the REAL opposition?
5. OPINIONS: If people want to conclude that JBS was a controlled opposition, they are free to do so. NOWHERE in our Afterthoughts did we state that JBS was not. We simply stated that we were happy to let McManus rebut a specific allegation.
6. JEWS: You seem to be implying "Jews: run the world. You may believe we have "trouble" with this "fundamental truth. In fact, we find this to be a naive world-view (blame the "Jews") and one that detracts from the way the world REALLY works. Who are the Jews? Who is the "power elite" REALLY? We have dealt with it substantively here:
Anti-Semitism, Douglas Reed and Zion
Click to view link
We wanted to bring up the issue of JBS as the "controlled opposition" and we did so in the interview and the afterthoughts. We were careful not to provide a conclusion, only to rebut a specific allegation that was untrue. People can make up their own minds regarding the "larger picture."
|
Posted by memehunter on 10/09/11 04:36 AM
Some background info on the Belmont Brotherhood, intimately connected with the JBS:
Click to view link
Worth reading even if it's a bit long.
Still not convinced that JBS is controlled opposition?
Reply from The Daily Bell
We let McManus rebut a specific allegation, one that was untrue. You are misreading our Afterthoughts or setting up a straw man to knock down. See our larger rebuttal above.
|
Posted by Alan on 10/09/11 04:28 AM
Interesting. I can understand why House was a communist, apparently it believes in free enterprise. The people who controlled Russia for some 70 years were the Bolsheviks. The Communists were wiped out in battles after the real purpose of the Bolsheviks emerged. When did the World Bank become a servant of the UN. It has been a tool of the U.S. Federal Government for decades, probably since inception. Look at it's record and look who has run it since inception. Along with the IMF it has done more to destroy so called third world countries than anything else in history. On every occasion the result has been a takeover by American Corporations, particularly of public assets, and increased poverty for many people. I can see why Cuba is such a serious problem for the U.S. I understand that the U.S. Congress first decided they had to take over Cuba in about 1830. It took them another 70 years and then they handed it over to American Corporations to run and a puppet they selected. The corporations "owned" about 70% of the arable land in Cuba.
|
|
