Dr. Kissinger on the 'New World Order' – Editorial or Policy Statement?
By Anthony Wile - August 30, 2014

Dr. Henry Kissinger has written an article entitled, "Henry Kissinger on the Assembly of a New World Order" posted at The Wall Street Journal.

It's an important article written by an important man. Dr. Kissinger, the Journal tells us, "served as national security adviser and secretary of state under Presidents Nixon and Ford." And his article is "adapted from his book 'World Order' " – apparently set for a September 9th unveiling from publisher Penguin Press.

You really have to read between the lines to understand what Dr. Kissinger is saying. But as someone who retains immense prestige with the global power elite around the world, Kissinger, probably with the consent of others, has apparently decided to send a message about what must be done to alleviate the world's current perilous situation. Anyway, this is certainly nothing he simply tossed off in the back seat of his limo one morning.

Here are some excerpts:

Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan's young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination.

The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis. The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension.

A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen.

The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries. In the Middle East, religious militias violate borders at will.

This effort to establish world order has in many ways come to fruition. A plethora of independent sovereign states govern most of the world's territory. The spread of democracy and participatory governance has become a shared aspiration if not a universal reality; global communications and financial networks operate in real time.

The years from perhaps 1948 to the turn of the century marked a brief moment in human history when one could speak of an incipient global world order composed of an amalgam of American idealism and traditional European concepts of statehood and balance of power. But vast regions of the world have never shared and only acquiesced in the Western concept of order.

These reservations are now becoming explicit, for example, in the Ukraine crisis and the South China Sea. The order established and proclaimed by the West stands at a turning point.

Kissinger is stating a problem here. To summarize, he and backers believe that a kind of Pax Americana existed in the 20th century but now the vision of what may be called the Anglosphere – one of democracy and participatory governance – is being challenged in "vast regions of the world that have … only acquiesced in the Western concept of order [without sharing it]."

He then begins to present the problem in a more detailed fashion. He points out that the EU is based on soft power but that "it is doubtful that claims to legitimacy separated from a concept of strategy can sustain a world order."

He writes that Europe does not yet have the attributes of statehood, which offers a "tempting vacuum of authority."

Meanwhile, Middle Eastern states, he writes, "have dissolved into sectarian and ethnic components in conflict with each other." This produces a phenomenon of "failed states not controlling their own territory."

And here is an astonishing statement: Kissinger worries that the clash now taking place, worldwide, between the international economy and political institutions "weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order."

This is where Kissinger's real point of view becomes bluntly apparent. The article is presented as an understated analysis of geopolitical difficulties, but the reason for concern – we can see now – has to do with how globalist aspirations are being damaged.

He expands on this theme with the following:

The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.

This dynamic has produced decades of sustained economic growth punctuated by periodic financial crises of seemingly escalating intensity: in Latin America in the 1980s; in Asia in 1997; in Russia in 1998; in the U.S. in 2001 and again starting in 2007; in Europe after 2010 …

The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.

For these reasons, forces of internationalism are failing, and Kissinger believes that there must be "an effective mechanism for the great powers to consult and possibly cooperate on the most consequential issues."

He does admit that various globalist forums exist for consultation but what he now suggests is more concentrated in nature and power in order to provide an "elaboration of long-range strategy." And this long-range strategy, it turns out, includes a "contemporary structure of international rules and norms [and one that] cannot merely be affirmed by joint declarations; it must be fostered as a matter of common conviction. "

Can there be any doubt about what Kissinger is saying? He seeks an overarching "structure of rules and norms." He is seeking, apparently, significantly expanded global governance.

And what if this structure is not forthcoming?

The penalty for failing will be not so much a major war between states (though in some regions this remains possible) as an evolution into spheres of influence identified with particular domestic structures and forms of governance. At its edges, each sphere would be tempted to test its strength against other entities deemed illegitimate.

A struggle between regions could be even more debilitating than the struggle between nations has been. The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.

… The triumph of a radical movement might bring order to one region while setting the stage for turmoil in and with all others. The domination of a region by one country militarily, even if it brings the appearance of order, could produce a crisis for the rest of the world.

If the world does not create a strong center "affirming individual dignity and participatory governance, and cooperating internationally in accordance with agreed-upon rules," there will be emergent problems including increased political conflict and even warfare.

The news is not all grim from Kissinger's standpoint. There are things that can be done. The end of the article provides us with some ideas, though they are vague and couched in deliberate generalities. Kissinger wonders what the "US" seeks in the 21st century and suggests that the country ask some tough questions about its goals and objectives. Then he writes the following:

For the U.S., this will require thinking on two seemingly contradictory levels. The celebration of universal principles needs to be paired with recognition of the reality of other regions' histories, cultures and views of their security. Even as the lessons of challenging decades are examined, the affirmation of America's exceptional nature must be sustained.

This is probably the article's crux paragraph. The "celebration of universal principles" surely implies those that are enshrined in such documents as the US Constitution. And he writes flatly that those principles must be "paired with a recognition … of other regions' histories, cultures and views of their security."

What Kissinger seems to be advocating is that US citizens revise the "laws of the land" – at least the Constitution – as necessary to advance comprehensive globalism. The tattered remnants of the rights that US citizens once enjoyed must be further shredded to accommodate the viewpoints of other countries, perhaps those that have lacked the strong civil and criminal protections provided by the Constitution and suggested by the Declaration of Independence.

In his last paragraph, Kissinger uses convoluted language to warn that "elevated convictions" may not be seen as providing the US and its allies with sufficient protection "in the absence of a comprehensive geopolitical strategy."

Dr. Kissinger and his backers want more comprehensive global government. Some of the chaos in the world today is certainly due to THEIR actions and their determination to create or sustain warfare in troubled regions of the world. Kissinger is being disingenuous by not admitting to that. He is also being disingenuous by not being clear about the seeming remedy: Reducing or eliminating parts of the Constitution (formally or not), that don't "fit" with the political systems of other regions.

Finally, if history shows us anything it is that the kinds of reconfigurations and centralization being suggested here are rarely bloodless or painless, despite the sanitary nature of the language.

The world, as Kissinger describes it, is already at war and I have no doubt that the wars will grow worse. Nor do I doubt that what we call the "Wall Street Party" will continue for a while longer, perhaps several years longer, thus generating eventually a terrible asset deflation.

This will likely be a worldwide phenomenon, just as modern warfare is resolutely internationalized. There is perhaps time to generate considerable wealth within the market – certainly this year and next if the market survives autumn. But at some point, the bubble will pop. Further economic misery will mix with considerable violence worldwide to create an especially noxious brew.

At this point, the palliatives that Dr. Kissinger is mentioning so gently will likely be presented in a far more insistent way. The rulers of this world going back to ancient times have always used the same formulas. The citizens are made miserable and then presented with a further centralized authority that will in fact aggravate what is already intolerable.

Gather wealth while you can. Protect yourself as you must. Read Dr. Kissinger's eloquent article several times and absorb the message.

It's not just an editorial, in my opinion, but a policy statement.


    Henry Kissinger’s Legacy of War Crimes Exposed by Secret Yale Visit Mar 26, 2014

    Abby Martin speaks about how Yale University’s secret invite to Henry Kissinger has shined a new light into the former Secretary of State’s long list of criminality, by helping facilitate US war crimes in South East Asia, South America and the Middle East, which resulted in the deaths of millions of civilians.


  • Danny B

    WOW, Kissinger goes out of his way to show that his intellect is over rated. He shows his blinders too. His “stability” includes dozens of wars for no logical reason. We went into Viet Nam to contain China. Since when did China need containing. What about North Korea? The Wolfowitz doctrine claims that America must control central Asia to maintain world control. Control just for the sake of control. The other claim is that America can’t control central Asia unless we pry loose Ukraine from Russia.
    He writes about wars caused by competing spheres of influence. These wars are BAD. If Pox Americana causes wars, these wars are GOOD.
    Dr. Kissinger seems to have little awareness of the effects of the demographic crash and falling birth rates. He ignores the fact that most of the strife in the world is a product of American machinations. He makes a ridiculously weak attempt to justify globalization. He claims that there will be great strife and war if America does not use great strife and war to consolidate power.
    There has always been competing spheres of influence. If the war mongers would just stay out, the competition would be limited to economic competition.
    like the British before us, America is hollowed out from over reach.


    War Criminal Henry Kissinger confronted on Bilderberg and Mass Murder May 31, 2012

    We Are Change is a nonpartisan, independent media organization comprised of individuals and groups working to expose corruption worldwide. We are made up of independent journalists, concerned citizens, activists, and anyone who wants to shape the direction our world is going in. We seek to expose the lies of governments and the corporate elite who constantly trash our humanity. By asking the hard questions the mainstream media refuses to ask, we shine a little more light on truth. Furthermore, we seek to connect, educate, and motivate those who are interested in alerting the public to the pertinent issues that are affecting our lives each and every day. Our goal is to create a community of truth-seekers and peacemakers who share a commitment to nonviolent action. We Are Change is not so much an individual or group, but an idea, an idea that “We the People” are the change we wish to see in this world. Together, as residents of this planet, we can push back against those who wish to dominate our lives and begin to restore liberty to all.


  • Dave Meekhof

    When will the likes of Kissinger and Brzezinski retire to the old folks home where they can play out their world strategy over a game of risk and hone their skills on a chess board. They have done enough damage to the real world already.

  • Most normal students read Orwell’s “Nineteen-eightyfour” in high school and recoiled at the science fiction, horror dystopia, but not the ruling robber baron elite who embraced the horror, believing they could accomplish this. Today the world is split into Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia with constant conflict and alternating allegiances. Today the Feral government Ministry of Truth LIES about everything. Today INGSOC monitors your every phone call and email, even when your devices are turned off. Today a groomed, preselected, token ethnicity sock puppet is the face of Big Brother, reading mindless dribble from a teleprompter to masses of zombies. Today we live in 1984, just 30 years late in arriving, but even MORE horrifying. These Demonic Warlords have also stated that their NWO plans require mass extermination down to the controllable level of 600 million Earthlings, meaning 90% of us must be snuffed.

    If we are to confront these psychopathic oligarchs then we must confront their most recent, GIANT LIE. Visit the Veterans Today site for “Slam Dunk, Most Classified 911 Revealed” and “VT Flexing It’s Nuclear Muscle”. Then site search at VT for JFK info. From the time of LHO assassination in the Dallas jail, more than 60% of Americans do not believe the ‘lone gunman’ myth. Even 50 years of constant brainwashing has not changed this fact. Educate yourself on these elitist LIES.

    “Ignorance is Bliss” ~ George Orwell….and the Demonic Warlords want you to be as blissful as possible.

    • elfmom55

      For even more LIE exposure go to “Nodisinfo.com” and “Livingonplanetz” YT. These people are not only exposing current lies and hoaxes but going back in time exposing all the lies I grew up with.

    • Bolt Upright

      I think Earth could possibly be petri dish like, in the vast infinite Universe, that may…or may not have been misplaced?…Forgotten?…or, just has not maturely cultivated yet? The cultures currently growing may, or may not have been planed or the cultivate may have been?….Have a great Holiday Sir!

  • Me Again

    “….nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative

    Which they have progressively discarded in favour of totalitarianism…….

  • Alice Maxwell

    The Daily Bell is right. Kissinger has issued a policy statement for the New World Order. They cannot proceed without a large group dedicated to their concepts, true believers who will not desert their meme, who will see the new global government build on those convictions and reject the naysayers.

    Kissinger has issued the NWO’s Mien Kampf. They have the devoted following and they are ready to announce it. ISIS is their creation and with it they will marshall one billion confirmed Islamites to march to victory. They have packed our two political parties with their American adherents and the coup is about to take place.

    Americans will never know how it happened. They have been so distracted by entertainment and the need to nourish everyone’s singular ego, that they are sitting ducks and the marksmen are ready to take them out, one by one, if necessary.

    Islam is a very interesting creed. It was built on men and their needs and it speaks to men very well about them. Young mens’ fancies are its thrust and with those primitive yearnings , it is taking our world. The funny thing about it, is the young women seem to like what Islam does to them, make them helpmates, chattel. Our young people are ready to join in a big outdoors movement that makes house and home obsolete. They are about to trade our American freedom for a new religion that frees them from having anything to do with any others except in managed meetings. Haven’t you noticed that men and women today always introduce themselves by their first names and never use their last names. They yearn to be part of the global community, to be with Allah. This is what is subborning our western culture.

    “We are the World” is the motto and how that has been sold! Kissinger has just announced it is ready to roll come September 9th! Doesn’t that date co-incide with the UN’s assembly in New York City? ISIS has promised it will be there.

    • Bill Ross

      Not biting. You claim that DB is “right” and then launch into a screed regarding the “Islamic Menace”, attempting to, by association attribute your “elaborations” to DB.

    • Praetor

      No Alice we know how it happened and the coup took place some time ago. They have done it all before. The only difference is we can see it live ” at 5:00″ as it happens. It can no longer be done in the Shadows of Time and the story telling of MYTHO’s.

    • Bologna in The China Shop

      You’ve been expanding upon your fearful ideas of Islam for a while now. I challenge you to go out and meet some moderate Muslims in your community and decide if reality matches your caricatures.

      More directly to the point, a cultural identity divide is exactly what the elites have in the cards. When you indulge in cultural fear mongering, you play into their game.

  • agstr1

    Scary stuff from Dr. No No

  • Shen

    You are so right.

    In 1973, Kissinger and Rockefeller founded a global elite organization that has promoted a New One World Order, their order. If you follow the activities of the members of that organization, your will see how they create crisis to further their plan. A member of that organization challenged Obama in a newspaper article two or three days prior to the breakout of the Arab Spring to quit talking democracy in the middle east and take action. (That individual was the uncle of a Harvard law professor appointed to the supreme court by Obama…also Obama’s lawyer to hide his birth and school records). He wrote that individuals had been sufficiently radicalized through the internet to revolt.

    This organization originated the G-8 (world leaders invited to gather to discuss global issues… with organization members attending to help guide in the issues and promote their desired policies). Hence, global warming! And, need for taxes and more taxes and more and more regulations.

    See how they have derailed our government that was to be of the people, by the people and for the people? They have made it a government for globalist through high dollar lobbying. They have the ear of our politicians and judiciary…not the citizens who think they participated in their government by voting.

  • Participatory Governance?? Oh, that is rich!! Celebration of Universal Principles? Who writes this stuff? Probably the same team that puts together the well considered utterances from the Federal Reserve. Under a screen of palliative blather and subtle concepts lies the iron fist of those who rule from the shadows. The dismantling of freedom, of the bill of rights, of the letter and spirit of the US Constitution proceeds under an umbrella of intellectual complexities and meaningless nostrums.

  • Bill Ross

    sucks to be elites if all they can do is drag this fossil (and war criminal) out of the woodwork, hoping that a faux “reputation” can generate some (or any) credibility. This is a VERY strange / insane war between “might is right” with no credible apologists and those who aspire be free of bullies with very credible “reasons” fully consistent with the lessons of history.

    Well (being foolish, and ASSUMING elites seek REAL answers, as opposed to “pretexts to prey”), here’s the answer they claim to seek (and have spent centuries attempting to usurp):


    I could choose a snapshot of the “mission statement, summary of grievances” of virtually any “terrorist” (AKA: freedom seeking) leaders from all of history

    …from the US “Declaration of Independence”:


    …to Osama Bin Ladin addressing the “great satan”:


    …to cutting edge Russian loyalists in east Ukraine:


    Strip away the rhetoric and, they are and have been, for all of history stating the same thing: get outa my face, we are not slaves and, our property, including lives and affairs “is not yours”

    No amount of elite rationalizations and strategic denial of the facts of life are EVER gonna change this. THEY cannot win, but are content to extract a “conflict tax”, pretending to try.

    • Well worth repeating: “Strip away the rhetoric and, they are and have been, for all of history stating the same thing: get outta my face, we are not slaves and, our property, including lives and affairs “is not yours”

  • Stephen Gray

    I believe The New World Order (NWO) is already in charge.
    The puppet politicians are doing the bidding of the puppet masters. I also believe
    NATO is the military arm of the NWO all paid for of course by the serfs tax





    • They are powerful, they pull lots and lots of strings, the pull off lots of wars, but they still do not dare show their faces in the broad daylight or hold press conferences and tell the hoi polloi watching Big Brother Media who they really are. They’ve still restricted themselves to invitation-only web sites where they let on some things and continue to hide some other things. They may declare themselves after awhile, the Bible even prophecies defaint declarations synchronized with economic measures like requiring a subcutaneous embedded chip.

      That chip is the divider. The ones who want to be free will refuse. Those who don’t understand “the signs of the times” or prefer an illusion of security over liberty will succumb. Refuseniks, like those who believe Revelation 13, will get a propaganda blast. This anti-Christian meme has started, and the brutal and unfair attacks that put William Wilberforce and Mother Theresa and David Livingston in the same dangerous-zone as the worst of Islamists, some even making an appearance in otherwise libertarian venues. DB including Wendy seem to include themselves who do not so delude themselves. After all, supporting Ron Paul were those of every kind of person you could think of.

      • Dave Meekhof

        What does the ‘chip’ have to do with Rev 13. I+V+X+L+C+D = 1+5+10+50+100+500 = 666. It seems to be more a metaphor for the currency of the day. The right hand for what ones does, the forehead for what one believes, the mark for what one is known for…when working for the ‘beast’, there is the divider, imho.

  • Bolt Upright

    Keep ’em fed, housed, stoned and eff’d. Mastermind’s motto to a peaceful world for themselves.

    • Fabian

      And it works.

  • George Henson

    Kissinger is a spokesman for an elite banker oligarchy. He is promoting a one world order to consolidate power and dominance over the entire world. Of course he wants to do away with the Constitution of the U.S. because this document poses the greatest threat to a “one world order” form of government and economic system. He neglects to point out that most of the wars of the last few hundred years were engineered by this very same oligarchy to enrich themselves and to draw attention away from the failed and progressively worsening policies that this group has instituted. The Constitution, which every politician pledges to preserve, protect and defend, has been shredded already. It amazes me that the majority of citizens in the U.S. are oblivious to what is happening and frankly am surprised at your apparent support and admiration for Kissinger’s position. Like obama said yesterday regarding Russia’s interference in the sovereign country of Ukraine, he failed to mention the February 2014 coup in Ukraine which was designed and funded by the obama administration. This is nothing more than a plan to install more nuclear tip missiles along Russia’s border. Listen to “confessions of an economic hit man” on youtube. Read the plans of the Northwood’s Operation. Read the conversation’s between fdr and his secretary of war henry stimson. Read the accounts from experts, i.e. architects, structural engineers, and demolition experts regarding 9/11. Listen to robert mcnamara explain that the Gulf of Token incidence was a hoax. It goes on and on. What this country needs is to return to the supreme law of the land, our Constitution in its entirety. I could go on, but have already strayed off topic. Anyway I would be happy to discuss any of these issues.

    • “It amazes me that the majority of citizens in the U.S. are oblivious to what is happening and frankly am surprised at your apparent support and admiration for Kissinger’s position.”

      Obviously you didn’t read the article and have never read The Daily Bell. Why do you bother to post when you don’t even know the reputation of the Bell and its editorial stances? Educate yourself, please … then return.

    • Bill Ross

      You are “preaching to the choir” and, mistook it for a “black mass”

    • ThisIsIt

      Very well stated and supported. It is rare indeed where a person as well
      informed as you appear to be has made such a valid over all point where the
      results of success of the NWO is no success at all but rather ends up where the
      masses are again the peasants of the villages and those in the rock building on
      top of the hill rein over all forever for their own best benefit leaving the
      masses no better off then back in the Dark Ages.

    • vongoh

      “apparent support and admiration for Kissinger’s position” — this statement is like walking into the best steakhouse in town, and loudly complaining to the 5 star chef in front of the diners (who are all regular customers):

      “The best tasting, most nutritious steaks come from grass fed naturally raised steers! How dare you feed this town with those nasty, synthetic, abused animals force fed genetically modified grain, pumped full of chemical and antibiotics!”

      We’re all staring at you with our forks paused halfway between the plate and our mouths .. appalled. Apparently you are lost, perhaps you should take a moment to sit down and have a look a the menu before you make assumptions about the food ….

      • Thanks.

        • vongoh

          Sure, great steaks! I eat here every day!

    • TTT

      George: You have some good points in your email. However, you like most people in this country, still cling to the hope that we can be saved if only the right men were chosen by the voters to rule this once great nation. Remember what Thomas Jefferson said during the creation of the Constitution? It was something to the effect of for the Republic to survive and prosper, the citizens of this country had to be aware of the contents of the Constitution and watch those who were elected to be sure they abided by it and didn’t try to modify it in any way. In other words, the voters must be half-way intelligent. Do you really think that a populace that views television programming on average six hours a day fits that category? I think not.
      The fact of the matter is that we are doomed. We have lost the protections of the Bill of Rights; the Constitution has been shredded by dictatorial presidents which seem to get worse with each election. The right of free speech has been curtailed to the point of non-existence. The Second Amendment will soon be obliterated. And when that happens all bets are off the table. We will have been returned to the state of peasants and peons, tax payers and cannon fodder. The state will rule over us totally.
      This is how I see the future unfolding. All efforts to reverse this situation will be futile. I have seen our freedoms and liberties chipped away since the administration of St. Lincoln when the federal government became supreme over the states.
      I hope you can demonstrate to me that I am totally wrong.

  • Fabian

    A good flippant but interesting way to start the week end. I don’t think they will prevail.

  • 2prickit

    His version of fantastic futuristic blather sounds of an attractive means to the future. Targeted consumers of The Profit Henry Kissinger have been groomed by professional marketing agencies to believe any improvement is really a necessary issue at all–Americans were not mindful of their very duty to preserve and keep in its original state or in good condition, one simple principle– Liberty. Funny? Liberty as a verb is something one does for oneself rather than having done to him —This massive body of toothless breathers has not a clue as to their feebleness, let alone any sense of loss, but rather, is convinced that their condition is universal and so be it. Is this not still Xenophobia, that which they should not want to eliminate from their consciousness? For without it, there is no idenity of self nor nation, at all.

    Now I want to relocate our perspective on Americans to that of the Near East, turning back the Muslim invasions of Europe:
    “… If one blesses the names of Charles Martel and Sobieksy for rescuing Western civilization from Islam, one must execrate the memory of the Fourth Crusade [presently, the ambitions of NWO], and the greed and Christian sectarianism that sacked Constantinople, destroyed the Byzantine Empire and called down the doom of Christendom’s eastern half. It is as vain to blame the Turks for spreading westwards over the wreckage as it would be to arraign the laws of hydrostatics for flood damage.”— Sir Patrick Leigh Fermor

  • windsor1

    Kissinger has an inherent ability to talk in esoteric terms more like riddles, claiming a NWO is some type of utopia to replace a system that no longer works. The current system is dying because the globalists want it to die, and are counting on us plebs doing nothing to stop it. In reality Kissinger is a psychopathic war criminal responsible for the deaths of many thousands of people from Cambodia to Chile. By burying his conscience, if he even has one, he has signed on as a globalist poster boy, and has greatly enriched himself financially in the process. Buy the book, but don’t expect any profound revelations, you do not already know. Expect it to be personal grandstanding. As for intellect, any NWO stooge gets all types of undeserved accolades. Look now farther than recent Nobel Peace Prize winners.

  • Praetor

    I wonder is it a “New World Order or Old World Order”? Wikipedia: and the strange bedfellows of the Order. Just follow, Kissinger Associates, Inc. Look see, who they affiliate with. There are no conspiracies any more. Go ahead you Progressive Keynesian Trolls make you Foolish arguments, we will forgive you if you can not read. The Rent-Seeking Mercantilists and their Zero-Sum game are continuing their game of Lie, Cheat and Steal, Lie by calling it “New” but in fact its the same “Old” game and they use Cheating and Stealing with Governments help to gain their ultimate goal of Dominating the World and the subjection of its people. Foolish Trolls.

  • killerbeans

    I think that Kissinger is more simple and nefarious in his thinking: The changes he wants in the USA is to merely write the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is every language, strengthen the right to pursue happiness in the USA, but subscribe to a scorched earth policy in the rest of the world.

  • Danny B

    Chief of staff, General Dempsey said that we are going to have to fight a total war with ISIS. He also said that we are going to have to dedicate all of our economy to winning the war. I see his lips moving but, all I hear is Raytheon and General Dynamics.

  • Goldcoaster

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer. Kissinger.

  • autonomous

    Attempting to find wisdom in Kissinger is like trying to retard the flammability of hydrogen in the Hindenburg with nitroglycerin. The final collapse of socialism will produce a bang that will far surpass the whimper of the collapse of Soviet communism.

  • Jimmy

    This is what I have to say,… FHK

  • Anisha Dunne

    All of these words assembled here on this page by this…DISGRACEFUL WAR CRIMINAL, are nothing but a lame intent by a cowardly puppet offering his services for favors by an UNLAWFUL, presumptive ‘Global Estate Trust/Vatican/Crown and all their phony myriad ‘secret societies’ whether it be Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, OTO, et al…to ‘do his part’ to help maintain the false illusion of ‘legitimacy’ for ANY of them!!!! Their stupid ‘New World Order’ is NOT for, by, of THEM, but of the awake, aware people of this earth who have had quite enough of the ‘scatology’ and stench of death of their OLD WORLD ORDER!!!

    Hey, look Henry, the Emperor has NO freakin clothes, and is as UGLY as hell with all those brown/green scales, tail, and blood sucking snout!!!

  • Burticus

    The only thing I have to offer German-born commie Heinz Alfred Kissinger is an American-made round from my German-made Sig Sauer 556 rifle. Respect? Nein!

    • No need to use violent metaphors.

      • me

        Relax DB!

        • Bill Ross

          DB has to be cautious and clear on the initiating violence issue, first, to stay on philosophical “message” and second, it is only a matter of time before states “legally” link comments to website owners, alleging the host is an “accessory to crime”, by tolerating free speech, when the “law” opines that we are only free to express what THEY consider legitimate. All of our rights have become hyphenated, only valid if our “predators on the bench” agree.

      • dfacts

        How about a joy-filled, group-grope, war crimes trial followed by an exuberant, hemp necktie party and some good cognac?

    • Praetor

      About the threat of violence to the death of a single individual. A true story, make it short, from the past (30 plus years ago). A friend of mine came to me and said, I’m going to kill that guy (a, department head), I’ll just say the guys only goal in life was to fire everyone that worked there, this was to cover up his own incompetence, we have all seen this kind, got his job because he knows someone, not, WHAT he knows. Well, I tell my friend, yes, we all feel that way, but, why ruin your life over apiece of crap like that. I said, his life is obviously one of a living hell, look at him, he is around 40 and looks like he is 60, living a miserable life, “at that time”. Well some 14 or 15 years ago, I hear this department head had contracted spinal cancer and die a miserable life, his wife left him, his kids hated him. He was also a serial sex harasser of women, real bad guy. So, if my friend had done away with him 30 plus years ago, his miserable life would have been shortened and his pain and suffering would have been lessened and my friends life would have been ruined. Life has away of taking care of the bad people, in time. How do you know that Heinz Alfred Kissinger’s life is not one of total misery or will become one of total abject miser and pain, why would you wish to deprive Heinz of such a life, let him live, he will never be happy and content, that’s his problem. He is never satisfied and that goes for all of his Elite friends too. Why ruin your life over scum like that, that’s stupid, let nature take its course.

      • alaska3636

        Like the idea of a creator, I can not confirm your analysis, however, I suspect that it is the way of the world. My humble experience…it is good advice to do right, take responsibility for yourself and loved ones, and let the mighty universe work it self out; it is mere hubris to think that we can, should or ought control everything.

        • Bologna in The China Shop

          Well said.

    • Don Duncan

      Individuals who preach an anti-life policy are only a problem if some elite has the power to implement it. A powerful elite ruling class can only exist if the masses want it. It follows the masses are to blame for the world situation, if only indirectly by defaulting on their obligation to self-rule. Delegation of running your life to someone else never works out well. When a whole society or culture does it, war and totalitarianism result.

  • Earl of Isadore

    HK says: “The triumph of a radical movement might bring order to one region while setting the stage for turmoil in and with all others. The domination of a region by one country militarily, even if it brings the appearance of order, could produce a crisis for the rest of the world.”

    Could there be a better description of the current state of affairs, i.e.: The US vis-a-vis ROW?

    Odd that Kissinger frets about lofty principles and bemoans postponements of the shining city of global governance but no mention of the internet, energy geopolitics, USD as global reserve currency, predatory banking institutions, drone warfare, surveillance state, secessionist movements, etc, etc, etc. as if none of that was relevant to our current situation.

  • Phyl

    The IRON MOUNTAIN REPORT is not a hoax…
    In 1961 The Kennedy Administration ordered a Top Secret Study to Determined the problems facing the United States.

    If the world moved from an era of war to a Golden Age of Peace.

    By 1963, the selection of specialists had been made. The final study group consisted of 15 Experts in various academic disciplines, selected for their expertise in their respective fields.

    Their first and last meetings were held at an underground nuclear survival retreat called – IRON MOUNTAIN. This study was concluded in 1966.

    President Lyndon Johnson gave the order that the report was never to be released. Due to the nature of the conclusions reached. One of the men involved in this study elected to release to the public at great risk to himself under the name of John Doe.

    It was published in 1967 by Dial Press. The Establishment promptly renounced it as a hoax.


    Iron Mountain is now hard to obtain, but many large libraries still have copies of it.
    This Report looks deep into the soul of the NEW WORLD ORDER.

    IRON MOUNTAIN is the covert agenda to bring the World and America, under the control of the UNITED NATIONS.

    The conclusions ARE NOW BEING IMPLEMENTED UPON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT. As this documentary will prove beyond all doubt.

    What you are about to see and hear IS REAL.
    It is very DISTURBING yet real.
    It is FRIGHTENING yet real.

    NO PERSON IN AMERICA IS SAFE, because inspite of all the denials of Authorities, IT IS REAL AND THESE PLANS ARE NOW COMING TO PASS.

    This Report will show you how the “Rich Men of the Earth” are operating and Why. You will now understand why America is changing into a fascist Police State.
    You will understand why all Federal Law Enforcement Agencies will soon be merged into ONE FEDERAL POLICE FORCE, called the MJTF POLICE.


    It is a look into the soul of LUCIFER THE ANTICHRIST, long foretold by JESUS CHRIST who in his Love for mankind, warned us 2000 years ago this was coming. IT IS NOW HERE.

    It’s objective was to determine, accurately and realistically the nature of the problems that would confront the United States.
    If and when a condition of permanent Peace should arise…


    And DRAFT A PROGRAM for dealing with this contingency.


    How Do We Control The People Of America If We Move Into An Era Of Peace?

    The “ERA OF PEACE” was part of the Agenda for eventual World Government. under the United Nations. longed planned by the Elite.

    IRON MOUNTAIN was ordered in 1961, the same year that the United States made major moves towards DISARMAMENT.

    The KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION knew that the United States would have to submerged under the UNITED NATIONS.

    How could the American people be convinced to give up their Constitution and Bill Of Rights?
    How could they be controlled and what should the Government expect?

    In 1961 PUBLIC LAW 87-297 was passed, paving the way for the United States to be merged into the United Nations.

    PUBLIC LAW 87-297 violates the clear intent of the Constitution (our right to bear arms) calling for the DISARMING of all Americans.
    This was to be done via a gradual DISARMAMENT, and then building up the United Nations with a powerful standing army.
    more@ – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY2VQtGgAJA

    • Bill Ross

      I would caution all of those who are looking for some “specific” grand conspiracy, with known or even constant white / black hats that YOU ARE VERY WRONG, or, at best, partially correct. Truth is predators are “out to get YOU” and, their methodologies are as ad-hoc, adaptive and innovative as your individually chosen defense.

      But, luckily, there is a SURE general defense, tested by the school of hard knocks (history):


      • Phyl

        and Of course you are such an expert on everything wow! Reminds me of those who stand at the pulpit and spout out bs to their followers telling their sheep that they know what’s best for them, do this do that I, I, I will tell you how this goes. You DO AS I SAY I KNOW WHAT”S BEST FOR YOU! what bollocks!

        • Blank Reg

          Well, if you’re espousing that there is some One Global Satanic Conspiracy working in secret for decades in a focused, unbending effort to subjugate us all, and it will take the combined enlightenment of the entire planet’s population to fight it, then we’re already fucked. It will simply never happen.

        • Earl of Isadore

          … and you stand for what, exactly? Easy to throw a stone, harder to put your own position on the line. Your own knowing what is best leads you to cry bollocks on Bill? So let’s hear it.

        • Dave Meekhof

          Jeez, how many times did you state, “IS REAL” from your ‘pulpit’. Bill urges caution and you blow a gasket. Not impressed. Anyway, thanks for the reminder of that report.

        • Bill Ross

          Clearly, you have not comprehended any of my postings and links, preferring a false strawman model of what YOU BELIEVE I am stating / proving. And, you interpreted my “caution” as personally disputing you, an attack. Ponder this: if your opinion is there is only ONE conspiracy, you WILL dedicate YOUR efforts to fighting it, leaving you wide open and unprepared to defend from the fate that other conspiring groups have in store for YOU. This is equivalent to the strategic military blunder of “fighting the last war”, oblivious to the fact the players, terrain and gameboard has changed.

  • Bruce C

    I’m looking forward to the day that “Mr. Kissinger” passes away.

    I know that will mainly be symbolic, but he is such an iconic architect of the late 20th century U.S. empire that his death may inspire hope.

  • mutton

    One evil B’tard.

  • 2prickit

    I picked out this yarn “‘reputation’ can generate some (or any) credibility” from these comments because its plausibility relies upon one’s conscious knowledge of former actions — viewers won’t/don’t remember diddly squat! I take it that “Ill repute” is meant by “reputation” for the remnant of doubters like myself. I see no evidence that the targeted audience for this promotion of the old and familiar Prince of Foreign Affairs possesses an inkling of knowledge as to who is paying for this spot? He is for hire. It is rather His previous position in FedGov and His often lofted resurrection; his face and voice are most familiar. My point being that it is to THE FAMILIAR (face/voice) goes the empathic connection, however much gleeful scorn your love evokes within this master of guile. This is no mere notion of mine: review, with numbers, how many Faces/Voices grace most popular movie/broadcast productions and news casts; those same Faces/Voices repeatedly have receive the Grammy; those most adept at the art of acting, present DESIRE and FEAR —empathy— as we know it, best. If this be the case, then it is a mindless, dissolute society of voyeurs and exhibitionists that receive FedGov’s first teat–And their heads will be the first to roll off the back side of a Muslim scimitar.

  • middleway

    [Reduce and] “Maintain humanity at under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”. With this objective realized, wouldn’t it be much easier to bring your ancient doctrines to fruition, Mr. Kissinger? … and no one believes it is happening now.

  • Bruce C

    A question for the DB: Why do you think the Fed and other central banks stopped the market crash in 2008 instead of taking advantage of it to usher in more centralization and power? Why do you think that next time (after the “Wall Street Party” crashes, say, in 2016/7) will be different?

    I know the Fed gained some new powers in 2008, but it seems like they (and other globalist organizations) could have gained a lot more had they let panic ensue.

    • They didn’t stop the crash. It took place.

      • Bruce C

        What? You don’t think their interventions stopped the market’s decline? All the alleged short-term loans (supposedly in the trillions) to hundreds of financial institutions, including European banks? QE1? TARP? Lowering of interest rates? Not allowing GM, Fannie/Freddie, Bear Sterns go bankrupt (and presumably many more would have followed)? They did all kinds of things.

        Why do you think they did that?

        • Bill Ross

          “stopped the market’s decline?”

          well, apparently, you are “believing” faux economic stats, as published by states, generating their own “report card”. The “value” of microbucks underlying all $US economic stats has been redefined downwards by counterfeiting (QE). Perhaps the penny should be used as the standard? Then, we will have a 100X “larger” economy and, people can “enjoy” the “improved” economy, counting pennies as opposed to dollars, appreciating their “riches”.

          • Bruce C

            That’s a different aspect. I’m talking about nominally, which is what most of the financial world is geared to.

            That said, you’re right the DOW/S&P has fallen when priced in gold. I saw a chart showing that recently but I can’t remember where.

            But nevertheless, if the gov/Fed didn’t intervene, however convoluted everything is/was, I think the stock market would have dropped (in real terms and nominally) even further.

      • Casey Phyle

        It did take place and had the potential to go all the way, but they stopped it, with difficulty, from expanding. Why? Maybe they were not ready yet for the slaughter. Maybe they chickened out at the last moment. Maybe the schedule says it must come later. How would we know?
        All I know is that no one should be able to make decisions like that. And for that the money printing power must be removed from them and honest money restored. Not to forget to prosecute them, a la Nuremberg, for crimes against humanity and confiscate all heir ill-gotten wealth they have plundered in the last 200 years or so.

        • Bruce C

          OR, maybe impoverishment is not a good way to invoke change. The gist of Kissinger’s “plan” is to appeal to moral relativism and pragmatism to dilute the US Constitution/BoR for all countries/regions to get along and go along. That’s been happening for decades already mainly because – I think – the citizenry have been, and still are, satiated with entertainment, cheap food and gas, and maybe soon to come new strains of recreational drugs.

          Furthermore, even if force/impoverishment is the preferred strategy to usurp freedom and liberty for nearly all, the 2008 “financial crisis” would have been a much better opportunity IMO. Now the globalists are having more trouble implementing their agendas than ever as more and more people are figuring things out. In 2 or 3 years when the “Wall Street Party” is over I seriously doubt most people will be as easy to fool and manipulate. Besides, Kissinger’s plan sounds like it would take years to really implement, or certainly longer than this WSP will last.

          It’s now clearer than ever that the central banks are heavily involved in the manipulation of the financial markets: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-30/its-settled-central-banks-trade-sp500-futures

          I really can’t see how this can last much longer. People know too much too quickly now. A full financial market strike may be imminent.

  • Bologna in The China Shop

    Kissinger can start the process of adhering to global norms by standing trial for war crimes.

  • Gene Lo

    I get the sense that he is trying to write the script for his own legacy

    Here are some excerpts:
    “… the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace…. the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order.”
    “Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries…”
    I want to gasp!
    Where, Mr. Kissinger, are:
    + Liberty? (given away for “security” against a false terrorist threat)
    + Democracy? (people are not informed that their politicians are bought by a Zionist state)
    + Lasting Peace? (never seen since Vietnam, and other wars HK helped to engineer)
    + Free Markets? (rigged by laws that give huge corporations advantages, and allow others to capture the commons, and profiteer on property rights, on what truly belongs to us all)
    They are mostly a lie. A curtain pulled over our eyes to hide the power adnd wealth garbs that the elites have done,

    Do I sound angry? I am. I have had my fill of Lies from Zionist elites

    This guy should be indicted for the various crimes he has committed. If he dies rotting in jail, it would be just.

  • Earl of Isadore

    Apparently HK will not be riding to the rescue of the USD as he did with his petrodollar scheme 40+ years ago. Does he now pretend he was defending truth, justice, and the American Way when he engineered the oil crisis and tossed a bone to the perpetually insecure house of Saud? Probably no single living person did more to create the underlying conditions for global conflict than this pompous teuton.

  • This be quite relevant here and would advise one and all that the stage for old dinosaurs in the US may matter not a jot elsewhere and to Greater IntelAIgent Gamers when their acts are in blind desperation for causes and influence increasingly lost and found wanting equitable and mutually beneficial, positively reinforcing benefit for the many because of their rabid and rancid support for a few nowhere near to even 1% …… and because of a distinct lack of Future Greater IntelAIgent Games Play Information for MetaDataBase Processing into Present Intelligence for Media and IT Hosting and Dissemination ….. Universal Sharing and Product Promotion.

    amanfromMars [1408300716] commenting on http://sluggerotoole.com/2014/08/29/friday-thread-where-do-good-ideas-come-from/

    Where do good ideas come from, Mick? They come in great chunks and bits and bytes of intelligence led information, rather than just in smaller fragments of imagination, although both processes have their favourite disciples and pet programs attending to business and vested interests.

    Do you think the spooky wonks sucking on the public finances tit in Palace Barracks* are responsible for such as may be spun as akin to virtual jihadism here ….. or be they little more than just idle spectators with the Private Pirate Sector the True Vector where All Real Live Operational Virtual Environment Action and HyperRadioProActive IT takes place with Command and Control of AI, Creative Cyber Space, Computers and Communications?

    And yes, I do suppose that is calling them out. How very nice for them whenever so much is readily available to them, if they be up for it in these new zerodays and ways and means with memes.


    cc …… https://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/constant-nav-items-holding/contact-us/make-a-complaint-about-our-activities.html re. not so much a complaint as an expression of current disappointment in present sub-prime product line and/or lack of prime future content presentation from intelligent intellectual property stores/raw source code bases.


    Trick or treat? Real event or false flag? 🙂 And would you dare care what is able to remotely rule and/or ruin y’all from space if IT so wished/wishes?

    Methinks very few would realise it perfectly possible and a current and readily available default facility/universal utility/anonymous autonomous virtual machine capability.

    * Security Service [MI5] Holywood, N.Ireland HQ base

  • cromwell

    This man has served the cause of the one percent all of his life. He continues to do so. Yes I took note of Mr Wyles observation to read between the lines. Frankly it frightens me to death.
    It boils down to some simple truths. Free markets scare the living hell out of these control freaks. They cannot exist without the manipulated / democratic sham that they impose on all. War is their smokescreen, individual liberty their enemy.
    As an Englishman, living in a lock down state, may I make one observation? The armed American citizen is the only thing standing in “their” way. If that goes, then all hope within a western context goes.
    The Pashtun has shown the way historically, individual and local loyalties are the root and branch of freedom. Not the collective and marxist.
    It is with interest I watch the machinations of these old men now. From Soros and his ilk, to the elder “statesmen” ( sarc ) they desire control. Their methods, the same historical evils. War, poverty and more of the same.
    Europe will fracture, aided by Russia indirectly. The US needs to fracture, to a Confederacy of free states.
    Then, given new technologies, free markets stand a chance.
    A dream? I think history teaches many things, one of which is the wild card. Maybe as yet, unseen.

    • Bill Ross

      history (once you deconstruct the LIES of “winners”) is but a chronicle of what works and what does not within an environment whose rules are fixed by the laws of physics and natural law. The basic truth is: we live in an action precedes consequence reality and, can CHOOSE to do anything allowed by the laws of nature. The only choice of others is “how they respond”.

      Those who choose to suppress (cannot, only punish) freedom are, by definition, reactive. The pro-active will always prevail, both by the laws of physics and, the laws of war (Sun Tsu, The Art of War).

      So, carpe diem, and, your OWN destiny:


      ..and, waiting on the constitutionalists (AKA: terrorists) in the US, while not tending your own garden, allows tyrannical forces to concentrate on them, depending on your lack of dissent, apart from powerless words.

      I say: split their forces, re-evolution EVERYWHERE until fully informed “consent of the governed” is achieved for EVERY individual human being.

    • john cummins

      wrongo, it’s the .001% that he has served…

  • Namaste

    Dr. Kissenger?? who has prevented the fair share of wealth in the world?! writes about Fair and Just.

  • chuck martel

    Kissinger is ninety-one years old and probably doesn’t know if he’s afoot or horseback. The op-ed piece was composed by a team of neo-con non-entities with the goal of using US munitions to bring the brown people of the world into line. It’s so poorly written that it’s unlikely that it will influence anyone beyond those already predisposed to western authoritarianism. A more important article in the same issue of the WSJ is the misguided European concern over deflation.

    • Old as he is, Kissinger has “written” another book, from which the article was taken. Obviously, there is a reason, one that may be a good deal MORE important than deflation ….

      • chuck martel

        Wander around the village square this afternoon and ask the people you encounter what they think of Kissinger’s piece in the WSJ. There’s a pretty good chance that nobody will have any idea what you’re talking about, if they even know who Kissinger might be. He hasn’t been a factor in US politics or diplomacy for over 35 years, half the population of the country having been born since then, and simply having outlived most of his contemporaries. It’s pretty tough for even a healthy, young, dynamic jerk to have things his own way, a doddering old man with one foot in the grave doesn’t have anything to do with national policy dynamics unless he throws money at it, like Soros.

        • He writes a book being published by a prestigious publisher and gets a spread in the Wall Street Journal to promo it and you believe he is “not a factor?”


          • chuck martel

            Mr. & Mrs. Bill Clinton both had meaningless and generally unread books published with big bucks advances, too.

          • Sydney

            Undoubtably this article is written in code a la the Leo Strauss directed political science department at the University of Chicago and the Golden Lie stuff. Whether Kissinger is the author, or master planner is not the point. Dr. Kissinger, although a doctor (ha), still to a large extent is likely a teleprompter reader like the rest that are in view. The undeniable point is that this WSJ article comes from the top and is sent out in the form of a coded message directed toward the functionaries and cronies who likely know what it means. I for one greatly appreciate this DB presentation in deciphering it for the rest of us. Best Wishes.

          • Thanks, we did our best.

          • Earl of Isadore

            Count me very interested in who actually put their fingers on the keyboard to write HK’s book and subsequent WSJ article, and who sat in a comfortable chair reading the rough drafts, suggesting revisions. HK is a brand that represents a certain point of view. His name is being associated with a message intended to produce very specific thought patterns in your brain. Henry (such a friendly, american appellation) used in this context, is a tool, and nothing less than a tool at this point. The actual person, Heinz Alfred Kissinger, born in Fürth, Bavaria, Germany, in 1923 during the Weimar Republic, to a family of German Jews, is no more responsible for the above referenced article than I am.

        • vongoh

          The people at the top level of this global cabal are insiders until death.

          Brzezinski and David Rockefeller are both old fossils too … do you honestly believe they also have checked out early and have ‘nothing to do with national policy dynamics?

          • Dave Meekhof

            Worse yet, since they have used the system to become fabulously wealthy, they use an offshoot of corporate personhood to form trusts, foundations, endowments, etc; to ensure their willful ideals are thrust upon proceeding generations. Rulership from the grave. So back to Chuck, he is definitely a factor, whether or not the peasants are rejoicing.

    • In recent public interviews, Kissinger doesn’t exactly come of as a senile old man. Old yes, but senile, no. He is still a very dangerous man. At a minimum he heads up organizations and groups, designed to perpetuate wars. He is indeed a very dangerous man to all of humanity.

  • Mark

    Never let a good crisis or crises go to waste even if you have to create them yourself. They have done a good job of that by funding both sides of conflicts with our tax dollars. They are good at creating a situation, then creating a skewed picture of what is happening so they can propose the solution to fix the problem which supports their goals of increased power. Putting the same people in charge and giving them greater power would only make the situation worse. This is the same as the financial situation. Giving them more power in global governance will only escalate violence as giving them more financial power only continues to destroy the economy.

  • LawrenceNeal

    A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance

    Noam Chomsky would beg to differ:

    “Goes way back to James Madison and the foundation of the constitution. A polyarchy is a system in which the power resides in the hands of those which Madison called the wealth of the nation, the responsible class of men, and the rest of the population is fragmented, distracted, allowed to participate every couple of years… they are allowed to come and say “Yes… thank you… why don’t you continue for another 4 years”. And they have a little choice among the “responsible men”, the “wealth of the nation”. That’s the way the country was founded.”

    • Dave Meekhof

      True that, yet it was better than anything before it. What platform should support the work of securing liberty? You got a better one?

      • Don Duncan

        No.! It was not better. It failed like all the other “platforms”.

        I suggest 7 billion platforms, supporting themselves by voluntary interactions. Any involuntary actions would be treated as immoral and anti-social, barbaric.

        • Dave Meekhof

          OK good. If hypothetically, this ideal begins now, then I’ll be sure to strap on before going to work on Tuesday; and I’ll probably be home early as commerce contracts to the bare essentials. Don’t get me wrong. Compared to what we have now, I’d prefer it. But you think there are no voluntary immoral, anti-social and barbaric acts? Lets be real. Seven billion creating how many laws? No, we want a minimum. If we want or expect a minimum rule of law, then we have to tolerate some kind of authority. What works is ‘bottom up’ where authority has to face, eye to eye, those who GRANT and CONSENT to that authority. What doesn’t work and fails time and time again is unrestrained, far off, and therefore militaristic centralized authority. The Constitutional Republic came as close to a workable system as any as far as I am concerned. But the US Constitution is flawed, in that it didn’t restrain the combining of State and the third source of influence over individuals, economy. Separate the powers of Church, State and Commerce for a better Constitutional Republic, if it still can be done. Otherwise, get armed and maybe I’ll see you at the watering hole, the center of political discussion.

          • FEEuser

            “Authority”? The only legitimate authority over your life is YOU.

    • FEEuser

      Good points, Lawrence. This is the kind of stuff that is, or SHOULD be front and center in today’s political debates. We need to start with the basics, i.e., the proper use of force. No one should have force brought against him unless he himself has used it against his neighbors.

      As for the founding of the US, it was not what mainstream historians tell us. It was, in fact, a legal framework for across the board, centralized power. That was what Hamilton wanted, and that was what he got. Fortunately for him, Washington went along with that.

  • RED

    Very intersting and enjoyable as always!
    I have been very busy as of late, and lack time to engage in much “feedback”, but my opinions and positions appear to be “well represented” by some regular stalwarts in our group.

  • SSMcDonald

    Here’s the facts. Near the end of this age, our world must be having a major war. The one-world government steps in with antichrist as the leader bringing about peace worldwide. Antichrist, as world peace-leader, probably located in Jerusalem, deceives many, until he declares himself to be God. At that point in time, all calamity breaks out as God brings about the end of this age, no more grace period. Folks, it’s not my fantasy; this scenario is written in anyone’s Bible, just waiting to be read.

    • Dave Meekhof

      Ya, written two thousand+ years ago by men savvy about the geopolitical/economic circumstances of their time. But it is significant when we realize that history tends to repeat. So don’t take it literally, rather read the meaning and wisely apply it to this day and age. Be a man of God, not of ancient men.

      • SSMcDonald

        Please allow me to disagree using just one example in anyone’s Bible. Ezekiel 36-37 was written 500 years before Christ (2500 or so years ago). Israel had already been divided into two separate nations: Israel and Judah. Yet in Ezekiel 36-37, the Bible describes (prophecy) a time when these two nations would be brought back into their land (which is today’s Israel), not as two divided nations, but joined back together as one nation. That prophecy occurred exactly on May 14, 1948. This is the date and event that starts the last generation of mankind. I don’t make this stuff up; it’s in your Bible which is just as current today just as it was when God had it written down for man to use. Do you now understand?

        • Dave Meekhof

          The tenth commandment just as one example,
          “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.
          Now I have nothing against the wisdom applied here, though I’ll have to use my imagination to replace ‘ox’ with tractor or truck; but manservant and maidservant? Though widely accepted in that day, that is no longer applicable. But I won’t toss out the message of ‘don’t covet’, just the manservant bit. Apply it wisely is all I am saying.
          Israel, for whatever the believed reason is, has been in turmoil for millennia. Whatever ones’ interpretation is, apply it wisely without dragging me and all into a world conflagration…please. Else, through psychological/sociological manipulation, one is only helping the world planners.

          • Dave Meekhof

            After all, they read the book too. Actually, “they” the Council of Nicaea (circa AD.325) edited and assembled many books into the ‘Holy Bible’ for everyman consumption. And “they” are not stupid, they pioneered/advanced the art of being learned.

  • SSMcDonald

    By the way, adding to my other post, Kissinger is not the antichrist, nor is Obama, Soros, Rockefeller nor any any other human, Satan is not going to allow anyone other than himself to impersonate Jesus Christ.

    • john cummins

      except Nero

  • Kissinger is a disgusting piece of work; a sociopath of the highest order.
    But he’s also just an elite-trusted messenger boy who works for the real powers behind the thrones.
    If not him, they certainly would have found someone else.

  • chuck martel

    Not only was the WSJ hand wringing on possible deflation in Europe more pertinent than the clear as mud opinion piece by Kissinger, wealth management editor Kevin Noblet’s story of how his financial manager failed him is an eye-opener as well. “Investing”, or gambling with money unneeded for day to day expenses, is too complicated for the writer who actually covers that activity for the leading paper in the country, so he gives his hard-earned zlotys to some boiler room operator hoping for a return on stocks rising. He could have bought a couple of truck loads of alfalfa or a scissor-lift to rent out or any number of real assets but that would require paying attention and actually doing some work. No time for that. You’re supposed to be able to just give some stranger your money and then he’s supposed to give you back even more some day. That’s called dreaming.

  • bailintheboat

    Right. The Founders had these carriage stickers “World Peace”.
    That was their vision? Kissinger off his rocker, remember that the next time he steps out of his limo.
    Peace through force? There is a huge difference between New World control, and liberty.
    edit 8/7: consider reading Ellis Washington, The Progressive Revolution: Liberal Fascism through the Ages.
    “(Vols. I & II) chronicles both the historical significance and political deconstruction that the Progressive Revolution,
    or the Progressive Age, (circa1870–present) has continuously perpetrated against society to this day.”

  • Don Duncan

    I would not advise reacting to these policy statements. Kissinger & cronies are little-minded men given big power. They do not build, they destroy. Without support, they are non-entities. The support, the political system of giving moral blank checks out to so-called representatives is the problem. But attacking it is a negative approach to the solution. A positive approach is to advocate self-governance, self-reliance, in favor of local solutions implemented by voluntary associations.

  • Mark Friedlander

    I’m sure Dr. Kissinger would love to return to his “glory” years, when he and tricky Dick experienced their great foreign policy “triumphs”. Too bad tricky Dick had to go and commit fraud against the entire world….
    Global governance will never succeed until the Lord jesus Christ returns and the “government will be on his shoulders”.

    • john cummins

      I would love to hear the Kissinger Tapes

    • WinChll

      Can’t help but wonder how K played N.


    Dr Kissinger is a member of the elite groups seeking one world government. So any advice from him if institutionalized would be a sentence of death and slavery for the world’s masses. Enough said.

  • Henry Kissinger should be put away for life, along with his cheerleaders. Hillary Clinton, and James Baker included. Henry Kissinger is a parasite on liberty and on free people everywhere. Natural law provides natural liberty for everyone. If a man/or woman can obtain a small parcel of land which they can claim for their own, then they can achieve liberty, and prosperity, above and beyond their wildest imagination. Henry Kissinger, Hillary Clinton, and their Washington D.C. minions are the most important threat to liberty ever known to humankind .PUT THOSE CRIMINALS IN PRISON. And watch the world expand like never before.

    • WinChll

      Put zbiggy boy in there as well. Imagine he claims the US didn’t attack Syria because of social networking? Ya right, as though that would stop these anti socials.

  • rahrog

    The best way to stop the masters of messenger boy henry is to decentralize. SECEDE…SECEDE…SECEDE!!! Then SECEDE again.

    • FEEuser

      Agreed. Other than the slow, but steady erosion of the reputations of people like Kissinger as it occurs naturally in the Internet Reformation, I see no workable political solution for the US (or EU, or any super-sized political unit) than SECESSION.

      Centralized government blocks and stymies every other kind of attempt at “reform” and even survival. It’s us or them.

      • WinChll

        I’m hearing noises about Germany possibly breaking from the EU?

        • FEEuser

          The Germans would be well advised to go ahead and do so. There is no future in a collectivist system, the EU or otherwise.

          If something is too big to manage, then the only fix for it is to make it smaller.

          To say that the EU is too big is an incredible understatement. Those people cannot even speak each other’s languages! At least Americans can talk to each other. But if the American union is not working, even though we speak the same language, then how much worse off must the EU be where they don’t?

  • Mark Eibner

    Piece Of S**T. No more words should be spent on him.

  • FEEuser

    Anthony, I think you have captured the essence of Kissinger’s essay, as far as that can be done considering the cryptic language.

    What strikes me is the sheer arrogance of minds which cannot define peace in any other way than the disarmament, neutralization, and domination of their neighbors. Kissinger may use innocuous language to express it, but this is what their agenda amounts to.

    What that says about their sanity I shall leave to the reader’s imagination.

    It never seems to occur to such men that simply setting a good example for their neighbors by practicing peace and free trade would rid the world of the upheaval from which it now suffers. The trouble with such men is that they cannot conceive of a world in which their neighbors are free. I really don’t think that men like Kissinger believe in human liberty at all.

    Yet here they are in the strange position of having to contemplate the limits of their power and the dangers of imperial overstretch. Their cherished New World Order is beginning to show some unexpected cracks in its foundations, and they are growing in scope in unpredictable ways and directions. Can any man or group of men ever hope to get a handle on such mysteries? Anyone who thinks he can is surely mad.

    One admission of Kissinger’s reveals a fatal flaw in their plans: “The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state.” Obviously, as Kissinger admits, the two systems cannot possibly continue to coexist. I see the global system of free trade as subjecting the nation-state to creative destruction and dominating the world when enough of the common people finally learn that they can do without the nation-state.

    A world which is trying to prosper through honest free trade is beset by organized crime. Henry Kissinger is the mouthpiece of these crooks who would rob us of our freedoms and our property in the name of “authority” and “order” as defined by said crooks. Modify the U.S. Constitution? At whose behest? The power elite? We know what changes we could expect from those scoundrels: more centralization and “globalization.”

  • WinChll

    From the man who wittingly said laws we break immediately, the constitution will take longer. What constitution?
    This man has spoke often about order out of chaos and understands full well a nuclear threat on US land will put enough fear into Americans so as to give up their liberty, while he proclaims the spread of democracy. Do not be fooled, for his idea is merely the apppearance of such. V i l e!