Canine Lives Matter
By Shane Smith - September 24, 2015

A seven-year old story that occurred in Prince George's County, Maryland, has stuck in my mind more firmly than any other as an example of the indiscriminate barbarism that can happen at the hands of the police state's knuckle-draggers.

The story is this: A package deemed suspicious by law enforcement was delivered to the address of the Berwyn Heights mayor, Cheye Calvo. SWAT waited in black SUVs for Calvo to return from walking his dogs, around 7pm. Once Calvo arrived home with his dogs, the SWAT team did just what you would expect them to do: broke down the door with a battering ram while screaming, and immediately gunned down Calvo's two dogs, Payton and Chase. They pointed guns at everyone, threatened death multiple times and trashed his house. The family was held for four hours until the cops realized they had just raided the mayor's house.

According to the Salon piece, when Cheye's wife arrived home later, she found her dogs' blood tracked throughout her home by the cops who continually walked through the blood before walking through the rest of the house. The Calvos didn't get an apology. In typical fashion, the police attempted to massage the official story: The dogs charged, Calvo tried slamming the door on the officers who tried to initially enter the home peacefully, etc.

The autopsy results on the dogs showed that the dogs were shot while running from the officers, not at them. The package, which contained marijuana, was sent using a dummy address, which, unfortunately for Calvo, happened to be his address. The official story unraveled quickly, but what happened can't be taken back for the Calvo family.

Stories like this can barely elicit a response from readers, due to the shocking barbarity of the officers. Who would shoot a dog? Who would break into the home of a quaint, upper-middle-class home and threaten murder to a benign man and his mother, and gun down their dogs? What criminal element in our nature is given free rein when armed with a badge and gun? But most of all, who would kill a dog?

Police kill dogs so frequently that the term puppycide has been given to the phenomenon. The stories of police killing non-threatening dogs are so numerous that I'm not sure where to begin, so I'll list a few examples from my home state of Oklahoma.

Blanchard, OK: An officer pulls into a private driveway to ask the resident for directions. A clearly harmless dog bounds up to him; he kills the dog. Here is the video, if you can stand it. The officer lied about the incident until the homeowner, Tammy Christopher, released video of the incident. Christopher received $19,000 over her dog's death, but it won't bring the dog back.

Ardmore, OK: Officer brags about how "awesome" it was to shoot a family dog that posed no risk to him or anyone else. Again, the dog is dead, no coming back. A family dog, a little girl's best friend.

At the other end of the spectrum, and one almost as disturbing, is how police, and the public, act toward police dogs. Last year, also in my state of Oklahoma, a police dog that was killed while chasing a suspect received a disturbingly opulent state funeral. The endless procession of squad cars, the hundreds of attendees, the morbid open casket, all point to a sick adulation of authority. View the pictures and gag. What happened to get the dog killed? A car chase suspect crashed and ran away. The cop controlling the German shepherd let the dog loose, knowing full well that either the suspect or the dog would die. When the dog reached the suspect, he turned and stabbed the dog to prevent an attack. This conveniently gave the first officer at the scene a reason to unload his clip into the suspect, which is what happened.

This isn't all to say that somehow dog's lives matter more than ours, but rather to ask: What is someone that is able to sleep at night after shooting a family pet capable of? Is one side effect of the officer-hiring process that they inevitably select for personalities that get off on shooting pets? Cops aren't the most brilliant examples of human intelligence, according to their IQ scores, and this seems to be by design. Robert Jordan sued for discrimination back in 1999 for being barred from police work due to an IQ deemed too high for police work in New London, Connecticut. He scored a 33 on the exam, the equivalent to an IQ of 125, while the national average for officers is around 21, or an IQ of 104. Smart people tend to question the wisdom of a course of action; dummies do as they're told.

As government increases, as we are ever more disarmed via legislative decree, law enforcement will continue to select for amoral sociopaths who won't question their orders. A police state wants minions who enforce serfdom effectively. The side effect of this is innocents getting shot by hair-trigger idiots who let their rage take over too easily. This "I don't have time for this" mental state that most of these cops seem to be in right before they pull the trigger is disturbing on a number of levels, but more so given that more and more government agencies are arming their agents, and stockpiling weapons in what can only appear to be anticipation of a war with the American people. A federal agent granted the license of lethal force, under the influence of an entitlement mentality that seems to always arrive shortly after receiving a gun and badge, is a recipe for officially-sanctioned murder. A union card means he or she will never see a jail cell. An endlessly malleable, police-worshipping media means the victim will be defamed and the murderer elevated to sainthood by the very creature that employs him.

Public sector unions are entirely in favor of a larger, more intrusive government. A burgeoning police state means more union jobs; bigger unions mean greater political clout. As the gulf between the privileged class and the subservient class widens, there will be more opportunities to join the privileged in the form of water-carrying jobs. Becoming a low-level enforcer for the American Hydra has become very lucrative, as is shown by the cushy "public sector" perks that come with employment in the parasitic class. Minion status with the police state doesn't come without a moral trade-off, however. To gain entry, you will have to accept spying and ratting out your fellow citizens as a normal fact of life. If you have no qualms about that behavior, there may be a career waiting for you within the Surveillance Bureaucracy. Join the union and you'll have complete job security, with lifetime benefits. Follow orders, don't question them, and you'll have a bright career. Catch us a big fish, surpass your quota, and you'll rise quickly. Oh yes, you'll have to vote how we tell you to vote. No problem?

This is the metastization of the police state. When private sector employment is regulated into oblivion, the only choice is to become infantry for a tyrannical government. When you don't have the money to eat, or see a quick path to fortune, your mindset will quickly accommodate even the most morally odious of employment prospects. This is music to the Hydra's ears, and does he have a deal for you. This includes spying, snitching, blackmailing, entrapping and black-bagging your fellow citizens as part of a day's work. And as more directives are heaped upon a buckling serf class, capital punishment becomes an option for low-IQ thugs whose only skill in this life has been the unquestioning obedience to orders from authority.

Shane Smith is an accountant living in Norman, Oklahoma. He writes for Red Dirt Report. Liberty is his religion.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

  • Umberto Indicci

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn explained the proper reaction to such things.

  • Samarami

    The dead dogs are but distractions. The culprit is monopoly.

    It’s almost funny in a sense — if it weren’t so sad. Most of us received our primary and secondary educations either from government (“public” ha ha) educational scams, or from private or parochial schools highly regulated by psychopaths grouped under the umbrella of that malicious abstraction we’ve been trained to call “the state” http://www.ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/library/DemystState.html

    In those places we were taught as tiny tots the danger and egregiousness of monopolies — that “fat cats” must be regulated


    For our own good, of course. And that we need “protection” not only from fat cats, but also from evildoers who break “our” laws. Protect-and-serve. Nobody thought to ask, and nobody had the wherewithal to say — and it took me the better part of 50 years to come to see — that I had been instructed about monopolies by and from the most horrendous and abhorrent monopoly ever devised by man. Read this:


    That group of evildoers http://proliberty.com/observer/20080306.htm who hide under the mantra called “government” (an evil abstraction).

    In fact, here I was, a government educator, when I began to smell the coffee of liberty. I had flip-flopped from flaming liberal to arch conservative in a short amount of time, and had become highly involved in the election efforts of a man by the name of Barry Goldwater in 1964. He wanted to be grand wizard of the klan. This was the last time I ever voted in a political election — before many of you were born. I suppose you could consider those youthful Ron Paul enthusiasts of late my protégés.

    Karl Hess literally took me by the seat of the pants and the scruff of the neck and rubbed my nose in the works of a fledgling author by the name of Harry Browne. Harry later wrote what became and remains my operation manual: “How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World”. You can read a revised copy of “Freedom” in PDF here:


    Yes, dogs shot by police are a sad event. But all monopolies of violence will always degenerate to this. And the only way monopolies stay in place is through consent — and force of arms. But large scale consent is the key — nobody has enough arms to continually rule large masses of people all the time. Abstain from beans



    • Gil G

      Psychopath – that word doesn’t mean what you think means. A survey of violent prisoners shows most of them aren’t psychopaths – namely they can empathise with their victims’ suffering but choose to enjoy it instead.

    • Bill Ross

      love Harry Browne…

  • Tom

    The difficulty is that the police chiefs do not have to answer. Who is training these law enforcement officers? How much, if any, federal money comes in each time a Swat Team is called out? Why is it that these Police Officers do not have to give a urine samples?

    I recently watched a documentary where an Israeli soldier explained to some people in Baltimore what the “training” given in Israel consists of, and it is a story of depravity of the worst order. Tax exempt organizations send United States police to Israel for training lasting a month. They are taught to treat U.S. citizens the way Israelis treat Palestinians, and then they are unleashed on us.

  • 2prickit

    Has male-ness, manliness,–gone to the dogs? Some very qualified female tenancy applicants have been turned away because of their significant other being, in all appearance and manners, a Junk Yard Dog. This profiling that I might seem guilty of, has led me to surmise that more women are generally more frightened these days, while the males, generally, have become more emasculated; that is, deprived of a male role or identity and he feels emasculated because he cannot control his own sons’ behavior. So, in a sense with Shane’s very direct hand in this issue, here, I might plausibly posit that this knitch for police officers, by design of social engineers, has created a virtual escape from the reality of themselves. As for my tenants, none are employed by government entities; all are females companioned by well-mannered, four footed, canines.

  • Bill Ross

    “When private sector employment is regulated into oblivion”…

    …that is a reduction of productivity and honest, mutually agreed trade.

    force and fraud are the only alternatives of goal-seeking, and, must, by process of elimination, increase

    nothing to see here folks, just the state making itself more “necessary” (Machiavellian sense of meaning) to deal with “problems” of their own creation

    had enuf yet?, losing tolerance?

    here, take the cure:


  • Bill Ross

    having trouble differentiating the treatment that peaceful dogs and peaceful suspects (people) receive.

  • Pilgrim

    Evidently the illegitimate “government” no longer protects our God-given, Constitutionally-protected right of property ownership, they have now codified into their very procedures the violation of it.

    If my calculations of prophecy are right (big ‘maybe’ there), this evil age will end in 2034, but the feces will begin to hit the fan in 2018 when the sixth seal is opened. Followed, of course, by the trumpets beginning in 2023. That will be when these tyrants will face God’s vengeance.

  • Bruce C.

    I realize that I may be slow on the uptake here, but I struggle with the distinction between rare/ “outlier” events and trends. There seems to be ever increasing coverage of just about everything so in a country of 325 million and a world of 7 billion what is one to make of extremes?

    Shane’s essay is compelling, and alludes to the SS and Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany, but since I have zero personal experience with any such events/behavior I don’t know what to do. When I think about it I’m haunted by what others may have thought during their times. Maybe they thought the same as me? But, then again, they probably had a personal situation to complain about. I don’t.

    Still processing this.

  • Charlie

    I’ve followed police shootings of dogs since 1986. It’s not any new thing, see 1880s New York Times story, “The Death of Range,” about an Irish Setter in Wyoming, a children’s pet, whose brains were bashed out by a town sheriff. I’ve tried to get Hollywood movie makers, who are notoriously disinterested in receiving suggestions outside their small arrogant circle, to do movies depicting police misconduct.. They may consider making a novel into a movie if the book sells five million copies. I’d make a movie that would leave police sleepless for a week. I am not aware of any decent police, because I don’t hear any of them calling for the witch hunters among them to be culled. Thanks to this site for using the “I’d rather post as a guest” feature, those that don’t are engaging in censorship and I have reports of people being disallowed by Disqus from logging in with their own passwords being told “it’s already in use.” A case from across the country was particularly startling—the Leatherman case from Texas, in which police massacred Shakespeare and Ninja then stood in the front yard joking and “enjoying their seemingly limitless power.” Honestly I can’t see any net morality in police ranks.