Gold & Silver, STAFF NEWS & ANALYSIS
Gold Stocks Decline as Fed Bluffs That We’re Headed in the Right Direction
By Daily Bell Staff - May 23, 2016

Conditions for a rate increase by the Federal Reserve are “on the verge of broadly being met,” Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, told the Financial Times … According to an article on Sunday, Rosengren told the FT he was getting ready to back tighter monetary policy as economic and financial indicators had become more positive.  -Reuters

The more you find out about how central banks operate, the stranger the system seems.

Gold has moved down of late while stocks have been mixed. But the last time the Fed raised rates in December, stocks nearly collapsed.

Are we supposed to believe this time round there will be a different outcome? According to some at the Fed, the answer is yes.

Eric Rosengren explains that “economic and financial indicators [have] become more positive in the US.

How does he know? We’ve examined these sorts of indicators and they seem exaggerated, tending to show progress where there is none.

Here’s an elaboration from John Crudele in The New York Post (late 2014):

The economy isn’t really doing what the statistics say it is doing. Our nation’s economic statistics are nipped and tucked, massaged, managed, fabricated and dolled up. In short, our statistics are wrong and Main Street folks know it. Here’s what a Wall Street hedge fund mogul, Paul Singer, head of Elliott Management Corp., told his clients the other day:

“Nobody can predict how long governments can get away with fake growth, fake money, fake jobs, fake financial stability, fake inflation numbers and fake income growth,” Singer wrote. “When confidence is lost, that loss can be severe, sudden and simultaneous across a number of markets and sectors.”

Is Rosengren aware of these manipulations? It doesn’t seem to matter. For some reason, he’s sure the economy is headed in the right direction:

“I want to be sensitive to how the data comes in, but I would say that most of the conditions that were laid out in the minutes, as of right now, seem to be … on the verge of broadly being met,” said Rosengren, a voter this year on the Fed’s policy-making Federal Open Market Committee.

Minutes of the Fed’s April meeting released last week showed Fed officials believed the U.S. economy could be ready for another interest rate increase in June.

Not even Bloomberg believes this time. In an article entitled Behind the Fed’s Faulty Logic on Interest Rates, Ramesh Ponnuru argues that, “The Fed shares the widespread view that the prolonged period of low interest rates we have been experiencing is abnormal and needs to change.”

And then there is this:

Central bankers may also want more room to maneuver in the event of a recession: It won’t be able to reduce interest rates very far if they are already low, so why not raise them when the economy is doing well?

The article points out that the Fed doesn’t seem very flexible when it comes to inflation targeting. Its two percent inflation target seems like a “ceiling” according to Ponnuru.

This means that the Fed will take proactive steps when it comes to damping price inflation, and these could damp economic activity as well.

We’ve argued that like other central banks the Fed cannot be aggressive about interest rates because the US economy is in what might be characterized as a depression. What else do you call it when 90 million Americans are not seeking formal work within the system?

It could be that Yellen and company understand that further economic blows are on the way. These will call for further rate cuts. And they are racing to raise rates beforehand.

This assumes that the Fed is not willing to pursue negative interest rates, and that is probably a good assumption. Negative rates would greatly complicate the Fed’s position as regards the American public and the alternative ‘Net media.

Ponnuru comes close to arguing this as well. He writes, “… Higher interest rates are an end in themselves.  That dubious assumption seems like the only way to make sense of the Fed’s current plan.”

Will the Fed actually follow through? Sometimes, the speculation alone accomplishes the purposes that Fed has in mind. For instance, the gold price against the dollar immediately suffered from rate-hike speculation.

At some point – as this past December – the Fed will have to act or lose credibility.

Conclusion: Another hike will likely have a negative equity impact, just as in December. Will gold then continue to move down … or will it be the “last asset-class standing.” We would suggest the latter rather than the former. Right now, the markets seem to have it backwards.

Posted in Gold & Silver, STAFF NEWS & ANALYSIS
  • Bruce C.

    The two main complaints I read about the Fed is, A) that they don’t know what they’re doing (or they don’t know what to do); and B) that they are trying to create financial chaos, especially in the US, so everybody will want the monetary systems of the world to be consolidated into a single global system. (Work with me here.)

    Those two possibilities are almost always presented as being binary, if not mutually exclusive. However, it is also possible that both could be true. That may be most close to the truth. Recall the (still) on-going debate between the consequences of central bank QE programs: Some argued convincingly that price inflation would be rampant, and others argued equallly brilliantly that there would be price deflation and depressed economic activity as financialization usurps productive investments. The result seems to be that both sides are correct, a kind of stagflation is occurring in which there is price inflation of most assets and services in the midst of falling prices in commodities due to stagnant economic growth.

    Therefore, what if both sides of the argument about the Fed are correct? What if the Fed wants to create financial chaos especially in the US but doesn’t know how to do that and still seem credible and competent?

    • veerar

      One of the reasons for the so-called deflation,while “inflating” with QEs is the cheap imports from China.

      • Bruce C.

        Sort of, but cheap Chinese imports were coming in before the Fed/ECB/BoJ/BoE, etc. QE programs after 2009. Diminishing economic growth is the main deflationary force caused by excessive debt and QE enabled financial engineering that has directed investment monies towards money games instead of productive business investments. For example, corporations borrowing cheap money to buy back their own stock instead of expanding their businesses.

  • Praetor

    The world. Bankrupt, in finance and morals. The Bank is not Benevolent (charitable), it is Malevolent (malicious). Their only purpose, to enforce the will of their masters on every single person living on this planet. They will do what ever it takes to achieve their goal, and as Randy Savage would say, ‘ World Domination’ is that goal.

    Just keep buying the PM’s, you will thank yourself!!!

  • 2016: Financial crisis, stock market crash, housing crash, student loan defaults, car loan defaults; economy crashes. Fed does QE4.

    Capitulation around Dow 11000.

  • Martin the American redux

    Nice analysis, thanks. I figured the market for a crash by now. I can only reckon one thing for certain, these ain’t boring times!

  • gordon

    Good article DB, quite clearly the talking heads are just that and anyone who believes the so called stats put out by the various organisations in the US is delusional rather like their president.

loading
Sign up now and join our exclusive international network for free-market thinkers
Privacy Assured: We will NEVER share your personal information.