Did You Make These Mistakes in Cryptocurrency? Accounting Firm has the Stats
By Joe Jarvis - January 25, 2018

You could turn $100 into a fortune!

That is why ICOs (Initial Coin Offerings) boomed last year. New projects launched their own digital tokens. Everyone wanted to get in on the bottom of a skyrocketing cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin easily fueled that desire. If you put $100 into Bitcoin in January of 2012, you would be sitting on over 200 grand now, assuming you didn’t get excited and sell when Bitcoin reached $1000, or $5000, or $10,000…

Cryptocurrencies are exciting. They have the potential to upend the entire financial sector. The blockchain and other technology underlying tokens will truly prove revolutionary. But that doesn’t mean you should throw caution to the wind and empty your savings account in favor of cryptocurrency speculations.

Accounting firm Ernst and Young released a report in December all about ICOs.

Last June 90% of ICOs reached their funding goals. But by the time November rolled around, fewer than 25% of ICOs hit their target.

The reason? The cryptomarket was flooded with crap. Everyone with an idea and some buzzwords threw together a half-assed whitepaper, a document that explains the technology and purpose of a cryptocurrency.

Ernst and Young found that a majority of whitepapers included basic errors and contradictions. Many lacked clear explanations about the project or even the purpose of the token.

White papers contain many clichés that attract inexperienced investors, with no reasonable justification for blockchain use…

►Next-generation platform
► First project to unlock multibillion market of < … >
► Decentralized network that puts users in control/the driver’s seat
► We are creating a community/ecosystem/economy
► No corrupted central authority
► Creating a Web3
► Most undervalued token

Most ICOs were just selling an idea. They had no business yet, and the capabilities of the founders were generally untested.

84% of projects launching Initial Coin Offerings analyzed by Ernst and Young were in the idea stage. 11% had prototypes, and just 5% were in operation.

32% of projects did not even specify when their project would go live.

From Bitcoin to Shitcoin

The risk in cryptocurrencies include projects that are crap, outright scams, and hackers/ thieves.

Hackers stole 10% of ICO funds last year, about $370 million. That doesn’t mean the cryptocurrency itself was a scam. It means hackers were able to steal from the speculators or the ICO project itself.

Most common was phishing, where a fraudulent email is sent to an account holder. The user follows a link and enters a password on a website which looks like the real thing.

Hackers also replaced the destination wallet address of an ICO with their own, so that speculators sent their payments to the hacker instead of the project.

But theft might not even be the biggest risk of speculating in cryptos. Sometimes the creators are incompetent or exaggerate their expertise.

Many ICOs use smart contracts. These are supposed to automatically execute agreements. But contrary to popular belief, smart contracts are not actually magic.

Hidden terms. Smart contract code can contain hidden terms that are not explicitly disclosed to investors

Unsafe algorithms. Insufficient testing of smart contract code, as well as the use of external public libraries, can lead to damaging consequences:

► Unintentional violation of smart contract logic through execution of a wrong order or number of functions used, as well as the use of nonstandard functions.
► Intentional influence on the smart contract logic with the purpose of breaking internal limits, for example, on funds withdrawal

Because tokens are currently fashionable, their value is not determined by the quality of a project. Instead, Ernst and Young found that the main drivers behind token price are fear of missing out, hype, and selling techniques.

However, they did find that the quality of a whitepaper also factors into the valuation of a cryptocurrency. A quality whitepaper could be a sign of a detail-oriented and intelligent team. Or it could mean they spent their development money on good copywriting instead of project development.

What to do?

Don’t take this as a warning to avoid cryptocurrencies. I hold some cryptocurrencies.

Part of it is philosophical, I want to see serious reform in the financial sector. Cryptocurrencies are in their infancy but have the potential to hand the power of the bankers back to individuals.

But I’ll admit I also would love to multiply my money. Early adopters take a risk by throwing their support behind cryptocurrencies. Some might be rewarded for that risk.

But the risk is substantial. The money I have in cryptocurrency is money I could watch burn, and my life wouldn’t change. Sure, I’d be upset. But it is not rent money. Do not speculate with money you cannot afford to lose.

Take a look at the whitepaper. It might not tell the whole story, but it’s a place to start. Use your critical thinking skills to make an educated guess about the potential for the project. Do some research, see what other informed people are saying about it–not what the sales team is saying.

And then protect yourself from hackers. For cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, you can, and should, store them on an offline hardware wallet, (and don’t buy it on eBay or secondhand!).

For currencies kept on an online exchange, use two-factor authentification. This requires a second type of verification beyond just a password, usually using your smartphone.

Be careful with email links, it is always better to go directly to the website. (Sometimes exchanges might send a verification email when signing in, but your password should be entered before you get the email, not after following the link.)

Diversify. Don’t keep all your eggs in one basket. Hold different currencies. Split up currencies on different exchanges, in different wallets, and different types of wallets.

Most of all, don’t let FOMO, fear of missing out, drive your cryptocurrency trades. Ernst and Young suggest this is the main driver of cryptocurrency valuations right now, and that is not good!

ICOs have become a synonym for hype, unjustified valuations and excessive risk. On the other
hand, blockchain can increase project transparency, decrease investor risk and develop into an
effective financing tool for quality blockchain projects.

Don’t use emotion, use information. You can find some solid speculations if you are patient, keep your eyes open, and keep a level head. But don’t let the craze get the better of you!

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

Tagged with: , , , ,
  • Number 6

    Bitcoin is an attempt at the one world currency, there are plenty of crypto currencies out there, whats the only one 99 percent of the world know about “Bitcoin” Why because their media made sure thats the only crypto currency the majority heard about. Besides its got their numerological finger prints all over it. Using the alphabetical order sum the values of the following words

    “Money” 13+15+14+5+25 = 72
    “Bitcoin” 2+9+20+3+15+9+14 = 72

    What a COIN-cidence Not !

  • Bruce C.

    The number one reason bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are at all interesting to me is that I don’t understand them (or maybe I do) and yet they continue to be promoted like everyone knows what they’re talking about.

    Personally, I think they are complete BS. There is an article (probably one of many) that I read recently that I didn’t understand a single word of other than the author seems to think bitcoin will become the reserve currency of the world. I may be wrong but I think that’s complete crap and he (and many others) are like snake oil salesmen.

    If one of the problems or complaints of our existing fiat, fractional reserve system is that few people understand it then crypto currencies are exponentially more abstract than that. In fact, I haven’t seen the most basic financial functions explained for bit coin, et al such as fractional reserve lending. You may not like fractional reserve lending, but if you think a 100% gold standard is restrictive then katy bar the door with crypto. No more than 21 million bitcoin theoretically possible? An arbitrary and quite in-elegant feature btw, you do the math.

    The link to the article is:

    You be the judge. Feedback welcome.

    • Samarami

      Excellent observation. Belief in either (“fiat” vs “crypto”) is superstition as I see it. Folderol in spades. In the final analysis all will crash. I, too, hope for a “crypto revolution” — simply because that illusion appears to be a path to genuine freedom. Not. Spreading the burning sand with h2o.

      In time there might be an authentic movement toward media of exchange that can be seen, touched, measured and evaluated against all exchanges. We’ve been living through times when that has not been possible — due, primarily, to the superstition of authority.
      My suggestion is to rid yourself of all superstition first. Sam

  • Randy

    The main thing that all of the lazy, greedy fools, idiots and morons always miss on when it comes to discussing ANY medium of exchange, is that not a one of them knows what money really is or even WHY it is! They just have no clue at all!
    Money is an idea backed by confidence. The more solid the confidence factor in that idea, the better it is as a medium of exchange. The lower the confidence factor in it (its perceived purchasing power), the greater amount of it will be needed to buy the same amount of goods and services than it did before. Now does that sound like what we call inflation, to you? Well it should, because that is all that inflation really is!
    To be money, the thing must be durable, rare and have a lot of human labor invested in it and be acceptable to others, because that’s what we’re really doing with this lubricant in our dry financial machinery, these exchanges, trading our labor back and forth. Different things have more or less intrinsic value in them. This is why a horse or cow has more value to it than a handful of eggs or three chickens. All of this is well explained in my paper What is Money?, from 1996.
    Anybody who is foolish enough to speculate in trading mediums of exchange of any kind or name, fully deserve to be fleeced by the con men who run them.
    How can one lie, fraud, artifice (the USD for example) be said to be worth more or less than another lie, fraud, artifice (your crypto currency of choice)? None of those lies have any real value to them, therefore, it’s only the belief in them that gives them any use.
    And, wait for it, if you do not have a near 100% reliable electrical grid operating 24/7/365, your virtual wallets may as well contain nothing, because you wan’t have any way to access their virtual contents or send them anywhere!