Fed May Raise Rates By 50 Basis Points in March or It Could Do Something Far More Dramatic
By Daily Bell Staff - February 18, 2017

The Fed Should Raise Rates Next Month … Inflation in the U.S. rose in the year that ended in January by 2.5 percent — faster than expected, and well above the Fed’s target of 2 percent. It was the latest sign that the economy needs a rise in interest rates when the Federal Reserve’s policy-making committee meets next month.

Earlier this year it looked as if rate hikes were being postponed again, at least until summer months. But now, thanks in particular to various derivative trades, we can see rates hikes could come sooner rather than later, perhaps as soon as next month.

The central bank has indicated a good deal of patience with rate hikes, not wanting to put an end to what little economic progress has actually been made.

Its also indicated that every month is a clean sheet. If new figures indicate that price inflation is kicking up, then the Fed intends to revise its interest rate decisions. And now, it seems, inflation is moving faster than previously expected.


Granted, the signal from inflation is ambiguous … The unadjusted index of consumer prices is distorted month to month by swings in volatile energy and food prices. The Fed prefers to keep an eye on a different measure of inflation — the price index of personal consumption expenditures. This went up by 1.7 percent, excluding food and energy, in the year to December, still a little below the central bank’s inflation target.

In addition, the current low unemployment rate of 4.8 percent most likely exaggerates the tightness in the labor market. As the economy expands, some of the many workers who’d previously dropped out of the labor force altogether (and therefore don’t count as unemployed) have started looking for jobs. This is why, despite rising employment, the jobless rate actually edged up in January. An expanding labor force gives the economy a bit of additional headroom.

The article points out other factors that might lead to inflation. The Fed’s short-term interest rate around 0.5 to 0.75 percent is very low, while its swollen balance sheet continues to offer monetary prompts. Even a quarter-point rise at this point probably wouldn’t do much to influence rates.

Of course moving too early may have a negative impact on some jobs that are about to be created. On the other hand doing nothing could put Fed in a worse position, one where it has to tighten hard in multiple months to try to catch up with price inflation that has been gathering speed. For this reason, March is starting to look like a reasonable option for a rate hike that might be 50 rather than 25 basis points.

Another alternative, one the Fed could get started on, is to shut down the bank entirely. Then instead of of Yellen trying to guess where rates should be, the market could decide.

This can’t be done all at once of course. The first step would be to audit the Fed, which would reveal which banks and firms it gave money to during and after the crises stating in 2008. Yellen would be dead set against anything of this sort, but the chances of an audit have gone up dramatically with President Donald Trump.

After an audit revealed the Fed has spent trillions illegally around the world bailing out subsidiaries of the largest banks and firms, many American pols might be tempted to place the Fed under an umbrella that mandated mathematical solutions to interest rates.

But in fact this is no better than human decisions themselves. Mathematical rates have to be developed to begin with by human beings. So ultimately such rates are still part of a situation that includes human approaches.

Again the only real solution is a purely market driven one. In such a situation, rates would not be monolithic but vary from region to region and even city to city. This is another area where modern rates are inadequate. Rates are not supposed to be monolithic, but they are getting moreso rather than less so.

Conclusion: Ultimately, we should let rates do what they choose absent man-made interference. Rates were like this since the beginning of time. And someday they will be like this again. It might as well be sooner rather than later.


You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

Tagged with:
  • Dimitri Ledkovsky

    Usury did not exist “since the beginning of time” so how could rates have? We are so conditioned to believe that the Fed and central banking are just plain vanilla normal.

    • what are you talking about? A rate can be as simple as one man talking to another and telling him he can borrow money for a price.

    • Bruce C.

      Besides that, “usury” only means “unreasonably high” interest rates (or costs) to borrow money. In the late middle ages in Europe “usury” was one of only a few other crimes that was punishable by death (treason and witchcraft being two others), but that didn’t mean money was normally borrowed “for free.”

      • concerndcitizen

        Real usury is lending something that doesn’t exist at interest. Something for nothing.

        • Bruce C.

          I know what you mean, and if you’re referring to “money” that’s basically true. However, one could argue that the newly created money is an exchange for the borrower’s credit – it is the transmutation of a borrower’s credit for physical money.

          That said, an even better example of “something for nothing” is the (flawed) legal ability to sell short something that doesn’t exist as is the case with precious metals. As crazy as it sounds one can sell PM’s that one doesn’t have.

    • User

      Big investment banking firms have been given near zero interest money or commonly, ZIRP, for a long time now whereas the average American borrower pays a much higher rate. It’s high time that the fat cats on Wall Street pay a little usury.

  • rahrog

    END THE FED!!!

  • Bruce C.

    Trump has an opportunity to reduce a lot of poop splatter on himself when things start unwinding monetarily.

    Just by talking about the Fed and central banking will educate (or confuse) a lot of people since the mainstream media hangs on his every word and tries to “fact check” everything. I’m looking forward to seeing how the MSM handles – or ignores – that hot potato. In either case, by Trump stating some basic facts NOW he should be able to dodge a lot of the blame when things become unhinged.

    For example, he should make it clear that the Fed is NOT a part of the federal government and is in fact a private corporation and cartel.

    He should question why they have the power to set interest rates, and ask why that isn’t a form of price fixing (of money.)

    He should ask why it wouldn’t be better for interest rates to be determined “naturally” by the market place itself.

    Et cetera.

    Let the MSM mock him for being so “ignorant” and let’s hear the talking heads that will undoubtedly be propped up and arrayed to defend and “explain” the current system…all while it starts to fall apart and “the experts” are shown to be wrong yet again.

    You may want to stock up on some popcorn for when the show begins.

  • Danny B

    It’s easy to talk about interest rates right now. After Trump is blocked from raising the debt ceiling, we’ll talk more about interest rates. 🙂 For those of you who need a GOOD chuckle this morning, Zero Hedge has just the thing.