Hillary: ‘I’m Not Here to Take Away Your Guns’ – But She Will
By Daily Bell Staff - July 29, 2016

Hillary Clinton at her DNC speech: “I’m not here to take away your guns” …   Hillary Clinton wants you to know one thing about her position on gun control: “I’m not here to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns.”  She elaborated further on her comments, which she made at her Democratic National Convention speech accepting the presidential nomination: “I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place.” –Vox

During her acceptance speech, see above, Hillary said she wasn’t going to take away guns in the US, but this is untrue.

She knows just how to do it.

First of all, she will make guns more expensive with new back ground checks.

Second, she will make guns manufacturers liable for selling guns that later are used in crimes.

But that is just the beginning.

Hillary doesn’t actually believe that people in the US should have guns.

In a Fox post HERE entitled, “Four ways Hillary Clinton will work to end gun ownership as president,” John Lott points out that in an appearance on ABC, Hillary would not say whether citizens had a constitutional right to own guns.

George Stephanopoulos pushed Clinton twice on whether people have a right to own guns on ABC News’ “This Week”:

“But that’s not what I asked.  I said do you believe that their conclusion that an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right?”

Clinton could only say: “If it is a constitutional right…”

Clinton like other gun opponents, believes an overabundance of guns are responsible for the shootings that take place in the US, especially in mass shootings.

But there are many questions about these mass shootings.

David Steele, second-highest-ranking civilian in the U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence and former CIA clandestine services case officer, has said this HERE:

“Most terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own security services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a lunatic asylum.”

Such FBI involvement leads one to ask whether there are forces in and behind the US government that are manufacturing violence in order to justify continued anti-gun agitation.

Authoritarian governments and those who back them don’t want people to have guns because without guns, it is much easier to force people to obey. When people are not armed, genocide becomes a more viable and convenient option.

Government killed hundreds of millions in the 20th century. The 21st century may equally bloody, especially if guns continue to be confiscated.

In the US, many citizens have fought back against gun confiscation.  But if Hillary wins the presidency, discussions about gun control will become moot.

Guns will be confiscated. Lott explains it this way:

Until 2008, Washington, D.C., had a complete handgun ban. It was also a felony to put a bullet in the chamber of a gun. In effect, this was a complete ban on guns. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down these laws.

But the constituency of the Supreme Court is changing. Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are Bill Clinton appointees. Sonia Sotomayor was appointed by Obama as was Elana Kagan.

“If Hillary wins in November, she will appoint [Antonin] Scalia’s successor and the Supreme Court will overturn the Heller decision.  Make no mistake about it, gun bans will return.”

Only one more appointee is needed.

Conclusion: Hillary herself will not have to “pull the trigger” on gun confiscations. She will let the Supreme Court do it for her.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

Tagged with:
  • conjure

    “Such FBI involvement leads one to ask whether there are forces in and behind the US government that are manufacturing violence in order to justify continued anti-gun agitation.”

    Paranoia. Please stop. The Supreme Court will not take up Heller.
    Who does your research?

    • You are so sure there is no appetite to revisit Heller?

      Scalia himself –in December 2015 — joined a dissent written by Justice Clarence Thomas when the court declined to take up a case concerning an assault weapons law in a Chicago suburb. Thomas and Scalia wanted the court to weigh in and clarify Heller, saying that appellate courts have upheld “categorical bans on firearms that millions of Americans commonly own for lawful purposes.”

      • Lynn Carroll

        There you go with the phrase “Assault weapons.” I seems as if even the courts are drinking the Kool-Aid by referring to legal hunting weapons that look like assault weapons as actual “Assault weapons.”
        Actual military assault weapons are already illegal in America! Wake up people. Don’t let these liberal propaganda experts fool you too.

        • Kernel01

          As for the science of simplification, propose that the purpose of guns be stated as “for hunting”. When you’re in the military, your gun is to hunt humans who are “the enemy”. When you’re a police officer, the police hunt humans who are “dangerous suspects/criminals”. And as for individuals, you can “hunt humans” who are threatening your life, or hunt Government tyranny gone wild. So I think to shift the vernacular in terms of “hunting” (the purpose behind guns) instead of “the gun” itself, may be a better way to steer the whole gun conversation being squawked about. Guns cannot fire by themselves, but need a “hunter” to pull the trigger.

        • deplorableirredeemable45

          An M-16 is an assault weapon. A AR-15 is not an assault weapon. The only difference between the two is one is full auto and one is not. But the Liberals call all of them assault weapons because they look alike.

    • Isefree

      Who does your crystal balls?

      • conjure

        sycophant, please stop.

        • Isefree

          No appetite for argument?

    • EDD

      If TPTB can convince a huge majority of the earth’s population that the Twin Towers catastrophe was an Islamic terrorist attack, the idea that ‘manufactured violence’ is a walk in the park.

      Is it paranoia when numerous architectural engineers back the charge where the collapse of the buildings was done demolition style? Is it paranoia when an airline stewardess wrote a book, (with help of a ghost writer), which detailed how the aircraft could not have caused the destruction?

      TPTB have developed situations with mathematical precision. I was watching tv in the hospital when J.F.K. was assassinated. It took me awhile to begin recognizing how quickly the msm is galvanized to respond to ‘planned tragedies’,

      When a person finally begins understand how people react to these situations, that person starts to see evil events in action. I watch the newscasts every time some ‘lone idiot’ or multiple participants creates havoc and it is easy to understand that the perpetrator(s) could have been manipulated to just for such an event. Providing the trigger action for the breaking point in a person’s psyche is a science for those behind the scenes.

      If the population is bombarded frequently with these atrocities, consider how an unsuspecting populace is lead into believing disarmament is to be desired.

      Public opinion has to be considered when developing a plan to criminalize gun ownership. The only reason there has not been a complete takeover of America’s citizens is timing. What you mentioned is not paranoia per se, it is TPTB’s attention to the timing of their grandiose scheme. And it is not paranoia to realize the possible consequences of continuing frequency of disastrous events.

      • conjure

        This is reasonable. However, if it is not paranoia, it is a manipulated reaction, induced by all that you have referred to. Nevertheless, the reaction of fear (paranoia) is NOT optimal, you must agree.

        • EDD

          Conjure, I think you and I agree on many concepts. Your remark: “Who does your research?” is what triggered me into responding with my reply. My idea of calling these atrocities ‘planned tragedies’ fits in with your ‘manipulated reaction’.

          It is the manipulated reaction that creates paranoia in most people. Then, if enough individuals in a given area responds with a conviction detrimental to a peaceful resolution, they tie into one or more of the groups sponsored by Soros and others.

          This is the classic example of ‘thought control’ written in the book ‘1984’.

          I submit to you; the research done by the DB staff may not be perfect but is far superior to the research done by the msm and others. My take on alt media is that the DB tries to give enough background info for us to ‘think’, not give us a ‘gut reaction’ based on emotional responses.

          I find the comment section of this news media, for the most part, to be read by well informed people who do not exhibit the reactionary tendencies predominant in some of the conservative alt media’s comment section.

          I think you, like myself and others, gain insights into the workings of TPTB and helps us develop opinions more in line with ‘reality’ through our discourse in our comments. For this I am grateful.

          • conjure

            We should be more impersonal. I simply wanted to know who did the legal research, the methodology, etc. The term “paranoia” could easy be applied to your use of the hyperbolic “atrocity.” As knowledgable individuals we strive to be neutral and magnanimous. In any event I fully agree about most of the comments. “Vile” emotional, unreasonable language is incompatible with the objective, rational and impartial perspective on these matters that thoughtful discourse demands.

          • EDD

            “As knowledgable individuals we strive to be neutral and magnanimous.” Could not have stated this better myself. And I hope you do not think I took your original post on this thread personally. If that is what you thought, then the posts the DB and myself made in response could be seen as reactionary and I apologize for any misconception.

            Sometimes I read and reread the posts in any thread in order to gain a better concept of how comments can be taken out of context. You have given me feedback in threads of other articles and I have found you to be thoughtful and considerate.

            I understand a lot of my posts may be somewhat wordy, but in each instance I strive to be clear as to my reasoning. And sometimes it is necessary to provide enough background info to lessen any misconception that may occur.

            Thank you for your replies.

        • EDD

          I mentioned the comment section of other alt news organizations and a classic example of reactionary comments are shown in response to this article: .

          While the article itself was relatively good, the reactions to the article generally demonstrates the anger many Americans are feeling about the present political landscape.

          I submit this equation as an example of how the DB comment section is populated with well thought out replies for the most part. Ever since reading my first article presented by the DB, I have been impressed by the intellectual reasoning of commenters. I pray it continues where each commentator respects other viewpoints without resorting to vile language and character smearing.

      • Lynn Carroll

        Please Lord help us from the hopelessly stupid! How can anyone with the least intelligence not see the whole thing happen on Television and not understand that steel beams will buckle under extreme heat and pressure. How can anyone with a mind the size of a pea believe that all this was a plot between the Islamic Terrorists and the U. S. government to fly the airplanes into the twin towers while some nefarious black ops CIA agents simultaneously blow up the buildings to they will collapse killing over 3000 innocent men women and children?
        This is a fine example of the “Walking Dead” who are eligible to vote in our elections.

        • EDD

          I will be kind to you regardless of your comments undoubtedly aimed at me. Perhaps the architects who are experts have pea brains too: , and at: .

          As for ‘hopelessly stupid’, this is something I am not. This whole tragedy goes far beyond CIA and Islamic terrorists, who were merely the agents assigned to a task.

          I do not watch the ‘Walking Dead’ because it has nothing of intrinsic value for me and I vote with the hopes we can have leadership who will deliver on their campaign pledges.

          I watched the whole series of events on the morning of that fateful day. I do ‘understand that steel beams will buckle under extreme heat and pressure’. However, a quote from the architects website describes it like this: “A collapse due to fire would likely proceed gradually with large
          deformations visible in the building’s perimeter, with the building
          tipping over slowly in the direction of the steadily weakening
          structural members – to the path of least resistance.” The site is very convincing about how this actually happened.

          Lynn, I cannot understand the murder of 3,000 innocents because that is pure evil. Since the experts in the field of demolition have reason to doubt the ‘official version’, I find a lot of support for my suspicions which I have had from the start. BTW, there are many other sites questioning the official version also, but I want to keep this as brief as possible.

          If I misread your post, I apologize ahead of time.

    • Lynn Carroll

      Don’t doubt it for one minute. In today’s violent environment, paranoia is good.

  • Praetor

    I see nothing the government does on the issue of weapons in the hands of the citizens having much impact.

    If criminals at this point have weapons, what makes them think, law abiding citizens will not weapon up or obtain firearms to protected themselves from criminals with weapons.

    Protecting oneself from criminals, includes Hillary Rodham Clinton. Her, and her kind was the reason the second was but into the constitution.

    Protecting oneself and family from criminals is no crime, and that means all criminals, private and public criminals!!!

    • Lynn Carroll

      I wouldn’t put it past Bill if he has already set up a deal in which he sells surplus military weapons to underground weapons dealers and citizens will be able to buy them, thereby enriching the Clintons even more. Obama did it with that arms to Mexican drug dealers, but for different reasons.

      • Lynn Carroll

        What these liberal noodle-heads don’t take into account is that America is a very unique country. We have a culture of freedom and liberty that no other country enjoys. Part of our culture is that we are willing to fight to keep our country intact and if that means resorting to guns, Americans are not averse to that. The only thing between us and another Hitler or Stalin is the ability to bear arms.

  • joe_bob_gonzales

    a prime example of: believe nothing until its officially denied. not that I would trust hiLIARy if she said the sun was out and it high noon. lying fat sack of a corpulent sore

    • Sol

      Trump’s just as fat as Hillary.

  • Sven

    So the gun mfrs can be sued but Pharmx companies cannot be sued if you die due to side effects. Sounds just like American justice.

    • Good point. Bartenders, too.

    • Isefree

      Pharmx companies have a special dispensation from the Grand Inquisitor. Illegal drug dealers, users, gun owners, dealers and manufacturers are the new witches, the infidels. Herr Scapegoat. Repent ye sinners!

    • SnakePlissken

      Let’s also sue auto manufacturers because someone used their car to drive drunk and hurt someone.

  • legal eagle

    There is only one thing to keep in mind that really matters and that is that Hillary is a bona fide LIAR.

  • buy 1 judge key to cover up



    Clinton dealing in uranium acquired in BLM land grabs

    wait til the entire country learns what is really happening

    this BLM group which includes harry reid and clinton have come up with a very complex scam.

    it uses the fbi and nevada city council and county commissioners
    who racketeer together in order to take land from people to sell to foreign investors by making it look like the ranch owners have broken the law
    when they have not.
    harry reid has a land grab partner named richard bryan who was a Nevada senator. richard bryan ran a lawfirm in nevada called lionel sawyer collins.
    richard bryan sold bundy’s land to the chinese.
    bryan took millions of dollars from Chinese solar clients who
    secretly purchased bundy’s land before the land grab attempt.
    reid and bryan sold the land because the Chinese needed it for minerals to make solar panels .
    BUT….the land grab backfired .. it did not go as reid and bryan planned.
    reid and bryan had local county commissioners de-value bundy’s land at only $3.4 million when bundy ranch is worth around $50 million .

    so…… through reid orchestrated federal mumbo jumbo and his internal govt agency trickery.
    reid tried to take the bundy land after reid and bryan pocketed the Chinese

    but blm was not abe to evict bundy…….


    because reid and bryan were unable to deliver on the bundy land sold to chinese.
    reid/bryan filed bankruptcy at lionel sawyer collins to prevent having to give the chinese back their millions in bundy land purchase money….
    cover up .
    bryan allowed the Lionel sawyer Collins law firm to file for bankruptcy
    and ruchard bryan relocated quietly to another lawfirm
    eventually the oregon land grab will reveal reid and bryan handle mineral deals for hilary clinton’s daughter’s husband……………
    chelsea’s husband who has Russian clients who deal in buying BLM acquired land plentiful in earth minerals.

    BLM’s bundy ranch land grab
    was attempted because reid and senator richard bryan failed to acquire bundy land for chinese solar investors .
    after richard bryan’s law firm went bankrupt because they could not pay
    back the retainer to the Chinese solar clients who did not get bundy land .
    the bundy land grab scam organized by reid and his mormons
    has not even been fully exposed yet.


    selling the presidential election on a grand scale.
    while making it appear as though nevada is hosting the democrat and republican conventions or debates
    in reality simply selling/rigging the election out the back door. to highest bidders
    would harry reid be part of a scam. ?
    harry reid could run this out of a payday loan business’ in nevada to launder money.
    a hard to trace bribe scam,
    rawle’s pay day loan business
    is where harry reid laundered his previous million dollar bribe through.
    who would ever find out ?

    emails surface exposing reid accepting bribes.
    reid bribe was initially $2 million dollars.
    Swallow wanted $2 million to enlist Harry Reid’s help to block online gaming investigation .
    .copies of emails show Swallow worked to arrange meetings between Johnson and top Utah officeholders.
    Then, with the FTC investigation continuing, Johnson said Swallow
    suggested Harry Reid could make all the problems with regulators go away — for a
    “I said, ‘OK, what do I need to do?’
    He’s like,………. ‘OK, it costs money,’
    ” Johnson said, Swallow was adamant he make a deal.
    “he told me, he has a connection with Harry Reid,’ ” Johnson said.
    He said Swallow wanted $2 million to enlist Reid’s help.
    But he did not have the money, Johnson
    said, so they eventually agreed on $300,000 upfront and $300,000 later.
    Swallow put Johnson in contact with Rawle, whose company has
    operations in Nevada. Rawle had given generously to Swallow’s failed
    congressional bids and hired Swallow as Check City’s lobbyist and
    in-house legal counsel, a position Swallow held until he became chief
    deputy attorney general in December 2009.
    Rawle, died of cancer before federal investigators could question him
    On Sept. 29, 2010, Swallow sent an email to Johnson with the subject line “Mtg. with Harry Reid’s .”
    ” Traveling to LV tomorrow and will be able to meet with Reid’s contact,
    who he has a very good relationship with. He needs a
    brief narrative of what is going on and what you want to happen….I don’t know the cost, but it probably won’t be cheap.”…

    eric holder blocked the american people from learning harry reid took a million bribe.FBI
    agents working alongside Utah state prosecutors in a wide-ranging
    bribery corruption investigation have uncovered wrongdoing by two
    of the U.S. Senate’s most prominent Mormon figures — Majority Leader
    Harry Reid and rising Republican Sen. Mike Lee — but Eric Holder and the Justice
    Department has thwarted their bid to launch a full federal

    The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States,
    shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for,
    Conviction of,
    or other high Crimes
    Article II, Section 4
    who got the biggest kickback ?
    Harry Reid personally bypassed DHS terrorism laws on behalf of son’s casino project
    Senate Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid took an intense interest in
    pushing through visas for dozens of shady Asian investors for a Las
    Vegas casino represented by his son, Rory Reid, documents and reports
    The investors, who were flagged under terrorists guidelines for “suspicious financial
    activity,” had initially been denied visas by the Department of Homeland
    Security in a process that does not allow for appeals.
    In a Dec. 5, 2012 email to officials at the Department of Homeland
    Security obtained by The Washington Times, U.S. Citizenship and
    Immigration Services (USCIS) Legislative Affairs official Miguel
    Rodriguez wrote, “This one is going to be a major headache for us
    all because Sen. Reid’s office/staff is pushing hard and I just had a
    long yelling match on the phone.”
    The investors were renovating the SLS Hotel — which was
    once the Sahara. SLS is represented by Sen. Reid’s son, Rory Reid, who
    at the law firm Lionel, Sawyer & Collins. In their 2012 “Year in
    Review,” the Nevada firm hyped “Lionel Sawyer & Collins” benefits
    from working with Harry Reid .
    “Rory Reid’s previous experience as chairman of the Clark County
    Commission is put to good use assisting with general legal advice for
    the law firm and helps circumvent the maze of regulations
    required to access economic incentives offered on the state and local
    levels,” the article, called “Redeveloping a Classic Strip Property,” continued.
    questioned on Sen. Reid’s intervention on behalf of SLS investors, Sen.
    Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman told Ralston Reports —
    where Rory’s connection was first reported — that “The SLS project
    is none of your business”
    “That is the calculus in Sen. Reid’s support of the project,” Orthman continued.
    “We have a long-standing office policy that strictly bars any member of
    the staff’s family or the Senator’s family from lobbying our office on
    behalf of their clients. That policy applies in this case.”
    Initial attempts by Sen. Reid’s office to expedite the visa requests
    were denied on Dec. 17, 2012, prompting the majority leader to
    personally call Obama who contacted USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas.
    “Within a few short weeks of Mr. Reid’s personal DHS intervention, the
    decision not to issue the visas was reversed, allowing the hotel to
    major funding from JP Morgan Chase,” the Times reports.Sen. Reid “has
    supported Lionel Sawyer & Collins a spokeswoman for the senator told
    the media

    October , 2010
    Reid terrorist ties cover up
    “An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
    repeatedly lied to federal immigration and FBI agents and submitted
    false federal documents to the Department of Homeland Security to cover
    up her illegal seven-year marriage to a Lebanese national who was the
    subject of an Oklahoma City Joint Terror Task Force investigation.”
    what is odd is that no criminal terrorist charges are brought against
    rory for his SLS clients or the long history of the lionel sawyer
    collins lawfirm facing the same terrorist charges.

    for some convenient reason LAST MONTH the law firm was allowed to skate
    around the feds and quietly just vanish out of sight and relocate to
    while harry reid (taxpayers stuck funding it ) handled the DHS terrorist
    scandal fall out & cover up here in nevada.
    October , 2010
    Reid terrorist ties cover up
    “An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
    repeatedly lied to federal immigration and FBI agents and submitted
    false federal documents to the Department of Homeland Security to cover
    up her illegal seven-year marriage to a Lebanese national who was the
    subject of an Oklahoma City Joint Terror Task Force investigation.”


    eventually the public will learn harry reid used the FBI to block investigations into his well organized multi billion dollar corruption schemes which took place within the country known as deseret.
    harry reid used his ties to the blm as well as his long time friend and previous nevada senator richard bryan who both have now gone into the business of selling land they do not own to Chinese corporations who need raw materials to build solar and electric car batteries.
    harry reid and richard bryan don’t realize the public is not as dumb as they think.
    and the tax exempt corporation known as the mormons who operate the legal system within deseret will also be exposed .
    your govt reminds you……..when you see something say something..



  • nathenism

    i have heard that the aurora theatre shooter had a psychiatrist who was employed by the court he seemed drugged up and totally confused..allegedly a jail guard said james holmes asked him why he was there..these things haven’t been confirmed, at least not to me, but if true it sounds like he was a patsy who didn’t participate in the crime but was probably drugged up and placed in his car to take the blame
    after the orlando shooting there was the guy arrested in LA..i read he called the police and asked them to protect him from the cia…he said he was trained in a cia base in virginia with the orlando shooter..he was supposed to stage an attack in LA, but when he heard the orlando shooter was dead he realized they had been set up..he claimed they promised them they would get away..

    it seems the false flags are happening too fast for people to have time to do enough research to get to the bottom of them..

    • Lynn Carroll

      You will notice that this the “silly season” for elections. Liberals, of which 90 % of our government agencies are made of, are experts at smoke and mirrors, false flags, and causing chaos. You are correct, these newsworthy attacks are happening with such frequency that there is no time to thoroughly get to the bottom of any of them. This is all designed to help the Democrats get elected. The timing of violent gun-crimes and the call for disarming the public is just too precious.

      • Kernel01

        That’s right, 90% of Feds are Liberals. And they will do anything or make up anything to justify keeping their jobs and their budgets going and flowing. No wonder why we’re $20T in debt with no end in sight.

    • SnakePlissken

      MKULTRA was a government program to use drugs and sleep deprivation to turn people into killers. After people found out about it, they said they shut it down, but many believe it is still in use.

  • DNS Signs

    The supreme court does not have the authority to ban guns. The second amendment like all amendments to the Constitution does not grant the people any rights, we already have them. The Constitution LIMITS government power. All gun control laws are a violation of the second amendment. We the people will not accept a tyrannical government. Look at the dismal compliance rate of less than 20% in MD and NY when it comes to so called “assault weapons” registration.

    • Zaphod Braden

      There has never been a government that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.

      Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
      Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
      The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
      The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
      The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
      Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
      Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
      Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
      There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
      The Second Amendment was given to the People, like all the other rights in the Bill or Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.

      “The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals … it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government … it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen’s protection against the government.” Ayn Rand

      • robertsgt40

        The US government is already disarming vets thru the VA

        • Lynn Carroll

          How are they doing that? I’m a retired vet and have never heard of that!!?? I know, for a while, the government had required all doctors to ask if you had any guns in your home, apparently that was for safety reasons? B.S. that was so the government could get a better idea of how many private citizens had guns in their homes. Any time the government makes you register your weapon, you can trust that they will eventually come to confiscate it for “safety reasons.”

          • robertsgt40

            I’m a Vietnam vet. 5yrs ago I applied for health benefits. Doc asked me if I’d like free vacations. Told him I was allergic to mercury. Then asked me if I had PTSD. Got meds for that. Told him I’d done my homework on SSRIs. Needless to say I’d rather die under a bridge than go back.

          • SnakePlissken

            If you have symptoms of PTSD, the VA considers that a mental illness, and then they use that as justification to take your guns. There was one vet who reached out for help because he couldn’t sleep and they sent the SWAT team to his house to forcibly confiscate his guns.

          • deplorableirredeemable45

            Come on.

        • deplorableirredeemable45

          I am a vet and they are not disarming me through the VA nor will they. You might need to recheck that.

          • robertsgt40

            I’m a Vietnam vet. VA working the backside against vets with psychological problems. Of course they would love to med you up. It’s happening. Been to VA twice. I was in healthcare for 25yrs. I’d rather die under a bridge than go back.

      • Lynn Carroll

        The second Amendment was meant to arm citizens as a deterrent to the government getting out of control and stripping us of all our rights. We were expected and encouraged to take up arms against a repressive government. Today, it is still our obligation, as a last resort, to take up arms and overthrow an oppressive government. That is why Hillary is so adamant about taking our guns away from us!

        • Kernel01

          The Clintons are solid believers in centralized power. The Federal leviathan in Washington DC is all consuming of your tax dollars and more forced indebtedness upon the citizenry. The fractional distillation of the United States of America would be a good start on disempowering the all growing blob of the Federal Government. Maintaining your guns is an assurance of your right to take on the Federal Government in cases of secession necessitated by the all-consuming Leviathan on the Potomac. The power of the Federal Leviathan is in the end held together by the gun of the state; so once you’re “gun-less”, the Federal Leviathan has complete control over you forever.

    • Lynn Carroll

      Correct. Especially your reference to the so-called “assault weapons.” Assault weapons have been banned for many years now. Assault weapons are automatic where the guns you buy in American gun shops are NOT. Sure, they are made to “look” like assault weapons, but to the underinformed, brain-washed liberals, if it looks like an assault weapon, then it must be one. They believe that if they bombard the public with the “Assault weapons” phrase, the public will, like all good zombie liberals, come to believe it. That is their modus operandi.
      You will notice that we cannot buy tanks and warplanes (even if we could afford them). The government doesn’t want the citizens to be armed as well as they are. Any national government is dangerous and the only thing protecting us from Hillary Clinton is our vote.

  • buy 1 judge key to cover up

    hear the latest on the 2nd amendment

  • Zaphod Braden

    no MAN will vote for that castrating PIG.

  • Zaphod Braden

    The “Dumbing Down” of schools was on PURPOSE.
    It is the deliberate destruction of the CULTURE that is at fault. Now who has been corroding Christian values for decades? Who has been PROFITING off
    Who has polluted the American “Mayberry” culture with songs, games, movies, that glorify VIOLENCE and PROMOTE violence as the ONLY way to deal with problems?!
    It is the CULTURE, STUPID ….. What has been done to Our culture by Media interested in PROFIT and “SOCIAL ENGINEERING” (just WHAT are they “engineering”?) NOT in creating a solid prosperous SOCIETY.
    MEDIA-ASSAULT-THOUGHTS. There is no action that is not preceded by the thought and idea of the action, and MSM has immersed America in violent anti-social thoughts. and been publicly proud and boastful of their ANTI-heroes. The immersion of a society in the thoughts and ideas of senseless violence unaccompanied by consequences. The flooding of Media venues such as music, movies, video games, TV, with thoughts and ideas designed to induce violent behavior. If purveying ideas through the media does not work ….. why are $BILLIONS spent every year on advertising and political propaganda if spreading “thoughts” does not matter?!?!
    What are the anti-Freedom activists doing except SPREADING anti-gun THOUGHTS hoping they will lead to ACTIONS?

  • robertsgt40

    My message to Hitlery: Bring it!

  • Sol

    Here’s hoping – you stupid idiots and your guns.

    • Lynn Carroll

      The only stupid idiot is you, Sol. When we have no guns, the only people who will have them are the government and the bad guys. Our country was established with the caveat that should the government abuse their power, we Americans are duty bound to rise up and overthrow the government. The only thing keeping Hillary Clinton from making America a police state like Soviet Russia is the fact that millions of Americans own guns.
      Cars kill people too. Especially big garbage trucks. Remember? 80 people killed by a garbage truck? Does that mean we must confiscate all garbage trucks and cars? DUH!!!

      • Sol

        Restricting/registering the use and ownership of guns HALF as much as cars would be a good start. Anyway, Americans are too stupid to rise up and overthrow anything and way too stupid to own guns – just stop it – your country is on the verge of collapse – guns aren’t going to help.

        • deplorableirredeemable45

          Let the government come after our guns and see what takes place. You do not know Americans very well do you.

          • Sol

            I sure do – dumb as hell, overgrown children and the laughing stock of the world. The last people on Earth who should be armed to the teeth. Act like babies, get a nanny state – stop complaining about it, you need it.

          • EDD

            Really? Dumb as hell? Overgrown children? Laughingstock of the world? Sounds to me like you have swallowed msm bait hook, line and sinker. The things you mention above is the very image TPTB wish to convey to those outside of the U.S.A.
            If that is what you believe, then you have no idea how Americans are awakening to the realization all citizens of the world are being misled by those in power.

            A sleeping America might give one such as yourself the impression you have listed. Blood, sweat and tears Americans are awakening to the fact that leadership has betrayed it’s citizens and one day those such as yourself could be grateful that our founding father’s gave us the option mentioned in this article.

            I am grateful to my Creator for giving me embodiment in this nation of limited governance and hoping those limits do not entirely disappear through the manipulations of TPTB. Do you not see how your posts here are of a condescending attitude? I am glad that those individuals of other nations I have contact with do not share your viewpoints of Americans.

          • Sol


          • EDD

            I am honored with your ‘lol’ reply. Following your disqus link to your posts, I found you use very coarse language when posting. That is until about two years ago. Then I found you wrote some very well written posts and your English was excellent with some very good intellectual reasoning. What happened that you began writing short, biting comments?

            Rise above the coarse language and you will find others treat your posts with dignity and respect.

          • Sol

            (a) Creepy.

            (b) I’m angry. As I should be. Angry at the kind of idiots that lap up the MSM and think it’s at all representative of reality, and angry at the “skeptics” like you who are really just on the opposite side of the same coin and believe ALL of the stupid crap they read on sites like this (which I find useful and informative SOMEtimes). You guys are just as stupid but on the other end of the spectrum. e.g. “I’m going to be skeptical of basically all of the world’s leading climatologists when it comes to global warming, but this guy who works for an oil-company funded thinktank, him I believe.” You’ve all got oppositional defiance disorder when it comes to anything that appears to be consensus. Flu shots are some kind of government mind-control conspiracy? No – but they are a conspiracy – to keep you healthy and productive at work and paying taxes and buying crap. I get that basically nothing governments or corporations do is altruistic but it certainly isn’t all that nefarious. Like they want people to have autism. To what end? Just so they can cackle about how evil they are? Come on. And it can’t be just as simple as some wackadoo with easy access to heavy weaponry went on a killing spree? They’re ALL brainwashed CIA drones out to weaken gun rights? Just stop it. It’s nonsense. You nutbars make people who might try to search for the truth flee back to the mainstream media where it’s not so goddamn weird (or at least weird in a less threatening way).

            The truth (probably) lies somewhere in the middle and you clowns on either end somehow manage to infuriate, frighten and BORE me all at the same time. Stop it.

            (Trump is a f***ing a**hole – plain and simple. Stop it.)

          • Sorry you are angry.

          • Sol

            Sorry you aren’t?

  • james ha

    cal. senator barbara boxer actively pursues disarming americans whilst simultaneously having a concealed carry permit with a handgun in her purse.
    hypocrisy much?

  • Bolt Upright

    If congenital Liberals take away my firearms, does that mean the bandits will not have them either?

  • Lynn Carroll

    It would not surprise me one iota if we discover that the government has been behind most of these terrorist acts. Since the liberals cannot go against the Constitution, they will find other ways to accomplish their goals. Always remember their motto, “…by any means necessary.” Believe me, they mean it too. The Supreme Court is the only venue which can override the Constitution — even though it is unconstitutional to do so.
    Constitutionally they cannot legislate from the bench, but they do it all the time.

  • Demonocracy

    “I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place.”

    I hope she meant the trigger happy AmeriKan police.

    • Kernel01

      Think she’s implying homeys with guns, which the Thin Blue Line protects us from such uncivilized dogs

    • Lynn Carroll

      What you brain-washed weenies should do is to go on a “ride” with the cops who patrol the worse areas in Detroit, Baltimore, D.C. or Los Angeles. I’ll bet you would wet your pants before the night was over.

  • Westcoastliberal

    As a nation we’re going the wrong way. What SHOULD be happening is relaxing the open carry runs so bad guys will need to consider the real threat of being killed before they can massacre innocents. Crazy fucks can always find guns on the black market; the law doesn’t even enter the equation. Now just watch some bold sheriff “deputizing” citizens with arms to assist LEO in states like California with ridiculous CCW laws. The day is coming if not already here.

  • BaronGreenBack

    O yes she is mark my words Clinton get in and she will come after your Guns.

  • Bruce C.

    This is the most chilling piece I’ve read since at least yesterday.

    I agree completely with the DB’s assessment of Hillary Clinton and I think she has the potential to be incredibly destructive and subversive as a NWO globalist. Fortunately, I don’t meet many people who disagree with that, and most do. She’s not liked or trusted and many are actually afraid of her.

    I continue to think that Trump will win the Presidency and probably by a larger margin than most might think possible at this time. “Democrat voters” will not be that motivated but Trump supporters will be, especially by November when I suspect things will be absolutely crazy. My hope is there is a “silent majority” who will show up in droves and voter turn out for Trump will be the most in history, surprising the “experts” yet again. That’s basically what has happened so far in terms of Presidential campaign statistics and I think it will continue. “Incredibly” Trump is already significantly ahead in the national polls which is practically unprecedented right after the party conventions.

    • Danny B

      It better be a BIG majority or Diebold will fix him good.

    • Lynn Carroll

      Have you noticed how hilLIARy is always just a few points ahead of Trump by ALL the polls? Now, today, she is even with Trump when it comes to trustworthiness!!! Are these polls rigged or what? My belief is that for these pollsters to come up with such ridiculous figures they probably hang out at liberal campi and game arcades in shopping malls to query the obvious Walking Dead with tattoos and rings in their noses and studs in their tongues.

  • Sean Ryan


    • deplorableirredeemable45

      In other words you have no problem when it comes to taking away my God given right to protect myself. Here is a hint. You are no one else will ever take away my guns without some one loosing their life. Is that what you want?

      • Sean Ryan

        When you get that knock on your door at 3 a.m., you won’t be so tuff…


    • Bruce C.

      A gun ban for everyone or just US citizens who are not members of the police or military or FBI or CIA or TSA or Homeland Security or security guards for politicians and government employees, etc.?

      • Sean Ryan

        Gun ban for TBaggers…

        : )

    • SnakePlissken

      Move to Europe where guns are banned but they still have gun crime.

      • Sean Ryan

        Nopers…I’m gonna stay right here and work to ban guns.

        HILLARY 2016: Trump Is Toast

    • Lynn Carroll

      Another Brain Dead voter heard from. Indeed, if all guns were banned from law-abiding citizens, who is to protect us from the bad guys? Do you think they will simply turn in their guns because you weenies insist that they do so? That is so laughable. There would have to a half-dozen cops in every neighborhood in the country to even give a semblance of protection. Listen up all you gun-banning boobs, the only reason Hillary and Obama haven’t already declared marshal law and taken over the government is that the great majority of Americans are gun owners.

      • Sean Ryan

        The debate is over, America wants a gun ban and Hillary is gonna give it to us!

      • Sean Ryan

        Gun ban is coming…you can’t stop it.

  • deplorableirredeemable45

    There are laws which keep criminal from purchasing a gun. Criminals do not purchase their guns through Cabelas or Bass Pro Shop or a legitimate gun dealership. They steal them. Let me repeat that. They steal them or they obtain them from a crook. That’s what you have to stop. It is obvious to me that no left wing Liberal can understand this. So what would Hillary do. She will go after all guns and you can 100% count on her doing that. Pass a law that says any one can be stopped at any time and searched for a gun. If they have a gun and no licenses or concealed carry permit then lock them up for one year. That will fix the problem. But taking every ones guns is not possible. That would cause an all out civil war.

    • Lynn Carroll

      Well, that is one way to collect some guns, but there is a much easier way and they have already done it and are doing it: Simply requiring you to register your guns is all they need to round them up one fine day. They did it in Canada some years back.

  • SnakePlissken

    Hillary hates guns, but she has a security detail armed to the teeth to protect her and her family. She believes she should have protection, but you shouldn’t.