No Email Charges for Hillary in a Series of Polarizing News Reports
By Daily Bell Staff - July 03, 2016

CNN and MSNBC confirm Hillary Clinton will not face any charges in email inquiry … Hours after Hillary Clinton held her long awaited interview with the FBI in the name of helping its investigation of a Romanian email hacker, which the media has routinely and willfully misreported as being an “investigation of Clinton” for the past year, MSNBC is now finally reporting the obvious: she’ll face no charges of any kind. -DailyNewsBin

Hillary was subject to an apparently intensive FBI interview on Friday, but now mainstream media is reporting that she won’t be charged with anything.

MSNBC’s Chuck Todd made the announcement during on Saturday afternoon and then CNN also reported it.

Todd wasn’t speculative about his announcement. He claimed certainty.

This is not exactly a dominant social theme in the sense that it is news reporting. But the larger message is certainly thematic.

Despite Hillary’s polarizing personality and politics, and her fairly obvious malfeasance, CNN believes she is going to remain a candidate and quite possibly win the election.

Just recently Rush Limbaugh described the process as follows:

Okay, folks, I’m gonna tell you what I think is actually going on here. I think we are being played in the standard, common, everyday way the Clinton team plays the American people. It has happened, I can’t count the number of times, dating back to when Bill Clinton was in the White House.

Essentially what this is — and the Lynch-Clinton meeting is the latest ingredient — we’re being set up for massive disappointment, depression, and dispiritedness. They’re making it look like, and they have all along, very possible Hillary Clinton could be indicted. They are toying with us. They’re dangling this carrot in front us. “This could be the time. This could be it when we finally get the Clintons once and for all.”

The DailyNewsBin article excerpted above puts this information into perspective:

This information was obvious enough all along to anyone who followed the story accurately, as the FBI had already publicly told the New York Times that she was not even a target of their email investigation.

News outlets knew this all along but decided to play up various misnomers about the story — on cable news in particular — because it seemed to be the only way in which they could get ratings about of Hillary’s otherwise steady and controversy free campaign.

The above is true so far as it goes. We found the following statement in the August 14 New York Times:

F.B.I. agents investigating Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server are seeking to determine who at the State Department passed highly classified information from secure networks to Mrs. Clinton’s personal account, according to law enforcement and diplomatic officials and others briefed on the investigation.

Law enforcement officials have said that Mrs. Clinton, who is seeking the 2016 Democratic nomination for president, is not a target of the investigation, and she has said there is no evidence that her account was hacked. There has also been no evidence that she broke the law, and many specialists believe the occasional appearance of classified information in her account was probably of marginal consequence.

We’ve written previously that mainstream media report seemed more negative about Clinton – and that negativity might be an indication that she was in trouble.

We also reported on Barack Obama’s seeming preference to have Joe Biden run against Hillary.

Either of these scenarios revolved around Hillary voluntarily excusing herself once the pressure of various investigations and lawsuits became too great.

But if these reports are to be believed, Hillary is moving forward. Alternative scenarios are mere speculation.

This would be quite a statement for the establishment to make. The FBI, if it does not indict, will be the subject of enormous criticism.

And if the Department of Justice doesn’t act on an indictment, there will also be a firestorm.

Whether purposefully or not, lack of action regarding Hillary will be seen by a tens of millions as proof of additional US corruption.

Hillary’s ascension and potential presidency would be a powerful signal that the rules have changed when it comes to the public US narrative. And this would tend to have a knock-effect on other elements of US governance, reducing public confidence even further.

Conclusion: A lack of legal consequences for obvious malfeasance on the part of Hillary and her husband will contribute to further polarization and loss of confidence in US civil society. It is, in fact, a signal that society is changing rapidly.


You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

Tagged with:
  • Praetor

    Yeah corruption! If you look at this country just over the last 36 years, the corruption has been on a course to its full completion and is in the final stages.

    A lot of people voted for these people over the last 36 years. You could say the country deserves what it gets from its lack of ‘thinking’, and those that voted for corruption over liberty and freedom. The country deserves what is coming!!!

    • MacUndecided

      You are not immune to the consequences, you will pay the price too.

  • Renov8

    Everything printed today is just a means to put out another meaningless poll tomorrow….and looking from prior polls, these future polls will further propagandize the illusion that hillary was a victim of the far right……yadda, yadda, yadda.
    Reality check……Hillary is a crook and the FBI knows it…..just need to find those with conviction within the FBI to stand out and convict the crooked one.

  • dave3200 ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ

    So, by November all will be forgotten and forgiven. Queen Clinton will be on her way to inauguration. The media will be singing her virtues loudly and the masses will swallow it greedily. At the same time, the British Parliament will decide not to move forward with Brexit; Brussels will have usurped control of NATO; Syria’s Assad will be gone; TPP will be on its way to full implementation and the establishment (CFR) will be back in solid control. Vive la Global Governance! Damned are the peasants.

  • Hey You

    The USA is well past peak.

  • Renrah

    watch the youtube video author of “The Creature From Jekyll Island”, G. Edward Griffin did w/ Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov to understand how the communists have taken over.

    It was done in mid 80’s !! and it’s all coming to pass. Yuri describes the plan Marxists use to destabilize any country – its all been happening here – pass on to all you know

    simply search in youtube – “Yuri Bezmenov interview” MIND BLOWING, particularly when considering this was done mid 80’s

  • Bruce C.

    Regarding the DB’s conclusion, it indicates the “elite’s” desperation.

    Either way – we may not have heard the end of it – it’s not going to work.

    Being a “Trump” supporter I think this actually may be the preferred probability. The message that this sends is in direct conflict with Hillary’s number one obstacle among voters – that’s she’s an insider within a corrupt government.

    The husband, Bill meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch was a cluster f____ , whether staged or not, and then passing the baton to FBI director Comey to decide on “the political choice of a lifetime” is too obvious even to the blind. The timing alone so close to the Benghazi case again makes me think that the elite a-holes are not on the same page. (Too many pit bulls in the pen…)

    NO MATTER. Either decision is a problem, after this much time.

    “All” Trump has to say is, ‘Would any of us have been given that much attention and leeway?’ The obvious answer to anyone who has dealt with the legal system is… NO (unless you pay big bucks and even then… Hey, it’s business. Could’ve, should’ve…).

  • rmp

    They’re both such lying pieces of crap that it’s beyond credulity at this point. This is the reason he (Clinton) should have been removed from office. They got away then and she’s getting away now. As a people, how much of this will we tolerate?

  • windsor1

    Come on folks! Why are we really even talking about this. Bill just accidentally bumped into Loretta Lynch. Pleasantry’s were exchanged and the meeting ended. No big deal, how can you even imagine this smells of influence pedaling.
    The FBI and Lynch know they are toast if they attempt to press charges against Hillary and she wins this election. Even if charges are levied it is probable she will be on the Commander in Chief’s pardon list. CHECKMATE! With rigged voting machines and a public that gets their geo-political information from leftist propagandist media networks, there is a very real chance that Hillary will win and those on the wrong side of her will pay for their integrity and belief in the Constitution. Remember no good deed goes unpunished.
    If you were on a nuclear submarine, for example, and took a selfie with a pressure gauge showing over your would do more hard time than Jonathan Pollard, but not Hillary and her email server, or the foundation or Laureat Educations big payouts to Bill for speaking engagements.
    I believe the American public are masochistic and simply want to be entertained even if is by a crime family like the Clintons, who enrich themselves rich while making you poorer. They love the double standard in justice. They want to see the criminal betrayed wife prevail. This is the American way, to uplift the downtrodden multi-millionaires.
    They rejected Ron Paul who was too radical with his “end the Fed” nonsense, a man of impeccable character with a enviable 20 some years in Congress. They are now opposed to a radical candidate like “Mr. Trump” who built a business with thousands of hard working employees. Instead they want continuity, a career criminal and pathological liar. Someone who wants more wars, arms supplies to terrorists but gun control for you.
    If Americans are dumb enough to elect this woman they deserve what they will get war, poverty, a collapsed currency, more outsourcing and offshoring. God help America!

    • Bruce C.

      Hey, try to relax.

      It’s not going to happen. I promise you, “Trump” is going to prevail.

      Far more people than you know, know.

    • MacUndecided

      So he bumped in to her on his private plane at 35,000 feet?

  • Gerold

    Amerikan voters were dumb enough to elect Obama, not once, but twice so they’re dumb enough to elect the Hildebeast.

  • gordon

    Another stitch up for law and order in the US, no surprise here at all.

  • rahrog

    What difference does it make? This is nothing but more election porn.

  • Praetor

    Its like this! When ‘all’ are corrupt, who wants to be on the chopping block for their corruption. All higher echelon bureaucrats in DC are as corrupt as Hillary and as sick as Bill. You know what they say about karma!!!

    • MacUndecided

      Except they have worked out a system by which people like you absorb the negative effects of their bad Karma.

  • Joseph Burke

    Of course Satan’s bi–h will walk did anyone ever think otherwise? Wake up people Hitllery walks the earth. George Soros owns the company that makes the electronic voting machines that we have been forced to use from sea to darkened sea. Is there any doubt at all that Hitllery will win this sham of an election? We have been completely sold out by our elected officials on BOTH sides of the isle. The next sound you will hear is the jack boot gestapo pounding on your door. Those of us over 60 will die on our front door steps. Those younger than that will embrace their masters on their knees and in failing to do that will simply disappear . 42 people associated with the Clinton’s throughout the years have died under suspicious circumstances. After Satan’s bitch is elected 42 million more will die… just like they did under Stalin. Too bad we won’t see it on the news.

    • NARF

      YOU, my friend, are exactly right…BOTH parties have sold the country out to the military/business/banking complex. They care nothing for the good of the country or its citizens…just what they “can get” for their family and friends. When it finally breaks it will be beyond understanding for the average american.

  • Conclusion: A lack of legal consequences for obvious malfeasance on the part of Hillary and her husband will contribute to further polarization and loss of confidence in US civil society. It is, in fact, a signal that society is changing rapidly.

    That conclusion, DB, is also the truth for UKGBNI should the shortly to be published Chilcot report not deliver blame and shame where it is due, and prosecutions for malfeasance in office and aiding and abetting war crimes.

    Failure to justly address such issues, is responsible for the inexorable rise of home grown terrorism and the export/import of foreign expertise in the effective strategic and tactical planning against catastrophically vulnerable systems and politically incorrect bodies which can easily also be the clinical targeting of political personnel.

    And, if one thinks logically about such matters, if one has a problem with the likes of a Saddam Hussein, former head honcho in charge of Iraq, get rid of the problem but don’t destroy an oppressed nation of forced into servitude innocents in the process, unless you want to prove yourself a war criminal with ulterior motives best kept hidden from mainstream view and general knowledge.

    However, that certainly DOES shift the spotlight of accountability and responsibility firmly onto those politicians and media darlings surely responsible for such shenanigans, where formerly they may have expected a full immunity and the crazy freedom to act with impunity. That aint possible in a smarter world, is it, for such is the height of stupidity, is it not? And it is globally proven to be counter-productive, age after age after age. Wage a war and you are a warmonger. It aint rocket science, is it? And is it foolish and/or madness to not expect to be personally targeted for retribution and punishment, by all and any means and memes possible, if one be guilty of such a crime against humanities, if dodgy established systems in incumbent systems are perversely designed to allow ongoing corruption and future destructions?

  • MacUndecided

    There is a lot of money behind the Clinton campaign, if the people vote for Trump, and deny the Clintons the White House, they will have lots of explaining to do to their supporters.

  • no republicrat

    This +
    Puts the total NBC orginization and Chuck U Todd in the ignore column.

    Check the Pictures.