Studies Confirm, Free People are Happier
By The Daily Bell Staff - September 30, 2017

If you don’t feel free, chances are you don’t feel happy either.

Both of these words, free and happy, are pretty loose in their official definitions. Scientific studies have used various metrics to measure happiness; self-reporting, brain waves, psychological evaluations, and family member surveys. As for freedom, the studies mainly use the self-reported metric, how free a person feels.

When people feel less restrained by outside forces, when people feel that their life is their own to do as they please, they are happier.

Even when holding income, sex, education, race, religion, politics, and family status constant, we find that people who felt free were about 18 percentage points more likely than others to say that they were very happy.

Even people who think that the government should be less involved in daily life are happier than people who think society needs more rules. And it might be tempting to chalk this up to people who are poor feeling unhappy, regardless of freedom. It makes sense to think they would want the government to intervene in order to make them more wealthy, and thus happier.

But when you look at countries overall, you still find that freer countries are happier countries.

…in 1990, at the end of the Communist era, one cross-country survey found that 41 percent of Americans said that they were very happy—contrasted with just 14 percent of East Germans, 6 percent of Russians and Czechs, and 2 percent of Latvians. Of course, regimes behind the Iron Curtain were not just economically unfree; they were politically unfree as well.

Of course, this could also just point to the fact that the freer the country, the more prosperous the people. So you could say that being prosperous makes you happy. Except this would prove that free economies deliver more prosperity. So no matter how you slice it, more freedom means more happiness–even if prosperity is a necessary step in between.

But another study found that even prosperity might not matter as much as freedom when it comes to happiness.

Swiss economists Bruno Frey and Alois Stutzer made this point convincingly in the 1990s, comparing happiness levels across various Swiss cantons, which vary dramatically in how much political participation they afford their citizens. Cantons that allowed citizens more direct democratic rights, as well as meetings with leaders to discuss political and financial matters, proved significantly happier than cantons where political access was more restricted.

Now there may very well be some very special people, who even in a prison cell would still mentally “feel free.” But for most of us, factors of our environment come into play as much as our mental attitude.

But then we get to the chicken or the egg thing. If you don’t feel free, is it because of your environment? Or does your environment not feel free because of your mentality? Either way, you can fix this. You can either change your environment, or you can change your attitude. But it takes recognizing the root of the issue.

If you don’t feel free, and it is making you unhappy, you should start getting specific. Identify exactly what is making you feel unfree. Not “government” but “high taxes or illegal marijuana.” You can legally set up your finances to drastically cut your tax rate. And you can move to a place where marijuana is legal.

And don’t say “society” makes you feel unfree. Is it watching the news or scrolling facebook? Stop. Living in a city with a country heart? Move. Is it Sunday dinner with terrible relatives? You’re under no obligation, although the choices they force on you may be tough. Still, it is their choice how to react. You have the ability to make yourself free of things that keep you constrained.

Let’s address the claim that people who have too many choices are less happy.

Some studies have found that when given too many options, people get freedom overload, and are more anxious, finding it harder to make any choice at all. In one instance, two sample booths were set up to sell jam. One gave away 24 samples, and that one attracted more tasters. Another booth gave away 6 samples, and even though fewer people stopped to try the jam, they actually sold more.

The idea is that people are attracted to freedom, but in the end, it makes them stagnate and shut down with an overload of choice.

But there are a couple factors to consider.

One is that people are naturally constrained by their circumstances to some extent. Maybe you are technically free to do anything you want. But at any one point in your life, there are really only a few choices to be made.

It gets overwhelming to think, I could move anywhere I want, start a business or get a job, find a lover or play the single life, or hike the Appalachian Trail and write a book. That train of thought makes it seem like there are too many choices. You may choose to stay in a situation that doesn’t make you happy because you have no idea what choice of the infinite possibilities will actually make you happier.

But you don’t really have that many choices right now. Do you want to move, or do you like where you are? That is only two choices.

If you choose to move, that clearly opens up more choices. You say, where should I move? Is every square inch of the earth truly an option? No. You should be able to identify why you want to move. Then you simply need to make another series of small choices that are not overwhelming when you take them one at a time. Warm or cold? City or country? Coastal or inland?

Second, most people are naturally constrained by their own unique morality. Some people adopt moralities from religion or spirituality, and some people create their own. It doesn’t really matter, there are some things you will be willing to do, and some things you definitely will not. You probably don’t truly have a choice between becoming a doctor, lawyer, teacher, meth dealer, or pimp. Some of those options probably don’t align with your morals–like becoming a lawyer.

When you break things down to a step by step process of where you are going from here, the choices for what to do with life become much less overwhelming. It is great to have a 5 or even 10-year plan, but things are going to change. Most choices don’t require a steadfast decision in the present. Your smaller choices in the present will instead present new opportunities to choose from later.

And if you have some general philosophy or morality that you live by, certain choices are off the table altogether.

So by if you limit your own choices, you may very well be happier. But if someone else limits your choices for you, you are likely to feel less free, and thus be unhappy.

But again, don’t let the feeling of being unfree convince you that you are actually unfree. If you aren’t convinced that you have this much control over your own life, start by reading the 1973 classic, How I found Freedom in an Unfree World, by Harry Browne.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

Tagged with: ,
  • According to news media there is a crisis autumn 2017 in East Asia!
    North Korea is prepared to attack and wipe out USA! Bla, bla, bla. Japanese NHK broadcasts daily footage of North Korean missiles flying away. Japan NHK government news is just propaganda … since 1945!

    So how to solve this stupid North Korean crisis 2017? Diplomacy? No! US president Trump has said he wants to destroy North Korea military! Diplomacy doesn’t work.

    The 25 million North Koreans must of course liberate themselves 2017 without external aid like the 18 million East Germans liberated themselves 1989.

    It was fairly easy back then.

    Pacifist resistance Ghandi Indian style.

    The East Germans didn’t like violence 1989. So they just started to ignore the nomenclatura people in charge at the top. And soon East Germany, DDR, collapsed like a house of cards 1989. West Germany,

    BDR, had of course to move in with real money to pay the bills but in the end
    not one shot was fired and nobody was killed. The North Koreans just need a
    little encouragement from outside to do it! I have a feeling both China and
    Russia would be happier with a Korea without crazy dictators like Kim and his father
    and grandfather fooling around in the north and are prepared to assist South
    Korea to afford to pay the bills. Any problems?

    Well, one is the North Korean a-bomb. It doesn’t work. Like the US, PRC and Russian ones. So USA, PRC and Russia just have to say that the North Korean Rocket Kim dictator is just a harmless clown without any missiles and weapons of mass destruction. The North Korean people will then solve the problem themselves. The United States of America military will not like it … but they are pretty useless anyway. Have lost most wars since 1950!

    • georgesilver

      As individuals it is our duty to ignore all governments.

      “We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force. ”
      Ayn Rand

      • Don Duncan

        “…citizens may act only by permission…”
        Yes, but why? How does govt. get this kind of total power?
        It starts in the mind of the enslaved. Without “the sanction of the victim”, no control is possible. Each person is ultimately responsible for themselves, and cannot be freed by another. Freedom is a choice that is individual, not collective.
        I write to motivate self governance, self reliance, self responsibility, and a respect for reason as expressed by engaging in only voluntary social interactions, boycotting all initiation of force. Why? It benefits me to live in such a society. It threatens me to live in the present society of self sacrifice to rulers. I see no moral fundamental difference in any government. They vary only in meaningless cultural presentation. Their essence is control by violence, threat thereof, and propaganda (lies). This is no way to live. It is anti-life, anti-happiness.

  • georgesilver

    “Studies Confirm, Free People are Happier”

    Amazing Sherlock! How do you do it?

  • Samarami

    Seems I’ve said this forever: I can be free. Today. Here. Where I’m “at”.
    So can you.
    If I wait to be set free I’ll never be free. If I depend upon changing the behaviors of others for my happiness I’ll forever be unhappy.
    If it’s gonna be, it’s up to me. Not thee (‘tho I wish the very best for thee). Sam