Why Governments Treat You Like a Number, Not an Individual
By Joe Jarvis - December 21, 2017

Governments hate anything that empowers individuals. This is because it makes governing harder. And this holds true regardless of whether you view government as overall good, or generally evil.

Say the U.S. government has the best intentions for making the drinking age 21. Surely some 18-year-olds could handle drinking, and surely many 25-year-olds cannot. But the government would have to expend massive resources evaluating the capacity of each individual to handle their alcohol.

Of course, this would also be extremely oppressive to allow a government to decide on an individual basis who has certain rights and can handle responsibilities. But it is no less oppressive to deny 22 million 18-20 year olds (still picking a relatively arbitrary age of responsibility) the right to decide what will go into their bodies.

Age can be a tricky one. There are massive amounts of material to discuss about age, including the fact that adolescence is unnatural and used as a tool to wildly oppress 13-20 year olds. So let’s leave that discussion alone for now and pick an example that has nothing to do with age.

Licensing by the government as a pre-requisite to enter a particular occupation is absurdly oppressive.

I can hear the hyperbolic objections now, “So you don’t want your brain surgeon to go to medical school?”

Of course, as an individual, I would still choose qualified professionals to provide services for me. The methods of evaluating these people would change based on the individual circumstances. For something as important as brain surgery, I may only rely on people who have achieved a medical doctorate from a reputable university, and passed an accreditation process in their field.

But a massage therapist? I might risk $60 on a masseuse with no official qualifications. More likely I would rely on reviews from other customers. Worst case scenario, I lose $60 and my back is still sore.

And then there is plenty of room in between. I might hire an electrician without any certificates on the recommendation of a friend who knows about wiring. But if I was finding a random electrician to hire, I would make sure they were somehow accredited by a third party with knowledge of the industry and skill.

But the choice should be mine. And the choice of how much education, and certification a person in any particular field wants should be their choice. Taken together, individuals will decide the requirements based on their interaction in the market.

Yet most states require between 1000-2000 hours of training to become licensed as a barber or a cosmetologist. In Massachusetts, it takes 100 more hours of training to become a refrigeration technician than to become a police officer. In fact, most states require less than half the training hours for police as required for professions like an interior designer, manicurist, or barber.

This is ignoring the fact that individuals vary greatly. If you grew up working on cars, you might know more than someone the same age who attended a four-year mechanic’s training program. But all the government sees are certifications and official hours of training.

Now you might think, “Who cares, just don’t get a license, and only take clients who don’t care.”

And this would be a valid argument if there were no legal penalties. In fact, even without government requirements, “licenses” would still exist from trade organizations. People would likely seek them out in order to prove to potential clients that they are skilled. However, under these circumstances, you would not get threatened with fines or jail time for practicing without a license.

A woman in Florida was a health coach. Part of her coaching involved suggestions on what people should eat. But because she is not a licensed dietician, the state of Florida says it is illegal for her to get paid to give nutritional advice.

Her clients have no problem paying for her dietary expertise. They have decided, through one method or another, that she is qualified and skilled enough to get their business. Yet the state of Florida has slapped her with a $750 fine and threatened her with an additional $1000 fine for every additional piece of paid dietary advice she gives. She could even face a year in prison!

Turns out, a licensed dietician reported her to the authorities. Someone who jumped through the hoops, and paid the fees to get the state license is pissed off that someone is encroaching on their turf.

It is a case of protectionism. Licensing ends up being a barrier to entry into professions. It keeps the cost up and allows cartel control over industries.

The government uses licensing to control groups. Politicians get support from whole labor unions. They offer legitimacy in a profession, for a price.

If individuals did not rely on the government to enter professions, then the government would have no way of manipulating the masses for their own particular ends. Elections, favors, donations, legislation, and regulation all rely on grouping individuals together in order to better control them.

Licensing and legal ages are just two examples of this problem. At every turn, the government does not look at people as the individuals they are, but as a number, a part of a group, or a statistic. They do this with tax brackets, health insurance requirements, and law enforcement. They forget about individuals when it comes to regulations on technology like Uber, cryptocurrencies, and drones.

Allowing individuals to group themselves voluntarily would mean letting go of control. It would mean an end to a two-party political system that manufactures problems that can broadly group people into support camps. It would mean actually focusing on how things effect individuals, instead of using the good of the group as a smokescreen for actions which harm particular individuals.

But it doesn’t have to be that way. The government doesn’t like individualism because it is harder to control people. But we don’t need the government to control people in order to be prosperous, safe, and healthy as individuals and as a society.

The economy is changing in a way that makes individuals more capable and powerful than ever before. You can now arrange your life however you want. And I suspect we will only see the market grow to offer more innovative ways to sidestep the government obstruction of our individual wants and needs.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Your $50 Ticket to the “$100 Billion Pot Stock Bonanza”

The $100 billion marijuana industry is dominated by penny stocks…

With legalization sweeping the country, these penny stocks have already begun skyrocketing in price…

Take action TODAY, and you have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to turn a tiny $50 investment into an absolute fortune.

Click here to find out how.

Biggest Currency Reboot in 100 Years?
In less than 3 months, the biggest reboot to the U.S. dollar in 100 years could sweep America.
It has to do with a quiet potential government agreement you’ve never heard about.

Tagged with: , , ,
  • Licencing really is a scam too often. A thousand or two thousand hours to make sure you don’t get a bad haircut?? The rules must have been the brainchild of a school for barbers to ensure a steady flow of below average high school students who want a decent paying job.

    As for drinking, the human brain isn’t fully developed until the age of 25. Since it is the reasoning part of the brain, those under that age are a risk even while sober. Society has a public interest and a compelling in keeping those under 21 from drinking although the age should be 26.

    • Lewie Paine

      What communism, fascism and other authoritarian ideologies have in common is an assumption that some very wise people – like you – need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people – like the rest of us – and impose those decisions by government fiat.

      • Don Duncan

        I don’t like the use of euphemism, e.g., govt. fiat. Govt. fiat is not reason, it is brute deadly force, threat thereof, and fraud. The fraud comes in when authorities pretend they are reasonable and rely on voluntary compliance, as in the IRS handbook and personal who state emphatically (zombie like?) that payment is voluntary.
        A euphemism helps obscure reality. This protects the guilty and permits delusions. It is psychologically unhealthy and physically dangerous.

        • Lewie Paine

          Certainly not trying to obscure reality.

          fiat: an arbitrary decree or pronouncement, esp. by a person or group of persons having absolute authority to enforce it; an authoritative determination.

  • Another meme on this subject.

    When government takes away
    Your Right to do something,
    and then sells it back to you…

  • jymm

    The government sees you as one thing, a way to get revenue. It is called being a taxpayer.

    • NobodysaysBOO

      that IS the EXACT REASON they are SCARED to DEATH of GUNS!!

  • Johnny Mountain

    Some people don’t want to be told to do anything.They think that makes them free . The person massaging your back has been taught enough to know how not to harm you and about local laws .Reulators in highly regulated states set up stings to see if those giving you the massage are no more than a prostitute.
    Look what happened to Massage Envy recently . Only a fool would hire an unlicensed electrician. Never let your landlord work on the electrical system in his house unless he is a licensed electrician.Insist on a professional. Picture Fire Marshall Bill . ( Jim Carey ) . :))

    • NobodysaysBOO

      bull crap if YOU can’t make an informed DECISION get an EXPERT to help MANY of these LICENSED people are SCAMS, many just PASS TESTS for a LIVING no hands on experience!

    • Col. Edward H. R. Green

      Someone’s having government permission in the form of a license does NOT at all guarantee competence, trustworthiness, and integrity, nor does it impart professionalism. A person can be duly licensed and subsequently act like Fire Marshal Bill–a comic character who is an implicitly duly licensed city government fire marshal.

      Government licensing is an instrument of government control over an individual, and a means of coercively obtaining money–nothing more.

      If I have evidence in the form of my landlord’s experience of being fully capable of installing and maintaining the electrical system in the house or apartment that I rent from him, I would confidently have him work on it, in spite of his not having government’s permission to perform that work.

      Building codes should be abolished for the same reason. While many of them coincide with universal common sense building practices that people would perform in the absent of a government-mandated code, many others make no sense, are contextually inflexible (thereby violating private property rights), and are present in the code simply because of politics.

  • NobodysaysBOO

    smack on RIGHT. ENGINEERS are being replaced with FAKE engineers from INDIA , fake degrees and dangerous engineering lacking any due diligence!!!
    we would all be better OFF with NATIONAL licensing laws!!! drivers licenses also it is a state RUN MONEY SCAM.