STAFF NEWS & ANALYSIS
Zionism as an Elite Promotion or Fashion Statement?
By Staff News & Analysis - November 07, 2011

Hate Crimes At Queens Libraries and Jewish Temple … Survey Finds Anti-Semitic Attitudes Rising … Swastikas were found painted on the facades of the Jackson Heights and East Elmhurst branches of the Queens Library and on the door of Congregation Tifereth Israel on Thursday. The Anti-Defamation League today condemned the anti-Semitic graffiti. The ADL says there were 133 anti-Jewish incidents reported across New York City in 2010. A nationwide ADL survey released just yesterday found that anti-Semitic attitudes have risen in America. The ADL survey found that 15 percent of Americans – nearly 35 million adults – hold deeply anti-Semitic views. That's up three percent from 2009. – MyFoxNY

Dominant Social Theme: These people simply need to go to Israel where they really belong. But then they need to leave Israel because they are oppressing and killing Palestinians.

Free-Market Analysis: With anti-Semitism apparently rising in America, (see article above) the question needs to be asked: What groups and people are consciously or unconsciously contributing to the rise of Jewish prejudice in America?

The answer is that certain elements of the 'Net intelligentsia now apparently think it's fashionable to "call out" Jews. The putative motive is to courageously name names, to call the cancer what it is: The Zionist Jew. But the larger mass of people does not unfortunately make a distinction between a Zionist and any other kind of "Jew."

Secondly, defining the one-world problem as a problem of "Zionist Jewry" (organized Jewry) gets the emphasis wrong in our view. The problem is a conflation of public and private interests called mercantilism and an actuating mechanism called Money Power (which begins with central banking).

Eliminate every Jew without paying attention to this larger mechanism and nothing will change. The culprits would simply be replaced by new ones. It's a system that needs changing, not the "Jews."

We've run a series of articles on this issue because it is an important one. When the intelligentsia of a nation or culture gets infected by this sort of "courage" then it seems civil society suffers and violence erupts much more easily.

Populist demagogues have their say and the result is impoverishment on many levels. Racism and prejudice hurts everybody and ruins what's left of social comity. Here at the Daily Bell, we have some elves with Jewish backgrounds, as we've written many times. The evolving situation concerns us.

Of course, there is no doubt that 20th century civil/social paradigms are fracturing around the world. Depression and war threaten internationally. Modern problems are being generated, in our estimation, by what we call directed history.

And surely there is in fact a small group of impossibly wealthy people, an Anglosphere power elite as we call them, that seems to be in the process now of creating maximum chaos in order to introduce their long-held goal, which is one-world government. Other people have other names for this group.

One name is "Zionist Jew." This nomenclature is becoming increasingly popular (once again?) in the West and especially in America. But are people using the phrase "Zionist" to better define the problem or do the words "Zionist Jew" only aggravate the problem by implying that Jews are an aggregate evil?

We tend to think the latter. There are thousands of websites now that denounce Zionist Jews and catalogue their misdeeds. But from there, it is very easy simply to blame Jews generally for what has gone wrong in the world and even to try to identify them by, say, noses and earlobes.

And yet, here is a proposition: Not all Jews are to blame for the state of the world today. Even Zionist Jews – those who generally believe in the state of Israel – are surely not entirely to blame for the way the world works. Better in our view to use a term like Mafia or "Jewish Cartel" to describe those who run the central banks that fund the one-world conspiracy.

The great Jewish banking families – seemingly behind the impetus toward one world government – are certainly not alone in their quest. They are accompanied and supported by enablers and associates in the corporate, military and political community, including, apparently, such institutions as the Vatican.

Of course, (comes the answer) the Vatican has been intimidated by Money Power. And when it is pointed out that others are involved in the Conspiracy who are Catholic or Protestant, etc., often the answer is that they are "crypto-Jews."

But, hey, how about this? The top leaders of the power elite may not be religious at all, just manipulative. Is that possible? Why is it so easily assumed that sociopaths are religious?

One of the progenitors of the modern, erupting Zionism meme is a courageous fellow by the name of Jack Bernstein, dead now and supposedly murdered by the Mossad. His work seems increasingly influential among those who employ the term Zionist Jew to describe those responsible for the horrid and horrible state of the modern world.

Bernstein wrote the following: "Judaism is a religion; but Zionism is a political movement started mainly by East European (Ashkenazi) Jews who for centuries have been the main force behind communism/socialism. The ultimate goal of the Zionists is one ONE-WORLD GOVERMENT UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE ZIONISTS AND THE ZIONIST-ORIENTED JEWISH INTERNATIONAL BANKERS."

Notice Bernstein asserts this. It is HIS vocabulary (though no doubt with historical precedent). It is also bound to be CONFUSING to many. Zionism is defined nominally in the West as a movement to set up a Jewish state (a state which should be secular, by the way). But Bernstein's definition is that Zionism is actually a synonym for those who believe in the genocidal concept of one-world government!

Now Bernstein, no matter his courage, has become a fashion. But it is a fashion that is bound to be confusing to the mass of people who are easily influenced by such terms. People hear the term "Zionism" and don't make the distinction that the fashionable 'Net intelligentsia is making. They just think "Jew."

One does not refer to people in the Italian mafia by their religious background; and what is the difference between the Italian mafia and the Jewish money mafia? We would argue it is mostly one of scope and breadth. They both work the same way, hiring insiders that are culturally similar in order to guarantee cohesion and secrecy and to ensure their crimes are hidden.

The Italian mafia is or was Catholic, but one does not hear the Italian Mafioso being referred to as "Black Catholic." Yet, that might be an analogous situation, as there is surely historical evidence for a Jesuitical Black Church, just as there is evidence for a Jewish-based one-world conspiracy.

No, from our point of view those who use the term "Zionist Jew" to define this broadly based one-world conspiracy are being honest and courageous by their own lights but needlessly divisive. The use of the word Zionism is a dividing and polarizing term and – here's the kicker – it would seem from what we know that this is exactly what the Anglosphere power elite wants!

The use of the term "Zionist Jew" to describe those who pursue the one-world conspiracy is surely confusing to those who don't fully follow the argumentation. It places Jews – all Jews seemingly (for those who don't understand) – into the position of being the "other." Jews are polarized and so is everyone else. Violence is enhanced; chaos is fomented. Isn't this desirable? Isn't this their MO?

So … from our point of view, the use of Zionism to describe one-world Money Power is actually a kind of elite dominant social theme. The elite's WANT the term floated. Heck, they made it up. They promote Zionism in numerous ways.

Those who use the term inimically are the elite's best friends: They're frightening the Jewish masses as they ought to be frightened. Then more of them will move to Israel in time to be fodder for the Big War.

In fact, there is an entire history on the Internet now documenting this fear-based campaign, which is at least 100 years old. Few groups of people in our view have likely been MORE manipulated by their leaders than average Jews.

The use of the word Zionism, in our opinion, basically tars all Jews, even if it is not intended that way. It increases suspicion and hate. It is also inaccurate because the urgent problem the world faces today is the one-world conspiracy and that is a MERCANTLIST conspiracy.

This is the OTHER basic reason that using the word Zionism is not so great. The fashionable anti-Zionist intelligentsia has spent about a billion man-years in aggregate researching the Illuminati and Jewish history and the Khazars, etc.

But maybe, just maybe, none of this much MATTERS. None of it is worth a damn without Money Power to actuate whatever conspiracy exists. And thus we regularly try to point out that it is the MECHANISM that must be uprooted.

We make the following modest proposition, therefore, to the fashionably courageous 'Net intelligentsia. Please define the problem properly!

The one-world conspiracy is succeeding to the degree that it is because it has found a way to marry Money Power to an ever-expanding one-world government. It intends to run the world like a private fiefdom in which a handful of people will be kings while everyone else will be either dead or zombified slaves.

Just as importantly, we speculate there is likely NO operative religious element at the core of the one-world conspiracy, not even "Satanism" or "Illuminism." People who are worth tens of trillions of dollars and are directing history are not likely to be exceptionally religious in our view. They are more likely to USE various belief systems and to exploit them to achieve their goals. They are more likely to believe they ARE gods than to worship one.

Putative belief structures can be useful, though. They can be used, for instance, in an intimidating way. Illuminati symbolism is increasingly used in this way, in our estimation. See, there is a REASON for Lady Gaga and the Supreme Court in Israel. A certain kind of "messaging" is taking place – and it's aimed at us!

No, as with the Italian mafia, an inter-generational conspiracy of this sort does NOT need a spiritual glue, certainly not a religious one. Religiosity is much more apt to be a TOOL for these individuals. They are motivated by fear (that their crimes will be discovered) and greed (the arrogance to believe that the Earth belongs to them).

At the top of this conspiracy is a sociopathic element. Why on earth do the fashionable analyzers of this conspiracy believe that sociopaths identify themselves as anything other than "owners"? It's a mafia. It uses Zionism and religious history as a promotion … as a way of introducing more chaos and bloodshed into the world. We would argue Israel was set up as a theocracy for this purpose.

The Money Power Conspiracy is run by a money mafia. To describe this mafia as consisting of "Zionist Jews" gives the impression it is mainly a religious problem generated by certain people. But get rid of every single Jew and Zionist (of any kind) and leave the system itself intact and the same problems would reoccur.

So call it what it is: A money mafia, a Jewish cartel, largely. But don't make the argument that the problem is ideological. There are plenty of bad ideologies in the world and one-world government is likely NOT being driven by an ideology. There are people involved in it who are neither Jewish nor Zionist.

After Thoughts

The system is one of Money Power. Without money power the ideology wouldn't even have a chance. Even Bernstein would be distressed to see that his warning was being used to tar an entire people, whether intentionally or not. It is the SYSTEM that is a horribly evil and murderous one. "By the Eternal, I will rout you out!"

"Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. … You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out!" (From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President Jackson, February 1834)

Posted in STAFF NEWS & ANALYSIS
loading