Newt Gingrich Argues U.S. Should Conduct Shariah Test … Newt Gingrich, a former speaker of the House and a finalist to become Donald J. Trump’s running mate, said in an interview on Fox News that Muslims in the United States should be subject to a test to see if they support Shariah law. “If they believe in Shariah,” Mr. Gingrich said Thursday night, referring to the legal code of Islam based on the Quran, “they should be deported.” – New York Times
Has Newt Gingrich actually talked to a Muslim?
Shariah law, as was explained to us long ago, is purposefully harsh to ensure that believers are warned not to transgress. Its intention is moral, not punitive.
The bar is set very high. For instance, it takes FOUR male believers to make an accusation of adultery. They actually have to witness the act. They have to be in the room.
Here, from Islamisweb.net:
In the case of adultery, Islam requires four witnesses to testify that they have seen the offence, or else, a clear and confirmed confession by the perpetrators.
It may be suggested, then, that the punishment is unreal and unenforceable, which renders it ineffective as a deterrent.
Punishment is not the basis of the Islamic approach; its basis is prevention, education and cultivating people’s finer feelings and consciences so that they refrain from even contemplating this offence.
The harshness of Shariah law is visited upon believers by sects like the Wahhabi. Wahhabi is a “mad” religion as we described it HERE.
It is this fundamentalist Wahhabism that Saudi Arabia is busily exporting around the Middle East … Wahhabism … contributes to the polarization of Islamic society generally.
[Western] elites, doing everything within their power to encourage a wider (phony) “war on terror,” surely have no compunction about supporting Saudi authoritarianism and the Saud family’s very own crazy religion.
And thus it is that one can argue the Americans and British are behind the dissemination of extremist Wahhabism in all its intolerance and brutality …
While making noises about liberating women in the Middle East and Africa, Western elites continue to prop up the Saud reign and its Wahhabi state religion …
This is truly the kind of psychopathology that can emerge only after societies have been corrupted for decades, for centuries. Unfortunately for Saudi citizens, their society has indeed been under attack for that long.
Does Gingrich not understand that the City is ultimately behind Wahhabism?
Does he not understand that Sunni Islam is fairly democratic, participative and peaceful?
He’s not a stupid person. He writes books and regularly opens his mouth for a living.
Just yesterday we wrote about the West – London’s City and the CIA – were behind the creation and expansion of Islamic terrorism. HERE.
This is well known. Gingrich must know it.
Shariah law’s fundamental intention is cautionary. And the Islamic extremists that regularly enforce it are Western inventions.
A war between Islam and the West is being fomented.
It is, however, a bankers’ war, ultimately, as every war is a BANKER’S WAR.
Gingrich later tried to walk back his remarks but it really doesn’t matter.
His intention is clear. He is preying on people’s ignorance to raise his profile. He will apparently say anything. Do anything.
During his nine-minute interview with Sean Hannity, Mr. Gingrich said: “Western civilization is in a war. We should, frankly, test every person here who is of a Muslim background, and if they believe in Shariah they should be deported. Shariah is incompatible with Western civilization …
“We need to be fairly relentless about defining who our enemies are. Anybody who goes on a website favoring ISIS or Al Qaeda or other terrorist groups, that should be a felony and they should go to jail.
“Any organization which hosts such a website should be engaged in a felony; it should be closed down immediately.”
… “That’s a powerful statement,” Mr. Hannity responded. “I agree wholeheartedly.”
What is wrong with these two? Just like the rest of the Western elite establishment, they are interested in manipulations not in truth.
They are promoting war because that is today’s agenda.
They only wish to reserve a place at the head of the procession.
Gingrich will never fight in the wars he is promoting.
The people he works for – or wants to work for again – have manufactured a global depression.
Now they are desperately trying to create wars to distract people from the economic ruin.
The end result is to be increased globalization experienced by the survivors and led by a handful of banking manipulators.
If war is coming, real war waged against China, Russia or consolidated regions of the Middle East, then it will be the responsibility of those who choose to use their positions to propagandize military interventions.
Conclusion: Most people in this world are peaceful. It takes a lot of organization to induce people to pick up guns and shoot them at strangers. It is unconscionable to lie to generate this sort of result. Those lying are doing the evil work of a handful of individuals who use war as a tool to line their own pockets. Few words or phrases, unfortunately, are strong enough to condemn this process.