DARKMOON (summing up): I am not really in disagreement with you on most important points. Even though I have accused you of being guilty of a "glaring contradiction" — your apparent U-turn on the unity of the Jews, once united like a swarm of locusts flying in ordered ranks, now disunited and split into several conflicting groups — this need not in fact be a contradiction at all. It could be a development or new nuance to your views, an added complexity; indeed, a kind of paradox in which the Jews are united and disunited at the same time, just as the universe is filled with light and darkness at the same time, and just as good and evil exist simultaneously in the same heart …. Life is too short and precious to waste it on "anti-Semitism". One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster. – Rense
Dominant Social Theme: Is it the fault of the Jews?
Free-Market Analysis: Former President George Bush's least favorite website, Rense.com, (but one we're partial to) recently published two interesting, additional articles on what could be called the Jewish Question. We found them interesting because we've written a series of articles on this subject. It is a big dominant social theme of the elite in our view.
In fact, it is one that seems to be blossoming. The powers-that-be have been patiently creating a modern brand of anti-Semitism for at least a century or longer, we tend to believe. And the same can be said of Zionism, which is once again (more and more) a term of opprobrium. We have even advanced the idea that modern Jewish elites are in a sense encouraging anti-Semitism to create maximum chaos, especially in the Middle East, and to frighten more Jews into going there.
Do elite Jewish families represent all Jews? A Zionist in common (Western) parlance, is someone who wants a Jewish state. That's the standard modern definition. Not all Zionists from what we know want to "rule the world." Not all Zionists even want Israel's borders to expand from "river to river." Not all Zionists may be in favor of killing Palestinians. Not all Zionists may be in favor of Jewish socialism.
And of course, not all Jews are in favor of Israel. Not all Jews believe a Jewish state is in the best interest of Jews. Some Jews wish the state of Israel had never been founded. Some Jews believe that inevitably it will be secularized. We hope it is secularized sooner than later.
So let us again note that the idea that the term "money mafia" or "Jewish cartel" is perhaps a better description than the term "Zionist" (when used as a term of opprobrium) and certainly the all-inclusive nomenclature "Jew." Language is important in an unsettled age and there seems to be a rising tide of anti-Semitism in America and around the world.
We have noted the increasing fashion of denouncing Zionism and even Jews by otherwise admirable denizens of the alternative Internet media. From our point of view, blaming an entire race for the sins of its elites is like blaming all Americans for the maltreatment of American Indians (AKA native Americans).
In our view it doesn't help the cause or credibility of the alternative press, no matter how well meaning it is. Not only that, but the Western world's elites, which we call the Anglosphere power elite, is made up far more than Jews, or even what some call "crypto Jews."
Not all Jews are to blame for what's going on. Not even all Zionists. You can see a previous article on the Zionist issue here: Zionism as an Elite Promotion or Fashion Statement?
Now, let us first comment briefly on the article excerpted above by the talented Dr. Darkmoon – poetess, artist and editorialist – entitled "DARKMOON UPON AMERICA, BY ISRAEL SHAMIR: Response, Pictures and Captions by Lasha Darkmoon."
This seems to contain language a little less stern than her previous position that Organized Jewry was basically responsible for the world's woes. Her comment at the end is telling: "…. Life is too short and precious to waste it on 'anti-Semitism'. One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy."
This seems hopeful, in fact, blaming a whole people for the putative sins of an elite is never healthy – not for either side. To define those responsible for what is going on as singularly "Jewish" or to imply that Jews – all Jews – are involved is simply inaccurate in our humble view. Well … we've written that before …
Now let us turn briefly to another article recently posted (or reposted) by Rense via "Real Zionist News" and entitled "The Jews Who Wrote the Protocols of Zion." This article gives us an alternative sense of a document that many deny is genuine. Others claim the Protocols, a damnably evil document, was the product of "Jews."
The author certainly seems to know his stuff and is trying to put to rest the idea that the Czar's secret service was somehow responsible for the document as a way to discredit Jews and to incite anti-Semitism. He quotes from declassified US Intel docs, to show that the founders of Zionism, "including Theodore Herzl, hailed as the father of world political Zionism," were influenced by the Protocols.
And yet … it is helpful to quote the very first feedback to the article: "Dear Real Zionist News Family: The evidence against the JEWS writing The Protocols is DAMNING! Out of their own mouths THEY PROVE that they WROTE The Protocols! …"
Is this obviously true? Is it? What the author has seemingly shown is someone "Jewish' or SOMEONES wrote the Protocols. And if this reportage is to be believed, the Protocols were heavily influenced by uber-philosopher Friedrich Nietzche, so we cannot even argue that they simply represent several thousand years of accumulated Talmudic history. Nietzsche died in 1900.
The Protocols, according to the article, were circulated among a secret Freemason society that claimed a Rothschild as a member. Thus the Protocols were circulating, apparently, at the highest level – not necessarily to all Jews, but to a Jewish elite.
Surely not all Jews were influenced by Nietzsche. If this article is to be believed, the Protocols may not even have circulated very widely and were in any case the work of some rather radicalized young men, at least initially. And here is Herzl, as quoted in the article:
The Jews must acquire economic power sufficiently great to overcome prejudice against them. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, but when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.
No better summation of mercantilism could we find, given that Herzl is obviously referring to a political process. It is economic power that empowers poor ideologies. And it is mercantilism that drives them forward. Nietzsche's ideas had the most impact, realistically, when married to STATE power. (See Nazi German.) The ideology itself is not of much importance, as Herzl realized. Ideology is only effective when the monopoly power of the state drives it.
Not all Jews wrote the Protocols (if "Jews" did write them). And aspects of the Protocols that may affect nations today do so because an ideology is being driven by mercantilism, by MONEY POWER. This is what we have argued elsewhere in other articles, and this article on the Protocols would seem to support this paradigm as well.
Getting rid of central banks and central banking won't kill the concept of the Nietzschian Superman but will render it far more harmless. Without mercantilism actuating the monopoly power of state-force, bad ideologies are nothing more than pieces of paper. Reduce the power of the state and the ability of bad people to manipulate its laws and you will make a real difference in this world.