News & Analysis
'Net Reporting Achieves Results at Sandy Hook?
State dismissive of truthers' Newtown hoax claims ... Danville, Va., woman claimed to the newspaper that she recently contacted Jepsen's staff, State Police and the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to ask them to separate fact from fiction ... Lt. J. Paul Vance, a State Police spokesman, reported fielding similar requests from the public since the tragedy. "There's a few people out there that say this didn't happen," Vance said Wednesday. "Quite frankly, I find them offensive. I take the time to say, 'I was there and saw it.' " – CT Post
Dominant Social Theme: Connecticut authorities don't need to take conspiracy theories seriously when it comes to Sandy Hook.
Free-Market Analysis: There is a good deal of confusion and debate over the Sandy Hook shootings and much of it seems warranted to us.
There have been so many false reports generally regarding school shootings that people are probably right to be suspicious.
As we have reported previously, there are over 100 eyewitness accounts regarding the Columbine School massacre that claim a number of shooters were involved, not just two boys.
The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting seems to have generated its own reports that directly conflict with official reports that have focused on a single shooter.
For the most part, the mainstream media has declined to focus on this alternative reporting. But in looking at what's been said and written within the context of alternative media reporting, the pressure to further explain the shootings seems intense.
There are literally thousands of articles on the Internet questioning the official reports and demanding further – and better – answers. Some can be seen individually as disrespectful or even hysterical but the aggregate result is powerful.
And recently, authorities have responded. We read this from Theintelhub.com:
Sandy Hook: Law Enforcement Officials Now Admit Possibility Of Multiple Shooters ... New information has now been brought forth by Connecticut State Attorney Stephen Sedensky, suggesting that records pertaining to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have been sealed to possibly hide the identity of witnesses from multiple shooter suspects and that they should not be unsealed anytime soon. Officials fear the safety of witnesses. Now we are getting somewhere, after nearly two months this new information is startling.
We would like to believe that US authorities want the truth to come out regarding Sandy Hook. On the other hand, it is quite evident that the Sandy Hook shootings, like other such tragedies, are being used for promotional purposes.
Whether by design or not, a furious "gun control" campaign has been launched on the heels of the massacre. This, plus hazy and inconsistent information, is fueling suspicions about what actually happened.
And arrogant responses from Connecticut officials probably don't help in defusing an already tense situation. Here's more from the Connecticut Post article above.
Vance is loath to get into a debate with conspiracy theorists, saying that he's had to block messages from some people who have repeatedly contacted him ...
Vance raised eyebrows in December when he said that authorities would seek to punish anyone spreading "disinformation" on the shooting via the Internet or social media.
On Wednesday, Vance said he was referring to persons attempting to mislead investigators or making bomb threats, as was the case in Ridgefield in the days after the massacre.
Stephen Sedensky III, the state's attorney for the Danbury Judicial District, said he has received no criminal complaints along the lines of people trying to use the Internet or social media for illicit purposes.
The kinds of responses that Vance is making might have gone unnoticed pre-Internet. But technology can focus intensely these days when attention is warranted.
Conclusion: What is going on in Sandy Hook may be fairly murky. What seems clearer is that alternative 'Net media reports are having an impact not only on the coverage of the investigation but also on how it is being handled.
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by 1776 on 02/10/13 02:51 PM
Rate of Killings Rises 38 Percent in Chicago in 2012
Click to view link
This is the result of making self defense illegal!
 |
Posted by Ol' Grey Ghost on 02/10/13 11:16 AM
dave jr said:
"Yes, let them keep and bear them if they can. But they should not complain if they are dogged day and night, questioned why, every move scrutinized and watched. And neither should government. No rest for the wicked."
Agreed, except, under Freedom of Speech, people have the right to complain; we just don't have to listen to them (Call 1-800-WAA-AAAH and QYB).
If past behavior is the best gauge as to guess potential future behavior of someone or some entity then the U.S. government needs to be watched very closely. It is the only one that have ever engaged in "Atomic Terrorism" - twice...
 |
Posted by Robert Eastman on 02/09/13 11:06 PM
A few days ago I watched Mark Howitt's "Sandy Hook, The Documentary 2013 Official" on Youtube. Although it's almost 3 hours long, it is definitely worth watching all the way through! It answers some of the questions that has led to confusion, but also brings up a lot of new information/doubts that casts even more suspicion on the "official story."
Questions that need answering include... 1. Why does the SSDI show Adam Lanza's death as December 13, 2012 the day before the event? Mom Nancy's death is listed as December 14, 2012 (SSDI)... obviously someone else beside her son murdered her. 2.Why did AP have breaking news at 7:30 am on the 14th concerning the shooting? 3. Why were there websites for "Sandy Hook victims" created as much as 4 days before the tragedy? 4. Why hasn't the press reported that there was a "lone-shooter drill" scheduled at another school 1 MILE AWAY from Sandy Hook the same morning of the 14th (not to be confused with the "DRILLS" at Bridgeport CT, 20+ minutes away)? This is only a few of the many questions raised in this "in-depth expose'."
The documentary also features "Crisis Actors" in action along with their Agency's "Marketing Pitch"... very enlightening!
View at: Click to view link
After watching this documentary you'll be totally convinced that the government story IS PHONY!!!
|
Posted by earnst on 02/09/13 04:23 PM
Who were the men in the woods? Arrested but never mentioned. Why did one woman appear as a teacher then as a parent? Why do we have video of a "parent" working up a cry before an "interview"? Why do they claim the AR15 was used when they found it in the car. These are inconsistencies in the LEAST suspect of these murders. Was Adam not on SRI's? They always shout about the most unreasonable aspects of theorists then ignore the reasonable.
 |
Posted by dave jr on 02/09/13 12:03 PM
Yes, let them keep and bear them if they can. But they should not complain if they are dogged day and night, questioned why, every move scrutinized and watched. And neither should government. No rest for the wicked.
|
Posted by Ol' Grey Ghost on 02/09/13 10:05 AM
dave jr said:
"And he doesn't just have an AR-15, he'got NUKES!"
On an interesting sidenote to your response, I am often asked by Gun Control Freaks if I think people have a Right to Keep and Bear nuclear weapons. I have to answer truthfully, "Yes, but I don't necessarily think they have a right to discharge them as an argument to justify the use of such weapons as a case of self-defense cannot be made (Truman didn't even try)."
I then ask them if they have ever checked the price tag on those type of weapons. They are very expensive and I prefer the "Invisible Hand" of economic scarcity, rather than the "Iron Fist" of government, to reduce the number of such weapons in the hands of private citizens.
Their high price is the reason that our benevolent government officials steal so much from the rest of us to buy the ones they get to brandish and occasionally discharge, which they can't justify any better than anyone else...
 |
Posted by James Jaeger on 02/09/13 02:30 AM
Dear Concerned Citizen:
Wayne LaPierre -- CEO and Executive VP of the National Rifle Association -- was recently on FOX News with Chris Wallace. He has also been on scores of other shows since the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. To his credit he is taking much heat in arguing that citizens have a right to keep and bear arms for personal defense, hunting and sports. Larry Pratt, President of Gun Owners of America has also been taking heat and standing up to the likes of Piers Morgan and other pundits foaming at the mouth.
Given the intensity of the situation, were LaPierre and Pratt to ALSO bring up the other reasons we have the right to keep and bear -- as a deterrent against tyranny AND as part of a well-regulated Militia -- the Gun-Control Lobby would probably go crazy.
The fact that the NRA rarely mentions the words "deterrent against tyranny" and "Militia of the several States" leads some to accuse them of being little more than a lobby for gun-manufacturing corporations rather than a lobby to stand up in defense of Constitutional self-government and respect for God-given rights. Whether this criticism is true or not, the Militia IS rarely, if ever, mentioned by ANYONE, especially the mainstream media. Ironic, the Founders mention the Militia in four (4) separate places in the Constitution. If they mention it, but few others mention it, should this not be a serious red flag?
MOLON LABE - How the Second Amendment Guarantees America's Freedom, our feature motion picture now in production, explains why the Constitution must be applied in its entirety. As everyone knows -- and again, most ignore -- the Second Amendment starts out with the concept of a Militia. "A well-regulated MILITIA being necessary to the security of a free state... "
A bunch of citizens running around with huge and expensive "assault" weapons, having no training or purpose, is not what was intended by the Framers. All this does is ensure the mentally ill, people abusing pharmaceuticals and vigilantes will have a means for local mass murders. This is why the Founders said a well-regulated Militia is NECESSARY. Well regulated means well-trained according to certain definitive principles. It means citizens that do more than just own "nasty" and expensive weapons purchased from their local gun manufacturing corporations. It means citizens who have come under the auspices of their respective states, who have been trained to safely and prudently use arms. This is NECESSARY, not only for personal and family defense, but the defense of each of the States -- and of the nation if called forth by Congress.
The fact that the media and some of the self-styled "pro-gun" organizations never addresses any of this, especially the Militia, should be a sore point with every Constitutionalist. If these pro-gun organizations are more interested in keeping the channels of commerce open for gun manufacturers than in repelling tyranny in defense of WE THE PEOPLE, isn't this really an issue of PROFIT vs. FREEDOM?
If a pro-gun organization fails to address the fact that the U.S. Constitution states that a well regulated Militia is NECESSARY -- how can such an organization be relied upon as a steward for the Second Amendment?
MOLON LABE discusses this and many other issues you probably have NEVER heard from the pundits in the mainstream media. In the main, there's a complete BLACKOUT on the subject of the Militia. The only organization that seems to be addressing the Militia in the proper context of the full Second Amendment is Oath Keepers. Oath Keepers is, in the tradition of the U.S. Military, 'apolitical'. It is thus free to focus on the ENTIRETY of the Second Amendment. To this end, Oath Keepers stands strong for the Militia of the several States and encourages veterans and current-serving military, police, and firefighters to accept personal responsibility for revitalizing the Militia as a duty and privilege of taking an oath to the Constitution. As this corporate media BLACKOUT FOR PROFIT continues, the membership of Oath Keepers will probably continue to expand.
MOLON LABE features Ron Paul and many other experts. You can see a clip of the completed interviews -- such being Ron Paul, G. Edward Griffin, Stewart Rhodes and Pastor Chuck Baldwin -- by going to http://youtu.be/-YYauJQP2iw
Also, a new website has been created for the production at Click to view link This website will accommodate both normal users (who have the bandwidth to access Flash) AND people with slower connections or older computers. If in doubt, try the Flash site first. Give it at least 30 seconds to load, a wait-period you will only have to suffer through the first time you access the site.
MOLON LABE -- How the Second Amendment Guarantees America's Freedom is inspired by Edwin Vieira's new 2,300-page academic work, The Sword and Sovereignty, available at Click to view link. Our next interviews will be with Edwin Vieira, Jack Rooney, Larry Pratt, Pat Buchanan, Jesse Ventura, Alex Jones (provisional), Ed Asner (provisional), Catherine Austin Fitts, CDR. David R. Gillie and Sheriff Mack. Again, these must all be done by 01 April 2013 in order to get in the movie.
MOLON LABE will be our sixth film on the U.S. Constitution. FIAT EMPIRE, featuring Ron Paul, was the first. This documentary was instrumental in bringing the public's attention to the issue of the Federal Reserve System and its unconstitutional creation of fiat currency with endless debt.
You can watch FIAT EMPIRE, and all the other films, as a free public service at Click to view link More than 15,000 people watch these movies every single day, so word IS getting out despite the negligence of the New York mainstream media, Hollywood, much of the clergy and the public school system.
But we need your help to complete MOLON LABE quickly. Time is of the essence. So PLEASE, disseminate this email, put its essence up on your website and donate what you can by going to Click to view link Multiple donations will be considered cumulative as far as earning screencredit acknowledgement.
Thank you,
JAMES JAEGER
Producer/Director
P.S. Don't forget to visit the new MOLON LABE website at Click to view link
|
Posted by dave jr on 02/08/13 07:56 PM
And he doesn't just have an AR-15, he'got NUKES!
|
Posted by Ol' Grey Ghost on 02/08/13 07:32 PM
dave jr said:
"Gosh, I'd just be happy with a background check on anyone running for Commander in Cheif (sic) of the US Military."
But that's what we have a free Press for... (snicker) Okay, okay, (LOL) I knew I could say that with a straight face. Our current Commandeering Thief won't even let us know where he attended Kindergarten...
|
Posted by dave jr on 02/08/13 05:49 PM
"The Obamanable Showman is claiming a majority of Americans is behind his push for a Universal Background Check on all sales of firearms in the U.S... "
Gosh, I'd just be happy with a background check on anyone running for Commander in Cheif of the US Military.
|
Posted by Ol' Grey Ghost on 02/08/13 02:32 PM
The Obamanable Showman is claiming a majority of Americans is behind his push for a Universal Background Check on all sales of firearms in the U.S. and the Gunowners of America (GOA) wants to prove him wrong. If you want to vote in their online survey then you can do so here...
Click to view link
If you feel strongly enough about the matter, you can vote like a Chicago Democrat - often and repeatedly and even after you have ceased all normal bodily functions...
|
Posted by Ol' Grey Ghost on 02/08/13 02:18 PM
I had my own suspicions on the Sandy Hook shooting and the alleged perpetrator...
Click to view link
But at least we know where the rifle was, maybe...
Click to view link
Nothing the governments of the U.S. are proposing to do now would have prevented it and cannot prevent anything like it from happening again. Even the VP admits this...
Click to view link
Only one thing will really work...
Click to view link
... but I doubt seriously that protecting young people from harm is their true goal. They need the press and "if it bleeds, it leads... "
