News & Analysis
Ron Paul Has Already Won
What happens if Ron Paul wins Iowa? ... Paul seems to have a natural ceiling among GOP voters: A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that nearly half of Republican voters feel Paul's foreign policy views are a major reason not to vote for him. Indeed, the primary reason Paul has an opening to win in Iowa is that no consensus candidate has emerged among social conservatives, which dominate the GOP electorate here – a situation that allows Paul to potentially win with less than 30 percent of the vote. Still, a Paul win in Iowa would have significant ramifications. It would go a long way toward pushing his Libertarian views, long dismissed as outside of Republican mainstream, to the center of the conversation. The resultant media coverage would allow Paul to further spread his message – and potentially win a host of new supporters. And if Paul can do well in New Hampshire on January 10, where he is currently tied for second place with Gingrich, Paul could even move to shared front-runner status with Romney, who is now ahead by more than 20 points in New Hampshire. – CBSNews
Dominant Social Theme: Paul is a crank and will never light up the sky.
Free-Market Analysis: The Internet Reformation is a process not an episode. US GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul shows us the accuracy of this statement. Ron Paul and his libertarian allies are winning the battle for the hearts and minds of Americans by the millions. In fact, they have already won. More on this below.
It is not too much of an exaggeration to say that a substantial minority, if not a majority, of Republicans and Democrats are really libertarians of some sort. This gives Ron Paul a natural constituency that is far larger than the mainstream media admits.
There is apparently only one struggle in the world – and in the US. That is the seeming struggle between a handful of ancient, elite families who control hundreds of trillions via central banks around the world and want to move to world government (dominated by them) and the rest of us.
This Anglosphere power elite has used its unimaginable money base to seemingly pervert the workings of the entire world. It apparently uses dominant social themes – fear-based promotions disseminated by its bought-and-paid-for media, think tanks, universities and governments – to frighten middle classes into giving up wealth and power to cleverly crafted globalist institutions. This is the internationalist government-in-waiting.
But a funny thing happened on the way to world government. The Internet. About a decade ago, we began to focus on the idea that the Internet was a modern-day Gutenberg Press and would have a similar impact.
The Gutenberg Press basically spawned the Renaissance, Reformation and contributed to counter-Reformation trends such as the Age of Enlightenment that was spawned by the elites themselves in an effort to counteract the power of the Gutenberg Press. The Age of Enlightenment postulated that man was perfectible and the agency of perfection was government.
Government is an absolute necessity for power elites. With the advent of the Gutenberg Press, however, something changed. The great families of Europe found it advisable to promote the fallacious idea of "democracy." This idea, that people would "have a say" in their governments, allowed the power elite then and now to withdraw from the public scene and dominate from behind the scenes. This domination is called "mercantilism."
Just as it is imperative these days for the power elite not to reveal itself, so it is imperative that the elites continue to have access to all levels of government in order to pass the laws necessary to its survival. Without the faux-system of civil society that the elites have erected in the past 150 years, there would be no prospect of a one-world order.
No one wakes up in the morning and decides to spend one's life building global government. It is an entirely false paradigm that this happens. People are coerced into believing that global government is inevitable and that their self-interest is better fulfilled by working with the powers-that-be than against them. This sense of INEVITABILITY is part of what drives the push toward the New World Order.
But it has long been our contention that those who predict the inevitability of the coming one-world order may not be entirely correct. It continues to be our contention – as we follow modern events – that the elites seeking global governance have been considerably set back by the Internet, as we have long predicted.
We know this to be true by the amount of violence the elite central banking families are turning to. Violence, insane legislative initiatives like SOPA, the erection of prison camps and the fomentation of wars around the world are all signs of the fear that has overtaken these elites. They do not want to be found out.
One needs only to study a little history to begin to understand the relevance of the paradigm we are suggesting. After the Gutenberg Press began to expose the power elite of the day and its manipulations, the first copyright laws were passed, the "isms" were suddenly developed, the Hegelian Dialectic was brought into play significantly and wars broke out throughout the West and lasted for decades.
There IS likely a playbook. There are surely manipulations that the elites pursue over and over in their loony quest for world government. One sees them put into play after the advent of the Gutenberg Press just as they are being put into play today. This is not an easy idea to accept, however, even for the alternative Internet Press. It is much easier and more psychologically satisfying to speak of ancient cabals, such as Jewish/Zionist penetration via vast Illuminati-Masonic plots.
But the truth TODAY is simpler than that, in our view. The world is being run by an intergenerational mafia of familial elites that USE religion and symbolism to affright people and impress on everyone the inevitability of what it is to come.
This is the reason, for instance, that Muammar Gaddafi's execution was shown over and over for weeks. This was the reason his purported buggery was made available throughout the world though ordinarily the Western mainstream media is averse even to showing so much as a kiss to a general audience that includes children.
Gaddafi's death was a warning. Just as the wars in Africa and the Middle East are cautionary ones. They have little or nothing to do with oil or the "great game" or other resources. When the Pentagon wanted to make a case for staying in Afghanistan it suddenly discovered a trillion-dollars'-worth of rare-earth minerals and other commodities. It is all so transparent.
The powers-that-be seek control. The stiff-necked Pashtuns and tricky Punjabis that are now 300 million strong and have dominated the navel of the earth for millennia must be conquered and pacified. This is the struggle taking place today.
And yet, we have predicted the Anglosphere may already have lost this war for global domination. The hidden influence of Money Power in our view peaked in the 20th century. The 21st century has offered them one disaster after another.
9/11 itself is still a questionable event. Attempts to impose the phony meme of global warming are also not going well. The war on terror is increasingly met by disbelief. Scarcity memes of all types have less power to upset, and are increasingly exposed on the Internet.
And then there is Ron Paul. Four years ago, libertarian politician Ron Paul was regarded by the mainstream media as a harmless, crazy crank. Today, according to a CBS article (see excerpt above), the only thing standing between Ron Paul and a sociopolitical consensus around his libertarian points of view is the view by many that he will "undermine" national security. Or so we are told.
But this meme, too, shall have its day – and be gone. That's because the Internet is a process not an episode. The damage control that the elites practices in the 20th century doesn't work anymore. They have turned to a more ancient playbook, in our view, but history shows THAT is not so effective, either.
People naturally lose perspective. But back in the 1990s a trio helped change the world. Dr. Ron Paul and economist Murray Rothbard were close friends. Lew Rockwell was the organizer and raised the money. Rothbard wrote prodigiously and Ron Paul kept delivering babies and running for office. Ron Paul is the most famous and successful libertarian politician of the past 100 years.
This trio built on what is good in what we today call civil society and eventually, as the Internet era began, were joined by popularizers like Matt Drudge, Alex Jones ... and then more. And so once again the ideas of freedom and individual HUMAN action (versus Adam Smith's Wealth of NATIONS) were propagated as they had been before. No one is perfect, but this aspiration is larger than personal agendas, and grounded in the logic of civil society built up over centuries by the greatest and most courageous of minds.
This is the story of civilization, in fact. It is a language and a conversation. It reoccurs. It cannot be extinguished because it may blaze anew in the hearts of the next generation. Sure, it may take a village, but it is one made up of INDIVIDUALS. And everyone is welcome. All who subscribe to the individual greatness of the human species are conveyances for what is worth carrying forward in human society. God damn those who do not.
History seems to us a series of cycles, struggles between historical elites and the rest. Such a struggle has been joined today. This is REAL history. We are lucky enough to live at a time when the old order is passing. Maybe what we are seeing is its death struggles.
The Internet is making it impossible for it to thrive in its current form. Central banks printing monopoly money-from-nothing, wars of aggression, the incarceration of millions ... these are indefensible paradigms when one does not fully control the media anymore.
The Internet Reformation is like a wildfire, perhaps. It seems to be burning away the manifestations of the American Empire by incinerating the disingenuous moral buttresses that hold together this phony construct of the modern power elite. By the time the Internet Reformation has run its course, today's authoritarian verities may have perished entirely. (They will of course emerge in another form.)
Right now, according to this CBS article, only the lie that the military-industrial complex "keeps America safe" stands between the fullness of Leviathan and its subsidence. But what happens, as will be inevitable, when Americans in larger numbers find out that this "safety" is non-existent?
What happens when Americans finally realize that the string of wars that have "defended" them were perhaps phony? What happens when the seeming manipulations that caused the phony Cold War fully penetrate popular consciousness? What happens when the truth about 9/11 – whatever it is – is finally revealed?
The last memes of the power elite that will tumble (as we have long predicted) are the fundaments of the state itself: the insanity of the current model of state justice (where the state itself and its controllers make the laws and then pay for the legislatures, courts and military and civilian police and penitentiary guards that enforce this phony "justice.")
The corollary is the military-industrial complex itself and its myriad millions of intel operatives in London, Washington, DC and Tel Aviv. These individuals are already worried; their privacy invasions, incarcerations and tortures weigh heavily on them. It is occurring to them that they may be on the wrong side of history – real history.
George W. Bush is afraid to travel outside of the United States. David Rockefeller is approaching the century mark and is not his old persuasive self. The Rothschilds are regularly making appearances on business television to show they are merely struggling businessmen and bankers. The US Congress attempts to pass evermore Draconian laws to stop the Internet Reformation. Wars are fomented to take over the world. And yet the navel of the world remains unconquered.
Conclusion: The Internet, which was never supposed to happen, continues to inform people every day about the despicable nature of the elite's 20th century directed history. The old paradigms are crumbling. A thousand, ten thousand, a million prison camps may not capture the truths echoing around the world. The Internet is a process not an episode.
l 
|
You must be a site member to submit suggested edits or post feedback. In addition to submitting edit suggestions and posting feedback, your Free Membership to The Daily Bell gives you access to our Member Zone where you will discover a plethora of other member benefits. Want to learn more? click here |
|||||
|
|
||||
 |
Posted by jimmiller5417 on 01/07/12 09:40 AM
Sorry for the duplicate post. Delete this one and add some edit features to this blog site so each author can edit his/her own posts.
|
Posted by jimmiller5417 on 01/07/12 09:38 AM
JEM comment on 9/11: It was an inside job intended to give the RadCon's an excuse to invade Iraq.
JEM comment on 'Attempts to impose the phony meme of global warming are also not going well.' There are about 200 competent and ethical scientists who have confirmed the fact of global warming. What creditable citations can you give to support your erroneous statement that global warming is a 'phony meme'?
|
Posted by jimmiller5417 on 01/07/12 09:37 AM
JEM comment on 9/11: It was an inside job intended to give the RadCon's an excuse to invade Iraq.
JEM comment on 'Attempts to impose the phony meme of global warming are also not going well.' There are about 200 competent and ethical scientists who have confirmed the fact of global warming. What creditable citations can you give to support your erroneous statement that global warming is a 'phony meme'?
Jim Miller
|
Posted by Leviathanfighter on 01/03/12 03:42 PM
This is excellent. Control over information is the key to the battle. He who controls that controls reality.
Being a graduate student of history, I have had to witness the obsession with control of information of the elites over and over again. Of all the themes that historians may explore, I am most impressed by the "control of information."
The reason? I guess it is because an elite or govenment cannot rule effectively, or at least to their satisfaction, without controlling the flow of information. Should alternative information enter the picture, the state perceives that as a "challenge," and a "threat" to their power, and it is.
Although some things found on the Internet are kooky or cannot be verified, at least people have choices and can keep searching if they are not satisfied with the results of their search. In the past, that was almost impossible. The invention of printing improved things, but the elites still imposed formidable barriers to materials with alternative views for a long time.
In my opinion, ultimately, the power elite must shut down or radically control the Internet, or give up power. They cannot maintain their grip on power with so many people finding out about their lies and crimes.
Reply from The Daily Bell
Thanks. We don't think they can shut it down. We are looking for academics to adopt our theory about the Internet Reformation and history as a struggle between the elites and middle classes, with the fulcrum being information technology and its effect on directed history.
|
Posted by jlax23 on 01/02/12 11:13 PM
I think he meant he wants us to slide into a voluntary, private law society.
 |
Posted by DrBryant on 01/02/12 01:11 PM
I find no one more disingenuous than those that insist Ron Paul is not a viable candidate. He has held the respect of his electorate longer than ANYONE else running.
IMHO, those that fear Ron Paul the most are those who are the most extreme on both sides of the political fence.
Try this scenario:
Ron Paul as the Republican candidate running against Barrack Obama.
Where will the ultra-right-wingers go? Like radical homosexuals and environmental communists, they will have nowhere else to go. They will either stay with the Republican Party or stay home.
Where will the moderate Democrats go? Given the economy, unemployment, and looming financial disaster they will seek change (again). Ron Paul, veteran, doctor, known libertarian leanings will certainly be more attractive to them than anyone else on the Republican stage.
Ron Paul has the very best chance to take Democrat votes and for this reason alone is why the so-called mainstream press has either ignored him (for so many years) and why they are now pounding away at the notion that he could ever get the Republican nomination. Why should I believe the Washington Post or CBS?
As a longtime (forever) Republican, Vietnam Veteran, small business owner, and elected official, I am sick of the "next-in-line" mentality that gave us Bob Dole and John McCain.
I will support anyone over Obama, but I will support Ron Paul FIRST, and for the first time.
|
Posted by DrBryant on 01/02/12 12:28 PM
This is certainly one of your best articles.
Why should we believe much of ANY history? The only sure truth is that the "victor" writes (their own) history.
A strong case can be made that any thought, other than that world wars were nothing more than mutual agreements, is completely naive.
The formation of the Bank of England would suggest that the American Revolution was a "manipulated success". Certainly the bloodline is the same; a bloodline regularly intermingled with other State elites; a bloodline ever present with the most privileged throughout that questionable World history.
Americans have been regularly lied to for reasons of "national security". The masses are simply too "simple" to handle the truth (/sarcasm). There is every reason to believe those methods are worldwide.
When it became necessary to steal (more) personal freedoms, the War on Terror was created. That "creation" is proven by the lies of the Oklahoma City bombing. The truth of that day, 9/11, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, Lusitania, etc. will likely never be fully known by the "simple" public.
Since the Gutenberg phenomenon, the elites were forced to be more careful in their planning and work harder in manipulating the truth. Their hold on the so-called "mainstream media" shows great effort and accomplishment. Surely CBS, NBC and ABC networks can be described as the world's greatest liars through quantity alone and people like Michael Goetner can be credited with their beginning downfall.
However, one should be careful to think that the internet will be perfect Deliverance. Likely those first people able to read the Bible without being burned at the stake believed they were witnessing similar Deliverance.
All things manmade can be manipulated.
|
Posted by tjdetmers on 01/02/12 12:40 AM
Libertarians understand that each person bears responsibility for their own actions. Abortion ( pro choice) kills someone. Not aborting (pro life) causes inconvenience to someone... .the parents. As the grandparent of a grandson born at 27 weeks one year ago... ..I can tell you without doubt ... that aborting my grandson would have been murder. Today he is a robust 20 pounds. Religion, biology and all the political posturing and attempts at feel good politics do not change a thing. Life starts at conception. If you want to choose to terminate that life... .you should at least have the honesty to admit that you have chosen to kill someone for selfish reasons. The ramifications of this PE inspired "pro choice" are biting us in the proverbial ass right now. Look at global demographics.
History is full of examples where someone else has the power of life and death over their fellow man. The Liberal (non libertarian) mindset has taught that the most important thing in the world is yourself. Their talk is care for the downtrodden and the masses... ... but their actions bear out exactly the opposite. Ron Paul is right on when he talks of personal responsibility. The practical reality of Liberal teaching is that I have responsibility for you and your happiness and well being... .but you have none for me. This is all typical PE BS.
Being on this site means that you must do at least some thinking. If your right to life is going to be determined by your age... ..or condition... .where does that take us as humans? Think about it.
|
Posted by Milan on 01/01/12 06:59 PM
I wanted to give this article 5 stars, but as soon as I clicked on the first star, it showed my rating as half of one. This is a great article and I would hate for the slip of my finger to lower the rating.
 |
Posted by DwightMann on 01/01/12 01:28 PM
I forgot to mention that Moses stuttered and stumbled in speech also. . .
|
Posted by DwightMann on 01/01/12 01:27 PM
Moses was not a very eloquent leader either, yet he delivered the Jews from egypt. . .
 |
Posted by Hoss on 01/01/12 11:20 AM
Canada privatized ATC and airplanes aren't falling out of the sky as was predicted by servile statists like you.
|
Posted by samson on 01/01/12 02:08 AM
Saint Paulia///If you have no evidence of when the Soul enters an unborn
child, why would you want to murder it?
Nappy//// Presently we fear no foreign enemy invasion of our borders.
But beware of the enemies within!!!!!
|
Posted by ostrading on 01/01/12 01:16 AM
(Global Elite: It is a secretive and closely guarded group of families and individuals.)
Who are they? Isn't it time that someone started to name names? If they are outed it will be the first step in dissolving their power. Make them visible and accountable, isn't that what the internet is supposed to do? Please start a public list of who these hidden power brokers are and describe their individual roles in the elitist machine.
|
Posted by Charlie on 12/31/11 04:55 PM
Well, shame on him for not having a smarmy doubletalking used car salesman delivery like Romrichmannorum. I LIKE it. Fumble away, Dr Paul. Ron Paul "fumbling" still shows up the rest of those Neocon tools for what they are. LOL!
|
Posted by Charlie on 12/31/11 04:51 PM
SUPPOSE we have private airports and airlines who are responsible for passenger safety? THEY might not hire the lowest bid providers, they'd be responsible. You are assuming that the FAA is doing the best that can be done. If not for the FAA we'd probably know the truth about Flight 800 and 9/11, they MIGHT not have even happened. The purpose of the FAA is control, not passenger safety, over-seeing takeoffs, etc. Every state agency PROTECTS the established order under the guise of "public safety" and "public good". The schools dumb down, train, indoctrinate, the CDC pushes untested corporate products, the SEC turns a blind eye to transgressions of "players" and elites while making people think they are "policing" the evil Wall Street crooks. The state always does the opposite of what they claim to be doing. Could Ron Paul do it overnight? No. But he'd have a heckuva mandate and the blame would be squarely on Congress who obstructed him. Besides, we'll undoubtably see more free market types in Congress.
|
Posted by Ted Newsom on 12/31/11 11:48 AM
Dr. Paul was specifically asked that by a moderator during one of the televised debates six weeks ago. His fumbling, equivocal answer was, "Well, uh, it would take some time... it wouldn't be-- there'd be a transition period... "
Ask yourself how much preferable it would be to have a lowest-bid private contractor running the skies, overseeing take-offs, navigation and landings. Three cheers for the free market.
Blanket elimination of all Federal services is as simple-minded as collectivization of all private enterprise. Both are unworkable, both are corruptable.
|
Posted by Ted Newsom on 12/31/11 11:43 AM
Dr. Paul was specifically asked that by a moderator during one of the televised debates. His fumbling, equivocal answer was, "Well, uh, it would take some time... it wouldn't be-- there'd be a transition period... "
|
Posted by Ted Newsom on 12/31/11 11:37 AM
And what happens when a true believer occupies the White House, and tries to get a workable consensus with other elected representatives on both ends of the spectrum, ALL of whom disagree with 80% of his views?
Nothing, that's what happens.
Now, if you want to propose a Libertarian armed revolution, wherein all loyal Objectivists replace all elected representatives in every government and judicial position across the country so that their free-market fantasy construct can save society, fine, now you've got something. Then, at least, you'd have a chance at proving that human greed and a complete misunderstanding of societal interaction is the only way to save civilization.
Until then, Dr. Paul will be what he has always been: a lone voice in the wilderness, appealing to few, agreeing with no one.
|
Posted by Bluebird on 12/31/11 10:03 AM
Daily Bell, are you aware that IE is interferring with your site? It is showing the old "only secure content" block and does not want to let me see the videos or the financial info to the side. Plus, I cannot log in unless I click the button on the blocker. Is this some kind of "fight back" from those who do not like the content? Very annoying.
|
|
